|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "How are you", in different languages?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 12:46:57 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: (Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Roger Mills |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:15:30 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: (Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:39:17 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: (Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
BP Jonsson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:29:17 +0100 |
47 lines |
A collectivizing affix in Jouevyaix Cherani
|
Elyse Grasso |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:32:42 -0700 |
102 lines |
a request for input.... vocalic inventory
|
b walker |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:15:38 -0500 |
74 lines |
American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Peter Clark |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:15:42 -0600 |
37 lines |
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:36:29 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Joe |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:58:21 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Mike Ellis |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:28:29 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
J Y S Czhang |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:57:34 EST |
64 lines |
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Dan Jones |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:47:48 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
David Barrow |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:22:16 -0500 |
38 lines |
And is completely insane
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:52:58 -0500 |
50 lines |
Another IPA site
|
Roger Mills |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:24:24 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Another IPA site
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:49:36 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Joe |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:57:06 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Tristan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:49:58 +1100 |
35 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Joe |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:48:09 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Tristan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 22:33:33 +1100 |
46 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Andreas Johansson |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 14:54:04 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Robert B Wilson |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:15:44 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Garth Wallace |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:57:06 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
John Cowan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 16:46:24 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:54:10 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Joe |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:27:35 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:00:54 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Joe |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 21:12:30 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:59:07 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
J Y S Czhang |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:57:33 EST |
67 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
H. S. Teoh |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:02:38 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:05:11 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:39:15 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
John Cowan |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:09:59 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:22:36 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Apollo Hogan |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:45:39 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:50:51 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:20:16 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: C-IPA
|
Herman Miller |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:55:11 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: C-IPA underlying principles and methods
|
Stephen Mulraney |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:52:49 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re:
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:11:26 -0500 |
36 lines |
C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Peter Clark |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:44:01 -0600 |
58 lines |
CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:42:36 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Tristan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:03:05 +1100 |
42 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:10:56 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Tristan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:27:29 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:26:18 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:27:55 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Nik Taylor |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:47:15 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
John Cowan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:14:23 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
J Y S Czhang |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:05:28 EST |
58 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Keith Gaughan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:35:18 GMT |
45 lines |
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
|
Tristan |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:44:36 +1100 |
35 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:01:01 +0000 |
172 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:32:36 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:09:48 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:35:28 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Muke Tever |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:56:09 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:20:41 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Herman Miller |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:38:24 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:37:51 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Peter Bleackley |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:22:32 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jean-François Colson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:16:04 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jean-François Colson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:46:33 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:02:09 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Pavel Iosad |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:14:12 +0300 |
43 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jean-François Colson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:59:33 +0100 |
106 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Garth Wallace |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:13:45 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:41:20 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:28:39 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:27:46 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Douglas Koller, Latin & French |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:40:46 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
|
Roger Mills |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:51 -0500 |
50 lines |
CHAT: Johannes (jara: Daniel and Andreas)
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:42:10 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: CHAT: Johannes (jara: Daniel and Andreas)
|
João Ricardo Oliveira |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:24:52 -0300 |
127 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Pavel Iosad |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:10:11 +0300 |
37 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:25:20 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:10:26 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:03:15 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:09:07 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:45:58 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:39:17 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Tristan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:37:04 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Steg Belsky |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:23:43 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:54:00 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Tristan McLeay |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:49:32 +1100 |
42 lines |
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Joe |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:29:26 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: CHAT: US locations (was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Roger Mills |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:00:45 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: CHAT: US locations (was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:27:20 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Keith Gaughan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 04:53:37 GMT |
39 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Nik Taylor |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:49:28 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Keith Gaughan |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:58:13 GMT |
41 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Tim May |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:40:19 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Tristan McLeay |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:26:15 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Nik Taylor |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:44:48 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Joe |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:14:16 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Steg Belsky |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:36:59 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
And Rosta |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:03:02 -0000 |
52 lines |
Re: CHAT: which's
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 07:11:25 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
|
Keith Gaughan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 04:33:31 GMT |
41 lines |
Re: Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
|
Nik Taylor |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:04:05 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
|
Garth Wallace |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:14:10 -0800 |
36 lines |
Conlang using hanzi... legal?
|
Fabrizio R. Del Ferraro |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:31:54 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:51:50 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
|
Peter Clark |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:52:45 -0600 |
45 lines |
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
|
Eamon Graham |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:06:42 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
|
ancient_wildfire <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:07:53 -0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:37:10 +0100 |
49 lines |
DUTCH: I am your father
|
Peter Clark |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:09:19 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:30:03 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:14:26 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 05:40:05 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:40:59 -0600 |
37 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:10:12 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:13:44 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:14:26 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:21:14 +0000 |
41 lines |
Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:40:44 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:12:21 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:05:26 -0500 |
158 lines |
FAQ
|
João Ricardo Oliveira |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 01:58:44 -0300 |
62 lines |
Re: fastly spoken english
|
Mike Ellis |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 02:06:22 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: fastly spoken english
|
Tristan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:16:30 +1100 |
53 lines |
font creation
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:09:39 -0500 |
30 lines |
ghoti? was Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Peter Clark |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:12:05 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: ghoti? was Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:45:00 -0500 |
51 lines |
Going NOMAIL
|
Matthew Kehrt |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:39:53 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Going NOMAIL
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 05:23:40 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Going NOMAIL
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:50:20 +0200 |
37 lines |
Good-bye for now
|
Fredrik Ekman |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:05:03 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Good-bye for now
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:48:44 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Good-bye for now
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:15:43 -0500 |
56 lines |
Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Herman Miller |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:42:04 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Shreyas Sampat |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:45:22 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Garth Wallace |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:30:17 -0800 |
43 lines |
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Herman Miller |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:34:07 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Dirk Elzinga |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:27:25 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Herman Miller |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:58:52 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
|
Garth Wallace |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:01:46 -0800 |
56 lines |
Harpelan number system
|
Nokta Kanto |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 03:37:18 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: Harpelan number system
|
Jean-François Colson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:12:57 +0100 |
119 lines |
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
|
Dan Sulani |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:26:48 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:31:14 +0200 |
89 lines |
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
|
John Cowan |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:45:11 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:27:51 +0200 |
55 lines |
Hebrew Ferrets (was: Relay)
|
Steg Belsky |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:08:06 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Hebrew Ferrets (was: Relay)
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:28:31 +0200 |
53 lines |
Hello again...
|
Joseph Fatula |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:19:39 -0800 |
34 lines |
Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
Muke Tever |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:14:32 -0500 |
82 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:57:28 -0500 |
115 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:40:48 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:51:05 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:37:07 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:56:07 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:08:26 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
Robert B Wilson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:44:54 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
|
Herman Miller |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:11:46 -0500 |
41 lines |
Ich Bin ein Berliner
|
Arthaey Angosii |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:11:04 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Ich Bin ein Berliner
|
John Cowan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:40:47 -0500 |
40 lines |
Inspiration
|
Peter Bleackley |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:53:27 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Inspiration
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:50:36 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Inspiration
|
Muke Tever |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:31:13 -0500 |
45 lines |
interesting dream
|
Robert B Wilson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:00:01 -0500 |
44 lines |
Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:13:14 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:47:27 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
mna_vanantha |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:43:09 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Peter Clark |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:22:52 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:32:29 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:25:24 +0100 |
136 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:20:08 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:35:26 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
João Ricardo Oliveira |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:35:18 -0300 |
131 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Paul Burgess |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:25:40 -0600 |
96 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Paul Burgess |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:45:25 -0600 |
74 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Paul Burgess |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:10:38 -0600 |
77 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
Peter Clark |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:24:04 -0600 |
45 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:34:51 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:16:39 -0500 |
50 lines |
Introductory Post
|
Kallah |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:36:51 -0600 |
53 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Tristan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:16:45 +1100 |
63 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:37:44 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:43:57 +0100 |
104 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:51:23 +0200 |
97 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Nik Taylor |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:34:02 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
BP Jonsson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:32:31 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:13:37 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:46:15 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Introductory Post
|
Tim May |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:36:57 +0000 |
39 lines |
Kinship terms?
|
Elyse Grasso |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 13:08:58 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Kinship terms?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:39:37 -0600 |
101 lines |
Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:45:40 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
H. S. Teoh |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:12:52 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:20:48 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:23:11 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:25:38 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:07:34 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Muke Tever |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:17:42 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
H. S. Teoh |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:38:35 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
H. S. Teoh |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:40:27 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
H. S. Teoh |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:44:20 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:07:51 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Roger Mills |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:50:17 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Sally Caves |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:56:12 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:26:08 +1100 |
50 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Peter Bleackley |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:30:06 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:17:44 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:52:51 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:09:27 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
J Y S Czhang |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:57:37 EST |
55 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
Keith Gaughan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:00:18 GMT |
40 lines |
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:01:33 -0500 |
46 lines |
Martian conlangs?
|
Fredrik Ekman |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:26:50 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Sally Caves |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:06:36 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:32:20 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:22:21 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Sally Caves |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:03:50 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Sally Caves |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:28:44 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Fredrik Ekman |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:03:17 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Sally Caves |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:41:14 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Joseph Fatula |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:30:14 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
BP Jonsson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:23:23 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Fredrik Ekman |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:24:56 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:05:59 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Martian conlangs?
|
Sally Caves |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:32:45 -0500 |
87 lines |
More information
|
Kallah |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:26:49 -0600 |
62 lines |
More on the Hermetic Language
|
Paul Burgess |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:34:08 -0600 |
118 lines |
Re: Non-verbal communication
|
Wesley Parish |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:02:19 +1300 |
55 lines |
number system for kxqqhwiiallccre
|
Robert B Wilson |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:03:47 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: OT Prime numbers / Telona number system
|
Roger Mills |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:21:26 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: OT Prime numbers / Telona number system
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:00:04 +0000 |
39 lines |
OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:31:42 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:05:02 -0600 |
37 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tim May |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:31:58 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:28:13 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tim May |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:03:27 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:40:55 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:51:29 +1100 |
58 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:55:52 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:44:51 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tim May |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:01:21 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:05:46 +1100 |
39 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:35:04 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:04:50 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:12:19 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Garth Wallace |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:16:09 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:07:44 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:08:07 -0600 |
45 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:10:59 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Steg Belsky |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:34:09 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Mike Ellis |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:40:09 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:48:24 +1100 |
43 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Garth Wallace |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:50:40 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:32:59 +1100 |
45 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Lars Henrik Mathiesen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:32:06 -0000 |
33 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:45:24 +1100 |
49 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 05:59:15 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Muke Tever |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:40:54 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:42:40 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Mike Ellis |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:29:09 -0500 |
82 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:24:00 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:09:08 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:14:14 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:06:14 -0500 |
152 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Jake X |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:54:45 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Jake X |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:58:46 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:59:09 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:30:56 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:40:21 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:00:39 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:10:36 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:13:05 +1100 |
68 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:47:33 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:39:00 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:08:48 -0500 |
124 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:31:03 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:38:12 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:49:52 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:48:02 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:58:37 -0500 |
91 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:00:47 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:59:08 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:04:45 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:42:30 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:02:54 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:34:48 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan McLeay |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:48:34 +1100 |
49 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Mike Ellis |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:56:55 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:17:56 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:27:24 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:50:12 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Nik Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:55:09 -0600 |
37 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:09:29 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:17:41 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Joe |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:24:08 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Muke Tever |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:06:27 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:53:53 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
BP Jonsson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:18:11 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
BP Jonsson |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:15:05 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Peter Bleackley |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:35:32 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:12:15 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:15:50 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Steg Belsky |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:18:48 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Mike Ellis |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:47:12 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:48:21 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:53:45 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:32:19 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
H. S. Teoh |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:46:29 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:45:34 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:49:38 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:23:41 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:57:21 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:57:58 +1100 |
72 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:58:01 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:58:06 +1100 |
61 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:58:14 +1100 |
41 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Tristan |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:58:17 +1100 |
52 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
Garth Wallace |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:10:36 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:16:43 -0500 |
40 lines |
OT: French language instruction books
|
Jake X |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:42:32 -0500 |
32 lines |
OT: Mail clients and servers (was Re: Workshops Review #10)
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:29:17 +0200 |
53 lines |
OT: Revelations (was Re: Saprutum website update)
|
Eamon Graham |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:23:33 +0100 |
85 lines |
OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 16:15:37 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
|
daniel andreasson |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:40:42 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:21:02 -0000 |
58 lines |
Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Delirious |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:40:16 -0500 |
276 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:48:34 +0100 |
307 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Roger Mills |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:12:08 -0500 |
94 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Delirious |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:01:59 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:14:00 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
|
Tristan McLeay |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:36:04 +1100 |
37 lines |
Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Delirious |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:36:58 -0500 |
172 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 23:22:21 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Roger Mills |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:54:03 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Delirious |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:21:24 -0500 |
114 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Garth Wallace |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:03:28 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:21:25 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Delirious |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:24:12 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Tristan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:03:11 +1100 |
34 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Peter Clark |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:20:43 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Elyse Grasso |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:00:58 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:11:47 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:26:02 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:28:50 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:26:34 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Christophe Grandsire |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:28:53 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Stephen Mulraney |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:25:43 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Pavel Iosad |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:55:47 +0300 |
42 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Andreas Johansson |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:58:19 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
John Cowan |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:01:21 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Stephen Mulraney |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:16:14 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Roger Mills |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:42:29 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
Steg Belsky |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:33:38 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
|
John Cowan |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:00:37 -0500 |
38 lines |
phonemic ex-/inhalation
|
Jake X |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:22:24 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: phonemic ex-/inhalation
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:40:17 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: phonemic ex-/inhalation
|
Wesley Parish |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:56:09 +1300 |
57 lines |
Re: phonemic ex-/inhalation
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:41:53 +0200 |
52 lines |
Poll by Email No. 25
|
Peter Clark |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:16:38 -0600 |
60 lines |
Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
|
Keith Gaughan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 05:16:49 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
|
Stephen Mulraney |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 03:02:53 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
|
Peter Bleackley |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:28:26 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
|
Keith Gaughan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:10:10 GMT |
73 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
J Y S Czhang |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 02:06:42 EST |
90 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 14:41:30 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Doug Dee |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:29:06 EST |
100 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
John Cowan |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 02:23:40 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Doug Dee |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 13:16:37 EST |
90 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
daniel andreasson |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:39:24 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Mike Ellis |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 13:49:35 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 15:46:38 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:16:34 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Peter Bleackley |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:20:12 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Andrew Smith |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:01:13 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Keith Gaughan |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 04:35:46 GMT |
39 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Nik Taylor |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:54:27 -0600 |
46 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Jake X |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:44:36 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Joseph Fatula |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:12:52 -0800 |
121 lines |
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
|
Doug Dee |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:15:36 EST |
126 lines |
Related conlangs (jara: Saprutum website update)
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:09:01 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Related conlangs (jara: Saprutum website update)
|
Eamon Graham |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:10:26 +0100 |
50 lines |
Relay
|
H. S. Teoh |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:52:22 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Relay
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:52:53 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: Relay
|
H. S. Teoh |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:59:31 -0500 |
111 lines |
Re: Relay
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:32:16 +0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Relay
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:48:06 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: Relay
|
Steg Belsky |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:40:53 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Relay
|
H. S. Teoh |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:45:54 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Relay
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:49:56 +0200 |
45 lines |
Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Peter Clark |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:07:21 -0600 |
101 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Roger Mills |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 12:12:54 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:54:57 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
E. Notagain |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:51:11 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Joe |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 22:37:13 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
E. Notagain |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 18:37:49 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Peter Clark |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:39:54 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Sally Caves |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 22:25:53 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Peter Clark |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 21:21:40 -0600 |
40 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Mike Ellis |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:56:32 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 05:46:11 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
E. Notagain |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:38:14 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
E. Notagain |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:40:29 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
E. Notagain |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:00:45 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Elyse Grasso |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 00:04:41 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Peter Bleackley |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:25:36 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:10:01 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:34:39 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Sally Caves |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:40:47 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
E. Notagain |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:29:41 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:38:47 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:11:43 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:55:57 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Andreas Johansson |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:59:20 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:49:10 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Stephen Mulraney |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:28:45 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
H. S. Teoh |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:46:50 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Andreas Johansson |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:07:26 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Tim May |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:12:55 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Joe |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:34:50 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
|
Wesley Parish |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:49:19 +1300 |
55 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:39:18 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Keith |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:01:55 +0000 |
102 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Delirious |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:14:42 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Eamon Graham |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:40:06 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:31:33 +0200 |
141 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:40:08 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Eamon Graham |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:40:39 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:03:32 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:11:06 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
John Cowan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:07:11 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:44:30 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Eamon Graham |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:52:07 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Wesley Parish |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:45:05 +1300 |
77 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:32:19 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Wesley Parish |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:50:17 +1300 |
103 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Keith Gaughan |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:40:02 GMT |
38 lines |
Re: Saprutum website update
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:47:18 +0000 |
42 lines |
Shayanan background and biology; was Re: Kinship terms?
|
Elyse Grasso |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:07:22 -0700 |
152 lines |
sound change resource?
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:20:06 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: sound change resource?
|
Keith |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 03:22:37 +0000 |
42 lines |
Stress shift
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:58:10 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Dirk Elzinga |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:03:32 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
JS Bangs |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:10:40 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Pavel Iosad |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:38:39 +0300 |
42 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:26:01 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:26:48 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:28:11 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:12:59 +0200 |
58 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Pavel Iosad |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:40:09 +0300 |
59 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
John Cowan |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:58:11 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
JS Bangs |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:28:43 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Muke Tever |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 00:42:47 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:52:27 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:21:25 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Tristan |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:58:08 +1100 |
37 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Muke Tever |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:41:53 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Stress shift
|
Keith |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:49:54 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: TECH: Easy way to build you conlang vocab
|
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:56:05 -0800 |
60 lines |
Telenzh Articles (was: Re: Probability of Article Replacement)
|
Andreas Johansson |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:30:49 +0100 |
55 lines |
Telona number system
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 15:21:51 -0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Robert B Wilson |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:51:41 -0500 |
82 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Mike Ellis |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:50:09 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:05:30 -0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Joe |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:55:03 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Roger Mills |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 02:25:25 -0500 |
105 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Joe |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:29:23 +0000 |
112 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Joe |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:32:07 +0000 |
114 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 15:39:44 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Roger Mills |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:40:07 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Mike Ellis |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 22:23:27 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:01:19 -0000 |
122 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:36:24 -0000 |
108 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Roger Mills |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:31:22 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Mike Ellis |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:03:32 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Roger Mills |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:54:56 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Telona number system
|
Jonathan Knibb |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:13:13 -0000 |
69 lines |
Re: Två frågor om svenska
|
Douglas Koller, Latin & French |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:29:27 -0500 |
53 lines |
Workshops Review #10
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:58:54 +0200 |
62 lines |
Re: Workshops Review #10
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:45:21 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Workshops Review #10
|
Isaac A. Penzev |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:30:58 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: Workshops Review #10
|
Garth Wallace |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:03:46 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Workshops Review #10
|
Jan van Steenbergen |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:11:15 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Workshops Review #10
|
Andreas Johansson |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:39:39 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Workshops Review #10
|
Pavel Iosad |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:52:18 +0300 |
49 lines |
[tT] affricate
|
Rachel Klippenstein |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:35:42 -0500 |
34 lines |