Conlang
Mailing List – April 2003, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
   NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
"The Miller's Sons" in Ygyde
bureaucratese Tong-cho-la
Colour terms
Conlang at Eurovision?
(7 messages)
email change
(7 messages)
English VL, was Ygde
Ergativity, accusativity, activeness and ebisedicity
first dribbles of YAC (Yet Another Conlang)
Folkspraak ( was Has anyone made a real conlang?)
For Sally: Ursula LeGuin's conlang Kesh
(3 messages)
Has anyone made a real conlang?
(17 messages)
HELP: New computer
i just started working on an IAL
(5 messages)
ICOT, anybody?
Improved (Short) Ygyde
(20 messages)
Introduction
(8 messages)
listserv troubles
(2 messages)
LOCL
(5 messages)
MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200316
Meyadhew Phonology
(4 messages)
my CONLANG subscription again
(2 messages)
NATLANG Russian, anyone?
NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
(2 messages)
New discovery concerning Khangathyagon nouns
New Webpage
(11 messages)
OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(7 messages)
OT: Research Paper Topic
(5 messages)
OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(6 messages)
Plurality
(14 messages)
plus idées pour le teque
(2 messages)
plus idées pour le teque
(3 messages)
Poll by Email No. 29
profile
(5 messages)
Profiles
Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(5 messages)
proving a conlang?
(5 messages)
Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(16 messages)
Russian, anyone?
(26 messages)
Russian, anyone? correction
SAMPA from IPA
(7 messages)
SIL IPA (was Telona on the web at last)
(2 messages)
Speaking in passives
Strange voices
(2 messages)
TECH: Cyrillics
TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
(5 messages)
TECH: Rejected postings
(7 messages)
Telona on the web at last
(22 messages)
test
(2 messages)
Test case #1
Test case #2
Tong-cho-la
(13 messages)
Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(34 messages)
Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
(5 messages)
UPSID
Weekly Vocab #2
Weekly vocab 3
Weekly Vocab 3
(5 messages)
Weekly vocab 3
Weekly Vocab 4
(3 messages)
Workshops Review #16
Workshops Review #17
(5 messages)
y sound
(45 messages)
Ygyde questions
Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(17 messages)
[conlang] Re: Russian, anyone?
(2 messages)
   NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
Re: Â Â Â NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
(41 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"The Miller's Sons" in Ygyde
"The Miller's Sons" in Ygyde
(76 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
bureaucratese Tong-cho-la
Re: bureaucratese Tong-cho-la
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Colour terms
Colour terms
(51 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang at Eurovision?
Conlang at Eurovision?
(48 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang at Eurovision?
(43 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang at Eurovision?
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang at Eurovision?
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang at Eurovision?
(61 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang at Eurovision?
(64 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang at Eurovision?
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
email change
email change
(25 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: email change
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: email change
(43 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: email change
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: email change
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: email change
(39 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: email change
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
English VL, was Ygde
Re: English VL, was Ygde
(55 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergativity, accusativity, activeness and ebisedicity
Ergativity, accusativity, activeness and ebisedicity
(110 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
first dribbles of YAC (Yet Another Conlang)
first dribbles of YAC (Yet Another Conlang)
(61 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Folkspraak ( was Has anyone made a real conlang?)
Re: Folkspraak ( was Has anyone made a real conlang?)
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
For Sally: Ursula LeGuin's conlang Kesh
Re: For Sally: Ursula LeGuin's conlang Kesh
(103 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For Sally: Ursula LeGuin's conlang Kesh
(87 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For Sally: Ursula LeGuin's conlang Kesh
(94 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Has anyone made a real conlang?
Has anyone made a real conlang?
(42 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(83 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(64 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(81 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(100 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(79 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(73 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(64 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(107 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(30 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(81 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(33 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(39 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(65 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(54 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
HELP: New computer
Re: HELP: New computer
(48 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
i just started working on an IAL
i just started working on an IAL
(66 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i just started working on an IAL
(84 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i just started working on an IAL
(41 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i just started working on an IAL
(44 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i just started working on an IAL
(46 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
ICOT, anybody?
ICOT, anybody?
(39 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Improved (Short) Ygyde
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(41 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(64 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(54 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(67 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(54 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(50 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(80 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(85 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(48 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(70 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Improved (Short) Ygyde
(64 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction
Re: Introduction
(35 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(45 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(52 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(51 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(28 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
listserv troubles
listserv troubles
(37 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: listserv troubles
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
LOCL
Re: LOCL
(28 lines)
From:
R Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOCL
(39 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOCL
(36 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOCL
(23 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOCL
(33 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200316
MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200316
(76 lines)
From:
Kvasir <
[log in to unmask]
>
Meyadhew Phonology
Meyadhew Phonology
(174 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meyadhew Phonology
(53 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meyadhew Phonology
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meyadhew Phonology
(60 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
my CONLANG subscription again
Re: my CONLANG subscription again
(57 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my CONLANG subscription again
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG Russian, anyone?
Re: NATLANG Russian, anyone?
(78 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
Re: NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
(44 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Arabic Pronunciation
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
New discovery concerning Khangathyagon nouns
New discovery concerning Khangathyagon nouns
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Webpage
New Webpage
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(46 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Webpage
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(99 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(52 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(43 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(47 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Humor: was Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Research Paper Topic
OT: Research Paper Topic
(39 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Research Paper Topic
(45 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Research Paper Topic
(55 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Research Paper Topic
(46 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Research Paper Topic
(49 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
Re: OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(48 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(51 lines)
From:
Jessica Husén <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(40 lines)
From:
Jessica Husén <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(64 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(62 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: School systems (was: Re: Introduction)
(125 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Plurality
Plurality
(47 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(64 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(65 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(62 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(37 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(60 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(43 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(39 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(70 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(36 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(99 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(68 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurality
(80 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
plus idées pour le teque
Re: plus idées pour le teque
(48 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: plus idées pour le teque
(158 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
plus idées pour le teque
plus idées pour le teque
(39 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: plus idées pour le teque
(42 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: plus idées pour le teque
(52 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 29
Re: Poll by Email No. 29
(48 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
profile
profile
(43 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: profile
(36 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: profile
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: profile
(78 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: profile
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Profiles
Re: Profiles
(50 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(34 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(45 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(42 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(47 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Profiles (WAS: Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections)
(51 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
proving a conlang?
Re: proving a conlang?
(45 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: proving a conlang?
(38 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: proving a conlang?
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: proving a conlang?
(54 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: proving a conlang?
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(101 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(85 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(95 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(43 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(94 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(123 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(56 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(41 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(80 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses in Ikanirae Seru
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Russian, anyone?
Russian, anyone?
(36 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(45 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(54 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(30 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(42 lines)
From:
Jessica Husen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(45 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(50 lines)
From:
Jessica Husén <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(88 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(36 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(55 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(41 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(51 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(45 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(57 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(41 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(46 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(41 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(36 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(40 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(54 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Russian, anyone?
(39 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Russian, anyone? correction
Re: Russian, anyone? correction
(33 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
SAMPA from IPA
SAMPA from IPA
(44 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SAMPA from IPA
(43 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SAMPA from IPA
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SAMPA from IPA
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SAMPA from IPA
(50 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SAMPA from IPA
(37 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SAMPA from IPA
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
SIL IPA (was Telona on the web at last)
Re: SIL IPA (was Telona on the web at last)
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SIL IPA (was Telona on the web at last)
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Speaking in passives
Speaking in passives
(43 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strange voices
Strange voices
(61 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strange voices
(49 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Cyrillics
Re: TECH: Cyrillics
(42 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
(34 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
(39 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
(41 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
(65 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Cyrillics (was: Russian, anyone?)
(45 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Rejected postings
TECH: Rejected postings
(60 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Rejected postings
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Rejected postings
(36 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Rejected postings
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Rejected postings
(62 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Rejected postings
(44 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Rejected postings
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Telona on the web at last
Telona on the web at last
(51 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(40 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(24 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(110 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(45 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(38 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(46 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(87 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona on the web at last
(153 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
test
test
(45 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: test
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Test case #1
Test case #1
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Test case #2
Test case #2
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tong-cho-la
Re: Tong-cho-la
(50 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(44 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(41 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(101 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(72 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(78 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(42 lines)
From:
Jonathan Johnson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(30 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(47 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(83 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(114 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(79 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(29 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(44 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(38 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(89 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(108 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(55 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(55 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(93 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(54 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(43 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(51 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(48 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(61 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(45 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(35 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(72 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(55 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(35 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(21 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(47 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(98 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(49 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(60 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(66 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(77 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(77 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(32 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tong-cho-la, a philosophical language
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
(35 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
(117 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
(81 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation exercise - On a Night of Snow
(97 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
UPSID
UPSID
(29 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #2
Re: Weekly Vocab #2
(139 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly vocab 3
Re: Weekly vocab 3
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 3
Re: Weekly Vocab 3
(82 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 3
(41 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 3
(26 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 3
(50 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 3
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly vocab 3
Re: Weekly vocab 3
(32 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 4
Weekly Vocab 4
(52 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 4
(57 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 4
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #16
Re: Workshops Review #16
(38 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #17
Workshops Review #17
(64 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #17
(40 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #17
(36 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #17
(55 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #17
(36 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
y sound
y sound
(32 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(37 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(37 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(33 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(33 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(41 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(32 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(36 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(47 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(44 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(58 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(37 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(41 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(51 lines)
From:
Jessica Husén <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(54 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(45 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(59 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(37 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(72 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(38 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(97 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(62 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(53 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(36 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(39 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(46 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(33 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(51 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: y sound
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ygyde questions
Ygyde questions
(32 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yogh (was Re: y sound)
Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(38 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(33 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(66 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(65 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(64 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(39 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(49 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(51 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(63 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yogh (was Re: y sound)
(58 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[conlang] Re: Russian, anyone?
[conlang] Re: Russian, anyone?
(113 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [conlang] Re: Russian, anyone?
(73 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – April 2003, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – April 2003, week 3
