Conlang
Mailing List May 2003, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
"......I have a banana in my ear" (was: Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know)
(2 messages)
/s/ vs /z/
/s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(19 messages)
2 columns
(2 messages)
A bit of Piata (was: Re: [p] <-> [k_W])
A conlang is being born (long)
(2 messages)
Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(6 messages)
ADMIN: more archives available!
(8 messages)
APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(7 messages)
ASCIIifying
(18 messages)
AW: AW: AW: Hello!
AW: AW: dialectal diversity in English
AW: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
AW: dialectal diversity in English
(6 messages)
AW: Die, artlanger scum!
AW: Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
AW: Hello!
(2 messages)
AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(5 messages)
AW: Scandinavian conlang
(5 messages)
Boheme Magazine Now Online, featuring Conlangs!
Carrajena text
CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(18 messages)
Conpidgin by Lewis Carroll
Country names
(12 messages)
Dearth of the melanin-enhanced on the list
Death threats was Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
dialectal diversity in English
(25 messages)
Die, Artlanger Scum
(6 messages)
Die, artlanger scum!
(17 messages)
die, auxlanger scum!
Die, x-langer scum!
(4 messages)
Engish 2sg/pl
(6 messages)
English 2sg/pl
(15 messages)
Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
(2 messages)
For David Starner: Project Gutenberg; Lau lg. etc.
For endless cackles of evil laughter try
(2 messages)
French village
(4 messages)
FW: Die, x-langer scum!
Gods of the Teonim: was Religious text in Conlangs
Has anyone made a real conlang?
(3 messages)
Ignore: test
(2 messages)
Kazakh links
kinsi rorotan translation
Kros Sam-loivjarhe slothate yuu Fuec Cohmpuun
(2 messages)
McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
(5 messages)
Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(11 messages)
NATLANG: pitch accent question
(7 messages)
Not linear writen forms?
(8 messages)
not linear written forms?
(2 messages)
Official language question!
OT: libraries (was Re: dialectal diversity in English)
OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(5 messages)
OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(5 messages)
OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
OT: YUM Bugs (was: What? the clean-shaven outnumber...)
OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(2 messages)
Parlez vous Kazakh?
(22 messages)
Please Tell Me I'm Not Too Late for the Relay!
Poll By Email No. 30
pre/ab-sence
prepositions in saalangal
Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(11 messages)
Re: Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
Relay
(25 messages)
relay
Relay
(6 messages)
Relay running order
Relay?
(6 messages)
Religious text in Conlangs
(2 messages)
Required Arguments?
(3 messages)
Results of Poll by Email No. 29
(4 messages)
Scandinavian conlang
(6 messages)
Serbian (was: Parlez-vous Kazakh)
Silindion Poem, Translation anyone?
(2 messages)
survey: time and space
(5 messages)
Synaesthesia
TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(17 messages)
TECH?? problem with attachments
(2 messages)
TEOH! was Re: OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
(2 messages)
Terms of Endearment
(7 messages)
The relay has begun
Two-column formatting (was Relay?)
Unahoban revisited + vowel inflections
(3 messages)
Weekly Review #19
(2 messages)
Weekly Vocab 5
(2 messages)
Weekly Vocab 6
(6 messages)
Weekly Vocab 6, in Kash (part 1)
Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(22 messages)
Weekly vocab. #6 in Kash, part 2
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug,"
(4 messages)
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
(5 messages)
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(17 messages)
writin' on paper (wasRe: Has anyone made a real conlang?)
X-SAMPA
Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(24 messages)
Yer Ugly Mug Suggestions
(2 messages)
Yer Ugly Mug, Problem
YUM troubles again
[p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(11 messages)
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
Re: Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(75 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
Re: Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(63 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"......I have a banana in my ear" (was: Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know)
"......I have a banana in my ear" (was: Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know)
(79 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "......I have a banana in my ear" (was: Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know)
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
/s/ vs /z/
Re: /s/ vs /z/
(48 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
/s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(45 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(45 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(69 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(148 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(65 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(66 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(59 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(62 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(44 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(49 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(73 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(53 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(53 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(56 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
2 columns
Re: 2 columns
(48 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2 columns
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
A bit of Piata (was: Re: [p] <-> [k_W])
A bit of Piata (was: Re: [p] <-> [k_W])
(48 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
A conlang is being born (long)
Re: A conlang is being born (long)
(122 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A conlang is being born (long)
(28 lines)
From:
James Kapches <
[log in to unmask]
>
Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(46 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(51 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(83 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accessing archives for Poll By Email No. 30
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: more archives available!
ADMIN: more archives available!
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: more archives available!
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: more archives available!
(67 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: more archives available!
(94 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: more archives available!
(32 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: more archives available!
(33 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: more archives available!
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: more archives available!
(42 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(49 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(38 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(62 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: APA -- Yet another ASCII representation of the IPA
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
ASCIIifying
ASCIIifying
(40 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(187 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(67 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(90 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(48 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(48 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(73 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(72 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(116 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(33 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(82 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(52 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCIIifying
(67 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: AW: AW: Hello!
Re: AW: AW: AW: Hello!
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: AW: dialectal diversity in English
AW: AW: dialectal diversity in English
(45 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
AW: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: dialectal diversity in English
AW: dialectal diversity in English
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: dialectal diversity in English
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: dialectal diversity in English
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: dialectal diversity in English
(36 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: dialectal diversity in English
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: dialectal diversity in English
(33 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: Die, artlanger scum!
AW: Die, artlanger scum!
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
AW: Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
(32 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: Hello!
AW: Hello!
(60 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: Hello!
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(47 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(40 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(71 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: Scandinavian conlang
AW: Scandinavian conlang
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: Scandinavian conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: Scandinavian conlang
(56 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: Scandinavian conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: Scandinavian conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Boheme Magazine Now Online, featuring Conlangs!
Boheme Magazine Now Online, featuring Conlangs!
(59 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Carrajena text
Carrajena text
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(50 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(40 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(40 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(32 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(60 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(31 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(36 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(52 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conpidgin by Lewis Carroll
Conpidgin by Lewis Carroll
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Country names
Country names
(90 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(32 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(39 lines)
From:
P. M. Arktayg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(60 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(34 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(46 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(54 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(101 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Country names
(54 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dearth of the melanin-enhanced on the list
Dearth of the melanin-enhanced on the list
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Death threats was Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
Re: Death threats was Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(72 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
dialectal diversity in English
dialectal diversity in English
(49 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(76 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(32 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(42 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(71 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(65 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(55 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(32 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(70 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(83 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(45 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(62 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(64 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dialectal diversity in English
(50 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Die, Artlanger Scum
Re: Die, Artlanger Scum
(38 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, Artlanger Scum
(63 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, Artlanger Scum
(130 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, Artlanger Scum
(66 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, Artlanger Scum
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, Artlanger Scum
(59 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Die, artlanger scum!
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(45 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(45 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(27 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(50 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(45 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(34 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(77 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(37 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(35 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(64 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, artlanger scum!
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
die, auxlanger scum!
die, auxlanger scum!
(71 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Die, x-langer scum!
Die, x-langer scum!
(30 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, x-langer scum!
(41 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, x-langer scum!
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die, x-langer scum!
(44 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Engish 2sg/pl
Engish 2sg/pl
(58 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Engish 2sg/pl
(65 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Engish 2sg/pl
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Engish 2sg/pl
(68 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Engish 2sg/pl
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Engish 2sg/pl
(46 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
English 2sg/pl
Re: English 2sg/pl
(47 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(53 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(44 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(58 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(41 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English 2sg/pl
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Even weg! (as we say in Dutch ;)) )
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
For David Starner: Project Gutenberg; Lau lg. etc.
Re: For David Starner: Project Gutenberg; Lau lg. etc.
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
For endless cackles of evil laughter try
For endless cackles of evil laughter try
(38 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For endless cackles of evil laughter try
(33 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
French village
French village
(76 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French village
(50 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French village
(40 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French village
(92 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
FW: Die, x-langer scum!
FW: Die, x-langer scum!
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gods of the Teonim: was Religious text in Conlangs
Gods of the Teonim: was Religious text in Conlangs
(115 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Has anyone made a real conlang?
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(60 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
(42 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ignore: test
Ignore: test
(24 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ignore: test
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kazakh links
Kazakh links
(32 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
kinsi rorotan translation
kinsi rorotan translation
(42 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kros Sam-loivjarhe slothate yuu Fuec Cohmpuun
Kros Sam-loivjarhe slothate yuu Fuec Cohmpuun
(30 lines)
From:
Rik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kros Sam-loivjarhe slothate yuu Fuec Cohmpuun
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
Re: McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
(30 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
(51 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
(74 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McCawley Festschrift (was Re: not linear written forms?)
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(58 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(64 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(52 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(32 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(56 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(47 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Me Ugly Mug (jara: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(45 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: pitch accent question
NATLANG: pitch accent question
(49 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question
(78 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question
(61 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question
(152 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question
(71 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Not linear writen forms?
Not linear writen forms?
(60 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(49 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(40 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(43 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(36 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(37 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(44 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not linear writen forms?
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
not linear written forms?
Re: not linear written forms?
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not linear written forms?
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Official language question!
Official language question!
(36 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: libraries (was Re: dialectal diversity in English)
OT: libraries (was Re: dialectal diversity in English)
(79 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
Re: OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(53 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(52 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(37 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: My ... Monitor is bigger than yours...(was: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!)
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
Re: OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(49 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
(113 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: YUM Bugs (was: What? the clean-shaven outnumber...)
Re: OT: YUM Bugs (was: What? the clean-shaven outnumber...)
(46 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(69 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT:: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Parlez vous Kazakh?
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(42 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(43 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(43 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(36 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(48 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(49 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(60 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(82 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(48 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(59 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parlez vous Kazakh?
(39 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Please Tell Me I'm Not Too Late for the Relay!
Please Tell Me I'm Not Too Late for the Relay!
(40 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll By Email No. 30
Re: Poll By Email No. 30
(49 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
pre/ab-sence
pre/ab-sence
(28 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
prepositions in saalangal
prepositions in saalangal
(59 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(140 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(120 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(48 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(43 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(26 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(72 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(64 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(27 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns Marked for Tense/Aspect/Mood
(38 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
Re: Re: Re: /s/ vs /z/ was CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
(84 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay
Relay
(30 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(36 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(35 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(41 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(34 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(28 lines)
From:
Mau Rauser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(40 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(36 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(42 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(45 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(36 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(27 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(39 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(45 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(48 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(35 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(38 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(42 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(42 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(48 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
relay
Re: relay
(22 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay
Re: Relay
(42 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(21 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(29 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(40 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay running order
Relay running order
(28 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay?
Relay?
(29 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay?
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay?
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay?
(44 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay?
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay?
(44 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religious text in Conlangs
Re: Religious text in Conlangs
(48 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religious text in Conlangs
(173 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Required Arguments?
Required Arguments?
(31 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Required Arguments?
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Required Arguments?
(46 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 29
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 29
(65 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 29
(38 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 29
(42 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 29
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scandinavian conlang
Scandinavian conlang
(97 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scandinavian conlang
(110 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scandinavian conlang
(37 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scandinavian conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scandinavian conlang
(71 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scandinavian conlang
(61 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Serbian (was: Parlez-vous Kazakh)
Serbian (was: Parlez-vous Kazakh)
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Silindion Poem, Translation anyone?
Silindion Poem, Translation anyone?
(178 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silindion Poem, Translation anyone?
(288 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
survey: time and space
survey: time and space
(48 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: survey: time and space
(71 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: survey: time and space
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: survey: time and space
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: survey: time and space
(93 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Synaesthesia
Synaesthesia
(36 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(38 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(43 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(61 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(88 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(63 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(65 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(41 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(55 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (aargh) More new computer woes
(53 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH?? problem with attachments
TECH?? problem with attachments
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH?? problem with attachments
(41 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
TEOH! was Re: OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
TEOH! was Re: OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEOH! was Re: OT: sending email to all your applicances (Was: Re: ASCIIifying)
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terms of Endearment
Re: Terms of Endearment
(110 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terms of Endearment
(158 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terms of Endearment
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terms of Endearment
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terms of Endearment
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terms of Endearment
(77 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terms of Endearment
(41 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
The relay has begun
The relay has begun
(29 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Two-column formatting (was Relay?)
Re: Two-column formatting (was Relay?)
(35 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unahoban revisited + vowel inflections
Unahoban revisited + vowel inflections
(119 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unahoban revisited + vowel inflections
(80 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unahoban revisited + vowel inflections
(75 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Review #19
Weekly Review #19
(75 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Review #19
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 5
Re: Weekly Vocab 5
(212 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 5
(104 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 6
Weekly Vocab 6
(49 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6
(98 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6
(166 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6
(102 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6
(84 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6
(50 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 6, in Kash (part 1)
Weekly Vocab 6, in Kash (part 1)
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 6: to know
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(55 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(50 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(62 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(33 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(52 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(41 lines)
From:
Jessica Husén <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(42 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(44 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(95 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 6: to know
(55 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly vocab. #6 in Kash, part 2
Weekly vocab. #6 in Kash, part 2
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug,"
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug,"
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug,"
(30 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug,"
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug,"
(36 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
(35 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc
(26 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(86 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(53 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(63 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(45 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(75 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(78 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(38 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(43 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(37 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "Yer Ugly Mug," etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
writin' on paper (wasRe: Has anyone made a real conlang?)
Re: writin' on paper (wasRe: Has anyone made a real conlang?)
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
X-SAMPA
X-SAMPA
(33 lines)
From:
Daniel Ryan Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(70 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(68 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(50 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(29 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(46 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(41 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(34 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(40 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(47 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(40 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(42 lines)
From:
Jessica Husén <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(39 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(32 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(54 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yer Ugly Mug is open for business!
(47 lines)
From:
Iain Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yer Ugly Mug Suggestions
Yer Ugly Mug Suggestions
(43 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yer Ugly Mug Suggestions
(36 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yer Ugly Mug, Problem
Yer Ugly Mug, Problem
(29 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
YUM troubles again
YUM troubles again
(31 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
[p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(36 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(32 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(54 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(60 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(45 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(67 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(34 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(45 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(49 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p] <-> [k_W] ( was Re: /s/ vs /z/)
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU