LISTSERV 16.0 - AUXLANG Archives

Re: Are there Grammatical sex distinctions in Sermo? (was: Auxlang for French-speakers

Sat, 17 May 2003 09:45:29 +0200

316 lines

Re: Are there Grammatical sex distinctions in Sermo? (was: Auxlang for French-speakers

Sat, 17 May 2003 09:55:20 +0200

71 lines

Re: Are there Grammatical sex distinctions in Sermo? (was: Auxlang for French-speakers

Sat, 17 May 2003 10:08:10 +0200

59 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 11:37:08 +0200

70 lines

Re: Are there Grammatical sex distinctions in Sermo? (was: Auxlang for French-speakers

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 11:45:39 +0200

41 lines

Re: Are there Grammatical sex distinctions in Sermo? (was: Auxlang for French-speakers

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 07:37:10 -0400

28 lines

Re: Are there Grammatical sex distinctions in Sermo? (was: Auxlang for French-speakers

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 15:42:22 +0200

70 lines

ARKive

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 18:03:57 +0000

53 lines

Auxlang for French-speakers

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 12:31:36 +0000

62 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 09:17:35 -0400

70 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 15:22:35 +0200

27 lines

Thu, 15 May 2003 16:51:01 +0200

37 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 11:00:50 -0400

22 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 11:08:22 -0400

33 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:29:08 +0200

45 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 15:56:09 +0000

119 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 15:59:18 +0000

58 lines

Thu, 15 May 2003 18:15:33 +0200

99 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 20:11:58 +0200

40 lines

Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:06:21 -0400

75 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 20:16:32 +0200

49 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 16:15:33 -0400

42 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 07:34:16 +0200

61 lines

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:17:01 +0200

114 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:33:48 +0200

74 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 04:05:11 -0400

47 lines

jss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 13:25:24 +0200

106 lines

jss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 13:36:40 +0200

84 lines

conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 09:20:23 -0400

35 lines

BIDEO

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 13:53:59 +0000

65 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Wed, 21 May 2003 08:39:49 +0200

174 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 03:45:22 -0400

37 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

jss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 09:47:38 +0200

68 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 12:23:50 +0000

64 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 12:35:38 +0000

56 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 08:53:41 -0400

66 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 13:30:56 +0000

81 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 10:48:52 -0400

22 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 18:13:59 +0200

84 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 18:49:42 +0200

72 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 19:28:21 +0200

68 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 16:48:33 -0400

49 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 19:55:46 -0400

37 lines

Re: conjunctivo o non conjunctivo ista esta la question!

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 23:09:01 -0400

49 lines

eclipse de Lune

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 02:10:16 -0400

58 lines

Re: eclipse de Lune

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:31:32 +0200

62 lines

Re: eclipse de Lune

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 00:13:43 -0400

28 lines

Re: eclipse de Lune

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 07:04:20 +0200

57 lines

eidero di neterolaño

Re: eidero di neterolaño

pracrito <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 17:55:40 +0200

58 lines

escatologico

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 20:02:36 +0200

59 lines

Re: escatologico

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 20:22:44 +0200

45 lines

Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 07:35:39 -0400

34 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Sat, 17 May 2003 13:49:10 +0200

79 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 08:19:25 -0400

25 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 15:25:56 +0200

45 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 07:13:35 -0700

30 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 07:14:33 -0700

30 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Sun, 18 May 2003 16:55:55 +0200

74 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 13:09:59 -0400

83 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 13:18:18 -0400

26 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Mon, 19 May 2003 08:24:46 +0200

181 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Tue, 20 May 2003 10:16:52 +0200

235 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 08:39:13 -0400

103 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Tue, 20 May 2003 16:03:28 +0200

147 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 10:24:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 11:35:43 -0400

115 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Tue, 20 May 2003 21:43:59 +0200

135 lines

Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 19:23:45 -0400

46 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 23:53:41 -0400

61 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 07:39:40 +0000

51 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 03:54:14 -0400

28 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 19:45:48 -0400

41 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 19:50:42 -0400

36 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 22:30:20 -0400

46 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 May 2003 22:38:34 -0400

53 lines

Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque (era: New poll for volapuk).

pracrito <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 01:45:40 +0200

234 lines

Re: Esto parece pagado por los enemigos del volapuque (era: New poll for volapuk).

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 11:19:27 +0200

31 lines

Fwd: [BJA] Malkovren la 6.700 surPlanedajn lingvojn

Re: Fwd: [BJA] Malkovren la 6.700 surPlanedajn lingvojn

Jean-Fran�ois Colson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 01:43:35 +0200

97 lines

Re: Fwd: [BJA] Malkovren la 6.700 surPlanedajn lingvojn

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 01:37:14 -0400

41 lines

Glosa mailing list

Marcel Springer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 18:50:46 +0200

31 lines

Ideas original

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 00:35:29 -0400

57 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 16:34:27 -0400

29 lines

Marcos Franco <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 21:45:56 +0000

53 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 18:16:26 -0400

27 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 23:15:21 -0400

49 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 07:54:20 +0200

60 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:11:46 +0200

46 lines

Marcos Franco <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 11:11:37 +0000

50 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 03:17:57 -0400

49 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 21:14:27 -0400

145 lines

Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 May 2003 05:19:42 +0200

67 lines

Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 May 2003 14:17:32 -0400

30 lines