Conlang
Mailing List July 2003, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
(4 messages)
C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot
C'ali: inverse verbs and pivots
CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(31 messages)
CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(49 messages)
Compound Tense Mystery
(7 messages)
Conlang Wiki
(18 messages)
Dang! I need one of those! was Fwd: DWG Needed rcngbq
Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(56 messages)
going nomail
(2 messages)
Going nomail for a while
Help me!
(2 messages)
Laafaah (was CHAT: Which world? Which culture?)
Newbie Question
Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(6 messages)
Non-human languages (was OT: Dolphin intelligence (...))
(2 messages)
OT: Harrius Potter
(2 messages)
Phonetics (IPA)
(62 messages)
semantics question
(11 messages)
the fruits of your advice
The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(7 messages)
translation exercise
USAGE: 'Canadian' raising [was Re: Evidence for Nostratic?]
USAGE: (was Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?))
Weapons of Mass Destruction
(5 messages)
Week 14 Exercise
Weekly Vocab 14
(2 messages)
Weekly Vocab 14 in Kash
Weird language idea
Which world? Which culture?
Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon"
Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
(39 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot
Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot
(157 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
C'ali: inverse verbs and pivots
C'ali: inverse verbs and pivots
(107 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(53 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(53 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(70 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(53 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(39 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(32 lines)
From:
John Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(40 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(36 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(56 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(32 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(36 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(36 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(32 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(37 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(40 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(37 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(35 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: False friends - echos from the mother tounge
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(42 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(71 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(88 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(57 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(77 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(42 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(57 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(79 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(35 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(47 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(43 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(37 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(36 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(32 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(117 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(105 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(90 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(55 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(77 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(93 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(79 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(39 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(34 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Which world? Which culture?
(128 lines)
From:
John Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Compound Tense Mystery
Compound Tense Mystery
(99 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Compound Tense Mystery
(27 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Compound Tense Mystery
(87 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Compound Tense Mystery
(69 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Compound Tense Mystery
(134 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Compound Tense Mystery
(50 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Compound Tense Mystery
(125 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Wiki
Conlang Wiki
(30 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(42 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(40 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(37 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(50 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(40 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(27 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(32 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(46 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(67 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(53 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Wiki
(68 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(37 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Wiki
(55 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dang! I need one of those! was Fwd: DWG Needed rcngbq
Dang! I need one of those! was Fwd: DWG Needed rcngbq
(85 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(33 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(61 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(40 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(46 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(84 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(53 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(29 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(47 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(37 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(70 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(54 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(77 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(107 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(67 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(55 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(41 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(37 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(65 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(70 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(66 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(110 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(166 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(176 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(79 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(57 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(41 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(51 lines)
From:
Ian Spackman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(63 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)
(40 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
going nomail
going nomail
(76 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
going nomail
(25 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail for a while
Going nomail for a while
(34 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help me!
Help me!
(36 lines)
From:
Michael Fors <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help me!
(47 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Laafaah (was CHAT: Which world? Which culture?)
Re: Laafaah (was CHAT: Which world? Which culture?)
(147 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Newbie Question
Re: Newbie Question
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(68 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(114 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(130 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
(77 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-human languages (was OT: Dolphin intelligence (...))
Re: Non-human languages (was OT: Dolphin intelligence (...))
(78 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human languages (was OT: Dolphin intelligence (...))
(135 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Harrius Potter
Re: OT: Harrius Potter
(51 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Harrius Potter
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonetics (IPA)
Phonetics (IPA)
(107 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(51 lines)
From:
Betsumei <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(63 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(63 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(79 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(56 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(73 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(92 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(67 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(62 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(63 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(70 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(68 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(52 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(54 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(88 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(78 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(88 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(34 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(54 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(67 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(68 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(74 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(42 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(33 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(45 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(39 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(59 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(47 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(79 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(49 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics (IPA)
(44 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
semantics question
semantics question
(45 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(72 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(40 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(51 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(72 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(38 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(89 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics question
(43 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
the fruits of your advice
the fruits of your advice
(85 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(55 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(82 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest, greatest Extra-Terrestrial Origin theory
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
translation exercise
translation exercise
(107 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: 'Canadian' raising [was Re: Evidence for Nostratic?]
USAGE: 'Canadian' raising [was Re: Evidence for Nostratic?]
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: (was Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?))
USAGE: (was Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?))
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Weapons of Mass Destruction
(73 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(56 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Week 14 Exercise
Week 14 Exercise
(74 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 14
Re: Weekly Vocab 14
(107 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 14
(90 lines)
From:
mathias <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 14 in Kash
Re: Weekly Vocab 14 in Kash
(150 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weird language idea
Re: Weird language idea
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Which world? Which culture?
Re: Which world? Which culture?
(82 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon"
Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon"
(92 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU