Conlang Mailing List – July 2003, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       Re: verbs?
• (Weekly vocab) and Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
• An Argument over Fortunatian quy versus cy
• Andy's Oondenvel PDF online! (4 messages)
• Another story finished, another few words added (2 messages)
• Antipassives (9 messages)
• Apology: Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (4 messages)
• Books (was:Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common?)
• Brad Coon? (5 messages)
• C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (14 messages)
• C'ali: antipassivization, "passivization", more on pivot alignment
• CHAT (was Re: Curious finding: conlanging beginning)
• CHAT : webpage mini-move
• CHAT Which world? Which culture? (8 messages)
• CHAT: Heads up, ppl (was: Re: help)
• Curious finding: conlanging beginning (4 messages)
• Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (37 messages)
• Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (6 messages)
• Emphatics? (5 messages)
• First thoughts on Imperial (6 messages)
• ghunchee caundz (5 messages)
• Going nomail
• help (7 messages)
• Janko Gorenc and conlang numbers
• JG's list of conlangs (3 messages)
• Linguolabial (6 messages)
• Mapwords (10 messages)
• Mary, merry, marry (2 messages)
• More on c'juun iinhinny (was: New Wierd Language)
• Nceutueiti ['gydeS] (2 messages)
• oblique passive (3 messages)
• Online Dialect Generator (5 messages)
• Orthography Design (Newbie Question)
• Orthography question for the group. (16 messages)
• OT Cuidado, hay llamas (was Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (2 messages)
• OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (10 messages)
• OT: Monster Raving Loony (was Re: verbs?) (2 messages)
• OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (29 messages)
• OT: Re: Phonetics (IPA)
• Palatal Trills, Taps, and Flaps (3 messages)
• Parts of Speech - how many? (17 messages)
• Phonetics (IPA) (15 messages)
• Redone my Website
• Silly new conlang (was: Weird New Conlang)
• Sonority of 'h'? (2 messages)
• Sound Change Question (17 messages)
• USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (9 messages)
• verbs? (18 messages)
• Website and IPA
• Weekly Vocab 5
• Weekly Vocab Fifteenish (2 messages)
• Weird New Conlang
• Weird New Language - Some Grammar and A Text
• What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (21 messages)
• Whisperers' Tongue
• YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (3 messages)
• Yer (was Definitely Not YAEPT; now is YAEPT) (2 messages)
• Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (6 messages)
• [conlang] Digest Number 2882

1.       Re: verbs?
   • Re:       Re: verbs? (104 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

2. (Weekly vocab) and Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
   • Re: (Weekly vocab) and Andy's Oondenvel PDF online! (40 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

3. An Argument over Fortunatian quy versus cy
   • An Argument over Fortunatian quy versus cy (62 lines)
     From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>

4. Andy's Oondenvel PDF online!
   • Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online! (40 lines)
     From: Andy Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online! (23 lines)
     From: Andy Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online! (24 lines)
     From: Andy Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Andy's Oondenvel PDF online! (38 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

5. Another story finished, another few words added
   • Another story finished, another few words added (55 lines)
     From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another story finished, another few words added (39 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>

6. Antipassives
   • Antipassives (44 lines)
     From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (70 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (57 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (71 lines)
     From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (62 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (59 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (58 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (62 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Antipassives (52 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

7. Apology: Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot
   • Apology: Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (59 lines)
     From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apology: Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (96 lines)
     From: Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apology: Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (49 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apology: Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (56 lines)
     From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>

8. Books (was:Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common?)
   • Books (was:Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common?) (45 lines)
     From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>

9. Brad Coon?
   • Brad Coon? (39 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brad Coon? (37 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brad Coon? (37 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brad Coon? (53 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brad Coon? (65 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

10. C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (37 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (38 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (54 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (50 lines)
      From: Dr. John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (100 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (42 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (125 lines)
      From: Pablo David Flores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (50 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (48 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (41 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (62 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: C'ali update: Split-S cross-referencing, agentive pivot (48 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>

11. C'ali: antipassivization, "passivization", more on pivot alignment
    • C'ali: antipassivization, "passivization", more on pivot alignment (164 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

12. CHAT (was Re: Curious finding: conlanging beginning)
    • Re: CHAT (was Re: Curious finding: conlanging beginning) (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

13. CHAT : webpage mini-move
    • CHAT : webpage mini-move (30 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

14. CHAT Which world? Which culture?
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (53 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (50 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (40 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (55 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Which world? Which culture? (63 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

15. CHAT: Heads up, ppl (was: Re: help)
    • CHAT: Heads up, ppl (was: Re: help) (76 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

16. Curious finding: conlanging beginning
    • Curious finding: conlanging beginning (45 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Curious finding: conlanging beginning (41 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Curious finding: conlanging beginning (57 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Curious finding: conlanging beginning (57 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

17. Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory?
    • Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (108 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (52 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (138 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (62 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (88 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (84 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (41 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (44 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (47 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (42 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (44 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (41 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (47 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (47 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (116 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (64 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (49 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (65 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (48 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (28 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (44 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (26 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (43 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (63 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

18. Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic
    • Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (46 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (33 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (39 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (45 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (33 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Development of Consemitic Bilabial Emphatic (39 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>

19. Emphatics?
    • Emphatics? (27 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Emphatics? (47 lines)
      From: Julien Eychenne <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Emphatics? (39 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Emphatics? (66 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Emphatics? (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

20. First thoughts on Imperial
    • First thoughts on Imperial (69 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: First thoughts on Imperial (172 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: First thoughts on Imperial (76 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: First thoughts on Imperial (42 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: First thoughts on Imperial (67 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • First thoughts on Imperial (82 lines)
      From: mathias <[log in to unmask]>

21. ghunchee caundz
    • ghunchee caundz (62 lines)
      From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ghunchee caundz (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ghunchee caundz (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ghunchee caundz (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ghunchee caundz (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

22. Going nomail
    • Going nomail (33 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>

23. help
    • help (46 lines)
      From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help (49 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help (54 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help (90 lines)
      From: Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help (29 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help (33 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>

24. Janko Gorenc and conlang numbers
    • Janko Gorenc and conlang numbers (60 lines)
      From: James W <[log in to unmask]>

25. JG's list of conlangs
    • JG's list of conlangs (54 lines)
      From: James W <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: JG's list of conlangs (44 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: JG's list of conlangs (60 lines)
      From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>

26. Linguolabial
    • Re: Linguolabial (35 lines)
      From: Rob Nierse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguolabial (43 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguolabial (38 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguolabial (33 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguolabial (44 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguolabial (35 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>

27. Mapwords
    • Mapwords (43 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (98 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (55 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (48 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (66 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (46 lines)
      From: Ted E. Saratoga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (46 lines)
      From: Ted E. Saratoga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (47 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (58 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mapwords (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

28. Mary, merry, marry
    • Re: Mary, merry, marry (40 lines)
      From: John Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mary, merry, marry (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

29. More on c'juun iinhinny (was: New Wierd Language)
    • More on c'juun iinhinny (was: New Wierd Language) (71 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>

30. Nceutueiti ['gydeS]
    • Nceutueiti ['gydeS] (52 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nceutueiti ['gydeS] (48 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

31. oblique passive
    • oblique passive (61 lines)
      From: mathias <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: oblique passive (56 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: oblique passive (51 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

32. Online Dialect Generator
    • Online Dialect Generator (41 lines)
      From: J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Online Dialect Generator (55 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Online Dialect Generator (73 lines)
      From: J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Online Dialect Generator (59 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Online Dialect Generator (27 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>

33. Orthography Design (Newbie Question)
    • Orthography Design (Newbie Question) (18 lines)
      From: Chad Stroomer <[log in to unmask]>

34. Orthography question for the group.
    • Orthography question for the group. (37 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (44 lines)
      From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (63 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (32 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (46 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (50 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (67 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (46 lines)
      From: michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (23 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (193 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography question for the group. (128 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

35. OT Cuidado, hay llamas (was Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common?
    • Re: OT Cuidado, hay llamas (was Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Cuidado, hay llamas (was Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (37 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>

36. OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial
    • OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (47 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (54 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (40 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (64 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (53 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (48 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (43 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial (35 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

37. OT: Monster Raving Loony (was Re: verbs?)
    • OT: Monster Raving Loony (was Re: verbs?) (61 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Monster Raving Loony (was Re: verbs?) (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

38. OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory?
    • OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (73 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (43 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (79 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (57 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (63 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (68 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (62 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (57 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (71 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (72 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (45 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (56 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (59 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (42 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (64 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (54 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (46 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Definitely Not YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

39. OT: Re: Phonetics (IPA)
    • OT: Re: Phonetics (IPA) (52 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>

40. Palatal Trills, Taps, and Flaps
    • Palatal Trills, Taps, and Flaps (41 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palatal Trills, Taps, and Flaps (57 lines)
      From: Julien Eychenne <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palatal Trills, Taps, and Flaps (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

41. Parts of Speech - how many?
    • Parts of Speech - how many? (47 lines)
      From: Harald Stoiber <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (53 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (77 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (61 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (59 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (55 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (82 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (64 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (38 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (45 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (57 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (113 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (76 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Parts of Speech - how many? (35 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>

42. Phonetics (IPA)
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (59 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (51 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (80 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (36 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (74 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (74 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (105 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (64 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (58 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (62 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (IPA) (57 lines)
      From: Julien Eychenne <[log in to unmask]>

43. Redone my Website
    • Redone my Website (95 lines)
      From: Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]>

44. Silly new conlang (was: Weird New Conlang)
    • Silly new conlang (was: Weird New Conlang) (42 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>

45. Sonority of 'h'?
    • Re: Sonority of 'h'? (93 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sonority of 'h'? (88 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

46. Sound Change Question
    • Sound Change Question (50 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (60 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (72 lines)
      From: mathias <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (73 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (94 lines)
      From: Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (69 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (42 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (63 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (103 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (31 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (26 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (54 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (82 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (42 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change Question (73 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

47. USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ...
    • USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (50 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (47 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (50 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (63 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE : Yet another proof people are weird ... (38 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

48. verbs?
    • verbs? (45 lines)
      From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (67 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (48 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (68 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (58 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (69 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (60 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (53 lines)
      From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (88 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (52 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (50 lines)
      From: Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (67 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (65 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (40 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: verbs? (70 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

49. Website and IPA
    • Website and IPA (117 lines)
      From: Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]>

50. Weekly Vocab 5
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 5 (125 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>

51. Weekly Vocab Fifteenish
    • Weekly Vocab Fifteenish (54 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Weekly Vocab Fifteenish (115 lines)
      From: mathias <[log in to unmask]>

52. Weird New Conlang
    • Weird New Conlang (87 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>

53. Weird New Language - Some Grammar and A Text
    • Weird New Language - Some Grammar and A Text (90 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>

54. What features do P-I-E languages have in common?
    • What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (60 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (70 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (35 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (62 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (38 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (41 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (73 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (57 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (41 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (100 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (43 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (67 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (81 lines)
      From: Elyse Grasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (54 lines)
      From: Elyse Grasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common? (77 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

55. Whisperers' Tongue
    • Whisperers' Tongue (37 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>

56. YAEPT: English phoneme inventory?
    • Re: YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (35 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: English phoneme inventory? (35 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>

57. Yer (was Definitely Not YAEPT; now is YAEPT)
    • Yer (was Definitely Not YAEPT; now is YAEPT) (26 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yer (was Definitely Not YAEPT; now is YAEPT) (46 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

58. Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon"
    • Re: Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (31 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (53 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (55 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (46 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (41 lines)
      From: Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Zireen language typology; introducing "Zircon" (63 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

59. [conlang] Digest Number 2882
    • Re: [conlang] Digest Number 2882 (93 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>