Conlang
Mailing List – September 2003, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
   Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
   OT: Reduplication enquiry
"Breathe one's last" (was:Re: Weekly Vocab 21)
Acute accents over non-vowels
(11 messages)
ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(22 messages)
Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
(5 messages)
Baby animals
(4 messages)
Back again
(17 messages)
Bat Sounds & Phonology
Beek
BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again)
(4 messages)
Cardinals and ordinals
(16 messages)
CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(6 messages)
CHAT: illuminati
(2 messages)
CHAT: illuminati (was: Back again)
CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21)
(4 messages)
Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(11 messages)
Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(24 messages)
Ebisedian tidbit of the day...
Essentialist Khangaþyagon?
(2 messages)
Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(11 messages)
Going nomail ...
Gweðes numbers and numbers from other conlangs
information about my web site
Latter-(day) Re: Inflecting Jesus Christ (was: Never violate a universal ...)
Lax counterpart of [&]?
(18 messages)
Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
(5 messages)
Magikimnaz case structure
nameless (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
New "Supplement" to Kash dictionary
numbers systems from conlangs
(7 messages)
One language or two?
(3 messages)
OOPS (was: Cardinals & ordinals)
(2 messages)
OT members' ages (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
(2 messages)
OT: Junk
(46 messages)
OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(15 messages)
OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m Correction!
OT: Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk)
(3 messages)
OT: Reduplication enquiry
(9 messages)
OT: The greetings problem (Re: Never violate a universal unless it seems like a good idea at the time)
Palawa Kani
(4 messages)
Quadruple length o
Simplified/Traditional Hanzi Input
Stribography
(2 messages)
Talarian pronoun system
(2 messages)
THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(32 messages)
to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :))
(3 messages)
Translation (was: Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads)
(2 messages)
Translation opportunity (was: Conorthography aesthetics)
USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry)
(4 messages)
vennish 10/ venezh noonts
vennish 9
VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages
(4 messages)
Weekly Vocab #13
Weekly Vocab 12
Weekly Vocab 14
Weekly Vocab 21
Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(6 messages)
Weekly Vocab 22
Weekly Vocab. 21 in Kash
   Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
Re: Â Â Â Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(106 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   OT: Reduplication enquiry
Re: Â Â Â OT: Reduplication enquiry
(80 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Breathe one's last" (was:Re: Weekly Vocab 21)
"Breathe one's last" (was:Re: Weekly Vocab 21)
(40 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Acute accents over non-vowels
Acute accents over non-vowels
(49 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(72 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(106 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(38 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(50 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(79 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(41 lines)
From:
Phillip Driscoll <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Acute accents over non-vowels
(83 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(61 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(28 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(89 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(29 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(48 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(64 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(48 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(42 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
(57 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
(53 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
(44 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk)
(64 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Baby animals
Baby animals
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Baby animals
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Baby animals
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Baby animals
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back again
Back again
(35 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(37 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(47 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(45 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(47 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(75 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(71 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(72 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bat Sounds & Phonology
Re: Bat Sounds & Phonology
(50 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Beek
Beek
(126 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again)
BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again)
(64 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again)
(43 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again)
(61 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again)
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cardinals and ordinals
Cardinals and ordinals
(39 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(87 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(73 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(55 lines)
From:
Matt Trinsic <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(67 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(99 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(70 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cardinals and ordinals
(55 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(56 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(83 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(146 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(67 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again)
(90 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: illuminati
Re: CHAT: illuminati
(78 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: illuminati
(119 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: illuminati (was: Back again)
Re: CHAT: illuminati (was: Back again)
(80 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21)
CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21)
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21)
(78 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(51 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(40 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(56 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(76 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(57 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(60 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(61 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(76 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(81 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(101 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(65 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(72 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(58 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(70 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(51 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(25 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(85 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(52 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(56 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ebisedian tidbit of the day...
Ebisedian tidbit of the day...
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essentialist Khangaþyagon?
Essentialist Khangaþyagon?
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Khangaþyagon?
(75 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(88 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(106 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(118 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(108 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(115 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(71 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(52 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet
(70 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail ...
Going nomail ...
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gweðes numbers and numbers from other conlangs
Gweðes numbers and numbers from other conlangs
(118 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
information about my web site
information about my web site
(42 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latter-(day) Re: Inflecting Jesus Christ (was: Never violate a universal ...)
Re: Latter-(day) Re: Inflecting Jesus Christ (was: Never violate a universal ...)
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lax counterpart of [&]?
Lax counterpart of [&]?
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(71 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(53 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(69 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(67 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(50 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(86 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(38 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(56 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(74 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?
(38 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
(37 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
(96 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
(145 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit
(84 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Magikimnaz case structure
Magikimnaz case structure
(63 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
nameless (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
Re: nameless (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
(27 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
New "Supplement" to Kash dictionary
New "Supplement" to Kash dictionary
(29 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
numbers systems from conlangs
numbers systems from conlangs
(46 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers systems from conlangs
(78 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers systems from conlangs
(65 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers systems from conlangs
(21 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers systems from conlangs
(212 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers systems from conlangs
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers systems from conlangs
(24 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
One language or two?
Re: One language or two?
(42 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: One language or two?
(95 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: One language or two?
(115 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
OOPS (was: Cardinals & ordinals)
OOPS (was: Cardinals & ordinals)
(36 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OOPS (was: Cardinals & ordinals)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT members' ages (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
Re: OT members' ages (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
(64 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT members' ages (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation)
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Junk
OT: Junk
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(35 lines)
From:
Ian Spackman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(60 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(57 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(97 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(84 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(94 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(59 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(45 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(56 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(113 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(39 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(62 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(66 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(80 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(80 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(47 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(61 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(73 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(69 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(62 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(38 lines)
From:
Ian Spackman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(38 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(46 lines)
From:
Phillip Driscoll <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(60 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(69 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m
(35 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m Correction!
Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m Correction!
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
OT: Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
(30 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk)
OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk)
(46 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk)
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk)
(68 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Reduplication enquiry
OT: Reduplication enquiry
(46 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(94 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(94 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry
(29 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: The greetings problem (Re: Never violate a universal unless it seems like a good idea at the time)
Re: OT: The greetings problem (Re: Never violate a universal unless it seems like a good idea at the time)
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Palawa Kani
Re: Palawa Kani
(48 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palawa Kani
(74 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palawa Kani
(33 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palawa Kani
(37 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quadruple length o
Quadruple length o
(50 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Simplified/Traditional Hanzi Input
Re: Simplified/Traditional Hanzi Input
(54 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stribography
Stribography
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stribography
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Talarian pronoun system
Re: Talarian pronoun system
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Talarian pronoun system
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Adpositional Heads
THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(22 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(25 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(50 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(63 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(47 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(37 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(44 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(25 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(30 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(72 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(31 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(33 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(52 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(44 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(70 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(61 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(40 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(42 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(47 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(38 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(38 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads
(96 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :))
Re: to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :))
(59 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :))
(64 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :))
(60 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation (was: Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads)
Translation (was: Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads)
(36 lines)
From:
Rik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation (was: Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads)
(64 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation opportunity (was: Conorthography aesthetics)
Translation opportunity (was: Conorthography aesthetics)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry)
USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry)
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry)
(69 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry)
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry)
(39 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
vennish 10/ venezh noonts
vennish 10/ venezh noonts
(66 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
vennish 9
Re: vennish 9
(35 lines)
From:
Nikhil Sinha <
[log in to unmask]
>
VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages
VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages
(80 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages
(73 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #13
Re: Weekly Vocab #13
(139 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 12
Re: Weekly Vocab 12
(115 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 14
Re: Weekly Vocab 14
(133 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 21
Re: Weekly Vocab 21
(131 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(46 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(45 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(33 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(39 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment)
(51 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 22
Weekly Vocab 22
(50 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab. 21 in Kash
Weekly Vocab. 21 in Kash
(94 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – September 2003, week 2
Conlang Mailing List – September 2003, week 2
