Conlang Mailing List – September 2003, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
• Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]> (20 messages)
• Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]> (12 messages)
• daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
• Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• David Barrow <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• David Peterson <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
• Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
• Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]> (14 messages)
• Harald Stoiber <[log in to unmask]>
• Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
• Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]> (22 messages)
• J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]> (13 messages)
• J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
• janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Joe <[log in to unmask]> (17 messages)
• John Cowan <[log in to unmask]> (20 messages)
• John Cowan <[log in to unmask]> (15 messages)
• Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
• JR <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
• Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]> (11 messages)
• Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>
• michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
• Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]> (17 messages)
• Phillip Driscoll <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]> (16 messages)
• Rik <[log in to unmask]>
• Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
• Robert Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (21 messages)
• Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
• Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• takatunu <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Tim May <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]> (18 messages)

1. <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
   • vennish 10/ venezh noonts (66 lines)
     Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:34:44 EDT

2. Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Weekly Vocab #13 (139 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:42:23 -0700
   • Re: Weekly Vocab 12 (115 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:56:38 -0700
   • Re: Weekly Vocab 14 (133 lines)
     Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:02:06 -0700

3. Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (46 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:46:04 +0200
   • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (50 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:09:06 +0200
   • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (53 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:16:09 +0200
   • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:18:48 +0200
   • Re: Baby animals (61 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:02:57 +0200
   • Re: Back again (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:38:07 +0200
   • Re: Back again (48 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:15:02 +0200
   • Re: Back again (49 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:44:51 +0200
   • Re: Back again (72 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:55:53 +0200
   • Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:26:00 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (33 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:05:14 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (50 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:13:08 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:16:54 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (81 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:26:35 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (50 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:27:48 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (59 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:05:40 +0200
   • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (106 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:07:48 +0200
   • Going nomail ... (35 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:09:42 +0200
   • OT: Junk (33 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:34:41 +0200
   • Re: OT: Junk (38 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:51:29 +0200

4. Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (51 lines)
     Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 03:26:30 -0700
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (25 lines)
     Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 03:28:17 -0700

5. Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: numbers systems from conlangs (65 lines)
     Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:28:46 -0400
   • Re: numbers systems from conlangs (21 lines)
     Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:32:48 -0400
   • Re: numbers systems from conlangs (24 lines)
     Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:16:44 -0400

6. Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (72 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:25:13 -0000
   • Re: Weekly Vocab 21 (131 lines)
     Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:29:18 +0200

7. Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back again (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:13:48 +0200
   • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (49 lines)
     Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:28:57 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (48 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:31:11 +0200
   • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (62 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:16:10 +0200

8. Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (44 lines)
     Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:59:11 -0400
   • Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment) (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:59:33 -0400
   • Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment) (33 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:30:30 -0400
   • Weekly Vocab 22 (50 lines)
     Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:02:56 -0400

9. Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:54:35 -0700
   • Re: Back again (47 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:56:36 -0700
   • Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again) (67 lines)
     Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:53:31 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21) (69 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:14:20 -0700
   • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (56 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 02:25:36 -0700
   • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (60 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:55:17 -0700
   • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (73 lines)
     Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:00:11 -0700
   • Re: Talarian pronoun system (63 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:39:17 -0700
   • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (69 lines)
     Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:36:36 -0700
   • Re: to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :)) (64 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:11:58 -0700
   • VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages (80 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 06:44:55 -0700
   • Re: VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:19:45 -0700

10. daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (35 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:30:48 +0200

11. Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:49:53 +0100
    • Re: Palawa Kani (33 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:11:16 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry) (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:23:06 +0100

12. David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (67 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:35:28 -0500
    • Re: Palawa Kani (74 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 03:09:49 -0500

13. David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re:       Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (106 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:13:57 EDT
    • Re:       OT: Reduplication enquiry (80 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:02:58 EDT

14. Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Beek (126 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:26:35 -0400

15. Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:30:30 -0600
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (64 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:29:45 -0600
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (65 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:23:04 -0600
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (51 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:53:19 -0600
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (50 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:39:50 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry) (69 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:32:51 -0600

16. Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:49:59 EDT
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:55:41 EDT
    • Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit (96 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:59:47 EDT

17. Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Junk (84 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:24:16 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:29:24 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (45 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:38:03 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:51:16 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:34:17 -0400

18. Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • OT: Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (30 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:21:40 -0400

19. Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (29 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:21:51 -0700
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (40 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0700
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (55 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:08:29 -0700

20. H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (67 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:38:05 -0400
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (61 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:18:00 -0400
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (51 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:59:30 -0400
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:02:41 -0400
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (56 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:31:24 -0400
    • Ebisedian tidbit of the day... (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:55:52 -0400
    • Re: numbers systems from conlangs (212 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:06:14 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:37:45 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:34:33 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:48:42 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (57 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:26:07 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (62 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:12:50 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (62 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:03:16 -0400
    • Re: Translation (was: Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads) (64 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:26:26 -0400

21. Harald Stoiber <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (28 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:45:02 -0400

22. Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Junk (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:58:27 +0200

23. Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (72 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:37:49 -0400
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (79 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:53:29 -0400
    • Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk) (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:45:13 -0400
    • Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk) (64 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:17:08 -0400
    • Re: Baby animals (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:57:28 -0400
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment) (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:41:14 -0400

24. Ian Spackman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Junk (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:59:08 +0100
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:55:59 +0100

25. Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palawa Kani (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:21:33 +0300
    • Re: Palawa Kani (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:12:34 +0300
    • Re: Simplified/Traditional Hanzi Input (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:53:42 +0300

26. Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
    • "Breathe one's last" (was:Re: Weekly Vocab 21) (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:54:11 -0400
    • Acute accents over non-vowels (49 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:46:32 -0400
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (106 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:48:16 -0400
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:56:28 -0400
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (50 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:49:07 -0400
    • Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk) (57 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:20:24 -0400
    • Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk) (44 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:14:50 -0400
    • Re: BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again) (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:28:22 -0400
    • Cardinals and ordinals (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:47:07 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (71 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:47:53 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (86 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:13:00 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (56 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:15:59 -0400
    • Re: numbers systems from conlangs (78 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:29:22 -0400
    • Re: One language or two? (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:39:28 -0400
    • Re: One language or two? (95 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:15:40 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:00:27 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (60 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:34:16 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:23:04 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:13:47 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:55:07 -0400
    • Re: to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :)) (59 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:41:18 -0400
    • Re: to translate (was: Re: I'M BACK!!! :)) (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:43:41 -0400

27. J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Back again (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:27:22 EDT
    • Re: Back again (75 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:30:59 EDT
    • Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again) (146 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:23:49 EDT
    • Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again) (90 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:31:26 EDT
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (58 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:24:52 EDT
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (85 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:23:53 EDT
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (52 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:04:14 EDT
    • Re: OT: Junk (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:31:16 EDT
    • Re: OT: Junk (97 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:25:27 EDT
    • Re: OT: Junk (94 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:25:10 EDT
    • Re: OT: Junk (113 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:06:04 EDT
    • Re: OT: Junk (66 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:08:41 EDT
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (69 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 02:08:44 EDT

28. J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bat Sounds & Phonology (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:56:31 -0500

29. janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
    • Gweðes numbers and numbers from other conlangs (118 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 06:14:59 -0700
    • information about my web site (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:42:04 -0700
    • numbers systems from conlangs (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 05:19:21 -0700

30. Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Back again (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:25:21 -0400
    • Re: nameless (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation) (27 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:55:13 -0400

31. Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:43:34 +0100
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:39:40 +0100
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (76 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:42:37 +0100
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (66 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:18:57 +0100
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (76 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:48:40 +0100
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (101 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:17:36 +0100
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (108 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:47:48 +0100
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (115 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:12:51 +0100
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (69 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:17:31 +0100
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (53 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:44:16 +0100
    • Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit (49 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:40:54 +0100
    • Re: OT: Junk (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:47:40 +0100
    • Re: OT: Junk (80 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:06:10 +0100
    • Re: OT: Junk (61 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:17:55 +0100
    • Re: OT: Junk (54 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:05:59 +0100
    • Re: Stribography (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:20:36 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:48:30 +0100

32. John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 01:59:46 -0400
    • Re: Back again (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:43:18 -0400
    • Re: Back again (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:55:03 -0400
    • Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again) (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:23:15 -0400
    • Re: CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21) (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:54:47 -0400
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:38:50 -0400
    • Re: OOPS (was: Cardinals & ordinals) (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:04:02 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:47:58 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:20:58 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (37 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:56:20 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (35 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:57:56 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:13:07 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (51 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 01:26:54 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:02:53 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (40 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:09:17 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (39 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:11:32 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 01:18:58 -0400
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:35:57 -0400
    • Translation opportunity (was: Conorthography aesthetics) (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:21:32 -0400
    • USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry) (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:52:24 -0400

33. John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:54:08 -0400
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:43:21 -0400
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (73 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:27:01 -0400
    • Re: CHAT: illuminati (78 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:22:10 -0400
    • CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21) (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:47:07 -0400
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (57 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:39:26 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:33:39 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:39:36 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:53:03 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:04:12 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (52 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:33:18 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (52 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:50:07 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:38:53 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:14:18 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Butterfly (was: Reduplication enquiry) (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:51:35 -0400

34. Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:55:52 +0100

35. JR <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Long Island conlangcon (was: Weekly Vocab 21) (78 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:10:52 -0400
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment) (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:40:40 -0400
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment) (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:35:20 -0400

36. JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:52:06 -0700
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (87 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:46:07 -0700
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (71 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:28:17 -0700
    • Re: OT: Junk (73 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:25:00 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (63 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:57:21 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (70 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:11:36 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (61 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:16:42 -0700

37. M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:22:23 -0400

38. Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (69 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 15:44:33 -0400
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (69 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:01:26 -0400
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (83 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:25:06 -0400
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:11:16 -0400
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:08:53 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:12:50 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (45 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:27:54 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (74 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:41:16 -0400
    • Re: OT members' ages (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation) (49 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:52:14 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:05:38 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:23:06 -0400

39. Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (55 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:24:24 -0400

40. michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit (84 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:17:15 +0100

41. Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:51:44 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:53:51 -0700

42. Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Baby animals (51 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:32 -0500
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (51 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:12:49 -0500
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (51 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:45:20 -0500
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (94 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:56:31 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:53:04 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:59:48 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:21:35 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (39 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:00:41 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:36:47 -0500

43. Nikhil Sinha <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:48:31 +0530
    • Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit (37 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:46:08 +0530
    • Re: Lithuanian v Hindi/Sanskrit (145 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:01:09 +0530
    • Re: vennish 9 (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:45:35 +0530

44. Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • OT: Reduplication enquiry (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:12:06 +0400
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (29 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:16:30 +0400

45. Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:32:03 +0100
    • Re: Back again (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:51:45 +0100
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:29:22 +0100
    • Essentialist Khangaþyagon? (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:51:25 +0100
    • Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (88 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:59:14 +0100
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:57:28 +0100
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:21:14 +0100
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (70 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:31:32 +0100
    • Re: Latter-(day) Re: Inflecting Jesus Christ (was: Never violate a universal ...) (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:50:19 +0100
    • Lax counterpart of [&]? (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:32:16 +0100
    • Magikimnaz case structure (63 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:47:02 +0100
    • Re: One language or two? (115 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:49:04 +0100
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:41:03 +0100
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (54 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:42:08 +0100
    • Re: OT: The greetings problem (Re: Never violate a universal unless it seems like a good idea at the time) (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:27:32 +0100
    • Stribography (31 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:54:17 +0100
    • Re: VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:17:11 +0100

46. Phillip Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Acute accents over non-vowels (41 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:18:50 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:20:47 -0400

47. Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Back again (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 06:50:19 +0100
    • Re: Back again (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:16:10 +0100
    • Re: Back again (71 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:11:41 +0100
    • BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again) (64 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:34:13 +0100
    • Re: BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again) (61 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:36:51 +0100
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (99 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:02:33 +0100
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (70 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:06:42 +0100
    • CHAT illuminati (was: Back again) (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:17:10 +0100
    • Re: CHAT illuminati (was: Back again) (83 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:28:33 +0100
    • Re: CHAT: illuminati (119 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:36:43 +0100
    • Re: CHAT: illuminati (was: Back again) (80 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:32:10 +0100
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (70 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:28:01 +0100
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (52 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:02:26 +0100
    • Re: Essentialist Khangaþyagon? (75 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:27:51 +0100
    • OOPS (was: Cardinals & ordinals) (36 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:41:56 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (96 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:32:01 +0100

48. Rik <[log in to unmask]>
    • Translation (was: Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads) (36 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:47:49 +0100

49. Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • THEORY: Adpositional Heads (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:45:10 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:36:08 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:06:03 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:11:52 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:09:21 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (30 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:55:34 -0400

50. Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (51 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:36:03 GMT

51. Robert Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (118 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:20:48 -0400

52. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:01:45 -0400
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:28:24 -0400
    • Re: Animal-sound ideophones (was Re: OT: Junk) (57 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:58:53 -0400
    • Baby animals (44 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:44:22 -0400
    • Re: Back again (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:10:05 -0400
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (53 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:58:52 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:13:17 -0400
    • New "Supplement" to Kash dictionary (29 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:44:34 -0400
    • Re: numbers systems from conlangs (58 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:28:29 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (53 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:53:06 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:40:03 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:19:53 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (55 lines)
      Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:06:45 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (73 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:52:27 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:55:29 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (41 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:09:42 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m Correction! (31 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:35:29 -0400
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:27:43 -0400
    • Re: Talarian pronoun system (33 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:50:37 -0400
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 21(comment) (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:59:06 -0400
    • Weekly Vocab. 21 in Kash (94 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:57:35 -0400

53. Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT members' ages (was Re: OBNatlang: German Pronunciation) (64 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:05:28 +0100
    • Re: VIRGINALS! was OT members' ages (73 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:04:58 +0100

54. Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Reduplication enquiry (94 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:19:27 -0700

55. Stone Gordonssen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (89 lines)
      Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:48:28 -0700
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:04:07 -0700

56. takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Quadruple length o (50 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:03:12 +0200
    • THEORY: Adpositional Heads (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:06:08 +0200
    • THEORY: Adpositional Heads (38 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:54:58 +0200

57. Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk) (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:17:33 +0100
    • Re: OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk) (68 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:28:19 +0100

58. Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (31 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:52:47 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (33 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:22:11 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Adpositional Heads (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:56:24 -0700

59. Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:38:52 -0400
    • Re: Back again (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 02:35:09 -0400
    • Re: BrScB syllabic symbols (was: Back again) (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:36:34 -0400
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (38 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:53:48 -0400
    • Re: Cardinals and ordinals (40 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:37:18 -0400
    • Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:52:04 -0400
    • Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ... (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:25:52 -0400
    • Re: Featural code based on the Latin alphabet (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:18:11 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:27:25 -0400
    • Re: Lax counterpart of [&]? (47 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:56:13 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:26:39 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (44 lines)
      Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:36:19 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (80 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 05:32:47 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (72 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 06:40:24 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:03:22 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk (49 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:35:10 -0400
    • Re: OT: Junk/Dim S(ui)m (69 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:00:27 -0400
    • Re: OT: Re: Dim sim (was Re: OT: Junk) (55 lines)
      Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:59:24 -0400