Conlang
Mailing List October 2003, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
¿Puedes oir los tambores, Fernando?
(2 messages)
" Broken English: Deviant Language and the Para-Poetic"
"Ancestor" in IE langs
(2 messages)
"FOUND" SPAM-LANG: uu sdields dhqu eeix rnrj
(2 messages)
<No subject>
A Survey
(17 messages)
Anticausative vs. Middle Voice, also IE Reflexive (Was A Survey)
(3 messages)
Back again
(4 messages)
Back and interesting text
(2 messages)
Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(12 messages)
Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Klingon Dialect Question or similar)
(2 messages)
Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Syracusian Dialect Question or similar)
CHAT: Amsterdam and Germanic woes ...
(2 messages)
CHAT: Anzac biscuits
CHAT: Back in a bit
CHAT: Ballar(r)at
(3 messages)
CHAT: Herodotos et alii
Chinese Dialect Question
(86 messages)
Conlang blogs?
(5 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(6 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 2003 to 5 Oct 2003 (#2003-281)
Conlang-L-isms (was: overlong subject line)
(4 messages)
Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(6 messages)
Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(6 messages)
Flemish "g" (was: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question))
(4 messages)
German and English (was Re: Losing languages ...)
Idea: Joint Conlang Project
Incorporation
Laundry and dishes (was: [T] -> [f])
Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(22 messages)
Natlang Audio
(2 messages)
Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(16 messages)
New language: Tama-i
(6 messages)
NG-NA correlation ...
(4 messages)
Noun case?
(3 messages)
Numbers from conlangs by Adam Walker
oops
OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(7 messages)
OT: Whee! [was Re: New language: Tama-i]
OT: Worcestershire sauce
(51 messages)
poly-rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(3 messages)
Re to All: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Re: [CONLANG] Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(2 messages)
Rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(3 messages)
Rhotics, was Re: Chinese Dialect Question
Seldm numbers
Sentences from "Introduction to Kerla"
(2 messages)
spam about 't0ys fPr w0Den'...
SPAM-CONLANGS Maybe if they laid off the drugs ...
Subject: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Tama-i update
(2 messages)
Thagojian Alphabet
(4 messages)
Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(8 messages)
Thagojian sample text
(2 messages)
Trailing backslash (was: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question))
Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(3 messages)
Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(2 messages)
USAGE/NEOLOGISM: _fuzaqiyin_ & _Klangenfarbengeräusch_
USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(10 messages)
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(7 messages)
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese DialectQuestion)
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(39 messages)
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(2 messages)
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f](formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(3 messages)
USAGE: Washing machines (was: [T] -> [f])
(3 messages)
Weekly Vocab #24 in Kash
Weekly Vocab 21
Weekly Vocab 22
Weekly Vocab 23
(2 messages)
Weekly Vocab 24
Weekly Vocab 25
(3 messages)
Who gets the human languages?
(7 messages)
[f] for [T] (long ago was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(2 messages)
[OT] Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(3 messages)
[OT] Re:Chinese Dialect Question
[T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(2 messages)
[T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(20 messages)
¿Puedes oir los tambores, Fernando?
¿Puedes oir los tambores, Fernando?
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¿Puedes oir los tambores, Fernando?
(45 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
" Broken English: Deviant Language and the Para-Poetic"
" Broken English: Deviant Language and the Para-Poetic"
(45 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Ancestor" in IE langs
"Ancestor" in IE langs
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ancestor" in IE langs
(67 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
"FOUND" SPAM-LANG: uu sdields dhqu eeix rnrj
"FOUND" SPAM-LANG: uu sdields dhqu eeix rnrj
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "FOUND" SPAM-LANG: uu sdields dhqu eeix rnrj
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(38 lines)
From:
Heather Fleming <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Survey
A Survey
(62 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(50 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(167 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(82 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(50 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(128 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(68 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(56 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(94 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(51 lines)
From:
Matt Trinsic <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(80 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Survey
(100 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anticausative vs. Middle Voice, also IE Reflexive (Was A Survey)
Anticausative vs. Middle Voice, also IE Reflexive (Was A Survey)
(141 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anticausative vs. Middle Voice, also IE Reflexive (Was A Survey)
(91 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anticausative vs. Middle Voice, also IE Reflexive (Was A Survey)
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back again
Back again
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(64 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back and interesting text
Back and interesting text
(55 lines)
From:
Gustavo Cabral <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back and interesting text
(62 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(41 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(36 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(83 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(34 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(42 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(67 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(68 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(99 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(31 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bat Sounds/Phonology Redux
(48 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Klingon Dialect Question or similar)
Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Klingon Dialect Question or similar)
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Klingon Dialect Question or similar)
(36 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Syracusian Dialect Question or similar)
Re: Chain Shifting bodoer [T] -> [f] (was: Syracusian Dialect Question or similar)
(66 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Amsterdam and Germanic woes ...
CHAT: Amsterdam and Germanic woes ...
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Amsterdam and Germanic woes ...
(31 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Anzac biscuits
CHAT: Anzac biscuits
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Back in a bit
CHAT: Back in a bit
(37 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Ballar(r)at
CHAT: Ballar(r)at
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Ballar(r)at
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Ballar(r)at
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Herodotos et alii
CHAT: Herodotos et alii
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chinese Dialect Question
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(41 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(110 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(54 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(45 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(63 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(92 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(73 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(69 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(56 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(56 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(67 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(55 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(75 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(68 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(95 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(46 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(36 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(67 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(58 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(37 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(37 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(55 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(63 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(79 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(34 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(73 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(44 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(33 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(62 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(99 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(76 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(64 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(64 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(101 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(63 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(38 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(62 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(40 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(74 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(53 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(37 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(80 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang blogs?
Conlang blogs?
(63 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang blogs?
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang blogs?
(102 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang blogs?
(51 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang blogs?
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(36 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Sep 2003 to 29 Sep 2003 (#2003-275)
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 2003 to 5 Oct 2003 (#2003-281)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 2003 to 5 Oct 2003 (#2003-281)
(124 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang-L-isms (was: overlong subject line)
Re: Conlang-L-isms (was: overlong subject line)
(79 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-L-isms (was: overlong subject line)
(53 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-L-isms (was: overlong subject line)
(70 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-L-isms (was: overlong subject line)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
Re: Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(59 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(77 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(32 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(85 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(87 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish, English _g_ shifts (was Chinese Dialect Question)
(62 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(34 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(37 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(19 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(16 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fixes to the conlang/conculture wiki.
(15 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flemish "g" (was: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question))
Re: Flemish "g" (was: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question))
(62 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flemish "g" (was: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question))
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flemish "g" (was: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question))
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flemish "g" (was: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question))
(70 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
German and English (was Re: Losing languages ...)
Re: German and English (was Re: Losing languages ...)
(87 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Idea: Joint Conlang Project
Re: Idea: Joint Conlang Project
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Incorporation
Incorporation
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Laundry and dishes (was: [T] -> [f])
Laundry and dishes (was: [T] -> [f])
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(80 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(52 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(39 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(30 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(93 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(74 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(66 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(28 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(82 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(50 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(48 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(80 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(70 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Medio-passive (was: A Survey)
(63 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlang Audio
Natlang Audio
(35 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Audio
(38 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(101 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(40 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(165 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(47 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(60 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(53 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(60 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
New language: Tama-i
New language: Tama-i
(257 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New language: Tama-i
(47 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New language: Tama-i
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New language: Tama-i
(123 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New language: Tama-i
(59 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New language: Tama-i
(77 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
NG-NA correlation ...
NG-NA correlation ...
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NG-NA correlation ...
(56 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NG-NA correlation ...
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NG-NA correlation ...
(71 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noun case?
Noun case?
(26 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun case?
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun case?
(27 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numbers from conlangs by Adam Walker
Numbers from conlangs by Adam Walker
(64 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
oops
oops
(32 lines)
From:
Heather Fleming <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(36 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(48 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(34 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(80 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Handedness (was Re: Complex script editor wish list)
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Whee! [was Re: New language: Tama-i]
OT: Whee! [was Re: New language: Tama-i]
(57 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Worcestershire sauce
OT: Worcestershire sauce
(55 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(47 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(90 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(71 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(44 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(36 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(56 lines)
From:
Heather Fleming <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(43 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(38 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
(78 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
poly-rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
poly-rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(101 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: poly-rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: poly-rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(71 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re to All: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
Re to All: Natlang Help: Do you know of a language that...
(29 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Re: Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(61 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [CONLANG] Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Re: Re: [CONLANG] Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(38 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: [CONLANG] Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
Rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(59 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(58 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhotics, was Re: Chinese Dialect Question
Rhotics, was Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(41 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Seldm numbers
Seldm numbers
(48 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sentences from "Introduction to Kerla"
Sentences from "Introduction to Kerla"
(116 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentences from "Introduction to Kerla"
(388 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
spam about 't0ys fPr w0Den'...
spam about 't0ys fPr w0Den'...
(81 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
SPAM-CONLANGS Maybe if they laid off the drugs ...
SPAM-CONLANGS Maybe if they laid off the drugs ...
(82 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subject: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Re: Subject: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(91 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tama-i update
Tama-i update
(146 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tama-i update
(193 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thagojian Alphabet
Thagojian Alphabet
(118 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Alphabet
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Alphabet
(93 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Alphabet
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(73 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(73 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(102 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(48 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(64 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian Cases and Pronouns
(96 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thagojian sample text
Thagojian sample text
(63 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian sample text
(63 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Trailing backslash (was: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question))
Re: Trailing backslash (was: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question))
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(102 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(147 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umberto Eco speaks Volapük!
(50 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE/NEOLOGISM: _fuzaqiyin_ & _Klangenfarbengeräusch_
USAGE/NEOLOGISM: _fuzaqiyin_ & _Klangenfarbengeräusch_
(92 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(72 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(52 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(39 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin alphabet (Re: Chinese Dialect Question)
(101 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(42 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(43 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(56 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(60 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(64 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese DialectQuestion)
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese DialectQuestion)
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(68 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(39 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(39 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(46 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(58 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(53 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(51 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(69 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(41 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(79 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(39 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(58 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(34 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(48 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(57 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly ChineseDialectQuestion)
(69 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f] (formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f](formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f](formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f](formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: Re: [T] -> [f](formerlyChineseDialectQuestion)
(35 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Washing machines (was: [T] -> [f])
USAGE: Washing machines (was: [T] -> [f])
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Washing machines (was: [T] -> [f])
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Washing machines (was: [T] -> [f])
(43 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #24 in Kash
Weekly Vocab #24 in Kash
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 21
Re: Weekly Vocab 21
(120 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 22
Re: Weekly Vocab 22
(116 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 23
Re: Weekly Vocab 23
(38 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 23
(116 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 24
Re: Weekly Vocab 24
(109 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 25
Weekly Vocab 25
(54 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 25
(79 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 25
(126 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Who gets the human languages?
Who gets the human languages?
(66 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who gets the human languages?
(47 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who gets the human languages?
(77 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who gets the human languages?
(39 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who gets the human languages?
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who gets the human languages?
(28 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who gets the human languages?
(52 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
[f] for [T] (long ago was: Chinese Dialect Question)
[f] for [T] (long ago was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [f] for [T] (long ago was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(46 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Re: Chinese Dialect Question
Re: [OT] Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(114 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(86 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Chinese Dialect Question
(157 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Re:Chinese Dialect Question
Re: [OT] Re:Chinese Dialect Question
(100 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
[T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (formerly Chinese Dialect Question)
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
[T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
[T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(90 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(59 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(39 lines)
From:
Stone Gordonssen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(80 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(84 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [T] -> [f] (was: Chinese Dialect Question)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU