Conlang
Mailing List November 2003, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
   Polysemy
(4 messages)
   Re: Language Identification?
(2 messages)
   Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
   Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
(2 messages)
"Language Creation" in your conlang
(6 messages)
Accidental natlang resemblances ...
(2 messages)
Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE
(3 messages)
Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(9 messages)
ANNOUNCE: 9.3rd edition of Essential Explanations
Another place to ask??
(3 messages)
Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(8 messages)
borrowed translation
BrSc (was: CHAT: Religions)
CHAT: Basquetry (was: Etruscana)
CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(19 messages)
CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch))
(4 messages)
congovernment
(5 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
(5 messages)
creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(6 messages)
Developments in Old Starrish
documentary
Ergative and other questions
(20 messages)
Erratum to "Inspiration"
Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(19 messages)
Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)
(2 messages)
Going away for a while
(5 messages)
Good Government (was: ...)
Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming))
(3 messages)
how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(12 messages)
I'm baaaack
(3 messages)
IE and Etruscan (was Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (...))
Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang
(4 messages)
invicem
(9 messages)
Káyasánoda conculture
konlang
Language creation in your conlang
(3 messages)
Language Identification - Continued
(5 messages)
Language Identification?
(18 messages)
Meghean phonemic stress ...
(2 messages)
Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
(5 messages)
Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(13 messages)
ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(8 messages)
Native grammatical terms
(8 messages)
numbers from your conlangs (by Aquamaríne Demon)
numbers from your conlangs (by Clint Jackson Baker)
(2 messages)
OT Re: Fuller Map OT: Shape of the Earth
(2 messages)
OT: Corpses, etc. (was: Re: Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad)))
(2 messages)
OT: Shape of the Earth (was Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visibleplanets))
(2 messages)
OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(10 messages)
Polysemy
(14 messages)
Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(15 messages)
Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(4 messages)
Re: Â Â Â Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
Relative Clauses (was CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets))
SET CONLANG MAIL
some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(13 messages)
Sound change rules for erosion
(23 messages)
Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...))
(3 messages)
TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang))
(3 messages)
TECH: Testing again
(4 messages)
TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(70 messages)
TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(6 messages)
TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4)
(2 messages)
Test message
(3 messages)
The Black Cat is back :)
(2 messages)
Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(4 messages)
Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
(2 messages)
Updating translations (fid -- Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content))
Vling
(2 messages)
WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(12 messages)
Weekly (sic) Vocab 28
(3 messages)
Weekly (sic) vocab. 28
Weekly Vocab 29
(16 messages)
Whistling languages
(3 messages)
YADPT (D=Dutch)
Zompist sound change program bugs? (was Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
   Polysemy
Re: Â Â Â Polysemy
(91 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Polysemy
(44 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Polysemy
(112 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Polysemy
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: Language Identification?
Re: Â Â Â Re: Language Identification?
(104 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Re: Language Identification?
(83 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
Re: Â Â Â Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(172 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
Re: Â Â Â Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
(59 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Language Creation" in your conlang
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
(51 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
(39 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
(32 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Accidental natlang resemblances ...
Accidental natlang resemblances ...
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accidental natlang resemblances ...
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE
Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE
(37 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE
(67 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE
(62 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(79 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(45 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(51 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(59 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04?
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
ANNOUNCE: 9.3rd edition of Essential Explanations
ANNOUNCE: 9.3rd edition of Essential Explanations
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another place to ask??
Another place to ask??
(32 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another place to ask??
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another place to ask??
(32 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(41 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(88 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(143 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(132 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(149 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(121 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(39 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
(136 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
borrowed translation
borrowed translation
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
BrSc (was: CHAT: Religions)
BrSc (was: CHAT: Religions)
(44 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Basquetry (was: Etruscana)
CHAT: Basquetry (was: Etruscana)
(63 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(48 lines)
From:
Heather Fleming <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(75 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(141 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(32 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(56 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(50 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(112 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(82 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(36 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)
(84 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch))
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch))
(74 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch))
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch))
(60 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch))
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
congovernment
congovernment
(58 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: congovernment
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: congovernment
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: congovernment
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: congovernment
(49 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
(59 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
(50 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
(72 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
(75 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
(83 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(61 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(75 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Developments in Old Starrish
Developments in Old Starrish
(54 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
documentary
Re: documentary
(45 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative and other questions
Ergative and other questions
(52 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(89 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(61 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(67 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(110 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(126 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(83 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(61 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative and other questions
(36 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative and other questions
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Erratum to "Inspiration"
Erratum to "Inspiration"
(38 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(66 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(81 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(32 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(136 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(54 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(60 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(97 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(101 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(148 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(139 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(49 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(156 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(39 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(74 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
(51 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)
Re: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)
(72 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)
(125 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going away for a while
Going away for a while
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going away for a while
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going away for a while
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going away for a while
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going away for a while
(38 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Good Government (was: ...)
Re: Good Government (was: ...)
(35 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming))
Re: Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming))
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming))
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming))
(43 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
how many of you can figure out what my message says?
how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(41 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(61 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(46 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(37 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says?
(43 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm baaaack
I'm baaaack
(52 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm baaaack
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm baaaack
(44 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
IE and Etruscan (was Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (...))
IE and Etruscan (was Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (...))
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang
Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang
(53 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang
(94 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
invicem
Re: invicem
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(59 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(68 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(50 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(57 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: invicem
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Káyasánoda conculture
Káyasánoda conculture
(50 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
konlang
konlang
(40 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language creation in your conlang
Re: Language creation in your conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language creation in your conlang
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language creation in your conlang
(38 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Identification - Continued
Language Identification - Continued
(92 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification - Continued
(105 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification - Continued
(112 lines)
From:
Phillip Driscoll <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification - Continued
(48 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification - Continued
(66 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Identification?
Language Identification?
(51 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(65 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(69 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(67 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(32 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(60 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(84 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(46 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(64 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(68 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(85 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(45 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(48 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(39 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Identification?
(81 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Meghean phonemic stress ...
Meghean phonemic stress ...
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meghean phonemic stress ...
(37 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
(55 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
(115 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
(90 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
(46 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes)
(77 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(90 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(58 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(100 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(96 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(65 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(84 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(62 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(69 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(127 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(94 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(62 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(157 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(97 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(64 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(100 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(54 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(56 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Native grammatical terms
Native grammatical terms
(78 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(30 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(63 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(151 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(64 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(79 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Native grammatical terms
(55 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
numbers from your conlangs (by Aquamaríne Demon)
numbers from your conlangs (by Aquamaríne Demon)
(50 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
numbers from your conlangs (by Clint Jackson Baker)
numbers from your conlangs (by Clint Jackson Baker)
(56 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers from your conlangs (by Clint Jackson Baker)
(81 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Re: Fuller Map OT: Shape of the Earth
OT Re: Fuller Map OT: Shape of the Earth
(63 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Re: Fuller Map OT: Shape of the Earth
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Corpses, etc. (was: Re: Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad)))
Re: OT: Corpses, etc. (was: Re: Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad)))
(152 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Corpses, etc. (was: Re: Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad)))
(184 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Shape of the Earth (was Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visibleplanets))
Re: OT: Shape of the Earth (was Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visibleplanets))
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Shape of the Earth (was Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visibleplanets))
(69 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(73 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(60 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(65 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Polysemy
Polysemy
(66 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(59 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(64 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(103 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(49 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(45 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(59 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polysemy
(53 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(48 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(97 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(74 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(58 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(123 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(65 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(108 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(68 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(72 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(66 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(67 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(57 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
Re: Re: Â Â Â Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(51 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relative Clauses (was CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets))
Relative Clauses (was CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets))
(54 lines)
From:
Phillip Driscoll <
[log in to unmask]
>
SET CONLANG MAIL
SET CONLANG MAIL
(22 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(119 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(200 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(300 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(321 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(71 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(145 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(65 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...))
(69 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sound change rules for erosion
Sound change rules for erosion
(36 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(30 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(51 lines)
From:
Heather Fleming <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(98 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(35 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(102 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(104 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(108 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(132 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(56 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(46 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(45 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(45 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(69 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(67 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(128 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(62 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(135 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...))
Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...))
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...))
(93 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...))
(66 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang))
TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang))
(67 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang))
(77 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang))
(72 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Testing again
Re: TECH: Testing again
(76 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again
(80 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again
(63 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(69 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(105 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(78 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(87 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(76 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(61 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(65 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(94 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(94 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(61 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(100 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(56 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(46 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(62 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(54 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(49 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(69 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(78 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(65 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(62 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(100 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(100 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(67 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4)
TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4)
(72 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4)
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Test message
Test message
(26 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test message
(25 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test message
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Black Cat is back :)
The Black Cat is back :)
(34 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Black Cat is back :)
(40 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tone/Pitch Accent Question
Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(107 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(69 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(79 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question
(64 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
(81 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content)
(36 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Updating translations (fid -- Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content))
Updating translations (fid -- Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content))
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vling
Vling
(46 lines)
From:
Viktoro Medrano <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vling
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(51 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(52 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(142 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(80 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(99 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(100 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(65 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(80 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(97 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
(88 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly (sic) Vocab 28
Weekly (sic) Vocab 28
(95 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly (sic) Vocab 28
(106 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly (sic) Vocab 28
(62 lines)
From:
Matt Trinsic <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly (sic) vocab. 28
Weekly (sic) vocab. 28
(93 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 29
Weekly Vocab 29
(46 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(30 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(33 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(69 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(38 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(64 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(72 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29
(112 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whistling languages
Whistling languages
(27 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whistling languages
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whistling languages
(38 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
YADPT (D=Dutch)
Re: YADPT (D=Dutch)
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zompist sound change program bugs? (was Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
Zompist sound change program bugs? (was Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(78 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU