Conlang Mailing List -- November 2003, week 3

Conlang Mailing List – November 2003, week 3

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang (59 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (66 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Relative Clauses (was CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets)) (54 lines)
From: Phillip Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)) (57 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch)) (74 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (48 lines)
From: Heather Fleming <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (79 lines)
From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
The Black Cat is back :) (34 lines)
From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (45 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (58 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Shape of the Earth (was Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visibleplanets)) (42 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (75 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (46 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (40 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (57 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)) (39 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch)) (48 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: YADPT (D=Dutch) (55 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (54 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (44 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (50 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (60 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (59 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Good Government (was: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming)) (43 lines)
From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch)) (60 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (45 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Good Government (was: ...) (35 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (119 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Visigoths (was: YADPT (D=Dutch)) (44 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...)) (53 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (141 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Meghean phonemic stress ... (48 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (68 lines)
From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (32 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (200 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (54 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (41 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (54 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (300 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (56 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Meghean phonemic stress ... (37 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (50 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...)) (93 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (73 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language creation in your conlang (34 lines)
From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language creation in your conlang (40 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
BrSc (was: CHAT: Religions) (44 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (45 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (61 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (51 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Language Identification? (51 lines)
From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (321 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The Black Cat is back :) (40 lines)
From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (65 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Re: Language Identification? (104 lines)
From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang (51 lines)
From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (69 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: creating words (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (75 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Re: Language Identification? (83 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (67 lines)
From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (32 lines)
From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (50 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (59 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (57 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (45 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Corpses, etc. (was: Re: Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad))) (152 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (60 lines)
From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Shape of the Earth (was Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visibleplanets)) (69 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Suprafixes (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (...)) (66 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (38 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (46 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language creation in your conlang (38 lines)
From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang (39 lines)
From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (84 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (46 lines)
From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang (32 lines)
From: Eddy Ohlms <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (54 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (71 lines)
From: Richard Wordingham <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (37 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (61 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang (41 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (53 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (61 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (145 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (58 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (42 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: documentary (45 lines)
From: michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
Polysemy (66 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (51 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
IE and Etruscan (was Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (...)) (47 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (44 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
OT Re: Fuller Map OT: Shape of the Earth (63 lines)
From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (63 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (43 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming) (72 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (46 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (50 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: invicem (50 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (112 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Amsterdam Conlangcon '04? (52 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT Re: Fuller Map OT: Shape of the Earth (44 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (91 lines)
From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (82 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (44 lines)
From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Evolution of governments (was: Consistency in naming) (125 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (65 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (58 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (64 lines)
From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (60 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (52 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (68 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Corpses, etc. (was: Re: Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad))) (184 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (36 lines)
From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (85 lines)
From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang (67 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly Vocab 29 (46 lines)
From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (46 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (37 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (50 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (30 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Religions (was: Visible planets) (84 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (69 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (66 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (60 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (62 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Whistling languages (27 lines)
From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (57 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (105 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Test message (26 lines)
From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (59 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: some Proto-Quendic grammar (was Re: creating words (...)) (69 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (78 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (87 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Whistling languages (37 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (58 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Test message (25 lines)
From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Test message (34 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Whistling languages (38 lines)
From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (50 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly (sic) Vocab 28 (95 lines)
From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes) (55 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (66 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (76 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (45 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (50 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (81 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (33 lines)
From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (45 lines)
From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (48 lines)
From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Language Identification - Continued (92 lines)
From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (69 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (60 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification - Continued (105 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (36 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (39 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (68 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (61 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (54 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (55 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (45 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (32 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (45 lines)
From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (38 lines)
From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (65 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (66 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (63 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Ergative and other questions (52 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (54 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (61 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (62 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (49 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (57 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (89 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (49 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (61 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (67 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (110 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (126 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Developments in Old Starrish (54 lines)
From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (54 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (52 lines)
From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (43 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (39 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
ANNOUNCE: 9.3rd edition of Essential Explanations (33 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (64 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (112 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (46 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (42 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (81 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (136 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (54 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (64 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes) (115 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification? (81 lines)
From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (54 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (94 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (94 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (72 lines)
From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (61 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (50 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (53 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (58 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (83 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)) (67 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (49 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (66 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (49 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
SET CONLANG MAIL (22 lines)
From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
how many of you can figure out what my message says? (41 lines)
From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (59 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification - Continued (112 lines)
From: Phillip Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (61 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (100 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (47 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (56 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (46 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (63 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (62 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again (76 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification - Continued (48 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (69 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (60 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (97 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (55 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (54 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Tone/Pitch Accent Question (107 lines)
From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (43 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (49 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (58 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (65 lines)
From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question (69 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (51 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (61 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (56 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (48 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (69 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again (62 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (61 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)) (77 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again (80 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Native grammatical terms (78 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question (79 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)) (72 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again (63 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (101 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes) (90 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly (sic) Vocab 28 (106 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question (172 lines)
From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (91 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (74 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly Vocab 29 (112 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Re: Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question (51 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (60 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (148 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Weekly (sic) Vocab 28 (62 lines)
From: Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (30 lines)
From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (53 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang (53 lines)
From: vaksje <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (46 lines)
From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (45 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
I'm baaaack (52 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (37 lines)
From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (74 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
konlang (40 lines)
From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang (94 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Erratum to "Inspiration" (38 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (62 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: I'm baaaack (57 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (54 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (53 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (52 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (63 lines)
From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (151 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tone/Pitch Accent Question (64 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (64 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (78 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (41 lines)
From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
Re: I'm baaaack (44 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (88 lines)
From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
K�yas�noda conculture (50 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (53 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (65 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (44 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
borrowed translation (46 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (59 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (62 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes) (46 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (44 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (79 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (143 lines)
From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (58 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Basquetry (was: Etruscana) (63 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (103 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (43 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (48 lines)
From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang (40 lines)
From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Inspiration, from Frankfurter Rundschau manglestrings to miniconlang (52 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (132 lines)
From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
Ergative and other questions (36 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (73 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ergative and other questions (41 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (139 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Mental/psych problems (was: Suprafixes) (77 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (62 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (51 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (149 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (67 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (52 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Sound change rules for erosion (36 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (54 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (142 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (34 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (40 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (57 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Native grammatical terms (55 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (42 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (121 lines)
From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (80 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly (sic) vocab. 28 (93 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (60 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (80 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Going away for a while (58 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Going away for a while (57 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (100 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (55 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (30 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Going away for a while (40 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (99 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (36 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (51 lines)
From: Heather Fleming <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (59 lines)
From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (98 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (157 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Going away for a while (49 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (50 lines)
From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Question on encoding Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (57 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (49 lines)
From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (39 lines)
From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (56 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (52 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (72 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (75 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (35 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (100 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (65 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Going away for a while (38 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Vling (46 lines)
From: Viktoro Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (100 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (39 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (102 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (67 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (104 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (108 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Testing again, some new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang) (66 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (48 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (49 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (132 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (80 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (97 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (51 lines)
From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (55 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (64 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (56 lines)
From: J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (72 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (46 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (51 lines)
From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (45 lines)
From: michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (45 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Accidental natlang resemblances ... (35 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (90 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (69 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (100 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (63 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (97 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (67 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (128 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (74 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (62 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (66 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (50 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (97 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (136 lines)
From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (45 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (156 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Translation Exercise (Adult Content) (81 lines)
From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (58 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content) (59 lines)
From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (39 lines)
From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Vling (52 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Zompist sound change program bugs? (was Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (78 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (57 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (44 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Accidental natlang resemblances ... (45 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (135 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (58 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE (37 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Updating translations (fid -- Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content)) (54 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (100 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (59 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (88 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (54 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content) (36 lines)
From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (47 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language Identification - Continued (66 lines)
From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Translation Exercise (Adult Content) (45 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Another place to ask?? (32 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Another place to ask?? (65 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Another place to ask?? (32 lines)
From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
numbers from your conlangs (by Aquamar�ne Demon) (50 lines)
From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (38 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
numbers from your conlangs (by Clint Jackson Baker) (56 lines)
From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
Re: numbers from your conlangs (by Clint Jackson Baker) (81 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (123 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Polysemy (53 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (56 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (49 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (73 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (96 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (65 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sound change rules for erosion (63 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (57 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (108 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (74 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (60 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (68 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (51 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (58 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (65 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (72 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (65 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (54 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE (67 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alternative sound change program ETYMO.EXE (62 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (47 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: TECH: Dumb Unicode question (55 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (84 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (66 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (62 lines)
From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (44 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (69 lines)
From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
Re: how many of you can figure out what my message says? (43 lines)
From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (56 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
congovernment (58 lines)
From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (127 lines)
From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
Re: congovernment (39 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: congovernment (50 lines)
From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (63 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (64 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: congovernment (33 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: congovernment (49 lines)
From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (50 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (83 lines)
From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (94 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU