Conlang Mailing List – November 2003, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       Arabic (Arabiya)
•       Re: OT: Ads on My Website
• "write him" was Re: More questions (54 messages)
• <No subject>
• A plea
• Ads on My Website
• An ancient conlang rediscovered
• Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question) (5 messages)
• Arabic (Arabiya) (3 messages)
• Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (3 messages)
• Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (9 messages)
• Bahasan. Careton etc.
• basic morphemes of a loglang (10 messages)
• Case question (15 messages)
• CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (10 messages)
• congovernment (10 messages)
• CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (2 messages)
• Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (11 messages)
• Estonian; Hungarian (6 messages)
• Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
• Fwd: Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch"
• Guask numbers
• hawai`i ôlelo/Hawaiian language: grammar - not vocab - is what I seek
• How to include a extra/new dictionary file for MS Word (costum.dic > sitarandelle.dic)
• Janko Gorenc: please read
• Kitchen furniture (was: Re: "write him" was Re: More questions) (3 messages)
• loglang vocab again (15 messages)
• Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions))
• Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (6 messages)
• ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
• ML4 again (was Re: More questions) (4 messages)
• More Microconlanging
• More questions (71 messages)
• my conlang's numbers
• NATLANG: Pre-reformed Russian (was Re: Apologies) (2 messages)
• New Guy
• numbers aint interesting
• Old English--style poetry (2 messages)
• OT Mensans
• OT: Ads on My Website (9 messages)
• OT: Ads on my website
• OT: Ads on My Website (4 messages)
• OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (26 messages)
• Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (4 messages)
• Queranarran description - comments? (7 messages)
• Queranarran texts. (2 messages)
• Question on conlang history (7 messages)
• Re: [CONLANG] More questions
• Survey of conlangs: numbers (13 messages)
• TECH: Testing again (2 messages)
• TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (4 messages)
• test phase 2, please ignore (3 messages)
• test, please ignore
• The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (29 messages)
• Tones (was: loglang vocab again)
• Umlaut (was: More questions) (13 messages)
• Unicode in "plain text" (14 messages)
• Weekly Vocab 30 (3 messages)
• Weekly Vocab 30 in Ancient Føtisk
• Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (7 messages)
• YAEDT (was Re: "write him" (was Re: More questions)) (2 messages)
• Yers (was Re: Apologies) (5 messages)

1.       Arabic (Arabiya)
   • Re:       Arabic (Arabiya) (105 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

2.       Re: OT: Ads on My Website
   • Re:       Re: OT: Ads on My Website (68 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

3. "write him" was Re: More questions
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (74 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (55 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (49 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (46 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (68 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (55 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (63 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (124 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (52 lines)
     From: phild <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (62 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (83 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (71 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (92 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (65 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (50 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (58 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (65 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (41 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (37 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (62 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (56 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (62 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (47 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (54 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (81 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (54 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (64 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (104 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (39 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (52 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (35 lines)
     From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (49 lines)
     From: phild <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (32 lines)
     From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (34 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (49 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (57 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (51 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (127 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (52 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (91 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (44 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (64 lines)
     From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (41 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (66 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (71 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (40 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (50 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (45 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (50 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (68 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

4. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (43 lines)
     From: Heather Fleming <[log in to unmask]>

5. A plea
   • A plea (34 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

6. Ads on My Website
   • Re: Ads on My Website (70 lines)
     From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

7. An ancient conlang rediscovered
   • An ancient conlang rediscovered (93 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

8. Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question)
   • Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question) (54 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question) (76 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question) (56 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question) (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Apologies (was Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question) (42 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

9. Arabic (Arabiya)
   • Arabic (Arabiya) (46 lines)
     From: Akhilesh Pillalamarri <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Arabic (Arabiya) (106 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Arabic (Arabiya) (63 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

10. Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment
    • Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (159 lines)
      From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (88 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Attributive Nominal Forms and Syntax in a lang experiment (108 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

11. Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering
    • Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (40 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (74 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (45 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (50 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (61 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (39 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (40 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (104 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering (109 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

12. Bahasan. Careton etc.
    • Bahasan. Careton etc. (61 lines)
      From: Via_Acadon <[log in to unmask]>

13. basic morphemes of a loglang
    • basic morphemes of a loglang (76 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (55 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (59 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (46 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (112 lines)
      From: fr-chauvet <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (199 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (99 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

14. Case question
    • Case question (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (70 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (75 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (58 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (93 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (71 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Case question (70 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

15. CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment)
    • CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (98 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (39 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (49 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (55 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (57 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (60 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: duumvirate (was: congovernment) (57 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>

16. congovernment
    • Re: congovernment (52 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (67 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (63 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (77 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (37 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (44 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: congovernment (49 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

17. CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325)
    • Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (189 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CONLANG Digest - 17 Nov 2003 to 18 Nov 2003 (#2003-325) (40 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

18. Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch"
    • Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (58 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (62 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (43 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (71 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (79 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (85 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (45 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (54 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

19. Estonian; Hungarian
    • Estonian; Hungarian (61 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (41 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (58 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (57 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

20. Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar)
    • Re: Etruscana (was: some Proto-Quendic grammar) (60 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

21. Fwd: Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch"
    • Fwd: Re: Conlang name in spam subject? "burzeon staoch" (73 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

22. Guask numbers
    • Guask numbers (54 lines)
      From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>

23. hawai`i ôlelo/Hawaiian language: grammar - not vocab - is what I seek
    • hawai`i ôlelo/Hawaiian language: grammar - not vocab - is what I seek (70 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>

24. How to include a extra/new dictionary file for MS Word (costum.dic > sitarandelle.dic)
    • How to include a extra/new dictionary file for MS Word (costum.dic > sitarandelle.dic) (77 lines)
      From: Payrga Laanka <[log in to unmask]>

25. Janko Gorenc: please read
    • Janko Gorenc: please read (81 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>

26. Kitchen furniture (was: Re: "write him" was Re: More questions)
    • Kitchen furniture (was: Re: "write him" was Re: More questions) (46 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kitchen furniture (was: Re: "write him" was Re: More questions) (46 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kitchen furniture (was: Re: "write him" was Re: More questions) (55 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

27. loglang vocab again
    • loglang vocab again (116 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (37 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (52 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (44 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (24 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (54 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (32 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (52 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (35 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: loglang vocab again (51 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

28. Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions))
    • Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions)) (105 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

29. Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (62 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (57 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (64 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (50 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

30. ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)
    • Re: ML4 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.) (70 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

31. ML4 again (was Re: More questions)
    • ML4 again (was Re: More questions) (42 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ML4 again (was Re: More questions) (78 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ML4 again (was Re: More questions) (56 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ML4 again (was Re: More questions) (52 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

32. More Microconlanging
    • More Microconlanging (34 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

33. More questions
    • More questions (155 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (85 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (68 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (124 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (39 lines)
      From: Sam Drost <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (90 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (118 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (39 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (66 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (72 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (87 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (78 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (49 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (61 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (85 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (72 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (59 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (45 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (62 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (110 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (67 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (81 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (61 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (79 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (52 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (32 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (52 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (51 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (72 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (57 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (54 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (66 lines)
      From: Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (52 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (40 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (67 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (116 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (44 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (61 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (73 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (88 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (75 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (49 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (59 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (62 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (81 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (67 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (56 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (57 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (45 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (50 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (45 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (35 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (57 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More questions (62 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

34. my conlang's numbers
    • my conlang's numbers (153 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>

35. NATLANG: Pre-reformed Russian (was Re: Apologies)
    • NATLANG: Pre-reformed Russian (was Re: Apologies) (44 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Pre-reformed Russian (was Re: Apologies) (65 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

36. New Guy
    • New Guy (97 lines)
      From: Caleb Hines <[log in to unmask]>

37. numbers aint interesting
    • numbers aint interesting (56 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>

38. Old English--style poetry
    • Old English--style poetry (26 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old English--style poetry (47 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

39. OT Mensans
    • OT Mensans (27 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

40. OT: Ads on My Website
    • OT: Ads on My Website (70 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (51 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (48 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (41 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (45 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (88 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (99 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (117 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (50 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

41. OT: Ads on my website
    • Re: OT: Ads on my website (110 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>

42. OT: Ads on My Website
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (75 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (52 lines)
      From: dansulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Ads on My Website (46 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

43. OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question
    • OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (37 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (55 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (57 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (72 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (32 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (40 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (43 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (72 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (90 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (73 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (68 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (56 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (75 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (63 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (78 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (78 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (48 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (88 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

44. Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms)
    • Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (63 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (73 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quantity shift (was: Re: Native grammatical terms) (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

45. Queranarran description - comments?
    • Queranarran description - comments? (285 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran description - comments? (41 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran description - comments? (43 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran description - comments? (59 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran description - comments? (55 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran description - comments? (90 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran description - comments? (51 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

46. Queranarran texts.
    • Queranarran texts. (138 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Queranarran texts. (38 lines)
      From: phild <[log in to unmask]>

47. Question on conlang history
    • Question on conlang history (38 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Question on conlang history (68 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Question on conlang history (39 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Question on conlang history (35 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Question on conlang history (63 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Question on conlang history (51 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Question on conlang history (61 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

48. Re: [CONLANG] More questions
    • Re:Re: [CONLANG] More questions (54 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>

49. Survey of conlangs: numbers
    • Survey of conlangs: numbers (104 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (89 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (74 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (71 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (109 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (83 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (49 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (61 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (69 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

50. TECH: Testing again
    • Re: TECH: Testing again (73 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Testing again (85 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

51. TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4)
    • Re: TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (62 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (41 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (70 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode ranges in various fonts (was Re: ML4) (61 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

52. test phase 2, please ignore
    • test phase 2, please ignore (53 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: test phase 2, please ignore (86 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: test phase 2, please ignore (116 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

53. test, please ignore
    • test, please ignore (29 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

54. The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
    • The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (57 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (105 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (130 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (121 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (98 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (63 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (129 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (31 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (70 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (199 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (94 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (56 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (292 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (54 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (94 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (230 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (63 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (50 lines)
      From: phild <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (124 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (136 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (81 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (55 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (160 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (71 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (65 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (77 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (87 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (46 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (66 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>

55. Tones (was: loglang vocab again)
    • Tones (was: loglang vocab again) (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

56. Umlaut (was: More questions)
    • Umlaut (was: More questions) (49 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (58 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (44 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (97 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (38 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (75 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (91 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (69 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (177 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Umlaut (was: More questions) (108 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

57. Unicode in "plain text"
    • Unicode in "plain text" (23 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (53 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (28 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (58 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (57 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (59 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (72 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (45 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (80 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (64 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (44 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (65 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (45 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

58. Weekly Vocab 30
    • Weekly Vocab 30 (48 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 (153 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 (126 lines)
      From: Eddy Ohlms <[log in to unmask]>

59. Weekly Vocab 30 in Ancient Føtisk
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Ancient Føtisk (135 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

60. Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (91 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (54 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (116 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (47 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (38 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab 30 in Kash (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

61. YAEDT (was Re: "write him" (was Re: More questions))
    • YAEDT (was Re: "write him" (was Re: More questions)) (99 lines)
      From: phild <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEDT (was Re: "write him" (was Re: More questions)) (52 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

62. Yers (was Re: Apologies)
    • Yers (was Re: Apologies) (39 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (62 lines)
      From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (51 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (54 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (58 lines)
      From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>