Conlang Mailing List – November 2003, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       New Guy (2 messages)
•       New Guy (2 messages)
•   New Guy (2 messages)
• "Language Creation" graphic up (8 messages)
• "write him" was Re: More questions (4 messages)
• An ancient conlang rediscovered (2 messages)
• anti-Sanskritism and more (3 messages)
• Apologies
• basic morphemes of a loglang (18 messages)
• Britano-Cantonese pidgin (wasRe: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering)
• Despite what you'd think, I mean what I say (was Re: "Language Creation" graphic up)
• Estonian; Hungarian (2 messages)
• Fwd: Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
• Greco-Latin (wasRe: New Guy) (2 messages)
• Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (3 messages)
• Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions))
• Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
• ML4 again (was Re: More questions)
• my conlang is now online
• my conlang: anyone interested? (6 messages)
• my surname (2 messages)
• OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question
• OT: pronunciation question (5 messages)
• Scandinavian languages (was: Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
• Survey of conlangs: numbers
• The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (2 messages)
• The story with which Q began (was Re: The Great Sundering)
• Tolkien-derived conlangs (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
• Unicode in "plain text"
• Unwarranted Erratum
• Yers (was Re: Apologies) (6 messages)
• [[log in to unmask]: Lecture by Dr Steven Pinker online-- "Words and rules: ingredients of language"]

1.       New Guy
   • Re:       New Guy (40 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:03:53 -0600
   • Re:       New Guy (180 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 02:24:42 EST

2.       New Guy
   • Re:       New Guy (44 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:39:58 -0500
   • Re:       New Guy (58 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:02:29 +0100

3.   New Guy
   • Re:   New Guy (55 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:09:20 +0100
   • Re:   New Guy (60 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:03:46 +0100

4. "Language Creation" graphic up
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (57 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:58:04 -0700
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (40 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 04:22:27 -0500
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (45 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:48:10 +0100
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (42 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:12:00 -0500
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (44 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 01:09:01 +0100
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (55 lines)
     From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:29:40 -0800
   • Re: "Language Creation" graphic up (60 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:53:13 +0100
   • "Language Creation" graphic up (53 lines)
     From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:31:23 -0800

5. "write him" was Re: More questions
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (53 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:42:53 -0800
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (56 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:10:58 -0500
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (65 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:56:14 +0000
   • Re: "write him" was Re: More questions (98 lines)
     From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:29:27 +0000

6. An ancient conlang rediscovered
   • Re: An ancient conlang rediscovered (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:37:58 -0800
   • Re: An ancient conlang rediscovered (120 lines)
     From: Clint Jackson BAKER <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:19:12 -0800

7. anti-Sanskritism and more
   • Re: anti-Sanskritism and more (31 lines)
     From: Eddy Ohlms <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:18:27 -0600
   • Re: anti-Sanskritism and more (54 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:53:52 -0700
   • anti-Sanskritism and more (75 lines)
     From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:20:00 -0500

8. Apologies
   • Apologies (23 lines)
     From: Francois Chauvet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:24:37 -0500

9. basic morphemes of a loglang
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (93 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:16:30 -0500
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (63 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:24:05 -0600
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (50 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:22:36 -0500
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (61 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:37:35 -0000
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (63 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:18:15 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (65 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:16:35 +0200
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (66 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:19:32 -0000
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (66 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:57:25 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (58 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:07:28 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (39 lines)
     From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:42:44 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (70 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 07:13:27 +0200
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (42 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:40:37 -0600
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (35 lines)
     From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:51:28 -0800
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (494 lines)
     From: François Chauvet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:10:58 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (302 lines)
     From: fr-chauvet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:51:55 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (302 lines)
     From: fr-chauvet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:36:59 +0100
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (60 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:24:02 +0200
   • Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (44 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:52:16 +0100

10. Britano-Cantonese pidgin (wasRe: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering)
    • Britano-Cantonese pidgin (wasRe: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering) (84 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 02:54:48 EST

11. Despite what you'd think, I mean what I say (was Re: "Language Creation" graphic up)
    • Despite what you'd think, I mean what I say (was Re: "Language Creation" graphic up) (47 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:34:52 -0500

12. Estonian; Hungarian
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (51 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 04:47:34 -0600
    • Re: Estonian; Hungarian (51 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 02:40:54 -0800

13. Fwd: Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
    • Fwd: Re: basic morphemes of a loglang (54 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:03:37 -0500

14. Greco-Latin (wasRe: New Guy)
    • Re: Greco-Latin (wasRe: New Guy) (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:09:59 +0100
    • Greco-Latin (wasRe: New Guy) (77 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 02:55:11 EST

15. Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
    • Re: Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (81 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:40:40 -0500
    • Re: Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (60 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:29:24 -0500
    • Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (71 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:21:47 -0500

16. Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions))
    • Re: Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions)) (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:12:39 +0100

17. Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
    • Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion) (39 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:17:04 +0100

18. ML4 again (was Re: More questions)
    • Re: ML4 again (was Re: More questions) (52 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 10:55:47 +0000

19. my conlang is now online
    • my conlang is now online (69 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:55:13 -0500

20. my conlang: anyone interested?
    • Re: my conlang: anyone interested? (79 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:59:16 -0800
    • Re: my conlang: anyone interested? (44 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 07:44:28 -0500
    • Re: my conlang: anyone interested? (85 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:48:23 +0100
    • Re: my conlang: anyone interested? (94 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:29:23 -0500
    • Re: my conlang: anyone interested? (114 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:09:41 -0800
    • my conlang: anyone interested? (112 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:27:02 -0500

21. my surname
    • Re: my surname (54 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:02:31 -0800
    • my surname (69 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:33:45 -0500

22. OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question
    • Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question (53 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:57:31 +0200

23. OT: pronunciation question
    • Re: OT: pronunciation question (74 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:06:00 +0100
    • OT: pronunciation question (39 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:02:20 +0100
    • Re: OT: pronunciation question (72 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:05:25 -0500
    • Re: OT: pronunciation question (52 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:20:34 +0100
    • OT: pronunciation question (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:26:33 -0500

24. Scandinavian languages (was: Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
    • Scandinavian languages (was: Re: anti-Sanskritism and more) (49 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:38:54 -0500

25. Survey of conlangs: numbers
    • Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers (42 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:27:51 +0000

26. The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (53 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:33:37 +0200
    • Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (35 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:25:46 +0100

27. The story with which Q began (was Re: The Great Sundering)
    • The story with which Q began (was Re: The Great Sundering) (50 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:10:49 +0100

28. Tolkien-derived conlangs (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
    • Tolkien-derived conlangs (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang) (58 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:36:13 +0100

29. Unicode in "plain text"
    • Re: Unicode in "plain text" (63 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:40:42 +0100

30. Unwarranted Erratum
    • Unwarranted Erratum (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:13:39 +0100

31. Yers (was Re: Apologies)
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (58 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:50:03 -0500
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (75 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:30:38 +0200
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (54 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:19:43 -0500
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (55 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:54:46 -0500
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:50:28 -0500
    • Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies) (67 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:01:34 +0200

32. [[log in to unmask]: Lecture by Dr Steven Pinker online-- "Words and rules: ingredients of language"]
    • [[log in to unmask]: Lecture by Dr Steven Pinker online-- "Words and rules: ingredients of language"] (118 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:13:59 -0500