Conlang
Mailing List November 2003, week 5
Sort by
Author
| Date |
Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Re: Â Â Â New Guy
(180 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Britano-Cantonese pidgin (wasRe: Auxlangs in conworlds, was Re: The Great Sundering)
(84 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Greco-Latin (wasRe: New Guy)
(77 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of phonemes (was Re: Umlaut (was: More questions))
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ML4 again (was Re: More questions)
(52 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Survey of conlangs: numbers
(42 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Messy orthography (Re: Sound change rules for erosion)
(39 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Great Sundering (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
(53 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies)
(67 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: pronunciation question
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(302 lines)
From:
fr-chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(302 lines)
From:
fr-chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies)
(55 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(494 lines)
From:
François Chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
Apologies
(23 lines)
From:
Francois Chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
The story with which Q began (was Re: The Great Sundering)
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies)
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: NATLANG: Romanian orthography question
(53 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies)
(75 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(35 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An ancient conlang rediscovered
(120 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
my conlang: anyone interested?
(112 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greco-Latin (wasRe: New Guy)
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Language Creation" graphic up
(53 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(55 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unicode in "plain text"
(63 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(114 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "write him" was Re: More questions
(98 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "write him" was Re: More questions
(65 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "write him" was Re: More questions
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: pronunciation question
(52 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: pronunciation question
(72 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â New Guy
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
my conlang is now online
(69 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(94 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(70 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An ancient conlang rediscovered
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: pronunciation question
(39 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(39 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â New Guy
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: pronunciation question
(74 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Estonian; Hungarian
(51 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Estonian; Hungarian
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(85 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(66 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â New Guy
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(44 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â New Guy
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(66 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unwarranted Erratum
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(65 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(79 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Language Creation" graphic up
(57 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(63 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[
[log in to unmask]
: Lecture by Dr Steven Pinker online-- "Words and rules: ingredients of language"]
(118 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tolkien-derived conlangs (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
(58 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(61 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yers (was Re: Apologies)
(58 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
(71 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "write him" was Re: More questions
(53 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
my surname
(69 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
anti-Sanskritism and more
(75 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Despite what you'd think, I mean what I say (was Re: "Language Creation" graphic up)
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â New Guy
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Katanda/Nasendi (was Re: basic morphemes of a loglang)
(81 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anti-Sanskritism and more
(54 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my surname
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scandinavian languages (was: Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
(49 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(63 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
(93 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anti-Sanskritism and more
(31 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU