Conlang
Mailing List December 2003, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
   allophones again, but English - not French
   mahlab
(2 messages)
   NATLANG: What's the sound of Cast ilian <s>?
   Newbie...intro to my conlang
   Re: Q's abuot trigger again
   tolkien?
 NATLANG: What's the sound of Cast ilian <s>?
"Lojban Dreams": A Lojban Personal Site
(a bit OT) Font software
A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(16 messages)
A technical question about the list
(5 messages)
ACollaborativeConlang again
allophones again, but English - not French
(4 messages)
American (was Re: Cants)
(5 messages)
Andreas' Re to my political postings
(4 messages)
Anyone see this?
(7 messages)
artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(13 messages)
artlang-blindness of linguists (was Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)])
(2 messages)
Arvorec numbers
(2 messages)
Blackboards (was Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read])
(4 messages)
C. Cornomorus, to finish this fight...
Cants
(48 messages)
CHAT reformed Gaelic
(6 messages)
Click consonants
(19 messages)
Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(12 messages)
Conlang paper
(7 messages)
Cornomerus, if you're going to criticize what I've written - and you have a couple good points - I would appreciate more than that
(2 messages)
Ditransitivity
(6 messages)
Early Christmas present from myself
(2 messages)
Eldler English, Andersaxon, etc. were Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
esa emban wa waesa nkhara goshu
(2 messages)
Eulalia numbers
(4 messages)
First Sentence in Piktok
(2 messages)
Glyph Shape Codes - semi-finalized
(4 messages)
Going No Mail
Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(9 messages)
If...then in Ikanirae Seru
(4 messages)
Is the list held?
Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonants)
(2 messages)
Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonats)
late to many Re:'s
mahlab
(3 messages)
Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(8 messages)
mediopassive voice: huh?
(3 messages)
METAFONT source
(2 messages)
Minor webpage update ...
Mormong Concreole Creation
my conlang: anyone interested?
(5 messages)
Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(6 messages)
New conlang?
(4 messages)
New Glyph Maker Program
new vocab from Spam
(2 messages)
newbie again
(2 messages)
Newbie...intro to my conlang
(11 messages)
North Slavic (fi: tolkien?)
(3 messages)
Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(2 messages)
OT (con)sign languages and secret messages
(2 messages)
OT : Latin phrase.
(7 messages)
OT mincemeat (was Re: Cants)
(3 messages)
OT The Universal Englishman was Re: tolkien?
(2 messages)
OT: free.fr
OT: French/English etymology question: "sauf"/"save"
(2 messages)
OT: More Latin
(2 messages)
OT: Re: Emperors
(6 messages)
OT: What color is blond(e)? (was Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
(2 messages)
OT: World: Saddam is caught!?
(3 messages)
Phonotactics?
(5 messages)
Piktok glyphs
(2 messages)
Piktok glyphs & meanings
Piktok Pictogram drawing tool for download
(3 messages)
Please welcome . . .
(32 messages)
Q's about trigger again
Q's abuot trigger again
(6 messages)
Re: Â Â Â Newbie...intro to my conlang
Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(29 messages)
res nata
(11 messages)
Restrictions on conjunction, was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?)
(4 messages)
Slight update on website
Sndatom pro ezaghr
Sound symbolism (was Re: tolkien?)
Speaking of Tolkien...
(3 messages)
Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
(5 messages)
TECH: annoyingness
TESTING - ignore at your peril!
The Curious Adventures of a Sig
Tolkien's notion of biology
(12 messages)
tolkien?
(44 messages)
tonal languages?
(6 messages)
trigger-incorporating language [was Re: Triggeriness ...]
Triggeriness
Triggeriness ...
(51 messages)
Twisted Worldview Colangs?
(2 messages)
Twisted Worldview Co[n]langs
(2 messages)
two conlangs
USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(9 messages)
Verbs & stuff
(9 messages)
visual languages
(2 messages)
Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(10 messages)
Weekly Vocab 30
Weekly vocab 30 in Kash
Weekly Vocab 31
(11 messages)
Welshness & Brithenig (was: reformed Welsh Spelling - comments?)
(2 messages)
What's going on with the list?
(3 messages)
YASPT
(10 messages)
[FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(6 messages)
   allophones again, but English - not French
Re: Â Â Â allophones again, but English - not French
(68 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   mahlab
Re: Â Â Â mahlab
(66 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â mahlab
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   NATLANG: What's the sound of Cast ilian <s>?
Re: Â Â Â NATLANG: What's the sound of Cast ilian <s>?
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Newbie...intro to my conlang
Re: Â Â Â Newbie...intro to my conlang
(107 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: Q's abuot trigger again
Re: Â Â Â Re: Q's abuot trigger again
(123 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   tolkien?
Re: Â Â Â tolkien?
(88 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
 NATLANG: What's the sound of Cast ilian <s>?
Re: Â NATLANG: What's the sound of Cast ilian <s>?
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Lojban Dreams": A Lojban Personal Site
"Lojban Dreams": A Lojban Personal Site
(19 lines)
From:
Viktoro 9 <
[log in to unmask]
>
(a bit OT) Font software
(a bit OT) Font software
(31 lines)
From:
Francois Chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(28 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(31 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(70 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(81 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(170 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(207 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(19 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(60 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(19 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
A technical question about the list
A technical question about the list
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A technical question about the list
(48 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A technical question about the list
(49 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A technical question about the list
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A technical question about the list
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
ACollaborativeConlang again
ACollaborativeConlang again
(26 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
allophones again, but English - not French
allophones again, but English - not French
(57 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allophones again, but English - not French
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allophones again, but English - not French
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allophones again, but English - not French
(52 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
American (was Re: Cants)
American (was Re: Cants)
(26 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American (was Re: Cants)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American (was Re: Cants)
(17 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American (was Re: Cants)
(62 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American (was Re: Cants)
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Andreas' Re to my political postings
Re: Andreas' Re to my political postings
(89 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Andreas' Re to my political postings
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Andreas' Re to my political postings
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Andreas' Re to my political postings
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anyone see this?
Anyone see this?
(42 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone see this?
(17 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone see this?
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone see this?
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone see this?
(16 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone see this?
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone see this?
(73 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(112 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(100 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(108 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(51 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(86 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(86 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(70 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was ...)
(65 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
artlang-blindness of linguists (was Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)])
artlang-blindness of linguists (was Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)])
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang-blindness of linguists (was Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)])
(101 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arvorec numbers
Arvorec numbers
(44 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arvorec numbers
(26 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Blackboards (was Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read])
Re: Blackboards (was Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read])
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blackboards (was Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read])
(55 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blackboards (was Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read])
(68 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blackboards (was Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read])
(20 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
C. Cornomorus, to finish this fight...
C. Cornomorus, to finish this fight...
(139 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cants
Cants
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(68 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(19 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(84 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(54 lines)
From:
dansulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(71 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(74 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Cants
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(94 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(83 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(50 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(20 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(26 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(62 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(19 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(28 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(34 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(30 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(34 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(56 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(27 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(52 lines)
From:
Greg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(55 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(74 lines)
From:
Greg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(62 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(70 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(35 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(50 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cants
(103 lines)
From:
Robert Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT reformed Gaelic
Re: CHAT reformed Gaelic
(99 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT reformed Gaelic
(89 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT reformed Gaelic
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT reformed Gaelic
(89 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT reformed Gaelic
(41 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT reformed Gaelic
(54 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Click consonants
Re: Click consonants
(40 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(22 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(38 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(62 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(33 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(59 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(60 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(41 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(66 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(61 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Click consonants
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(92 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(158 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(41 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(65 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(38 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Common Orcish Article (Long) - was Re: tolkien?
(34 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang paper
Conlang paper
(265 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang paper
(59 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang paper
(54 lines)
From:
James W <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang paper
(367 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang paper
(17 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang paper
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang paper
(33 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cornomerus, if you're going to criticize what I've written - and you have a couple good points - I would appreciate more than that
Cornomerus, if you're going to criticize what I've written - and you have a couple good points - I would appreciate more than that
(142 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cornomerus, if you're going to criticize what I've written - and you have a couple good points - I would appreciate more than that
(73 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ditransitivity
Ditransitivity
(31 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity
(45 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity
(85 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity
(66 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Early Christmas present from myself
Early Christmas present from myself
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Early Christmas present from myself
(45 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eldler English, Andersaxon, etc. were Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
Eldler English, Andersaxon, etc. were Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
esa emban wa waesa nkhara goshu
Re: esa emban wa waesa nkhara goshu
(143 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: esa emban wa waesa nkhara goshu
(82 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eulalia numbers
Eulalia numbers
(68 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eulalia numbers
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eulalia numbers
(76 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eulalia numbers
(91 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Sentence in Piktok
Re: First Sentence in Piktok
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Sentence in Piktok
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Glyph Shape Codes - semi-finalized
Glyph Shape Codes - semi-finalized
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glyph Shape Codes - semi-finalized
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glyph Shape Codes - semi-finalized
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glyph Shape Codes - semi-finalized
(18 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going No Mail
Going No Mail
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(128 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(45 lines)
From:
LuÃs Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(74 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(66 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(135 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(64 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(35 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
If...then in Ikanirae Seru
If...then in Ikanirae Seru
(57 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If...then in Ikanirae Seru
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If...then in Ikanirae Seru
(99 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If...then in Ikanirae Seru
(55 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is the list held?
Is the list held?
(43 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonants)
Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonants)
(58 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonants)
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonats)
Re: Labiovelar stops (Re: Click consonats)
(71 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
late to many Re:'s
Re: late to many Re:'s
(127 lines)
From:
Francois Chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
mahlab
mahlab
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mahlab
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mahlab
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Meanings for Piktok gylphs
Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(30 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(67 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(73 lines)
From:
makeenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Meanings for Piktok gylphs
(15 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
mediopassive voice: huh?
mediopassive voice: huh?
(56 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mediopassive voice: huh?
(53 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mediopassive voice: huh?
(71 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
METAFONT source
METAFONT source
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: METAFONT source
(65 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Minor webpage update ...
Minor webpage update ...
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mormong Concreole Creation
Mormong Concreole Creation
(58 lines)
From:
Daniel D Hicken <
[log in to unmask]
>
my conlang: anyone interested?
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(78 lines)
From:
dansulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(42 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(59 lines)
From:
dansulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(67 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my conlang: anyone interested?
(78 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(44 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
New conlang?
Re: New conlang?
(75 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang?
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang?
(42 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang?
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Glyph Maker Program
New Glyph Maker Program
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
new vocab from Spam
new vocab from Spam
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new vocab from Spam
(43 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
newbie again
newbie again
(42 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: newbie again
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Newbie...intro to my conlang
Newbie...intro to my conlang
(41 lines)
From:
Beau Didler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(50 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(33 lines)
From:
Beau Didler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Beau Didler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(36 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(60 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie...intro to my conlang
(71 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
North Slavic (fi: tolkien?)
Re: North Slavic (fi: tolkien?)
(38 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: North Slavic (fi: tolkien?)
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: North Slavic (fi: tolkien?)
(67 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(73 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(65 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT (con)sign languages and secret messages
OT (con)sign languages and secret messages
(55 lines)
From:
Sam Drost <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (con)sign languages and secret messages
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT : Latin phrase.
OT : Latin phrase.
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT : Latin phrase.
(32 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT : Latin phrase.
(50 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT : Latin phrase.
(25 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT : Latin phrase.
(67 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT : Latin phrase.
(29 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT : Latin phrase.
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT mincemeat (was Re: Cants)
Re: OT mincemeat (was Re: Cants)
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT mincemeat (was Re: Cants)
(22 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT mincemeat (was Re: Cants)
(50 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT The Universal Englishman was Re: tolkien?
OT The Universal Englishman was Re: tolkien?
(90 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT The Universal Englishman was Re: tolkien?
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: free.fr
OT: free.fr
(72 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: French/English etymology question: "sauf"/"save"
Re: OT: French/English etymology question: "sauf"/"save"
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: French/English etymology question: "sauf"/"save"
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: More Latin
OT: More Latin
(28 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: More Latin
(16 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Emperors
OT: Re: Emperors
(40 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Emperors
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Emperors
(30 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Emperors
(54 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Emperors
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Emperors
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: What color is blond(e)? (was Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
Re: OT: What color is blond(e)? (was Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: What color is blond(e)? (was Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
(63 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: World: Saddam is caught!?
OT: World: Saddam is caught!?
(225 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: World: Saddam is caught!?
(85 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: World: Saddam is caught!?
(36 lines)
From:
Vladimir Vysotsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonotactics?
Re: Phonotactics?
(62 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics?
(64 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics?
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics?
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics?
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piktok glyphs
Piktok glyphs
(33 lines)
From:
Francois Chauvet <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piktok glyphs
(18 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piktok glyphs & meanings
Re: Piktok glyphs & meanings
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piktok Pictogram drawing tool for download
Re: Piktok Pictogram drawing tool for download
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piktok Pictogram drawing tool for download
(16 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piktok Pictogram drawing tool for download
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Please welcome . . .
Please welcome . . .
(34 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(36 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(39 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(32 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(32 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(39 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(47 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(48 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(46 lines)
From:
Phillip Driscoll <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(42 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(75 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(87 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(43 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(76 lines)
From:
dansulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(73 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(50 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Please welcome . . .
(44 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Q's about trigger again
Re: Q's about trigger again
(685 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Q's abuot trigger again
Q's abuot trigger again
(103 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q's abuot trigger again
(58 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q's abuot trigger again
(84 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q's abuot trigger again
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q's abuot trigger again
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q's abuot trigger again
(34 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker @ school <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Newbie...intro to my conlang
Re: Re: Â Â Â Newbie...intro to my conlang
(26 lines)
From:
Beau Didler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(76 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(162 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(23 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(16 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(58 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(37 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(43 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(139 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(51 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(143 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(48 lines)
From:
Greg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(21 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(85 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(66 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(69 lines)
From:
Greg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(84 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(164 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(48 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
res nata
res nata
(38 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(76 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(53 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(85 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(89 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(105 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(57 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(112 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(57 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: res nata
(78 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Restrictions on conjunction, was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
Re: Restrictions on conjunction, was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?)
Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?)
(60 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?)
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?)
(70 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?)
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Slight update on website
Slight update on website
(42 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sndatom pro ezaghr
Sndatom pro ezaghr
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sound symbolism (was Re: tolkien?)
Re: Sound symbolism (was Re: tolkien?)
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Speaking of Tolkien...
Speaking of Tolkien...
(33 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speaking of Tolkien...
(61 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speaking of Tolkien...
(35 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
(36 lines)
From:
Daniel D Hicken <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stunt Linguists (was Newbie)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: annoyingness
TECH: annoyingness
(43 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
TESTING - ignore at your peril!
TESTING - ignore at your peril!
(29 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Curious Adventures of a Sig
Re: The Curious Adventures of a Sig
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tolkien's notion of biology
Tolkien's notion of biology
(44 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(51 lines)
From:
Greg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(63 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(70 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(59 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkien's notion of biology
(103 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
tolkien?
tolkien?
(38 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(83 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(113 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(81 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(38 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(37 lines)
From:
makeenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re:tolkien?
(79 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(43 lines)
From:
James W <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(70 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(196 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(22 lines)
From:
Greg Johnston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(51 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(22 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(42 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(100 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(58 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(69 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(46 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(95 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(65 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(64 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(46 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(66 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(41 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(76 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(71 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(77 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(57 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(38 lines)
From:
Camilla Drefvenborg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(129 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(67 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tolkien?
(92 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
tonal languages?
tonal languages?
(41 lines)
From:
Etak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages?
(87 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages?
(108 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages?
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages?
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages?
(53 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
trigger-incorporating language [was Re: Triggeriness ...]
Re: trigger-incorporating language [was Re: Triggeriness ...]
(39 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Triggeriness
Triggeriness
(78 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Triggeriness ...
Triggeriness ...
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(106 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(111 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(117 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(118 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(79 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(44 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(31 lines)
From:
Viktoro 9 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(43 lines)
From:
Viktoro 9 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(30 lines)
From:
Viktoro 9 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(54 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(49 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(61 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(45 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(69 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(55 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(37 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(74 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(69 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(45 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(81 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(99 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(139 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(46 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(51 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(71 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(46 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(76 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(54 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(80 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(98 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(161 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(122 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(81 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(36 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(114 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(55 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Triggeriness ...
(77 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Twisted Worldview Colangs?
Re: Twisted Worldview Colangs?
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Twisted Worldview Colangs?
(29 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Twisted Worldview Co[n]langs
Re: Twisted Worldview Co[n]langs
(57 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Twisted Worldview Co[n]langs
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
two conlangs
two conlangs
(68 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(81 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(70 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(67 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(56 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: "each other" vs. "each ... the other"
(55 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbs & stuff
Re: Verbs & stuff
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(57 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(54 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(59 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(55 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(49 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs & stuff
(33 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
visual languages
Re: visual languages
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: visual languages
(30 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(138 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(72 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(187 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(69 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(67 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(122 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vjatjackwa (the result of all those sound changes!)
(59 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 30
Re: Weekly Vocab 30
(129 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly vocab 30 in Kash
Weekly vocab 30 in Kash
(99 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 31
Weekly Vocab 31
(49 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(101 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(30 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(41 lines)
From:
paul-bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(117 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(134 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(134 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab 31
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 31
(107 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Welshness & Brithenig (was: reformed Welsh Spelling - comments?)
Re: Welshness & Brithenig (was: reformed Welsh Spelling - comments?)
(128 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welshness & Brithenig (was: reformed Welsh Spelling - comments?)
(83 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
What's going on with the list?
What's going on with the list?
(31 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's going on with the list?
(36 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: What's going on with the list?
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
YASPT
Re: YASPT
(41 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(92 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(65 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASPT
(85 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
[FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(109 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(28 lines)
From:
Beau Didler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [FWD: Artificial Descendants of Latin (New Book)]
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU