Conlang
Mailing List December 2003, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
(5 messages)
'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(12 messages)
(con)langs and linguistics: top 10
<No subject>
Acid paper (was: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
Aknok on Comali for Delibro (was Re: Japanese (was "Borrowing Words"))
(2 messages)
All New Website for Jovian!
Apology
APOLOGY: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
Arabic vocab
Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(14 messages)
Back from Christmas
(5 messages)
bye, conlangers
(2 messages)
case problems
(3 messages)
CHAT : The End of the Internet
CHAT: acid paper
CHAT: pacifism
(4 messages)
Chat: PDF file conversion
Conlangs in the Comics!
Copyrighted Conlangs?
(10 messages)
CORRECTION to METAGRAM + OOP = ABLE a conlang experiment
Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(14 messages)
Ditransitivity
(2 messages)
Extrapolating languages
(2 messages)
free website hosting
(2 messages)
Georgian Language Resources
(2 messages)
Georgian vocab resource - Swadesh 100 Word List and a bit more!
goomeelegoo: nue orthograufi (very small "ruf draaft" sample)
help please - unreadable PDF files
(2 messages)
help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
If they could only keep off the drugs ...
Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(8 messages)
LOTR credit line
(7 messages)
META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(3 messages)
METAGRAM + OOP = ABLE a conlang experiment
Months and Lunar Cycles (was: [CONLANG] META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)))
(4 messages)
My Conlanging History (was: Re: Tolkein?)
(3 messages)
NATLANG: Rumantsch Online!
Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(6 messages)
Nuclear waste warnings (was: Archiving language...)
(4 messages)
Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word
OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(15 messages)
Pictogram problem solved
Poetique
(4 messages)
Quantifiers and negation with unusual grammatical number
(2 messages)
Re: jäätelötötteröt etc.
Recreating English: Request for information.
(2 messages)
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(11 messages)
Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(2 messages)
Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(20 messages)
Season's greetings
(3 messages)
Sell Non stick cookware and Air bed
(2 messages)
Sorry again ...
Stative passive
(7 messages)
story conlang
(7 messages)
Surrogate Weekly Vocab
(2 messages)
Tagalog - reponse to Christophe (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions)
Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS
(3 messages)
Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions)
The 30-Minute Conlang: A Challenge or two
triconsonantal roots
(2 messages)
USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(6 messages)
USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(89 messages)
Voice question
What's your favorite sounding word in any language?
Yoruba
"Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
Re: "Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
(57 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
(61 lines)
From:
R J <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
(61 lines)
From:
Etak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
(85 lines)
From:
Getulio Medeiros <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Writing Transformational Grammars" Book
(89 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(76 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(44 lines)
From:
Elyse M. Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(26 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(70 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(75 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(71 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(78 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'snowstorm vs. blizzard'
(72 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
(con)langs and linguistics: top 10
Re: (con)langs and linguistics: top 10
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Acid paper (was: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
Re: Acid paper (was: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(51 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aknok on Comali for Delibro (was Re: Japanese (was "Borrowing Words"))
Aknok on Comali for Delibro (was Re: Japanese (was "Borrowing Words"))
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aknok on Comali for Delibro (was Re: Japanese (was "Borrowing Words"))
(81 lines)
From:
Jonathan Beagley <
[log in to unmask]
>
All New Website for Jovian!
All New Website for Jovian!
(38 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Apology
Apology
(28 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
APOLOGY: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
APOLOGY: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic vocab
Arabic vocab
(69 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(66 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(81 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(49 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(42 lines)
From:
Vladimir Vysotsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(65 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(49 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(85 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(75 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(71 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archiving language information (was Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(74 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back from Christmas
Back from Christmas
(30 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back from Christmas
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back from Christmas
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back from Christmas
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back from Christmas
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
bye, conlangers
bye, conlangers
(76 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: bye, conlangers
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
case problems
case problems
(82 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case problems
(69 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case problems
(70 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT : The End of the Internet
CHAT : The End of the Internet
(80 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: acid paper
CHAT: acid paper
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: pacifism
Re: CHAT: pacifism
(66 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: pacifism
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: pacifism
(64 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: pacifism
(29 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chat: PDF file conversion
Re: Chat: PDF file conversion
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs in the Comics!
Re: Conlangs in the Comics!
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Copyrighted Conlangs?
Copyrighted Conlangs?
(36 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(107 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(62 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(46 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copyrighted Conlangs?
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
CORRECTION to METAGRAM + OOP = ABLE a conlang experiment
Re: CORRECTION to METAGRAM + OOP = ABLE a conlang experiment
(69 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(69 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(96 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(46 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(66 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(84 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(53 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(105 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(42 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(116 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
(79 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ditransitivity
Re: Ditransitivity
(63 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity
(58 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Extrapolating languages
Re: Extrapolating languages
(58 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Extrapolating languages
(71 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
free website hosting
free website hosting
(70 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: free website hosting
(40 lines)
From:
Aaron Shaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Georgian Language Resources
Re: Georgian Language Resources
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian Language Resources
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Georgian vocab resource - Swadesh 100 Word List and a bit more!
Georgian vocab resource - Swadesh 100 Word List and a bit more!
(62 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
goomeelegoo: nue orthograufi (very small "ruf draaft" sample)
goomeelegoo: nue orthograufi (very small "ruf draaft" sample)
(76 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
help please - unreadable PDF files
help please - unreadable PDF files
(98 lines)
From:
R J <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: help please - unreadable PDF files
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
(70 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
If they could only keep off the drugs ...
If they could only keep off the drugs ...
(61 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(88 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(54 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(31 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(163 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(51 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was an ol Conlang Post: "Borrowing Words")
(84 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
LOTR credit line
LOTR credit line
(39 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(51 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(62 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(152 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages))
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
METAGRAM + OOP = ABLE a conlang experiment
Re: METAGRAM + OOP = ABLE a conlang experiment
(110 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Months and Lunar Cycles (was: [CONLANG] META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)))
Months and Lunar Cycles (was: [CONLANG] META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)))
(102 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Months and Lunar Cycles (was: [CONLANG] META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)))
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Months and Lunar Cycles (was: [CONLANG] META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)))
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Months and Lunar Cycles (was: [CONLANG] META: messages (was: Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)))
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
My Conlanging History (was: Re: Tolkein?)
Re: My Conlanging History (was: Re: Tolkein?)
(62 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Conlanging History (was: Re: Tolkein?)
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Conlanging History (was: Re: Tolkein?)
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Rumantsch Online!
NATLANG: Rumantsch Online!
(32 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(40 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(32 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(64 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nostratic (was Re: Schwebeablaut (was Re: tolkien?))
(59 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nuclear waste warnings (was: Archiving language...)
Re: Nuclear waste warnings (was: Archiving language...)
(66 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nuclear waste warnings (was: Archiving language...)
(98 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nuclear waste warnings (was: Archiving language...)
(57 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nuclear waste warnings (was: Archiving language...)
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word
Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(24 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(84 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(34 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(170 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(76 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(83 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pictogram problem solved
Pictogram problem solved
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poetique
Poetique
(66 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(64 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(58 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(83 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quantifiers and negation with unusual grammatical number
Re: Quantifiers and negation with unusual grammatical number
(115 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quantifiers and negation with unusual grammatical number
(49 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: jäätelötötteröt etc.
Re: Re: jäätelötötteröt etc.
(53 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Recreating English: Request for information.
Recreating English: Request for information.
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recreating English: Request for information.
(68 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(222 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(104 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(167 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(77 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(77 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(40 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(54 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religious Development WAS: Re: OT: Socialism (WAS: Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(167 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(180 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(74 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(96 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(52 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(78 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(57 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(53 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(182 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(69 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(72 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(92 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(53 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(97 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saving endangered langs (was Re: Extrapolating languages)
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Season's greetings
Season's greetings
(37 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Season's greetings
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Season's greetings
(42 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sell Non stick cookware and Air bed
Re: Sell Non stick cookware and Air bed
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sell Non stick cookware and Air bed
(79 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sorry again ...
Sorry again ...
(30 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stative passive
Stative passive
(54 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stative passive
(92 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stative passive
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stative passive
(91 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stative passive
(74 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stative passive
(61 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stative passive
(207 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
story conlang
story conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: story conlang
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: story conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: story conlang
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: story conlang
(96 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: story conlang
(90 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: story conlang
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Surrogate Weekly Vocab
Re: Surrogate Weekly Vocab
(53 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Surrogate Weekly Vocab
(15 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tagalog - reponse to Christophe (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions)
Tagalog - reponse to Christophe (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions)
(249 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS
Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS
(164 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS
(60 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions)
Tagalog - response to takatunu (was Re: Help: Ergative VOS Conjunctions)
(135 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
The 30-Minute Conlang: A Challenge or two
Re: The 30-Minute Conlang: A Challenge or two
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
triconsonantal roots
triconsonantal roots
(69 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: triconsonantal roots
(33 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE : ALOT: the final word
Re: USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(78 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(137 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(103 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(57 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : ALOT: the final word
(95 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(60 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(58 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(84 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(60 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(45 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(84 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(119 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(82 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(89 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(24 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(159 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(72 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(88 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(60 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(39 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(92 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(74 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(72 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(70 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(68 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(42 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(57 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(75 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(51 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(76 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(83 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(56 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(43 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(71 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(53 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(68 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(42 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(56 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Voice question
Voice question
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
What's your favorite sounding word in any language?
Re: What's your favorite sounding word in any language?
(43 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yoruba
Yoruba
(42 lines)
From:
Etak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU