Conlang Mailing List – December 2003, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• (ir)realism (2 messages)
• a Mayan conlang! (2 messages)
• Back from Christmas (2 messages)
• Back; Babel Text
• CHAT : Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line)
• CHAT: Yo-yo Ma (was: LOTR credit line)
• Chomp (Was:Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language)
• Conlangs on TV
• Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
• Edward Kelly a conlanger?
• Latin "should" (12 messages)
• Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (22 messages)
• LOTR credit line (17 messages)
• LOTR credit line redux
• Mapudungun glossary: English translation wanted please (2 messages)
• Mayan langs (2 messages)
• Moirie nawe jar! (2 messages)
• Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word (2 messages)
• OT: Russian in ASCII? (9 messages)
• OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR credit line)
• Poetique (2 messages)
• Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line) (3 messages)
• Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (6 messages)
• Seba wevejo: I'm Back
• Stative passive (4 messages)
• The Dizzy Fox
• triconsonantal roots (2 messages)
• USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et (4 messages)
• Voice question (8 messages)
• Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (7 messages)
• Voynich Manuscript, anyone? (4 messages)
• What will I get for Donatist Christmas? (2 messages)

1. (ir)realism
   • (ir)realism (62 lines)
     From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:57:53 -0500
   • Re: (ir)realism (70 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:06:47 -0800

2. a Mayan conlang!
   • a Mayan conlang! (81 lines)
     From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:02:58 -0500
   • Re: a Mayan conlang! (23 lines)
     From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 23:06:28 -0500

3. Back from Christmas
   • Re: Back from Christmas (54 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:53:49 EST
   • Re: Back from Christmas (55 lines)
     From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:58:28 -0800

4. Back; Babel Text
   • Back; Babel Text (51 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:03:23 EST

5. CHAT : Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line)
   • CHAT : Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line) (66 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:18:56 +0100

6. CHAT: Yo-yo Ma (was: LOTR credit line)
   • CHAT: Yo-yo Ma (was: LOTR credit line) (54 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:36:19 -0500

7. Chomp (Was:Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language)
   • Re: Chomp (Was:Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language) (57 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:37:43 -0800

8. Conlangs on TV
   • Conlangs on TV (87 lines)
     From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:03:04 EST

9. Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang)
   • Re: Decomposed verbs (OOP-ish but applies to any lang) (54 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:53:58 EST

10. Edward Kelly a conlanger?
    • Edward Kelly a conlanger? (49 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:11:01 -0600

11. Latin "should"
    • Latin "should" (57 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:31:00 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (62 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:16:42 -0800
    • Re: Latin "should" (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:46:12 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (37 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:31:34 -0800
    • Re: Latin "should" (32 lines)
      From: Isidora Zamora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:54:48 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (62 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:04:18 -0800
    • Re: Latin "should" (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:27:30 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (62 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:40:24 -0800
    • Re: Latin "should" (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:25:25 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:27:40 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (54 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:48:57 -0500
    • Re: Latin "should" (40 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:41:35 -0800

12. Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
    • Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (20 lines)
      From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:41:12 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (37 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:00:00 -0800
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (29 lines)
      From: Viktor Aozora <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:16:26 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:09:19 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (36 lines)
      From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:39:11 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (104 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:49:24 EST
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (40 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:39:09 -0800
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (48 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:48:02 -0800
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (51 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:12:29 +0000
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (47 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:29:07 +0100
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (31 lines)
      From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:48:28 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (47 lines)
      From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:54:43 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (37 lines)
      From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:30:05 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (40 lines)
      From: Viktor Medrano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:37:05 -0500
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (59 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:40:10 +0100
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (33 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:54:36 +0100
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (50 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 05:36:52 -0800
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (66 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:59:03 -0800
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (55 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:50:29 +0200
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (65 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:50:36 +0200
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (99 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:36:53 EST
    • Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language (172 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:49:39 -0800

13. LOTR credit line
    • Re: LOTR credit line (87 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:54:02 EST
    • Re: LOTR credit line (75 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:59:41 -0800
    • Re: LOTR credit line (99 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:49:29 EST
    • Re: LOTR credit line (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:30:01 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:04:34 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:21:33 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (122 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:17:32 -0800
    • Re: LOTR credit line (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:01:27 -0500
    • Re: LOTR credit line (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:42:20 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (53 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:25:51 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (96 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:15:58 -0800
    • Re: LOTR credit line (190 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:36:58 EST
    • Re: LOTR credit line (108 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:37:03 EST
    • Re: LOTR credit line (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 00:59:42 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 01:13:48 +0100
    • Re: LOTR credit line (73 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:09:17 -0800
    • Re: LOTR credit line (215 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:57:25 -0800

14. LOTR credit line redux
    • LOTR credit line redux (31 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:18:21 -0500

15. Mapudungun glossary: English translation wanted please
    • Mapudungun glossary: English translation wanted please (74 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:01:40 -0500
    • Re: Mapudungun glossary: English translation wanted please (60 lines)
      From: Jonathan Lipps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:13:28 -0800

16. Mayan langs
    • Mayan langs (60 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:23:56 -0500
    • Re: Mayan langs (39 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:58:47 +0000

17. Moirie nawe jar!
    • Moirie nawe jar! (25 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:17:25 -0500
    • Re: Moirie nawe jar! (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:25:22 -0800

18. Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word
    • Re: Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word (63 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:54:21 EST
    • Re: Offence in Usage fuit USAGE : ALOT: the final word (56 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:08:47 -0800

19. OT: Russian in ASCII?
    • OT: Russian in ASCII? (39 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:11:33 +0100
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:04:52 -0500
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (40 lines)
      From: Vladimir Vysotsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:29:37 -0800
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (67 lines)
      From: Alexander Savenkov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:46:04 +0300
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (69 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:37:21 +0200
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:14:47 +0100
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (71 lines)
      From: Alexander Savenkov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:01:08 +0300
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:27:38 -0500
    • Re: OT: Russian in ASCII? (67 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:44:34 +0200

20. OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR credit line)
    • OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR credit line) (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:04:33 -0500

21. Poetique
    • Re: Poetique (80 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:15:00 +0000
    • Re: Poetique (68 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:48:32 -0800

22. Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line)
    • Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line) (44 lines)
      From: Akhilesh Pillalamarri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:30:04 -0800
    • Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:16:33 -0500
    • Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line) (74 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:42:24 -0800

23. Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
    • Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:39:52 -0500
    • Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (47 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 05:26:22 -0800
    • Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:39:11 -0500
    • Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (60 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:06:28 -0800
    • Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 23:39:44 -0500
    • Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics? (58 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:49:30 -0800

24. Seba wevejo: I'm Back
    • Seba wevejo: I'm Back (35 lines)
      From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:33:20 -0500

25. Stative passive
    • Re: Stative passive (70 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:52:39 -0800
    • Re: Stative passive (52 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:47:48 +0100
    • Re: Stative passive (93 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:40:46 +0100
    • Re: Stative passive (68 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:08:16 +0100

26. The Dizzy Fox
    • The Dizzy Fox (168 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:57:55 EST

27. triconsonantal roots
    • Re: triconsonantal roots (41 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:00:43 +0200
    • Re: triconsonantal roots (47 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:46:45 -0700

28. USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et
    • Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et (55 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 02:12:32 -0600
    • Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et (70 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 02:13:17 -0600
    • Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:36:51 -0500
    • Re: USAGE : English past tense and participle in -et (70 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:54:30 EST

29. Voice question
    • Re: Voice question (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:21:19 +0100
    • Re: Voice question (67 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:58:48 +0100
    • Re: Voice question (78 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:23:59 +0100
    • Re: Voice question (66 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:42:12 -0500
    • Re: Voice question (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:20:30 +0100
    • Re: Voice question (40 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:59:30 -0800
    • Re: Voice question (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:45:42 +0100
    • Re: Voice question (51 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:12:09 -0700

30. Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective
    • Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (50 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:53:21 -0800
    • Re: Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (143 lines)
      From: Robert Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:37:32 -0500
    • Re: Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (35 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:32:09 -0500
    • Re: Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (47 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:37:37 -0600
    • Re: Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:32:57 +0100
    • Re: Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (64 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:49:38 EST
    • Re: Voice, Mood, Tense, a minimalist perspective (52 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:07:55 +0200

31. Voynich Manuscript, anyone?
    • Voynich Manuscript, anyone? (39 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 23:01:30 +1300
    • Re: Voynich Manuscript, anyone? (30 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:52:35 -0800
    • Re: Voynich Manuscript, anyone? (34 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:45:09 -0500
    • Re: Voynich Manuscript, anyone? (29 lines)
      From: Caleb Hines <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:45:10 -0600

32. What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
    • What will I get for Donatist Christmas? (47 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:49:43 -0800
    • Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas? (57 lines)
      From: Costentin Cornomorus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:56:14 -0800