Conlang
Mailing List January 2004, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
   Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
   How much data in your conlang nouns?
   polysynthetic conlangs
   Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
   Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language       Creation?)
   Re: First Conlang...? & What Ha ppened?
   Re: First Conlang...? & What Happened?
(2 messages)
   Re: Hawaiian "we"
 Re: CHAT: Chomsky ( Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on L anguage  Creation ?)
¡Feliz Navidad Oriental!
(Not so) New Guy
? ? ? How much data in your conlang nouns?
a Mayan conlang!
(2 messages)
A Prarie Home Conlang
(3 messages)
Agglutination and kinds of affixes [was Re: First Conlang...?]
ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?
(3 messages)
Arabic help?
(6 messages)
Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness
Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(13 messages)
Borg I/we existentialiste
breakin outta tough sentences
Chance resemblances...
(4 messages)
CHAT : Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line)
CHAT: changing msgs to non-html
(3 messages)
CHAT: Chomsky ( Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on L anguage Creation ?)
CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(13 messages)
CHAT: Steven etc. (was: new Klingon spelling)
CHAT: Winamp versions
(5 messages)
CHAT: Winamp versions (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(3 messages)
Conlang born of a boring meeting
consonant clusters...
CORRECTIONS (was Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page)
Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
(2 messages)
Cushitic, South Semitic etc.
(2 messages)
Edward Kelly a conlanger?
(3 messages)
Excuse me, ...?
Extraterrestrial - new conlang found on web
First Conlang...?
(2 messages)
First Conlang...? & What Happened?
(2 messages)
First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(6 messages)
First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandicsentences)
(2 messages)
First Translation in Zanona-ye (Sawelendere)
Flower Poem
FWIW: Sorta kinda almost nearly a conlang
(3 messages)
Gallia/Italia vs. Frantia/Langobardia (fi: new Klingon spelling)
Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(7 messages)
Georgian consonant clusters and syllables (was: Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.)
going nomail
Goodbye, cruel world
graphemes of Piraha~
Happy New Year
(6 messages)
Happy New Year (to some)
(5 messages)
Hawaiian "we"
(3 messages)
help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
(2 messages)
Help with IPA, Gothic
(5 messages)
How much data in your conlang nouns?
(12 messages)
inclimate climes (wasRe: LOTR credit line)
(4 messages)
Info on Nama
insane word/sentence contest
Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(18 messages)
Japanese words in English [was Re: new Klingon spelling]
Kayumanggi (was: LOTR credit line)
Klingon
Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(9 messages)
Klingon grammar
(12 messages)
Kosher fried plantain & rice dish (wasRe: Racial Classification ...& blahblah, etc)
langs
(2 messages)
language paper
(2 messages)
Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(6 messages)
Lilipu: The Bonsai Language:Flower Poem
Looking for a good grammar
(3 messages)
LOTR credit line
(13 messages)
Mephaph : Public BETA
(3 messages)
META: Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but l ong and on-topic :)
(2 messages)
Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but long and on-topic :)
More Winamp 5 ...
Musical conlangs
Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(8 messages)
musical language (was: Re: Poetique)
My crazy conlang
(4 messages)
My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(11 messages)
new Klingon spelling
(106 messages)
Njaama Tone Page Up
OT: code-switching
(23 messages)
OT: code-switching (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(4 messages)
OT: consonant clusters...
OT: long consonant clusters
(10 messages)
OT: Long Consonant Clusters (Berber)
(2 messages)
OT: Mark Rosenfelder's story
(2 messages)
OT: Name Frequencies (WAS: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(2 messages)
OT: newbie
OT: non-decimal arithmetic [was Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language]
(2 messages)
OT: Quechua <runa>
OT: Re: Chance resemblances...
(2 messages)
OT: Re: insane consonant clusters
OT: Re: insane/long consonant clusters
(2 messages)
OT: Re: Japanese "good"
(3 messages)
OT: Re: Japanese +ACI-good+ACI-
(4 messages)
OT: Re: Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
OT: Re: the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
OT: Re:Test, please ignore
OT: Russian in ASCII?
(38 messages)
OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
(5 messages)
OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTRcreditline)
(2 messages)
OT: Shortening Amazon URLs (was Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language)
OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(6 messages)
OT: Test, please ignore
(4 messages)
OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(15 messages)
OT: The Salish sentence (again)
(3 messages)
OT: Turning off HTML
OT: What's wrong with the Conlang archive's search tool?
(2 messages)
OT: Winamp (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(6 messages)
OT:The Salish sentence (again)
(2 messages)
phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
(5 messages)
Pirahã, Piraha~
Poetique
(10 messages)
Poetique ...Viku
polysynthetic (con)langs
polysynthetic conlangs
(8 messages)
PRe: triconsonantal roots
(2 messages)
pronunciation of "conlang"
(11 messages)
Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(13 messages)
Racial Classification & credit line
(21 messages)
Re: ? ? ? How much data in your conlang nouns?
Really bad Hungarian: a tiny lang...
(2 messages)
relative clauses!
(3 messages)
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Tal...
(4 messages)
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(16 messages)
revised language paper - comments etc. welcome!
Romance WE
(6 messages)
Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
(2 messages)
semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(6 messages)
set CONLANG nomail
some insane West Greenlandic sentences
(4 messages)
Some q's
(7 messages)
speech
(2 messages)
Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(13 messages)
Test, please ignore
(4 messages)
the name Keith (was Re: new Klingon spelling)
the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
(2 messages)
The Salish sentence
(2 messages)
The Salish sentence (again)
Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
(5 messages)
Trick sentences was Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
triconsonantal roots
(2 messages)
USAGE: stress in Arabic feminine forms
Voynich Manuscript, anyone?
(2 messages)
What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(19 messages)
Where is everyone?
Writing glottalized consonants in IPA
(4 messages)
Writing glottalized consonants in X-Sampa
(4 messages)
YAEPT: Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(2 messages)
YIPPY! Bibliotheca Alexandrina On Line!!!!
Zaandam conlangcon
Zaandam Conlangcon
Zaandam conlangcon
Zaandam Conlangcon
[Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(7 messages)
[
[log in to unmask]
: Re: Does {teb} appear anywhere in canon?]
   Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
Re: Â Â Â Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
(41 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   How much data in your conlang nouns?
Re: Â Â Â How much data in your conlang nouns?
(80 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   polysynthetic conlangs
Re: Â Â Â polysynthetic conlangs
(169 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
Re: Â Â Â Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(159 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language       Creation?)
Re:    Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language       Creation?)
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: First Conlang...? & What Ha ppened?
Re: Â Â Â Re: First Conlang...? & What Ha ppened?
(91 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: First Conlang...? & What Happened?
Re: Â Â Â Re: First Conlang...? & What Happened?
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Â Â Â Re: First Conlang...? & What Happened?
(73 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
   Re: Hawaiian "we"
Re: Â Â Â Re: Hawaiian "we"
(78 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
 Re: CHAT: Chomsky ( Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on L anguage  Creation ?)
Re:  Re: CHAT: Chomsky ( Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on L anguage  Creation ?)
(70 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
¡Feliz Navidad Oriental!
¡Feliz Navidad Oriental!
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
(Not so) New Guy
(Not so) New Guy
(39 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
? ? ? How much data in your conlang nouns?
Re: ? ? ? How much data in your conlang nouns?
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
a Mayan conlang!
Re: a Mayan conlang!
(91 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Mayan conlang!
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Prarie Home Conlang
A Prarie Home Conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Prarie Home Conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Prarie Home Conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Agglutination and kinds of affixes [was Re: First Conlang...?]
Agglutination and kinds of affixes [was Re: First Conlang...?]
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?
ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?
(76 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?
(92 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?
(76 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic help?
Arabic help?
(48 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic help?
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic help?
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic help?
(58 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic help?
(70 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic help?
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness
Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness
(97 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(52 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(110 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(57 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(27 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(95 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(42 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(66 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(55 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Borg I/we existentialiste
Borg I/we existentialiste
(57 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
breakin outta tough sentences
breakin outta tough sentences
(100 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chance resemblances...
Chance resemblances...
(65 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chance resemblances...
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chance resemblances...
(65 lines)
From:
Morgan Palaeo Associates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chance resemblances...
(38 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT : Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line)
Re: CHAT : Re: Racial Classification (was Re: LOTR credit line)
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: changing msgs to non-html
CHAT: changing msgs to non-html
(65 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: changing msgs to non-html
(33 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: changing msgs to non-html
(76 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chomsky ( Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on L anguage Creation ?)
Re: CHAT: Chomsky ( Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on L anguage Creation ?)
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(76 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(72 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(74 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(95 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(95 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomsky (Was Re: ALERT: Chomsky Giving a Talk on Language Creation?)
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Steven etc. (was: new Klingon spelling)
CHAT: Steven etc. (was: new Klingon spelling)
(50 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Winamp versions
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions
(83 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions
(64 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions
(77 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions
(36 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions
(52 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Winamp versions (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
CHAT: Winamp versions (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(65 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Winamp versions (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang born of a boring meeting
Conlang born of a boring meeting
(127 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
consonant clusters...
consonant clusters...
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
CORRECTIONS (was Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page)
CORRECTIONS (was Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page)
(72 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
(63 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cushitic (was Re: triconsonantal roots)
(38 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cushitic, South Semitic etc.
Cushitic, South Semitic etc.
(70 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cushitic, South Semitic etc.
(99 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Edward Kelly a conlanger?
Re: Edward Kelly a conlanger?
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Edward Kelly a conlanger?
(28 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Edward Kelly a conlanger?
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Excuse me, ...?
Excuse me, ...?
(34 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Extraterrestrial - new conlang found on web
Extraterrestrial - new conlang found on web
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Conlang...?
Re: First Conlang...?
(49 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...?
(20 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Conlang...? & What Happened?
Re: First Conlang...? & What Happened?
(36 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? & What Happened?
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(59 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(72 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(110 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences)
(27 lines)
From:
Viktor Orenji <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandicsentences)
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandicsentences)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Conlang...? (Was Re: some insane West Greenlandicsentences)
(44 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Translation in Zanona-ye (Sawelendere)
First Translation in Zanona-ye (Sawelendere)
(61 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flower Poem
Re: Flower Poem
(66 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
FWIW: Sorta kinda almost nearly a conlang
FWIW: Sorta kinda almost nearly a conlang
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FWIW: Sorta kinda almost nearly a conlang
(66 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FWIW: Sorta kinda almost nearly a conlang
(31 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gallia/Italia vs. Frantia/Langobardia (fi: new Klingon spelling)
Re: Gallia/Italia vs. Frantia/Langobardia (fi: new Klingon spelling)
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(45 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(48 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Georgian consonant clusters and syllables
(34 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Georgian consonant clusters and syllables (was: Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.)
Georgian consonant clusters and syllables (was: Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.)
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
going nomail
going nomail
(31 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Goodbye, cruel world
Goodbye, cruel world
(76 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
graphemes of Piraha~
graphemes of Piraha~
(64 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Happy New Year
Happy New Year
(28 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year
(24 lines)
From:
Viktor Orenji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year
(144 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year
(31 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year
(56 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year
(75 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Happy New Year (to some)
Happy New Year (to some)
(101 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year (to some)
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year (to some)
(49 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year (to some)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy New Year (to some)
(58 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hawaiian "we"
Hawaiian "we"
(66 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian "we"
(55 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian "we"
(44 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
Re: help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
(64 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: help please: creating a Semitic-ish conlang
(42 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help with IPA, Gothic
Help with IPA, Gothic
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel D Hicken <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with IPA, Gothic
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with IPA, Gothic
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with IPA, Gothic
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with IPA, Gothic
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
How much data in your conlang nouns?
How much data in your conlang nouns?
(67 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(143 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(65 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(56 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(135 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(103 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(66 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(74 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(52 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How much data in your conlang nouns?
(52 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
inclimate climes (wasRe: LOTR credit line)
inclimate climes (wasRe: LOTR credit line)
(121 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inclimate climes (wasRe: LOTR credit line)
(106 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inclimate climes (wasRe: LOTR credit line)
(174 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inclimate climes (wasRe: LOTR credit line)
(88 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Info on Nama
Info on Nama
(26 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
insane word/sentence contest
insane word/sentence contest
(63 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(88 lines)
From:
R J <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(38 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(37 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(35 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(38 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(119 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(75 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(69 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(35 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(67 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(29 lines)
From:
Viktor Orenji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese "good", consonant clusters etc.
(42 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Japanese words in English [was Re: new Klingon spelling]
Re: Japanese words in English [was Re: new Klingon spelling]
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kayumanggi (was: LOTR credit line)
Kayumanggi (was: LOTR credit line)
(36 lines)
From:
Viktor Orenji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon
Re: Klingon
(72 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(114 lines)
From:
R J <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(53 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(75 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon and puns (was Re: Klingon grammar)
(99 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon grammar
Klingon grammar
(55 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(36 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(53 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(55 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(68 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(64 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon grammar
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kosher fried plantain & rice dish (wasRe: Racial Classification ...& blahblah, etc)
Kosher fried plantain & rice dish (wasRe: Racial Classification ...& blahblah, etc)
(95 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
langs
langs
(56 lines)
From:
R J <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: langs
(179 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
language paper
language paper
(318 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language paper
(222 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(171 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(82 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(72 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(38 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language
(110 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lilipu: The Bonsai Language:Flower Poem
Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language:Flower Poem
(34 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for a good grammar
Looking for a good grammar
(73 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a good grammar
(86 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a good grammar
(49 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
LOTR credit line
Re: LOTR credit line
(89 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(76 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(91 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(119 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(92 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(98 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LOTR credit line
(47 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mephaph : Public BETA
Mephaph : Public BETA
(135 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mephaph : Public BETA
(43 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mephaph : Public BETA
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
META: Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(33 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but l ong and on-topic :)
Re: Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but l ong and on-topic :)
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but l ong and on-topic :)
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but long and on-topic :)
Modern Føtisk Orthography (is fun, but long and on-topic :)
(250 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
More Winamp 5 ...
More Winamp 5 ...
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Musical conlangs
Re: Musical conlangs
(39 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(96 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(72 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(50 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(43 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(101 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical conlangs (was: Poetique)
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
musical language (was: Re: Poetique)
Re: musical language (was: Re: Poetique)
(63 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
My crazy conlang
My crazy conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My crazy conlang
(87 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My crazy conlang
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
My crazy conlang
(60 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(68 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson BAKER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(72 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(54 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(115 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(74 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(82 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(77 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(71 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My current practise in using Conlang e-mails
(87 lines)
From:
Scott Heath <
[log in to unmask]
>
new Klingon spelling
new Klingon spelling
(85 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(55 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(90 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(101 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(42 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(123 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(33 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(50 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(108 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(70 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(47 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(42 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(40 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(44 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(61 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(61 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(78 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(128 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(42 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(61 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(81 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(67 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(46 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(96 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(34 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(64 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(60 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(45 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(58 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(66 lines)
From:
dansulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(78 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(23 lines)
From:
Viktor Orenji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(48 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: new Klingon spelling
(47 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(43 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(38 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(55 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(50 lines)
From:
P. M. Arktayg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(114 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(74 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(81 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Klingon spelling
(49 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Njaama Tone Page Up
Njaama Tone Page Up
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: code-switching
Re: OT: code-switching
(65 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(77 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(72 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(73 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: code-switching (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
OT: code-switching (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: code-switching (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: consonant clusters...
Re: OT: consonant clusters...
(46 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: long consonant clusters
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(64 lines)
From:
R J <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(62 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(51 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(64 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(36 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: long consonant clusters
(47 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Long Consonant Clusters (Berber)
OT: Long Consonant Clusters (Berber)
(83 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Long Consonant Clusters (Berber)
(68 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Mark Rosenfelder's story
OT: Mark Rosenfelder's story
(63 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Mark Rosenfelder's story
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Name Frequencies (WAS: Re: new Klingon spelling)
OT: Name Frequencies (WAS: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(79 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Name Frequencies (WAS: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: newbie
OT: newbie
(48 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: non-decimal arithmetic [was Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language]
OT: non-decimal arithmetic [was Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language]
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: non-decimal arithmetic [was Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language]
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Quechua <runa>
OT: Quechua <runa>
(64 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Chance resemblances...
OT: Re: Chance resemblances...
(51 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Chance resemblances...
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: insane consonant clusters
OT: Re: insane consonant clusters
(38 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: insane/long consonant clusters
Re: OT: Re: insane/long consonant clusters
(52 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: insane/long consonant clusters
(49 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Japanese "good"
OT: Re: Japanese "good"
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Japanese "good"
(26 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Japanese "good"
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Japanese +ACI-good+ACI-
Re: OT: Re: Japanese +ACI-good+ACI-
(53 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Japanese +ACI-good+ACI-
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Japanese +ACI-good+ACI-
(65 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Japanese +ACI-good+ACI-
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
OT: Re: Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
(51 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
OT: Re: the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re:Test, please ignore
OT: Re:Test, please ignore
(38 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Russian in ASCII?
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(45 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(68 lines)
From:
Alexander Savenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(40 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(63 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(96 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(143 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(42 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(61 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(100 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(76 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(40 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(171 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(68 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(55 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(46 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(43 lines)
From:
Jean-Fran+AOc-ois Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(158 lines)
From:
Alexander Savenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(143 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(71 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(86 lines)
From:
Alexander Savenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(43 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(51 lines)
From:
Alexander Savenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(45 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(55 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?
(67 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
(28 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
(61 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
(38 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTR creditline)
(62 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTRcreditline)
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTRcreditline)
(31 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Science of Race (was Racial Classification was LOTRcreditline)
(74 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Shortening Amazon URLs (was Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language)
OT: Shortening Amazon URLs (was Re: Lilipu: The Bonsai Language)
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Simplified Latin typeface
OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(29 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(68 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(32 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(53 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(39 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Simplified Latin typeface
(71 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Test, please ignore
OT: Test, please ignore
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Test, please ignore
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Test, please ignore
(48 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Test, please ignore
(53 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(173 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(41 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(77 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(113 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(33 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(84 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: The Salish sentence (again)
Re: OT: The Salish sentence (again)
(71 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: The Salish sentence (again)
(40 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: The Salish sentence (again)
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Turning off HTML
OT: Turning off HTML
(36 lines)
From:
Vladimir Vysotsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: What's wrong with the Conlang archive's search tool?
OT: What's wrong with the Conlang archive's search tool?
(72 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: What's wrong with the Conlang archive's search tool?
(56 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Winamp (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
OT: Winamp (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(63 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(45 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(48 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: karaoke (was: Re: new Klingon spelling)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT:The Salish sentence (again)
Re: OT:The Salish sentence (again)
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT:The Salish sentence (again)
(58 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
(53 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
(74 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonological markedness [was Re: Happy New Year (to some)]
(78 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pirahã, Piraha~
Pirahã, Piraha~
(55 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poetique
Re: Poetique
(61 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(65 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(102 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(76 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poetique
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poetique ...Viku
Re: Poetique ...Viku
(40 lines)
From:
Viktor Orenji <
[log in to unmask]
>
polysynthetic (con)langs
polysynthetic (con)langs
(75 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
polysynthetic conlangs
polysynthetic conlangs
(78 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(77 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(39 lines)
From:
Morgan Palaeo Associates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(33 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(57 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: polysynthetic conlangs
(30 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
PRe: triconsonantal roots
PRe: triconsonantal roots
(69 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PRe: triconsonantal roots
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
pronunciation of "conlang"
pronunciation of "conlang"
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(35 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(34 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(43 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(35 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(62 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(56 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
(55 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Racial Classification & credit line
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(177 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(105 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(139 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(118 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(70 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(68 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(78 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(73 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(70 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Racial Classification & credit line
(106 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ? ? ? How much data in your conlang nouns?
Re: Re: ? ? ? How much data in your conlang nouns?
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Really bad Hungarian: a tiny lang...
Really bad Hungarian: a tiny lang...
(161 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really bad Hungarian: a tiny lang...
(52 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative clauses!
relative clauses!
(89 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative clauses!
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative clauses!
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Tal...
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Tal...
(25 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Tal...
(33 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Tal...
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Tal...
(24 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(41 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(48 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(77 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(75 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(67 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(91 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religion and Holidays, were Socialism (WAS: Re: Why Can't We Just Not Talk Politics?
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
revised language paper - comments etc. welcome!
revised language paper - comments etc. welcome!
(284 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romance WE
Romance WE
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance WE
(46 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance WE
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance WE
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance WE
(33 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance WE
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
(33 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ruminations on managing the volume of this list
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(83 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(115 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: the Monkey Year (wasRe: Religion and Holidays)
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
set CONLANG nomail
set CONLANG nomail
(25 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
some insane West Greenlandic sentences
some insane West Greenlandic sentences
(130 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences
(91 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: some insane West Greenlandic sentences
(32 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some q's
Some q's
(68 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some q's
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some q's
(37 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some q's
(64 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some q's
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some q's
(52 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some q's
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
speech
speech
(75 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: speech
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Take my poll on the Conlang Page
Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(43 lines)
From:
Akhilesh Pillalamarri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(83 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(51 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(87 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(80 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Take my poll on the Conlang Page
(74 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Test, please ignore
Test, please ignore
(32 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test, please ignore
(46 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test, please ignore
(34 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test, please ignore
(30 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
the name Keith (was Re: new Klingon spelling)
Re: the name Keith (was Re: new Klingon spelling)
(107 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
(78 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the name Keith (wasRe: new Klingon spelling)
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Salish sentence
The Salish sentence
(86 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Salish sentence
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Salish sentence (again)
The Salish sentence (again)
(74 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
(122 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
(54 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tirelat is essentially a Sangari language
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Trick sentences was Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
Re: Trick sentences was Bi-objective Prepositions & betweeness.
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
triconsonantal roots
Re: triconsonantal roots
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: triconsonantal roots
(30 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: stress in Arabic feminine forms
USAGE: stress in Arabic feminine forms
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Voynich Manuscript, anyone?
Re: Voynich Manuscript, anyone?
(55 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich Manuscript, anyone?
(72 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(73 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(48 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(55 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(105 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(80 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(78 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(80 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(71 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(59 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(49 lines)
From:
Isidora Zamora <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What will I get for Donatist Christmas?
(76 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Where is everyone?
Where is everyone?
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Writing glottalized consonants in IPA
Writing glottalized consonants in IPA
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing glottalized consonants in IPA
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing glottalized consonants in IPA
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing glottalized consonants in IPA
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Writing glottalized consonants in X-Sampa
Writing glottalized consonants in X-Sampa
(62 lines)
From:
Robert Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing glottalized consonants in X-Sampa
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing glottalized consonants in X-Sampa
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing glottalized consonants in X-Sampa
(43 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
YAEPT: Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Re: pronunciation of "conlang"
(33 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
YIPPY! Bibliotheca Alexandrina On Line!!!!
YIPPY! Bibliotheca Alexandrina On Line!!!!
(89 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zaandam conlangcon
Zaandam conlangcon
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zaandam Conlangcon
Re: Zaandam Conlangcon
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zaandam conlangcon
Re: Zaandam conlangcon
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zaandam Conlangcon
Re: Zaandam Conlangcon
(60 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
[Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(40 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(61 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Quite on topic] Why can't www.conlanglinks.tk be displayed?
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
[
[log in to unmask]
: Re: Does {teb} appear anywhere in canon?]
[
[log in to unmask]
: Re: Does {teb} appear anywhere in canon?]
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU