Conlang
Mailing List January 2004, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Miapimoquitch text: E ye Juggler (long)
Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(2 messages)
Re: † † † Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
Translation Exercise
"Each Other"
(20 messages)
"substrate" (was: Q about /c/)
A more systematic approach to language mutation
(3 messages)
A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(28 messages)
A Reference Document
(2 messages)
Again trigger & stuff
(6 messages)
Atlantean
Back again
CB Notation [was: glottals]
(7 messages)
Changing CXS (Was: Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May))
(3 messages)
CHAT Megan (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(3 messages)
CHAT: Holy dread
CHAT: Merhabteen, Trebor! Keef halak? (was Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Microsoft
(5 messages)
CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(8 messages)
CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(11 messages)
Chomsky's notions
(11 messages)
Classical Latin, was Re: Slezan
Count and mass nouns
Czechia (was: OT: Spatial thinking)
Dialects of certain langs
(2 messages)
Ditransitivity (again!)
(23 messages)
Dog Latin
(13 messages)
French <chez>
(15 messages)
French transitivity etc.
(4 messages)
glottals
(21 messages)
Going NOMAIL
Guess work
(2 messages)
Happy (Belated) Chinese New Year!
Interjections
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(27 messages)
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessivemarkers?
(2 messages)
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness inpossessivemarkers?
Khmer
(2 messages)
Learn MUTLAK the secret language of mutants
Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(16 messages)
Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(9 messages)
List held?
Metalanguage query
(5 messages)
Miapimoquitch story "Eye Juggler" in Kash
(2 messages)
Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(4 messages)
Mutant English take two
(4 messages)
mystery phoneme
NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(6 messages)
OT Buenos Aires (was Re: Q about /c/)
(2 messages)
OT-ish Conlang Census
OT-ish Conlang Census (cont.)
(2 messages)
OT-ish: Conlang Census
OT-ish:Conlang Census
(38 messages)
OT-ish:Conlang Census (cont.)
(3 messages)
OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(5 messages)
OT: Chinese (& the Pearl Drink Invasion)
(3 messages)
OT: Jared/Jarrod
OT: Metaphoric language
OT: Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(2 messages)
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(16 messages)
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re: Count and mass nouns)
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re: Count andmass nouns)
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re:Countandmass nouns)
(2 messages)
OT: Street systems (was: Spatial thinking)
(2 messages)
OT: Test, please ignore
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(2 messages)
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(22 messages)
Part 2 Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(3 messages)
please try to decipher my conlang
(2 messages)
Primitives, was Re: Left / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
Q about /c/
(28 messages)
Q- and P- Celtic
(9 messages)
Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(9 messages)
Rihana-ye Babel Text: Rohana-ye grammar
(3 messages)
Russian soft/hard 'l' minimal pairs (was: glottals)
Shaquean syllabary
Shoshoni syllables [was: Re: Vowel Harmony Q]
Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(20 messages)
Slezan
(38 messages)
Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
symbolproject.org Symbolic Characters Collaborative Creation project
(3 messages)
this is a test
Tibetan orthography (was Re: Why my conlangs suck!!!)
(3 messages)
Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(11 messages)
Translation Exercise
(21 messages)
Translation: Trolls and their Management
USAGE: Abugidas
(2 messages)
USAGE: Aryans and Tolkien
USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(7 messages)
USAGE: Vulgate (was: Slezan)
(3 messages)
USAGE: What do you call this sound?
Variety of Pronouns / Number, Gender, etc. (was something else)
Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(16 messages)
Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives (Phase 2)
Vowel Harmony Q
(5 messages)
Weakly vocab
Weakly [sic] vocab
What is a woman ?
(12 messages)
Where is /c/ found? (was Re: Q about /c/
(3 messages)
Why my conlangs SUC K!!!
Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(22 messages)
Workshops Review No.3 '04
(8 messages)
XSAMPA Question
(8 messages)
Miapimoquitch text: E ye Juggler (long)
Re: Miapimoquitch text: E ye Juggler (long)
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
Re: Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(124 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(129 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: † † † Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
Re: Re: † † † Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(126 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
Re: Re: Vowel Harmony Q
(62 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Exercise
Re: Translation Exercise
(67 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Each Other"
Re: "Each Other"
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(67 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(77 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(40 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(44 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(63 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(62 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(26 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(33 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(45 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(68 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(78 lines)
From:
dansulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(56 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(57 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Each Other"
(26 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
"substrate" (was: Q about /c/)
Re: "substrate" (was: Q about /c/)
(42 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
A more systematic approach to language mutation
A more systematic approach to language mutation
(105 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A more systematic approach to language mutation
(49 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A more systematic approach to language mutation
(20 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
A New Conlang For Your Consideration
A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(77 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(15 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(32 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(109 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(72 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(23 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(31 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(33 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(24 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(53 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(72 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(37 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(76 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(85 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(41 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(47 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(48 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(30 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(42 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(56 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(59 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
(33 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Reference Document
A Reference Document
(78 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Reference Document
(105 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Again trigger & stuff
Re: Again trigger & stuff
(95 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Again trigger & stuff
(181 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Again trigger & stuff
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Again trigger & stuff
(62 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Again trigger & stuff
(78 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Again trigger & stuff
(56 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Atlantean
Re: Atlantean
(146 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back again
Back again
(32 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
CB Notation [was: glottals]
CB Notation [was: glottals]
(78 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CB Notation [was: glottals]
(112 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CB Notation [was: glottals]
(92 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CB Notation [was: glottals]
(57 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CB Notation [was: glottals]
(41 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CB Notation [was: glottals]
(37 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CB Notation [was: glottals]
(31 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Changing CXS (Was: Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May))
Changing CXS (Was: Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May))
(67 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Changing CXS (Was: Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May))
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Changing CXS (Was: Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May))
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Megan (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
CHAT Megan (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(51 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Megan (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(48 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT Megan (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(63 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Holy dread
CHAT: Holy dread
(65 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Merhabteen, Trebor! Keef halak? (was Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration)
CHAT: Merhabteen, Trebor! Keef halak? (was Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration)
(73 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Merhabteen, Trebor! Keef halak? (was Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration)
(25 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Microsoft
CHAT: Microsoft
(63 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Microsoft
(94 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Microsoft
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Microsoft
(64 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Microsoft
(80 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(55 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(78 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(59 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: WPs for conlangs [was: CHAT: Microsoft]
(46 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(75 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(83 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(73 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(84 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(146 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: XS vs. Kirshenbaum vs. Who-knows-what
(80 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chomsky's notions
Re: Chomsky's notions
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(54 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(30 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(90 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(42 lines)
From:
Steve Cooney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(54 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(72 lines)
From:
Steve Cooney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomsky's notions
(99 lines)
From:
Morgan Palaeo Associates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Classical Latin, was Re: Slezan
Classical Latin, was Re: Slezan
(35 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Count and mass nouns
Re: Count and mass nouns
(70 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Czechia (was: OT: Spatial thinking)
Czechia (was: OT: Spatial thinking)
(32 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dialects of certain langs
Dialects of certain langs
(70 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dialects of certain langs
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ditransitivity (again!)
Ditransitivity (again!)
(67 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(74 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(95 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(74 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(28 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(85 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(74 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(78 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(88 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(93 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(78 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(47 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(90 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(76 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ditransitivity (again!)
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dog Latin
Dog Latin
(28 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Dog Latin
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(40 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(71 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(85 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(62 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(55 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(59 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(71 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dog Latin
(87 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
French <chez>
French <chez>
(63 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(60 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(46 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(31 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(73 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(60 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(37 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(54 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French <chez>
(49 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
French transitivity etc.
French transitivity etc.
(168 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French transitivity etc.
(99 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French transitivity etc.
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French transitivity etc.
(40 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
glottals
glottals
(41 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(46 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(71 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(47 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(62 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(64 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(43 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(46 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(41 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(55 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(63 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(29 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(34 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(39 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: glottals
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going NOMAIL
Going NOMAIL
(35 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Guess work
Guess work
(53 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Guess work
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Happy (Belated) Chinese New Year!
Happy (Belated) Chinese New Year!
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interjections
Interjections
(31 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(92 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(95 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(69 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(74 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(56 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(66 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(57 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(64 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(61 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(192 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(69 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(55 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(66 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
(92 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessivemarkers?
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessivemarkers?
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessivemarkers?
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness inpossessivemarkers?
Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness inpossessivemarkers?
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Khmer
Khmer
(61 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Khmer
(43 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Learn MUTLAK the secret language of mutants
Re: Learn MUTLAK the secret language of mutants
(50 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(43 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(55 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(52 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(65 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(55 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(62 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(77 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(28 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(53 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(52 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(67 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(61 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(84 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(64 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(48 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
List held?
List held?
(26 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Metalanguage query
Metalanguage query
(56 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage query
(51 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage query
(75 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Metalanguage query
(41 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage query
(33 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Miapimoquitch story "Eye Juggler" in Kash
Re: Miapimoquitch story "Eye Juggler" in Kash
(175 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miapimoquitch story "Eye Juggler" in Kash
(532 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
Re: Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(73 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(78 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miapimoquitch text: Eye Juggler (long)
(112 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mutant English take two
Mutant English take two
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mutant English take two
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mutant English take two
(43 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mutant English take two
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
mystery phoneme
mystery phoneme
(65 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(94 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(62 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(46 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Russkii morphology (was: "Each Other")
(53 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Buenos Aires (was Re: Q about /c/)
Re: OT Buenos Aires (was Re: Q about /c/)
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Buenos Aires (was Re: Q about /c/)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT-ish Conlang Census
Re: OT-ish Conlang Census
(44 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT-ish Conlang Census (cont.)
Re: OT-ish Conlang Census (cont.)
(78 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish Conlang Census (cont.)
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT-ish: Conlang Census
Re: OT-ish: Conlang Census
(47 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT-ish:Conlang Census
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(102 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(97 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(88 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(69 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(54 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(58 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(37 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(85 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(106 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(61 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(86 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(39 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(92 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(64 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(71 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(67 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(33 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census
(40 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT-ish:Conlang Census (cont.)
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census (cont.)
(97 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census (cont.)
(83 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census (cont.)
(76 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(81 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: blue blood Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns:Re:Red
(75 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Chinese (& the Pearl Drink Invasion)
Re: OT: Chinese (& the Pearl Drink Invasion)
(55 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Chinese (& the Pearl Drink Invasion)
(81 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Chinese (& the Pearl Drink Invasion)
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Jared/Jarrod
OT: Jared/Jarrod
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Metaphoric language
Re: OT: Metaphoric language
(45 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
OT: Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(57 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(66 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(91 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(56 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(65 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(62 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(73 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re: Count and mass nouns)
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re: Count andmass nouns)
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re: Count andmass nouns)
(86 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re:Countandmass nouns)
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re:Countandmass nouns)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right,was Re:Countandmass nouns)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Street systems (was: Spatial thinking)
Re: OT: Street systems (was: Spatial thinking)
(47 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Street systems (was: Spatial thinking)
(89 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Test, please ignore
OT: Test, please ignore
(49 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(59 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(41 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(41 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(64 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(64 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(61 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(82 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(84 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(39 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(49 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my con langs SUCK!!!
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Part 2 Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
Re: Part 2 Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(36 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Part 2 Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(47 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
please try to decipher my conlang
please try to decipher my conlang
(48 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: please try to decipher my conlang
(92 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Primitives, was Re: Left / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
Re: Primitives, was Re: Left / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns
(124 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Q about /c/
Q about /c/
(63 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(36 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(59 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(107 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(88 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(105 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(73 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(36 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(51 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(58 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(46 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(52 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(38 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(32 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q about /c/
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Q- and P- Celtic
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(103 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(69 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(80 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(42 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(33 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(170 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(70 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(77 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q- and P- Celtic
(53 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(58 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(42 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Representing tones in X-Sampa; Khmer phonemes (for Tim May)
(70 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rihana-ye Babel Text: Rohana-ye grammar
Re: Rihana-ye Babel Text: Rohana-ye grammar
(37 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rihana-ye Babel Text: Rohana-ye grammar
(28 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rihana-ye Babel Text: Rohana-ye grammar
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Russian soft/hard 'l' minimal pairs (was: glottals)
Re: Russian soft/hard 'l' minimal pairs (was: glottals)
(46 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shaquean syllabary
Re: Shaquean syllabary
(42 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shoshoni syllables [was: Re: Vowel Harmony Q]
Shoshoni syllables [was: Re: Vowel Harmony Q]
(64 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sidestepping Spelling Reform
Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(69 lines)
From:
Steve Cooney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(82 lines)
From:
Steve Cooney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(119 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(57 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(82 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(85 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Slezan
Slezan
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(45 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Slezan
(79 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(78 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(57 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(59 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(89 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(54 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(50 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(84 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(63 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(93 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(54 lines)
From:
Costentin Cornomorus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(47 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slezan
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
Re: Spatial thinking (WAS: Re: Letf / Right, was Re: Count and mass nouns)
(70 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
symbolproject.org Symbolic Characters Collaborative Creation project
symbolproject.org Symbolic Characters Collaborative Creation project
(58 lines)
From:
Steve Cooney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: symbolproject.org Symbolic Characters Collaborative Creation project
(84 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: symbolproject.org Symbolic Characters Collaborative Creation project
(61 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
this is a test
this is a test
(26 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tibetan orthography (was Re: Why my conlangs suck!!!)
Re: Tibetan orthography (was Re: Why my conlangs suck!!!)
(62 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was Re: Why my conlangs suck!!!)
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was Re: Why my conlangs suck!!!)
(63 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(40 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(38 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(66 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(82 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(59 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(48 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tibetan orthography (was: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!)
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Exercise
Translation Exercise
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(53 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(35 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(60 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(46 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(78 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(74 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(93 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(62 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Translation Exercise
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(61 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(74 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(45 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(70 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(57 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation: Trolls and their Management
Re: Translation: Trolls and their Management
(24 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Abugidas
USAGE: Abugidas
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Abugidas
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Aryans and Tolkien
USAGE: Aryans and Tolkien
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(30 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(59 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Translation of Russian _inorodtsy_
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Vulgate (was: Slezan)
USAGE: Vulgate (was: Slezan)
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: Vulgate (was: Slezan)
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Vulgate (was: Slezan)
(143 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: What do you call this sound?
USAGE: What do you call this sound?
(31 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Variety of Pronouns / Number, Gender, etc. (was something else)
Re: Variety of Pronouns / Number, Gender, etc. (was something else)
(61 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(25 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(29 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(59 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(89 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(25 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(83 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(24 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(68 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(38 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(52 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(27 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives
(45 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives (Phase 2)
Venn Diagram of the English Catenatives (Phase 2)
(28 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel Harmony Q
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
(59 lines)
From:
rob_nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
(63 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Vowel Harmony Q
(44 lines)
From:
rob_nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weakly vocab
Weakly vocab
(64 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weakly [sic] vocab
Re: Weakly [sic] vocab
(590 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is a woman ?
What is a woman ?
(34 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(38 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(44 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(28 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(62 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(40 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(39 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(65 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(50 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is a woman ?
(52 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Where is /c/ found? (was Re: Q about /c/
Where is /c/ found? (was Re: Q about /c/
(58 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Where is /c/ found? (was Re: Q about /c/
(57 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Where is /c/ found? (was Re: Q about /c/
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why my conlangs SUC K!!!
Re: Why my conlangs SUC K!!!
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(88 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(82 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(61 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(59 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(37 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(63 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
(28 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review No.3 '04
Workshops Review No.3 '04
(90 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(60 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(44 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(101 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.3 '04
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
XSAMPA Question
XSAMPA Question
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(109 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(172 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(62 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA Question
(176 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU