Conlang
Mailing List February 2004, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Person marking on nouns?
Re: syllable importance
Too long words
"pro-conlang attitudes" (wasRe: Conlangs in the press!)
(In)transitive verbs
(2 messages)
+AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(9 messages)
a wacky language
(7 messages)
ADMIN: shrinking giant URLs (was: Endangered languages in the news)
Adverbs
Alphabets on Langmaker.com
(2 messages)
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(10 messages)
CHAT: Spammer tools
(3 messages)
chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
(2 messages)
Computer syntax and VSO
(10 messages)
Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
(2 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 18 Feb 2004 to 19 Feb 2004 (#2004-49)
Conlangs in the press!
(8 messages)
Current Relay Q
(2 messages)
Endangered languages in the news
Essential Dutch
(6 messages)
Genitive apposition
(2 messages)
Genitive of apposition
(2 messages)
Greetings all & Re: The Very Very First Sentence
Handwriting
(2 messages)
info appreciated
(2 messages)
James Ostram Fraser, Christian missionary, linguist, musical genius and engineer
Lahabic in the Press
(2 messages)
language learning software (Word of the Day :: Transparent.com ::)
laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
Looking for a case: counting
(11 messages)
Looking for a case: Counting
Looking for a case: counting
(26 messages)
Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(8 messages)
Lord's Prayer in Jases Lalal
numbers from 1275 conlangs
OT: Language learning software question
(5 messages)
OT: Possible French idiom?
(10 messages)
OT: Possible French idiom? (fairly long, ok? ok?)
OT: the Race Question & twisted humour (wasRe: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
Person marking on nouns?
point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
(3 messages)
Questions about Tense/Mood/Case
(3 messages)
semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
syllable importance
(19 messages)
The Very Very First Sentence
(2 messages)
theolinguistics: "The Language Gap and God: Religious Language an…"
theolinguistics:"The Language Gap and God (was various trans. of Lord's Prayer)
THEORY: unergative
(7 messages)
Too long words
(10 messages)
Tutorial--Lesson 1
(7 messages)
USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(7 messages)
Velar approximant?
(2 messages)
vidyet
Vowel romanization
(5 messages)
Workshops Review No.7 '04
[CONLANG]� Vowel romanization
(2 messages)
Person marking on nouns?
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(145 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
Re: Re: syllable importance
(67 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Too long words
Re: Too long words
(122 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"pro-conlang attitudes" (wasRe: Conlangs in the press!)
"pro-conlang attitudes" (wasRe: Conlangs in the press!)
(122 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
(In)transitive verbs
Re: (In)transitive verbs
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (In)transitive verbs
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
+AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(45 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(51 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(70 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(67 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(80 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
a wacky language
a wacky language
(77 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a wacky language
(37 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a wacky language
(126 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a wacky language
(95 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a wacky language
(48 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a wacky language
(69 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a wacky language
(133 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: shrinking giant URLs (was: Endangered languages in the news)
ADMIN: shrinking giant URLs (was: Endangered languages in the news)
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Adverbs
Adverbs
(136 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alphabets on Langmaker.com
Re: Alphabets on Langmaker.com
(71 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alphabets on Langmaker.com
(54 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(55 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(61 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(86 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(57 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Spammer tools
CHAT: Spammer tools
(74 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Spammer tools
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Spammer tools
(52 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
(140 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
Re: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
(50 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
(95 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Computer syntax and VSO
Computer syntax and VSO
(75 lines)
From:
Samuel Rivier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(114 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(20 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(27 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(43 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Computer syntax and VSO
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
Re: Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
(72 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
(87 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 18 Feb 2004 to 19 Feb 2004 (#2004-49)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 18 Feb 2004 to 19 Feb 2004 (#2004-49)
(53 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs in the press!
Conlangs in the press!
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(41 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(33 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(28 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(81 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(64 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in the press!
(26 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Current Relay Q
Current Relay Q
(31 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Current Relay Q
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Endangered languages in the news
Endangered languages in the news
(30 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essential Dutch
Essential Dutch
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Dutch
(77 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Dutch
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Dutch
(37 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Dutch
(22 lines)
From:
Felix Ahlner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Dutch
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Genitive apposition
Re: Genitive apposition
(31 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Genitive of apposition
Re: Genitive of apposition
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive of apposition
(20 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Greetings all & Re: The Very Very First Sentence
Re: Greetings all & Re: The Very Very First Sentence
(156 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Handwriting
Handwriting
(58 lines)
From:
Morgan Palaeo Associates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Handwriting
(67 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
info appreciated
info appreciated
(37 lines)
From:
RJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: info appreciated
(39 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
James Ostram Fraser, Christian missionary, linguist, musical genius and engineer
James Ostram Fraser, Christian missionary, linguist, musical genius and engineer
(119 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lahabic in the Press
Lahabic in the Press
(40 lines)
From:
Anthony M. Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lahabic in the Press
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
language learning software (Word of the Day :: Transparent.com ::)
Re: language learning software (Word of the Day :: Transparent.com ::)
(73 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
Re: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
(67 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for a case: counting
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(67 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(122 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(84 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(65 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(138 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for a case: Counting
Re: Looking for a case: Counting
(123 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for a case: counting
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(38 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(82 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(60 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(103 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(217 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(76 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(82 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(136 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(70 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(188 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(114 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(59 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(142 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(201 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(48 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(75 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(42 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(80 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(72 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(127 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(196 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(84 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(60 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(47 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(47 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(101 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
(68 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lord's Prayer in Jases Lalal
Re: Lord's Prayer in Jases Lalal
(39 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
numbers from 1275 conlangs
numbers from 1275 conlangs
(58 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Language learning software question
OT: Language learning software question
(36 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Language learning software question
(76 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Language learning software question
(36 lines)
From:
Vladimir Vysotsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Language learning software question
(59 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Language learning software question
(98 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Possible French idiom?
OT: Possible French idiom?
(82 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(41 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(53 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(71 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(103 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Possible French idiom?
(90 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Possible French idiom? (fairly long, ok? ok?)
Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (fairly long, ok? ok?)
(167 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: the Race Question & twisted humour (wasRe: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
OT: the Race Question & twisted humour (wasRe: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
(96 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Person marking on nouns?
Person marking on nouns?
(53 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
(72 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
(50 lines)
From:
J. K. Hoffman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Questions about Tense/Mood/Case
Questions about Tense/Mood/Case
(51 lines)
From:
Akhilesh Pillalamarri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Tense/Mood/Case
(110 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Tense/Mood/Case
(70 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
(91 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
syllable importance
syllable importance
(35 lines)
From:
Alexandre Lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(61 lines)
From:
Steve Cooney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(37 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(61 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(90 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(114 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(70 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: syllable importance
(75 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(35 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: syllable importance
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable importance
(63 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Very Very First Sentence
Re: The Very Very First Sentence
(107 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Very Very First Sentence
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
theolinguistics: "The Language Gap and God: Religious Language an…"
theolinguistics: "The Language Gap and God: Religious Language an…"
(99 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
theolinguistics:"The Language Gap and God (was various trans. of Lord's Prayer)
theolinguistics:"The Language Gap and God (was various trans. of Lord's Prayer)
(204 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: unergative
THEORY: unergative
(44 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(84 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: unergative
(69 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: unergative
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(82 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Too long words
Too long words
(90 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(33 lines)
From:
Eddy Ohlms <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(61 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(65 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker @ school <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(85 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(67 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(28 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Too long words
(69 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tutorial--Lesson 1
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(34 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(36 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(375 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(133 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(34 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(187 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(128 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(57 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(62 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(76 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(58 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
(57 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Velar approximant?
Velar approximant?
(57 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Velar approximant?
(69 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
vidyet
vidyet
(82 lines)
From:
<Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel romanization
Vowel romanization
(91 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel romanization
(29 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel romanization
(40 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel romanization
(42 lines)
From:
Akhilesh Pillalamarri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel romanization
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review No.7 '04
Workshops Review No.7 '04
(74 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CONLANG]� Vowel romanization
Re: [CONLANG]� Vowel romanization
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [CONLANG]� Vowel romanization
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU