Conlang Mailing List – February 2004, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       Person marking on nouns?
•       Re: syllable importance
•       Too long words
• "pro-conlang attitudes" (wasRe: Conlangs in the press!)
• (In)transitive verbs (2 messages)
• +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (9 messages)
• a wacky language (7 messages)
• ADMIN: shrinking giant URLs (was: Endangered languages in the news)
• Adverbs
• Alphabets on Langmaker.com (2 messages)
• CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (10 messages)
• CHAT: Spammer tools (3 messages)
• chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
• chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_ (2 messages)
• Computer syntax and VSO (10 messages)
• Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia) (2 messages)
• CONLANG Digest - 18 Feb 2004 to 19 Feb 2004 (#2004-49)
• Conlangs in the press! (8 messages)
• Current Relay Q (2 messages)
• Endangered languages in the news
• Essential Dutch (6 messages)
• Genitive apposition (2 messages)
• Genitive of apposition (2 messages)
• Greetings all & Re: The Very Very First Sentence
• Handwriting (2 messages)
• info appreciated (2 messages)
• James Ostram Fraser, Christian missionary, linguist, musical genius and engineer
• Lahabic in the Press (2 messages)
• language learning software (Word of the Day :: Transparent.com ::)
• laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
• Looking for a case: counting (26 messages)
• Looking for a case: Counting
• Looking for a case: counting (11 messages)
• Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (8 messages)
• Lord's Prayer in Jases Lalal
• numbers from 1275 conlangs
• OT: Language learning software question (5 messages)
• OT: Possible French idiom? (10 messages)
• OT: Possible French idiom? (fairly long, ok? ok?)
• OT: the Race Question & twisted humour (wasRe: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
• Person marking on nouns?
• point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_ (3 messages)
• Questions about Tense/Mood/Case (3 messages)
• semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
• syllable importance (19 messages)
• The Very Very First Sentence (2 messages)
• theolinguistics: "The Language Gap and God: Religious Language an…"
• theolinguistics:"The Language Gap and God (was various trans. of Lord's Prayer)
• THEORY: unergative (7 messages)
• Too long words (10 messages)
• Tutorial--Lesson 1 (7 messages)
• USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (7 messages)
• Velar approximant? (2 messages)
• vidyet
• Vowel romanization (5 messages)
• Workshops Review No.7 '04
• [CONLANG]� Vowel romanization (2 messages)

1.       Person marking on nouns?
   • Re:       Person marking on nouns? (145 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:50:34 EST

2.       Re: syllable importance
   • Re:       Re: syllable importance (67 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:28:28 EST

3.       Too long words
   • Re:       Too long words (122 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:24:28 EST

4. "pro-conlang attitudes" (wasRe: Conlangs in the press!)
   • "pro-conlang attitudes" (wasRe: Conlangs in the press!) (122 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:42:49 EST

5. (In)transitive verbs
   • Re: (In)transitive verbs (62 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:38:34 +0100
   • Re: (In)transitive verbs (44 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:27:46 -0500

6. +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (80 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:15:28 -0000
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (67 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:13:22 -0800
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (48 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:45:40 +0100
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (60 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:41:18 +0100
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (50 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:10:55 +0000
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (42 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:03:52 +0100
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (70 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:45:07 +0000
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (51 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:38:54 -0600
   • Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization (45 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:29:18 -0000

7. a wacky language
   • Re: a wacky language (133 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 05:19:08 EST
   • Re: a wacky language (69 lines)
     From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:49:54 -0500
   • Re: a wacky language (48 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:59:02 -0500
   • Re: a wacky language (95 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:45:37 EST
   • Re: a wacky language (126 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:12:24 -0800
   • Re: a wacky language (37 lines)
     From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:32:21 -0500
   • a wacky language (77 lines)
     From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:10:56 -0800

8. ADMIN: shrinking giant URLs (was: Endangered languages in the news)
   • ADMIN: shrinking giant URLs (was: Endangered languages in the news) (45 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:50:48 -0500

9. Adverbs
   • Adverbs (136 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:55:36 -0800

10. Alphabets on Langmaker.com
    • Re: Alphabets on Langmaker.com (54 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:43:38 EST
    • Re: Alphabets on Langmaker.com (71 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:42:17 -0500

11. CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (49 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 23:58:04 -0500
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:35:06 +0100
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (60 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:02:54 +0000
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:56:38 -0600
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (57 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:16:09 -0500
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:10:09 -0500
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (86 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:18:12 -0500
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (61 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:50:05 +0000
    • Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (55 lines)
      From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:35:21 -0600
    • CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:06:36 -0500

12. CHAT: Spammer tools
    • Re: CHAT: Spammer tools (52 lines)
      From: Iain E. Davis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:55:36 -0600
    • Re: CHAT: Spammer tools (61 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:53:45 +0100
    • CHAT: Spammer tools (74 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:17:01 -0500

13. chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
    • chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_ (140 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:38:54 EST

14. chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
    • Re: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_ (95 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:32:32 EST
    • Re: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_ (50 lines)
      From: Eddy Ohlms <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:07:49 -0600

15. Computer syntax and VSO
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (47 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:41:30 -0600
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:33:52 -0600
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (43 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:27:26 -0500
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:44:12 -0600
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (27 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:31:52 -0500
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (67 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:57:07 +0100
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:00:42 +0100
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (20 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:31:13 -0500
    • Re: Computer syntax and VSO (114 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:17:11 -0800
    • Computer syntax and VSO (75 lines)
      From: Samuel Rivier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:14:46 -0800

16. Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
    • Re: Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia) (87 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:21:46 -0500
    • Re: Con-Romance &/a (was: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia) (72 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:24:16 +0200

17. CONLANG Digest - 18 Feb 2004 to 19 Feb 2004 (#2004-49)
    • Re: CONLANG Digest - 18 Feb 2004 to 19 Feb 2004 (#2004-49) (53 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:01:31 +0100

18. Conlangs in the press!
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (26 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:28:01 -0500
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (64 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:24:08 -0500
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (81 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:18:55 EST
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (28 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:46:41 -0500
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (33 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:38:10 -0500
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (41 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:08:06 +0300
    • Re: Conlangs in the press! (43 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:42:41 +0000
    • Conlangs in the press! (44 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:24:37 -0500

19. Current Relay Q
    • Re: Current Relay Q (39 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:14:40 +0000
    • Current Relay Q (31 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:51:23 -0500

20. Endangered languages in the news
    • Endangered languages in the news (30 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:26:43 -0500

21. Essential Dutch
    • Re: Essential Dutch (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:47:47 +0100
    • Re: Essential Dutch (22 lines)
      From: Felix Ahlner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:09:01 -0500
    • Re: Essential Dutch (37 lines)
      From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:23:17 -0500
    • Re: Essential Dutch (45 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:23:51 +0000
    • Re: Essential Dutch (77 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:14:43 -0500
    • Essential Dutch (33 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:33:19 +0100

22. Genitive apposition
    • Re: Genitive apposition (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:10:31 +0100
    • Re: Genitive apposition (31 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:47:24 +0100

23. Genitive of apposition
    • Re: Genitive of apposition (20 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:30:13 -0500
    • Re: Genitive of apposition (46 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:35 -0500

24. Greetings all & Re: The Very Very First Sentence
    • Re: Greetings all & Re: The Very Very First Sentence (156 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:36:45 -0800

25. Handwriting
    • Re: Handwriting (67 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:58:31 +0100
    • Handwriting (58 lines)
      From: Morgan Palaeo Associates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:07:56 +1030

26. info appreciated
    • Re: info appreciated (39 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:29:14 -0500
    • info appreciated (37 lines)
      From: RJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:07:12 -0800

27. James Ostram Fraser, Christian missionary, linguist, musical genius and engineer
    • James Ostram Fraser, Christian missionary, linguist, musical genius and engineer (119 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:43:38 EST

28. Lahabic in the Press
    • Re: Lahabic in the Press (44 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:39:23 -0500
    • Lahabic in the Press (40 lines)
      From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:20:22 -0600

29. language learning software (Word of the Day :: Transparent.com ::)
    • Re: language learning software (Word of the Day :: Transparent.com ::) (73 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:53:26 EST

30. laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia)
    • Re: laterals (was: Pharingials, /l/ vs. /r/ in Southeast Asia) (67 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:18:47 +0200

31. Looking for a case: counting
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (127 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:31:35 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (72 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:44:23 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (80 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:38:34 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (42 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:22:58 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (75 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:51:30 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (48 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:02:56 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (201 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:28:59 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (142 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:58:53 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (59 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:16:11 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:14:06 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (114 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:44:30 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (188 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:23:15 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (70 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:05:03 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (136 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 07:03:10 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (82 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:59:56 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:55:37 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (76 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:48:35 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:27:19 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (217 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:12:10 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (103 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:50:58 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:43:13 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (60 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 07:54:00 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (59 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:48:57 +0000
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (40 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:31:46 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (82 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:43:42 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (38 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:35:59 +0000

32. Looking for a case: Counting
    • Re: Looking for a case: Counting (123 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:29:19 -0500

33. Looking for a case: counting
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (138 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:32:56 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:24:59 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (65 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:23:06 +0000
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (84 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:06:52 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (122 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:53:44 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:40:16 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (73 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:16:05 +0100
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:13:09 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:25:38 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (67 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:43:32 -0800
    • Re: Looking for a case: counting (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:11:54 -0600

34. Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (68 lines)
      From: Jonathan Lipps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:27:47 -0800
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (101 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:11:02 -0800
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (47 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:52:50 +0000
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (47 lines)
      From: Jonathan Lipps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:26:53 -0800
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:28:37 +0100
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (60 lines)
      From: Jonathan Lipps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:02:47 -0800
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (84 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 04:40:01 -0800
    • Lord's Prayer in Enaselvai (196 lines)
      From: Jonathan Lipps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:27:41 -0800

35. Lord's Prayer in Jases Lalal
    • Re: Lord's Prayer in Jases Lalal (39 lines)
      From: michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:55:31 -0000

36. numbers from 1275 conlangs
    • numbers from 1275 conlangs (58 lines)
      From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:21:05 -0800

37. OT: Language learning software question
    • Re: OT: Language learning software question (98 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:33:17 -0500
    • Re: OT: Language learning software question (59 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:27:28 +0100
    • Re: OT: Language learning software question (36 lines)
      From: Vladimir Vysotsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:18:15 -0800
    • Re: OT: Language learning software question (76 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:25:41 -0800
    • OT: Language learning software question (36 lines)
      From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:06:26 -0500

38. OT: Possible French idiom?
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (90 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:38:25 -0800
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (103 lines)
      From: michael poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:15:42 -0000
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:18:10 -0800
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (43 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:04:38 -0500
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:40:11 -0600
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (71 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:15:26 -0800
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (53 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:20:27 -0800
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:51:57 -0600
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (41 lines)
      From: Axiem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:34:22 -0600
    • OT: Possible French idiom? (82 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:52:09 -0500

39. OT: Possible French idiom? (fairly long, ok? ok?)
    • Re: OT: Possible French idiom? (fairly long, ok? ok?) (167 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:17:25 EST

40. OT: the Race Question & twisted humour (wasRe: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_
    • OT: the Race Question & twisted humour (wasRe: chock-a-blockful of Jewish data (wasRe: point to consider MelGibson's _Passion_ (96 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:18:56 EST

41. Person marking on nouns?
    • Person marking on nouns? (53 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:45:17 -0500

42. point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_
    • Re: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_ (50 lines)
      From: J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:19:18 -0600
    • Re: point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_ (42 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:35:18 -0500
    • point to consider Mel Gibson's _Passion_ (72 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:46:02 EST

43. Questions about Tense/Mood/Case
    • Re: Questions about Tense/Mood/Case (70 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:33:07 +0000
    • Re: Questions about Tense/Mood/Case (110 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 01:16:09 -0800
    • Questions about Tense/Mood/Case (51 lines)
      From: Akhilesh Pillalamarri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:18:52 -0800

44. semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
    • semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews" (91 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:18:19 EST

45. syllable importance
    • Re: syllable importance (63 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:03:42 -0000
    • Re: syllable importance (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:40:02 +0100
    • Re: syllable importance (51 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:16:27 +0000
    • Re: syllable importance (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:08:21 +0100
    • Re: syllable importance (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:55:49 -0500
    • Re: syllable importance (52 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:59:45 -0500
    • Re: syllable importance (37 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:59:51 -0500
    • Re: syllable importance (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:44:24 -0500
    • Re: syllable importance (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:52:31 +0100
    • Re: syllable importance (56 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:30:46 -0600
    • Re: syllable importance (35 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:48:44 EST
    • Re: syllable importance (75 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:45:46 EST
    • Re: syllable importance (70 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:03:26 -0500
    • Re: syllable importance (114 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:20:00 -0700
    • Re: syllable importance (90 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:31:22 -0500
    • Re: syllable importance (61 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:04:44 -0700
    • Re: syllable importance (37 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:40:26 -0700
    • Re: syllable importance (61 lines)
      From: Steve Cooney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:39:19 -0800
    • syllable importance (35 lines)
      From: Alexandre Lang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:20:21 -0500

46. The Very Very First Sentence
    • Re: The Very Very First Sentence (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:36:31 +0100
    • Re: The Very Very First Sentence (107 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:43:43 EST

47. theolinguistics: "The Language Gap and God: Religious Language an…"
    • theolinguistics: "The Language Gap and God: Religious Language an…" (99 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:40:49 EST

48. theolinguistics:"The Language Gap and God (was various trans. of Lord's Prayer)
    • theolinguistics:"The Language Gap and God (was various trans. of Lord's Prayer) (204 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 05:19:48 EST

49. THEORY: unergative
    • Re: THEORY: unergative (82 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:31:09 -0600
    • THEORY: unergative (57 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:30:24 -0600
    • THEORY: unergative (69 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:45:39 -0000
    • Re: THEORY: unergative (72 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:12:48 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: unergative (84 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:55:21 -0600
    • Re: THEORY: unergative (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:52:10 -0600
    • THEORY: unergative (44 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:21:59 -0000

50. Too long words
    • Re: Too long words (69 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:12:42 -0500
    • Re: Too long words (28 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:00:09 -0500
    • Re: Too long words (67 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:51:29 +0100
    • Re: Too long words (58 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:15:03 -0700
    • Re: Too long words (85 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:17:30 -0500
    • Re: Too long words (65 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker @ school <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:13:18 -0500
    • Re: Too long words (45 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:59:50 +0100
    • Re: Too long words (61 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 05:09:04 -0800
    • Re: Too long words (33 lines)
      From: Eddy Ohlms <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:07:25 -0600
    • Too long words (90 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:29:03 +0100

51. Tutorial--Lesson 1
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (128 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:09:57 -0500
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (187 lines)
      From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:06:57 -0500
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (34 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:03:42 -0500
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (133 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:55:05 -0500
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (375 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:27:22 -0500
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (36 lines)
      From: Iain E. Davis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:34:18 -0600
    • Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1 (34 lines)
      From: takatunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:19:15 +0100

52. USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text)
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (57 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:18:02 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (58 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:37:44 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (76 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:24:38 +0200
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (65 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:19:29 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:20:00 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (62 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:12:59 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Initial "and" (was Re: The Babel Text) (57 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:31:33 -0500

53. Velar approximant?
    • Re: Velar approximant? (69 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:58:45 +0100
    • Velar approximant? (57 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:34:35 -0500

54. vidyet
    • vidyet (82 lines)
      From: <Wilhelm Ulrich Schlaier> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:10:18 EST

55. Vowel romanization
    • Re: Vowel romanization (39 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:35:55 +0000
    • Re: Vowel romanization (42 lines)
      From: Akhilesh Pillalamarri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:45:17 -0800
    • Re: Vowel romanization (40 lines)
      From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:29:54 -0500
    • Re: Vowel romanization (29 lines)
      From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:54:04 -0500
    • Vowel romanization (91 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:53:07 -0600

56. Workshops Review No.7 '04
    • Workshops Review No.7 '04 (74 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:19:50 +0200

57. [CONLANG]� Vowel romanization
    • Re: [CONLANG]� Vowel romanization (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:46:19 -0500
    • Re: [CONLANG]� Vowel romanization (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:38:51 -0500