Conlang
Mailing List February 2004, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
Re: Noun Cases
Re: THEORY: unergative
+AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(8 messages)
ach y fi (was: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.))
(2 messages)
altarielen guraule loriendea
(2 messages)
Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(6 messages)
ATR- + vowel-harmony (Re: No Subject)
ATTN Czhang
(2 messages)
Babel Text in Jases Lalal (Hemana-ye)
Bantoid conlang - morphology
(4 messages)
Bantoid conlang - phonology
(3 messages)
Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(10 messages)
CHAT Editiones Vulgatae (was: Person marking on nouns?)
CHAT Etruscana (was: Oh! Kay! (was : ...etc))
(3 messages)
CHAT Loo (was: Lavatories, bathrooms,...etc)
CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(13 messages)
CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
(5 messages)
CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea)
(2 messages)
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(8 messages)
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(97 messages)
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (with an aside about IKEA)
CHAT: IKEA (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.)
(2 messages)
Clang, clang, clang (was:Re: CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea))
CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(27 messages)
CONLANG DIGEST: my fault
Conlang dreams
(4 messages)
Conlangs on Oprah!!
English words (was Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.))
Ergative (was: Conlang digest, etc.)
Ergativity
(6 messages)
Ergativity (was Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52))
F.L.O.E.S.
(7 messages)
Fwd: Molecular Expressions
Gendered language Re: Person marking on nouns?
Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(8 messages)
Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(7 messages)
German O.D. (or poetically-endowed German-fluent peep(s) needed)
HELP: Q about an ATR Vowel Harmony System
Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(26 messages)
Labiodental plosives?
(5 messages)
Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(10 messages)
Lenmoct Actancy (was Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52))
Looking for a case: counting
My reformed X-Sampa (was OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)))
(2 messages)
NATLANG: French spelling questions
(4 messages)
New conlang site
(2 messages)
No Subject
Noun Cases
(8 messages)
O'Jesperson,lowercase,&RussoFuturistZaum. (wasRe: CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization)
oh uh, I**A (IKEA!) [wasRe: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.]
Oh yeah, I'm back
Oh! Kay! (was : Hymn to Ikea etc)
(2 messages)
OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(8 messages)
OT: comment (was Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...))
OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(7 messages)
Person marking on nouns
Person marking on nouns?
(22 messages)
Question About "Pan Lengua" and "Neo Criollo"
Re: Person marking on nouns?
Reconstructed Aramaic
Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(6 messages)
semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
(3 messages)
Some scattered thoughts about Kaman (YAC)
Some words
(2 messages)
Source code for Ebisédian tools
split ergativity
(2 messages)
TEST: Could Someone Check This Out?
(3 messages)
The Letter "K"
(4 messages)
THEORY: unergative
(22 messages)
Tutorial--Lesson 1
(2 messages)
tyo-7
USAGE: Stress in English
(17 messages)
Vowel romanization
(3 messages)
Workshops Review No.8 '04
(2 messages)
[Q] is a vowel?! (...)
(5 messages)
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
Re: Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(73 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
Re: Re: Noun Cases
(70 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
Re: Re: THEORY: unergative
(86 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
+AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(152 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(68 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization
(61 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
ach y fi (was: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.))
Re: ach y fi (was: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.))
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ach y fi (was: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.))
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
altarielen guraule loriendea
altarielen guraule loriendea
(126 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: altarielen guraule loriendea
(60 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(156 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(63 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(133 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(62 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)
(147 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
ATR- + vowel-harmony (Re: No Subject)
ATR- + vowel-harmony (Re: No Subject)
(85 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
ATTN Czhang
ATTN Czhang
(18 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ATTN Czhang
(104 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel Text in Jases Lalal (Hemana-ye)
Babel Text in Jases Lalal (Hemana-ye)
(78 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bantoid conlang - morphology
Bantoid conlang - morphology
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bantoid conlang - morphology
(66 lines)
From:
James Worlton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bantoid conlang - morphology
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bantoid conlang - morphology
(81 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bantoid conlang - phonology
Bantoid conlang - phonology
(81 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bantoid conlang - phonology
(70 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bantoid conlang - phonology
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(193 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(277 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(55 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(106 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(116 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(42 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(57 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(105 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque bizarreries (was: Conland Digest etc.)
(52 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Editiones Vulgatae (was: Person marking on nouns?)
CHAT Editiones Vulgatae (was: Person marking on nouns?)
(135 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Etruscana (was: Oh! Kay! (was : ...etc))
CHAT Etruscana (was: Oh! Kay! (was : ...etc))
(130 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Etruscana (was: Oh! Kay! (was : ...etc))
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Etruscana (was: Oh! Kay! (was : ...etc))
(69 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Loo (was: Lavatories, bathrooms,...etc)
CHAT Loo (was: Lavatories, bathrooms,...etc)
(63 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(44 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(76 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(46 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(65 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(50 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(47 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(74 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Starbucks (was: Hymn to Ikea etc.)
(37 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
(53 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
(54 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
(78 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
(56 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT When is a bath not a bath? (Re: Hymn to IKEA etc)
(38 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea)
CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea)
(82 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea)
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(78 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(110 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(59 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(160 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(76 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(67 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S
(48 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(38 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(59 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(56 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(78 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(70 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(40 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(87 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(61 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(70 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(154 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(87 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(74 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(116 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(74 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(38 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(35 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(53 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(57 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(56 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(193 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(55 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(106 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(77 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(96 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(71 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(74 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(86 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(71 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(71 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(35 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(55 lines)
From:
Barbara Barrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(53 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(55 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(53 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(51 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(131 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(45 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(114 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(36 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(64 lines)
From:
Axiem <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(50 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(392 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(87 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(31 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(52 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(59 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (with an aside about IKEA)
Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S. (with an aside about IKEA)
(51 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: IKEA (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.)
CHAT: IKEA (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.)
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: IKEA (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.)
(81 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Clang, clang, clang (was:Re: CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea))
Clang, clang, clang (was:Re: CHAT: Explaining English to the Americans (was: Hymn to Ikea))
(40 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(54 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(75 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(45 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(45 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(30 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(64 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(52 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(42 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(93 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(125 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(49 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(60 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(40 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(87 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(45 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(56 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(58 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(39 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(41 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52)
(86 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG DIGEST: my fault
CONLANG DIGEST: my fault
(58 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang dreams
Conlang dreams
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang dreams
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang dreams
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang dreams
(83 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs on Oprah!!
Conlangs on Oprah!!
(33 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
English words (was Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.))
English words (was Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.))
(68 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative (was: Conlang digest, etc.)
Ergative (was: Conlang digest, etc.)
(77 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergativity
Re: Ergativity
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergativity
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergativity
(87 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergativity
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergativity
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergativity
(72 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergativity (was Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52))
Ergativity (was Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52))
(57 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
F.L.O.E.S.
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(110 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(54 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(52 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: F.L.O.E.S.
(64 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Molecular Expressions
Fwd: Molecular Expressions
(61 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gendered language Re: Person marking on nouns?
Gendered language Re: Person marking on nouns?
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(62 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(82 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(71 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(95 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(78 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(79 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitive apposition (and Swedish questions)
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(48 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(71 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(34 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives
(64 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
German O.D. (or poetically-endowed German-fluent peep(s) needed)
German O.D. (or poetically-endowed German-fluent peep(s) needed)
(111 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
HELP: Q about an ATR Vowel Harmony System
HELP: Q about an ATR Vowel Harmony System
(233 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(166 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(190 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(60 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(165 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(29 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(67 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(43 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(66 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(95 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(111 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(116 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(33 lines)
From:
Tommie L Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hymn to Ikea (was: Re: Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
(49 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiodental plosives?
Labiodental plosives?
(30 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental plosives?
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental plosives?
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental plosives?
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental plosives?
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(128 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(63 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(92 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(35 lines)
From:
Iain E. Davis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(39 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(41 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lavatories, bathrooms,... Was: Re: Hymn to Ikea
(66 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lenmoct Actancy (was Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52))
Lenmoct Actancy (was Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2004 to 22 Feb 2004 (#2004-52))
(102 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for a case: counting
Re: Looking for a case: counting
(29 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
My reformed X-Sampa (was OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)))
My reformed X-Sampa (was OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)))
(200 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My reformed X-Sampa (was OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)))
(86 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: French spelling questions
NATLANG: French spelling questions
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: French spelling questions
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: French spelling questions
(44 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: French spelling questions
(70 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
New conlang site
New conlang site
(61 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang site
(42 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
No Subject
No Subject
(227 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noun Cases
Noun Cases
(29 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(32 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(60 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(29 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(68 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun Cases
(42 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
O'Jesperson,lowercase,&RussoFuturistZaum. (wasRe: CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization)
O'Jesperson,lowercase,&RussoFuturistZaum. (wasRe: CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization)
(171 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
oh uh, I**A (IKEA!) [wasRe: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.]
oh uh, I**A (IKEA!) [wasRe: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.]
(78 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oh yeah, I'm back
Oh yeah, I'm back
(25 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oh! Kay! (was : Hymn to Ikea etc)
Oh! Kay! (was : Hymn to Ikea etc)
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh! Kay! (was : Hymn to Ikea etc)
(57 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(71 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(35 lines)
From:
David Zitzelsberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(122 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(273 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(40 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(55 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Blond(e) (Was Re: Genitives and Possessive Adjectives)
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: comment (was Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...))
OT: comment (was Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...))
(37 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(36 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(49 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(68 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative))
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Person marking on nouns
Re: Person marking on nouns
(149 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Person marking on nouns?
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(62 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(60 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(56 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(46 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(61 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(84 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(45 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(99 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(45 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(55 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(67 lines)
From:
M. Astrand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(82 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(71 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(65 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(64 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question About "Pan Lengua" and "Neo Criollo"
Re: Question About "Pan Lengua" and "Neo Criollo"
(62 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Person marking on nouns?
Re: Re: Person marking on nouns?
(209 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reconstructed Aramaic
Reconstructed Aramaic
(40 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(232 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(42 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(183 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(101 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised X-Sampa revision (was [several other things])
(143 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
Re: semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
(37 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
(73 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semiOT: intriguing Chinese "Jews"
(40 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some scattered thoughts about Kaman (YAC)
Some scattered thoughts about Kaman (YAC)
(108 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some words
Some words
(113 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some words
(48 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Source code for Ebisédian tools
Source code for Ebisédian tools
(49 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
split ergativity
Re: split ergativity
(58 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: split ergativity
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TEST: Could Someone Check This Out?
TEST: Could Someone Check This Out?
(53 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEST: Could Someone Check This Out?
(207 lines)
From:
Jonathan Lipps <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEST: Could Someone Check This Out?
(72 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Letter "K"
The Letter "K"
(42 lines)
From:
Akhilesh Pillalamarri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Letter "K"
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Letter "K"
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Letter "K"
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: unergative
Re: THEORY: unergative
(147 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(256 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(38 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(34 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(162 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(51 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(116 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(70 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(100 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(72 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(50 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(202 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(125 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(58 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(54 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(58 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(72 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: unergative
(73 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tutorial--Lesson 1
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(111 lines)
From:
John L. Leland <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tutorial--Lesson 1
(284 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
tyo-7
tyo-7
(71 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Stress in English
USAGE: Stress in English
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(49 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(48 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(49 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(57 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(69 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(49 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stress in English
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel romanization
Re: Vowel romanization
(59 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel romanization
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel romanization
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review No.8 '04
Workshops Review No.8 '04
(81 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review No.8 '04
(57 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Q] is a vowel?! (...)
Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...)
(84 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...)
(78 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...)
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...)
(59 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Q] is a vowel?! (...)
(89 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU