Conlang Mailing List – March 2004, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       Is this excessive?
•       Re: Automatic word generation
• "do" captures agent+subject (10 messages)
• /t/ (was Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (2 messages)
• A Lesson on Service and Duty - Nyulyen
• A new conlang
• A Nice Conlang News Article (4 messages)
• Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (8 messages)
• Alternative English Alphabet and Base 12 numbers
• ANNOUNCE: new conlang (3 messages)
• Aspects of English Grammar (14 messages)
• Automatic word generation (10 messages)
• Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (10 messages)
• Benct Philip Jonsoon: Why you didn't answer on my message about numbers (1-10) from your conlangs on Conlang list?
• Cases, again (55 messages)
• Caucasian phonologies and orthographies (3 messages)
• CHAT: Fun with Chow Mei! (4 messages)
• CHAT: How conlangers are treated by mortals (was: HELP: Is this sensible?) (2 messages)
• CXS chart and machine-readable Unicode->CXS mappings
• Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (7 messages)
• Deriving new languages from English and French (4 messages)
• English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (7 messages)
• Essentialist Explanations 9.4
• Explaining tone to a non-linguist; pharyngeals; noun incorporation (3 messages)
• FAO Douglas Koller (2 messages)
• Going nomail
• Hangul (Korean) script for languages other than Korean
• Has Anyone Ever Heard of This Person? (2 messages)
• HELP: Is this sensible? (8 messages)
• I'm back ...
• ideas and questions (2 messages)
• Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions. (5 messages)
• Is this excessive? (5 messages)
• Jases Lalal: New Word Order (2 messages)
• LaTeX for Conlangers List (3 messages)
• License Plates (was Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug) (3 messages)
• Origin of Estonian /7/ (11 messages)
• OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (3 messages)
• OT: "history" vs. "fantasy" (was Re: OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug)
• OT: TV for linguists?
• Proto-Romance (11 messages)
• Quenya Questions (3 messages)
• Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
• Renaming (was: Aspects of ENglish Grammar)
• Request for feedback on the Vilani verb (3 messages)
• Rihana-ye: The Peasants: Prequel
• S7 grammar in a nutshell (long) (3 messages)
• TECH: Sigs in Outlook Express and feedback forms (2 messages)
• USAGE:  indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words
• USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (13 messages)
• USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (14 messages)
• USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (3 messages)
• Verbing
• vocab/translation #2, #3, #4, #5
• vocab/translation #5
• vocab/translation #6
• vocab/translation #7 (3 messages)
• vocab/translation #8 (2 messages)
• vocab/translation 1-5
• Wikibooks Tsán page up. Feedback? (2 messages)
• Workshops Review No.11 '04
• You meet the oddest people on the Internet (2 messages)
• [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (8 messages)

1.       Is this excessive?
   • Re:       Is this excessive? (58 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:15:16 EST

2.       Re: Automatic word generation
   • Re:       Re: Automatic word generation (186 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:33:03 EST

3. "do" captures agent+subject
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (80 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:57:17 -0800
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (52 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:36:24 -0500
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (51 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:21:06 -0500
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (40 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:09:07 -0500
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (64 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:41:53 +0100
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:37:25 -0500
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (69 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:16:54 +0000
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (56 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:16 +0100
   • Re: "do" captures agent+subject (79 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:14:43 +0100
   • "do" captures agent+subject (44 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:33:05 -0500

4. /t/ (was Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification
   • Re: /t/ (was Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (55 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:43:34 -0000
   • Re: /t/ (was Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (32 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:33:42 -0500

5. A Lesson on Service and Duty - Nyulyen
   • A Lesson on Service and Duty - Nyulyen (84 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:48:48 -0800

6. A new conlang
   • A new conlang (32 lines)
     From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 21:12:20 -0500

7. A Nice Conlang News Article
   • Re: A Nice Conlang News Article (32 lines)
     From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:24:48 EST
   • Re: A Nice Conlang News Article (22 lines)
     From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 02:45:04 EST
   • Re: A Nice Conlang News Article (61 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:45:29 -0500
   • Re: A Nice Conlang News Article (36 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:08:56 -0500

8. Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (46 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:43:02 +0100
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (49 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 05:24:46 -0800
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (63 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:28:31 -0500
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:33:06 +0100
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (72 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:45:56 -0800
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (85 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:19:35 +0000
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (43 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:59:11 -0600
   • Re: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad... (98 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:08:49 +0100

9. Alternative English Alphabet and Base 12 numbers
   • Alternative English Alphabet and Base 12 numbers (30 lines)
     From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:00:25 -0500

10. ANNOUNCE: new conlang
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: new conlang (37 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:40:45 -0500
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: new conlang (30 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:40:15 -0800
    • ANNOUNCE: new conlang (64 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:17:04 +0100

11. Aspects of English Grammar
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:13:39 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (86 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0800
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (55 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:18:25 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:57:42 -0600
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (54 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:54:58 -0600
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (75 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:54:07 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (75 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:27:09 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (53 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:58:59 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (83 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:51:06 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (73 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:33:57 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (55 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:58:11 -0800
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:03:28 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:31:50 -0500
    • Re: Aspects of English Grammar (62 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:44:34 -0800

12. Automatic word generation
    • Re: Automatic word generation (60 lines)
      From: J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:01:14 -0600
    • Re: Automatic word generation (52 lines)
      From: Aaron Morse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:42:15 -0800
    • Re: Automatic word generation (58 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:29:07 +0100
    • Re: Automatic word generation (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:53:40 -0500
    • Re: Automatic word generation (48 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:03:35 +0100
    • Re: Automatic word generation (36 lines)
      From: Michael Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:07:44 -0800
    • Re: Automatic word generation (50 lines)
      From: Aaron Morse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:57:34 -0800
    • Re: Automatic word generation (78 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:23:01 -0800
    • Re: Automatic word generation (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 21:03:36 +0100
    • Automatic word generation (36 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:20:01 -0500

13. Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (108 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:10:06 +0000
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (35 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:43:39 -0000
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (51 lines)
      From: J. K. Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:21:59 -0600
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (106 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:03:39 EST
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (69 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:10:13 +0000
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (67 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:32:39 EST
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (67 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:27:09 -0500
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (40 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:43:29 -0000
    • Re: Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (49 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:03:09 -0500
    • Auxlangs and Orcs' Langs (35 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:22:37 +0000

14. Benct Philip Jonsoon: Why you didn't answer on my message about numbers (1-10) from your conlangs on Conlang list?
    • Benct Philip Jonsoon: Why you didn't answer on my message about numbers (1-10) from your conlangs on Conlang list? (46 lines)
      From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 06:08:06 -0800

15. Cases, again
    • Re: Cases, again (51 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:15:51 +0200
    • Re: Cases, again (67 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:36:03 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (89 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:18:05 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (56 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:02:09 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (98 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:24:44 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (74 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:05:35 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (66 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:36:05 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (50 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:14:29 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:53:01 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:41:08 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (65 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:22:43 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:00:27 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:37:53 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (52 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:21:27 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:37:29 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (71 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:09:29 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (67 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:05:18 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:33:51 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (43 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:18:57 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (71 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:07:31 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (81 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:36:16 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:45:30 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (128 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:41:04 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (49 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:54:12 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (47 lines)
      From: Apollo Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:15:52 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (63 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:56:30 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (47 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:51:21 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (69 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:04:00 -0000
    • Re: Cases, again (46 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:23:17 EST
    • Re: Cases, again (93 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:26:38 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:24:58 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (60 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:19:47 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (77 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:25:16 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:03:18 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:56:24 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:24:44 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (90 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:03:45 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:37:50 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (41 lines)
      From: Michael Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:19:46 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (48 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:25:49 -0600
    • Re: Cases, again (68 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:11:44 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (81 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:03:52 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (64 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:47:03 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (123 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:31:38 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (73 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:58:33 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (37 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:19:40 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (127 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:10:00 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:21:27 -0500
    • Re: Cases, again (94 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:45:15 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:43:39 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:32:45 +0100
    • Re: Cases, again (66 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:44:10 -0800
    • Re: Cases, again (51 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:50:58 +0000
    • Re: Cases, again (188 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:30:49 EST
    • Cases, again (40 lines)
      From: Michael Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:04:35 -0800

16. Caucasian phonologies and orthographies
    • Re: Caucasian phonologies and orthographies (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:20:17 +0100
    • Re: Caucasian phonologies and orthographies (51 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:45:31 -0800
    • Re: Caucasian phonologies and orthographies (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:25:31 +0100

17. CHAT: Fun with Chow Mei!
    • Re: CHAT: Fun with Chow Mei! (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:24:16 -0500
    • Re: CHAT: Fun with Chow Mei! (65 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:30:22 EST
    • Re: CHAT: Fun with Chow Mei! (36 lines)
      From: Felix Ahlner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:29:01 -0500
    • CHAT: Fun with Chow Mei! (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:48:41 -0500

18. CHAT: How conlangers are treated by mortals (was: HELP: Is this sensible?)
    • Re: CHAT: How conlangers are treated by mortals (was: HELP: Is this sensible?) (69 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:25:46 +0000
    • CHAT: How conlangers are treated by mortals (was: HELP: Is this sensible?) (105 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:44:53 +0100

19. CXS chart and machine-readable Unicode->CXS mappings
    • Re: CXS chart and machine-readable Unicode->CXS mappings (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:35:50 +0100

20. Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again
    • Re: Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (100 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:20:31 -0600
    • Re: Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (88 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:25:42 +0000
    • Re: Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (75 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:15:42 -0500
    • Re: Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (50 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:04:05 +0100
    • Re: Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (106 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:47:21 +0100
    • Re: Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (112 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:41:04 -0500
    • Def. of Case WAS: Cases, again (45 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:27:39 -0500

21. Deriving new languages from English and French
    • Re: Deriving new languages from English and French (72 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:51:54 -0800
    • Re: Deriving new languages from English and French (57 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:57:51 -0800
    • Re: Deriving new languages from English and French (81 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:16:22 -0600
    • Deriving new languages from English and French (34 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:52:29 -0500

22. English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...)
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (64 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:25:30 +0000
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (52 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:20:01 +0000
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (47 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:58:45 +0000
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (52 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:17:45 +0000
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (61 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:40:35 -0500
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:03:30 -0500
    • Re: English colour verbs (was: Adjectives, Adverbs, Ad...) (52 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:23:58 +0000

23. Essentialist Explanations 9.4
    • Essentialist Explanations 9.4 (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:06:43 -0500

24. Explaining tone to a non-linguist; pharyngeals; noun incorporation
    • Re: Explaining tone to a non-linguist; pharyngeals; noun incorporation (105 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:08:21 -0500
    • Re: Explaining tone to a non-linguist; pharyngeals; noun incorporation (49 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:41:29 +0200
    • Explaining tone to a non-linguist; pharyngeals; noun incorporation (37 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:55:07 -0500

25. FAO Douglas Koller
    • Re: FAO Douglas Koller (35 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:35:41 -0500
    • FAO Douglas Koller (30 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:06:50 +0000

26. Going nomail
    • Going nomail (36 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:50:46 -0500

27. Hangul (Korean) script for languages other than Korean
    • Hangul (Korean) script for languages other than Korean (61 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:04:11 -0800

28. Has Anyone Ever Heard of This Person?
    • Re: Has Anyone Ever Heard of This Person? (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:12:22 -0500
    • Has Anyone Ever Heard of This Person? (31 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:25:04 -0500

29. HELP: Is this sensible?
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (110 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:10:12 +0100
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (90 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:34:47 +0100
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (121 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:43:10 +0100
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (168 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:53:42 +0100
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (66 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:15:13 -0800
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (41 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:17:20 -0500
    • Re: HELP: Is this sensible? (80 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:50:34 +0100
    • HELP: Is this sensible? (70 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:47:27 +0100

30. I'm back ...
    • I'm back ... (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:17:28 +0100

31. ideas and questions
    • Re: ideas and questions (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:26:57 -0500
    • Re: ideas and questions (64 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:17:12 +0100

32. Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions.
    • Re: Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions. (66 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:57:46 +0000
    • Re: Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions. (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:00:46 +0000
    • Re: Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions. (83 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:18:46 -0800
    • Re: Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions. (61 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:26:05 -0800
    • Interesting way of expressing tense/aspect distinctions. (38 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:16:28 +0000

33. Is this excessive?
    • Re: Is this excessive? (32 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:14:24 -0500
    • Re: Is this excessive? (42 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:46:08 -0500
    • Re: Is this excessive? (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:08:53 -0600
    • Re: Is this excessive? (95 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:04:02 +0100
    • Is this excessive? (33 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:44:21 +0000

34. Jases Lalal: New Word Order
    • Re: Jases Lalal: New Word Order (128 lines)
      From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:35:00 -0600
    • Re: Jases Lalal: New Word Order (61 lines)
      From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 02:58:24 EST

35. LaTeX for Conlangers List
    • Re: LaTeX for Conlangers List (62 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:36:17 +0100
    • Re: LaTeX for Conlangers List (82 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:03:21 +0100
    • LaTeX for Conlangers List (45 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:31:11 +0100

36. License Plates (was Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug)
    • Re: License Plates (was Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug) (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:10:31 -0500
    • Re: License Plates (was Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug) (28 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:46:46 -0500
    • License Plates (was Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug) (70 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:04:37 -0500

37. Origin of Estonian /7/
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (38 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:53:52 +0200
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 21:10:14 +0100
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (49 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:09:10 -0600
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:05:10 +0100
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (33 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:26:43 -0500
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (47 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:00:11 +0100
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (49 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:46:48 +0000
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (49 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:21:21 -0500
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:48:13 +0100
    • Re: Origin of Estonian /7/ (50 lines)
      From: vehke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:31:49 +0100
    • Origin of Estonian /7/ (31 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:03:30 -0500

38. OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug
    • Re: OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:51:24 +0100
    • Re: OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (114 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:50:21 EST
    • Re: OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (67 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:38:51 -0500

39. OT: "history" vs. "fantasy" (was Re: OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug)
    • OT: "history" vs. "fantasy" (was Re: OT sorta (was USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug) (48 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:18:59 +0100

40. OT: TV for linguists?
    • OT: TV for linguists? (35 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:58:02 -0500

41. Proto-Romance
    • Re: Proto-Romance (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:25:09 -0500
    • Re: Proto-Romance (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:56:34 -0600
    • Re: Proto-Romance (73 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:47:15 -0500
    • Re: Proto-Romance (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:09:16 -0500
    • Re: Proto-Romance (42 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:44:36 -0000
    • Re: Proto-Romance (58 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 21:55:28 +0200
    • Re: Proto-Romance (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:15:13 -0500
    • Re: Proto-Romance (81 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:43:18 +0000
    • Re: Proto-Romance (71 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:34:02 -0800
    • Re: Proto-Romance (54 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:13:56 -0500
    • Proto-Romance (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:14:38 -0500

42. Quenya Questions
    • Re: Quenya Questions (42 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:14:11 -0500
    • Re: Quenya Questions (51 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:01:48 +0300
    • Quenya Questions (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:52:25 -0500

43. Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
    • Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (81 lines)
      From: L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:40:18 -0500

44. Renaming (was: Aspects of ENglish Grammar)
    • Renaming (was: Aspects of ENglish Grammar) (63 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:16:01 -0500

45. Request for feedback on the Vilani verb
    • Re: Request for feedback on the Vilani verb (83 lines)
      From: Robert Eaglestone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:22:18 +0000
    • Re: Request for feedback on the Vilani verb (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:23:03 -0500
    • Request for feedback on the Vilani verb (112 lines)
      From: Robert Eaglestone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:22:40 +0000

46. Rihana-ye: The Peasants: Prequel
    • Re: Rihana-ye: The Peasants: Prequel (119 lines)
      From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:04:17 EST

47. S7 grammar in a nutshell (long)
    • Re: S7 grammar in a nutshell (long) (39 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:24:48 +0000
    • Re: S7 grammar in a nutshell (long) (273 lines)
      From: Aaron Morse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:02:37 -0800
    • S7 grammar in a nutshell (long) (246 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:56:53 +0100

48. TECH: Sigs in Outlook Express and feedback forms
    • Re: TECH: Sigs in Outlook Express and feedback forms (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:28:28 -0500
    • TECH: Sigs in Outlook Express and feedback forms (45 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:12:47 -0500

49. USAGE:  indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words
    • Re: USAGE:  indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (126 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:43:29 EST

50. USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (85 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:39:53 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (34 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:38:31 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (82 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:09:01 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (52 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:50:46 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (51 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:52:07 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (75 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:39:12 +0000
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (73 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:53:14 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:53:34 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:51:46 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:21:49 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (76 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:49:27 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (24 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:57:28 -0500
    • USAGE: indefinite "a" before vowel-initial words (55 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:46:58 -0600

51. USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (102 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:50:25 EST
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (37 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:26:44 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:58:43 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (84 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:21:44 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (50 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:46:51 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (51 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:42:02 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:40:23 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (67 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:30:35 +0000
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (82 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:14:38 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:09:13 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (36 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:42:25 +0000
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:56:50 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (64 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:18:23 +0200
    • Re: USAGE: names for pillbug/wood louse/woodbug (87 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:33:02 -0800

52. USAGE: Schwa and syllabification
    • Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:07:11 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (41 lines)
      From: Chris Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 22:46:47 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: Schwa and syllabification (45 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:57:14 -0600

53. Verbing
    • Verbing (29 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:54:29 -0500

54. vocab/translation #2, #3, #4, #5
    • Re: vocab/translation #2, #3, #4, #5 (124 lines)
      From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 01:44:01 EST

55. vocab/translation #5
    • vocab/translation #5 (36 lines)
      From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:36:13 -0500

56. vocab/translation #6
    • vocab/translation #6 (35 lines)
      From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:31:58 -0500

57. vocab/translation #7
    • Re: vocab/translation #7 (46 lines)
      From: John L. Leland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:01:26 EST
    • Re: vocab/translation #7 (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:01:54 -0500
    • vocab/translation #7 (35 lines)
      From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:08:30 -0500

58. vocab/translation #8
    • Re: vocab/translation #8 (79 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:13:39 -0000
    • vocab/translation #8 (35 lines)
      From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 03:14:25 -0500

59. vocab/translation 1-5
    • vocab/translation 1-5 (136 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:13:28 -0500

60. Wikibooks Tsán page up. Feedback?
    • Wikibooks Tsán page up. Feedback? (68 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:26:38 -0500
    • Wikibooks Tsán page up. Feedback? (30 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:20:06 -0500

61. Workshops Review No.11 '04
    • Workshops Review No.11 '04 (74 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:50:03 +0200

62. You meet the oddest people on the Internet
    • Re: You meet the oddest people on the Internet (44 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:26:44 -0000
    • Re: You meet the oddest people on the Internet (44 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:59:02 +0200

63. [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 20:10:14 -0500
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (73 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:54:59 -0800
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (52 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:08:07 -0000
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (48 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:47:06 -0500
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:34:38 -0500
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:18:57 +0100
    • Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 02:12:47 -0500
    • [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy (35 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:48:25 -0500