Conlang
Mailing List – May 2004, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
USAGE: Circumfixes
? ? ? USAGE: Circumfixes
(2 messages)
About myself
(2 messages)
Attn: Janko
Aymara a loglang? (was Re: what is a loglang?)
BOOK: Metaphor, Culture and Worldview: The Case of American English and the Chinese Language
(3 messages)
CHAT Hellenika (was: USAGE: Circumfixes)
CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(15 messages)
CHAT: The Arabic equivalent of "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"?
(3 messages)
Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(8 messages)
Infinityscrapers
(5 messages)
Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(26 messages)
Mail archives lost!
NATLANG: the theory of basic colour terms & Yéli Dnye
Of artlangs & engelangs (was: what is a loglang?)
(2 messages)
OT: Hungarian translation help
(3 messages)
Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(8 messages)
Programming a calendar system
(5 messages)
Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(10 messages)
Questione: riforma di ortografia italiano
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
(2 messages)
rhetorically speaking
(6 messages)
Tech: Unicode (was...)
(5 messages)
the sound [a]
(7 messages)
The verb "to post" (was Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen")
(2 messages)
THEORY: The fourth person
TOOL(S): Intercontinental Dictionary Series (IDS), lexical & semantic fields
Two different opposites (again)
(17 messages)
Two different opposites (again) ++
Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(6 messages)
USAGE: Circumfixes
(56 messages)
USAGE: Latin puerique (was: Circumfixes)
(4 messages)
what is a loglang?
(5 messages)
Yat' (was Czech orthography)
USAGE: Circumfixes
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(71 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
? ? ? USAGE: Circumfixes
Re: ? ? ? USAGE: Circumfixes
(54 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ? ? ? USAGE: Circumfixes
(85 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
About myself
About myself
(59 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About myself
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Attn: Janko
Attn: Janko
(29 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aymara a loglang? (was Re: what is a loglang?)
Aymara a loglang? (was Re: what is a loglang?)
(39 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
BOOK: Metaphor, Culture and Worldview: The Case of American English and the Chinese Language
BOOK: Metaphor, Culture and Worldview: The Case of American English and the Chinese Language
(62 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BOOK: Metaphor, Culture and Worldview: The Case of American English and the Chinese Language
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BOOK: Metaphor, Culture and Worldview: The Case of American English and the Chinese Language
(86 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Hellenika (was: USAGE: Circumfixes)
CHAT Hellenika (was: USAGE: Circumfixes)
(78 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(45 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(68 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(65 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(105 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(74 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(106 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(123 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen"
(52 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
CHAT: The Arabic equivalent of "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"?
CHAT: The Arabic equivalent of "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"?
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: The Arabic equivalent of "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"?
(42 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: The Arabic equivalent of "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"?
(56 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(73 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(73 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(67 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(43 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(40 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(61 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(42 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Czech orthography (was Re: Lack of ambiguity in Czech, was Re: EU allumettes)
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Infinityscrapers
Infinityscrapers
(32 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Infinityscrapers
(39 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Infinityscrapers
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Infinityscrapers
(72 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Infinityscrapers
(47 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(70 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(45 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(88 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(74 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(76 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(67 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(57 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(88 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(92 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(54 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(65 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(101 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(146 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(58 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(82 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(79 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(56 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(89 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin a loglang? (was Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes))
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mail archives lost!
Mail archives lost!
(41 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: the theory of basic colour terms & Yéli Dnye
NATLANG: the theory of basic colour terms & Yéli Dnye
(254 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Of artlangs & engelangs (was: what is a loglang?)
Of artlangs & engelangs (was: what is a loglang?)
(75 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of artlangs & engelangs (was: what is a loglang?)
(109 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Hungarian translation help
OT: Hungarian translation help
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Hungarian translation help
(41 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Hungarian translation help
(67 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(78 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(44 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(74 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(73 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(153 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(42 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
(144 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Programming a calendar system
Re: Programming a calendar system
(33 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker @ school <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Programming a calendar system
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Programming a calendar system
(24 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Programming a calendar system
(45 lines)
From:
Getulio Medeiros <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Programming a calendar system
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(73 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(37 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(57 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(48 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(54 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(51 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(155 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(51 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(60 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question(s): creative spelling reform(s) of Techno-Greco-Latin-ish
(47 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Questione: riforma di ortografia italiano
Questione: riforma di ortografia italiano
(52 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
Re: Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(70 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
(214 lines)
From:
L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
(214 lines)
From:
L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <
[log in to unmask]
>
rhetorically speaking
rhetorically speaking
(31 lines)
From:
Matt Trinsic <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhetorically speaking
(85 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhetorically speaking
(59 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhetorically speaking
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhetorically speaking
(48 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhetorically speaking
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tech: Unicode (was...)
Re: Tech: Unicode (was...)
(66 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tech: Unicode (was...)
(80 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tech: Unicode (was...)
(127 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tech: Unicode (was...)
(111 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tech: Unicode (was...)
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
the sound [a]
Re: the sound [a]
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the sound [a]
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the sound [a]
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the sound [a]
(66 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the sound [a]
(75 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the sound [a]
(80 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the sound [a]
(78 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The verb "to post" (was Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen")
The verb "to post" (was Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen")
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The verb "to post" (was Re: CHAT: opposite of "verneinen")
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: The fourth person
Re: THEORY: The fourth person
(54 lines)
From:
takatunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
TOOL(S): Intercontinental Dictionary Series (IDS), lexical & semantic fields
TOOL(S): Intercontinental Dictionary Series (IDS), lexical & semantic fields
(291 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Two different opposites (again)
Two different opposites (again)
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(92 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(45 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(76 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(73 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(79 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(84 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(30 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(67 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(54 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(66 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(73 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(73 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(62 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two different opposites (again)
(57 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Two different opposites (again) ++
Re: Two different opposites (again) ++
(502 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(72 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(140 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(71 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unambiguous languages (was: EU allumettes)
(97 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Circumfixes
USAGE: Circumfixes
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(72 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(50 lines)
From:
Scott Barron <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(57 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(61 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(25 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(86 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(63 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(51 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(54 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(59 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(149 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(86 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(124 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(61 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(58 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(72 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(79 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(34 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(59 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(62 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(83 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(73 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(66 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(40 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(36 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(138 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(62 lines)
From:
vehke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(85 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(40 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(52 lines)
From:
Racsko Tamas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(118 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(105 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(58 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(98 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(63 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(66 lines)
From:
Tamas Racsko <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(90 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(35 lines)
From:
Mark P. Line <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Circumfixes
(95 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Latin puerique (was: Circumfixes)
USAGE: Latin puerique (was: Circumfixes)
(47 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin puerique (was: Circumfixes)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin puerique (was: Circumfixes)
(101 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Latin puerique (was: Circumfixes)
(63 lines)
From:
Richard Wordingham <
[log in to unmask]
>
what is a loglang?
Re: what is a loglang?
(156 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: what is a loglang?
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: what is a loglang?
(82 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: what is a loglang?
(151 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: what is a loglang?
(88 lines)
From:
Philippe Caquant <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yat' (was Czech orthography)
Re: Yat' (was Czech orthography)
(57 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – May 2004, week 2
Conlang Mailing List – May 2004, week 2
