Conlang Mailing List – May 2004, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 'U Trau' (3 messages)
• Apologies (was OFFLIST Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky)
• B. Quoy?
• Back from Nicaragua
• C'ali update:  tonal phonology (2 messages)
• C'ali update: tonal phonology (5 messages)
• Canuckistan
• Cham
• CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (9 messages)
• Check http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gconlangs/ (2 messages)
• Different forms of Greek small letters (Re: Latin mxedruli)
• Dravidian
• Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (38 messages)
• English Accents and Dialects
• Farsi writing (was: Novus Scriptio)
• How to "set" in Lindiga
• I need help. I need a conlager. (2 messages)
• It's a "fine" day.
• Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (38 messages)
• Lindiga vocabulary: "bolt"
• magic natlang corpus harvesting (9 messages)
• MNCH (was: magic natlang corpus harvesting) (3 messages)
• NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (6 messages)
• Next word: "key"
• Nova Scriptio (was: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation])
• Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (6 messages)
• OFF-TOPIC: Flame baiting (2 messages)
• OFF-TOPIC: Iraq
• OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (31 messages)
• OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (28 messages)
• OFF-TOPIC: On topic!
• OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (8 messages)
• OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguisticsbooks by Chomsky]
• OFFLIST Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky
• OT: More Idiolectal Forms (MIF) (4 messages)
• Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
• Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2
• Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A (2 messages)
• Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A:Pronunciation
• Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 3
• Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 4
• The "character" of Lindiga
• The difficulties of being weirder than English (23 messages)
• The difficulties of judging a language which you don't speak natively (was Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English) (3 messages)
• The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (6 messages)
• Today's word: "pit" (2 messages)
• TTFN
• Untangling "knot"
• USAGE: Circumfixes (8 messages)
• Word of the day: "box" (3 messages)
• Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (12 messages)
• Words of the day: 'box' and 'bolt'
• Yet another interesting French expression

1. 'U Trau'
   • 'U Trau' (176 lines)
     From: Marshall and Endemann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'U Trau' (16 lines)
     From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'U Trau' (38 lines)
     From: Marshall and Endemann <[log in to unmask]>

2. Apologies (was OFFLIST Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky)
   • Apologies (was OFFLIST Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky) (30 lines)
     From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>

3. B. Quoy?
   • B. Quoy? (37 lines)
     From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

4. Back from Nicaragua
   • Back from Nicaragua (59 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

5. C'ali update:  tonal phonology
   • Re: C'ali update:  tonal phonology (42 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: C'ali update:  tonal phonology (49 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

6. C'ali update: tonal phonology
   • C'ali update: tonal phonology (161 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: C'ali update: tonal phonology (139 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: C'ali update: tonal phonology (102 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: C'ali update: tonal phonology (108 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: C'ali update: tonal phonology (48 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

7. Canuckistan
   • Canuckistan (66 lines)
     From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

8. Cham
   • Cham (47 lines)
     From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

9. CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website)
   • CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (50 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (52 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (43 lines)
     From: Barbara Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (72 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (64 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT anecdotage (was: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website) (27 lines)
     From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

10. Check http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gconlangs/
    • Check http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gconlangs/ (41 lines)
      From: Omid Ghayour <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Check http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gconlangs/ (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

11. Different forms of Greek small letters (Re: Latin mxedruli)
    • Different forms of Greek small letters (Re: Latin mxedruli) (56 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

12. Dravidian
    • Dravidian (41 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

13. Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website
    • Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (68 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (108 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (65 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (44 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (72 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (38 lines)
      From: Livi Ruffle <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (46 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (138 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (53 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (54 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (80 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (22 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (111 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (77 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (87 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (127 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (104 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (53 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (64 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (78 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (124 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (67 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (62 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (58 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (55 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (112 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (69 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Easy and Interesting Languages -- Website (77 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>

14. English Accents and Dialects
    • English Accents and Dialects (27 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

15. Farsi writing (was: Novus Scriptio)
    • Farsi writing (was: Novus Scriptio) (59 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

16. How to "set" in Lindiga
    • How to "set" in Lindiga (42 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

17. I need help. I need a conlager.
    • I need help. I need a conlager. (74 lines)
      From: Omid Ghayour <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help. I need a conlager. (52 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>

18. It's a "fine" day.
    • It's a "fine" day. (34 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

19. Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters?
    • Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (58 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (202 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (93 lines)
      From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (38 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (56 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (256 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (65 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (80 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (72 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (78 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (127 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (62 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (64 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (86 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (62 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (55 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (62 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (65 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (161 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (94 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (84 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (53 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (83 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (60 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (102 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (70 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin mxedruli, or do we really need capital and small letters? (61 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>

20. Lindiga vocabulary: "bolt"
    • Lindiga vocabulary: "bolt" (42 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

21. magic natlang corpus harvesting
    • magic natlang corpus harvesting (61 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (47 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (33 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (44 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (95 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (28 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (39 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: magic natlang corpus harvesting (44 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

22. MNCH (was: magic natlang corpus harvesting)
    • MNCH (was: magic natlang corpus harvesting) (43 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: MNCH (was: magic natlang corpus harvesting) (73 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: MNCH (was: magic natlang corpus harvesting) (55 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

23. NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English
    • NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (27 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (57 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (57 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (40 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Long/Short Variations in English (58 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

24. Next word: "key"
    • Re: Next word: "key" (37 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

25. Nova Scriptio (was: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation])
    • Nova Scriptio (was: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation]) (36 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

26. Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation]
    • Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (293 lines)
      From: Barbara Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (77 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (106 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (55 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Novus Scriptio [was: capitolisation] (28 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

27. OFF-TOPIC: Flame baiting
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Flame baiting (33 lines)
      From: Steve Cooney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Flame baiting (36 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

28. OFF-TOPIC: Iraq
    • OFF-TOPIC: Iraq (33 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

29. OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of
    • OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (45 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (68 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (41 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (61 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (42 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (50 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (64 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (45 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (48 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (50 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (41 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (44 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (50 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (61 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (53 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (61 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (66 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (42 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (73 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Misspoken... Sort Of (61 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

30. OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (116 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (147 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (56 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (87 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (83 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (48 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (63 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (65 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (65 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (41 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (65 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (45 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (60 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (54 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (54 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (93 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (36 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (56 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (76 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (52 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (62 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (44 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (65 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

31. OFF-TOPIC: On topic!
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: On topic! (46 lines)
      From: Steve Cooney <[log in to unmask]>

32. OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky]
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (67 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (76 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (43 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (58 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (58 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguistics books by Chomsky] (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

33. OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguisticsbooks by Chomsky]
    • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Pocinators & [lE"pri:S@nz] [was: Non linguisticsbooks by Chomsky] (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

34. OFFLIST Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky
    • OFFLIST Re: OFF-TOPIC: Non linguistics books by Chomsky (50 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>

35. OT: More Idiolectal Forms (MIF)
    • OT: More Idiolectal Forms (MIF) (57 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: More Idiolectal Forms (MIF) (46 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: More Idiolectal Forms (MIF) (72 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: More Idiolectal Forms (MIF) (48 lines)
      From: Barbara Barrett <[log in to unmask]>

36. Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian)
    • Re: Phonemic vocalic length in PU/PFU (was Re: Questions about Hungarian) (59 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>

37. Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2
    • Re: Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2 (72 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

38. Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A
    • Re: Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A (118 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A (67 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>

39. Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A:Pronunciation
    • Re: Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 2A:Pronunciation (56 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

40. Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 3
    • Re: Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 3 (54 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

41. Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 4
    • Re: Rihana:Hetiba-fe-ye Diha-fe 4 (46 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

42. The "character" of Lindiga
    • The "character" of Lindiga (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

43. The difficulties of being weirder than English
    • The difficulties of being weirder than English (57 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (46 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (50 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (57 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (75 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (66 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (45 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (67 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (50 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (71 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (43 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (56 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (76 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (70 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (53 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (94 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (89 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (50 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (60 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

44. The difficulties of judging a language which you don't speak natively (was Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English)
    • The difficulties of judging a language which you don't speak natively (was Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English) (86 lines)
      From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of judging a language which you don't speak natively (was Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English) (42 lines)
      From: Marshall and Endemann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of judging a language which you don't speak natively (was Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English) (66 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

45. The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting)
    • The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (50 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (60 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (43 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (46 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The On and Off Topic of Non-linguistic Flame Baiting (WAS: flame-baiting) (106 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

46. Today's word: "pit"
    • Today's word: "pit" (54 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Today's word: "pit" (25 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

47. TTFN
    • TTFN (35 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

48. Untangling "knot"
    • Untangling "knot" (44 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

49. USAGE: Circumfixes
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (48 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (95 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (72 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (65 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (75 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (115 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Circumfixes (137 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

50. Word of the day: "box"
    • Word of the day: "box" (47 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word of the day: "box" (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word of the day: "box" (51 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

51. Words of the day: "box" and "bolt"
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (66 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (89 lines)
      From: Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (51 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (41 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (58 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (69 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (91 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Words of the day: "box" and "bolt" (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

52. Words of the day: 'box' and 'bolt'
    • Re: Words of the day: 'box' and 'bolt' (64 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>

53. Yet another interesting French expression
    • Yet another interesting French expression (67 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>