Conlang Mailing List – June 2004, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

1.       Ergativity and verbs forms
   • Re:       Ergativity and verbs forms (105 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

2. "Igbo"
   • Re: "Igbo" (42 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

3. 'Igbo'
   • Re: 'Igbo' (51 lines)
     From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>

4. (TECH) Re: 'Igbo'
   • Re: (TECH) Re: 'Igbo' (30 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

5. 2nd person inanimate
   • 2nd person inanimate (86 lines)
     From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (35 lines)
     From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (43 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (53 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (60 lines)
     From: Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>

6. 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri)
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (41 lines)
     From: Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (52 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (41 lines)
     From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (65 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (31 lines)
     From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (67 lines)
     From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (51 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (53 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 2nd person inanimate (WAS: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri) (63 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

7. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (46 lines)
     From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>

8. A sketch of Old Albic 1/4: Phonology
   • A sketch of Old Albic 1/4: Phonology (173 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A sketch of Old Albic 1/4: Phonology (129 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

9. A sketch of Old Albic 2/4: Nominal morphology
   • A sketch of Old Albic 2/4: Nominal morphology (345 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

10. A sketch of Old Albic 3/4: Verbal morphology
    • A sketch of Old Albic 3/4: Verbal morphology (226 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

11. A sketch of Old Albic 4/4: Syntax
    • A sketch of Old Albic 4/4: Syntax (196 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

12. After
    • After (40 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: After (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: After (33 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: After (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

13. Aktionsart
    • Aktionsart (15 lines)
      From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Aktionsart (48 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Aktionsart (27 lines)
      From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Aktionsart (48 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

14. an accidental conlang
    • an accidental conlang (101 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: an accidental conlang (129 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: an accidental conlang (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • an accidental conlang (149 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: an accidental conlang (67 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • an accidental conlang (121 lines)
      From: Rachel Klippenstein <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: an accidental conlang (51 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: an accidental conlang (66 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>

15. Arabic Alphabet
    • Re: Arabic Alphabet (76 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Arabic Alphabet (40 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Arabic Alphabet (39 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

16. Back!
    • Back! (29 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>

17. Books: Caucasian Families
    • Books: Caucasian Families (134 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

18. Borg: The Binary Conlang
    • Borg: The Binary Conlang (34 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>

19. California Cheeseburger
    • California Cheeseburger (42 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: California Cheeseburger (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

20. Celtica (was: Maggel)
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (40 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (55 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (63 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (76 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (84 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (99 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (56 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (54 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (41 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (99 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (57 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (70 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (59 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (43 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtica (was: Maggel) (56 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

21. CHAT Cities
    • CHAT Cities (43 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (69 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (54 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (40 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (60 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

22. CHAT Cities: Sidney
    • Re: CHAT Cities: Sidney (30 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Cities: Sidney (43 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>

23. CHAT Citizens
    • CHAT Citizens (64 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>

24. CHAT Jet-lag et al. (was Re: future past)
    • Re: CHAT Jet-lag et al. (was Re: future past) (76 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

25. CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis)
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (49 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (51 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (60 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (87 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (66 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (58 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (56 lines)
      From: Sigmund Kopperud <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (50 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (51 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (128 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (127 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (62 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (62 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (56 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (56 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (48 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (81 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (55 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (36 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (65 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Stambul (was: A new version of Genesis) (40 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

26. CHAT: figureheads etc [WAS: Re: For information only !]
    • CHAT: figureheads etc [WAS: Re: For information only !] (90 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: figureheads etc [WAS: Re: For information only !] (67 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: figureheads etc [WAS: Re: For information only !] (137 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

27. CHAT: representative bodies
    • CHAT: representative bodies (65 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

28. Conciseness
    • Re: Conciseness (82 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

29. Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs.
    • Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (33 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (54 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (83 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (93 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (57 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (49 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (61 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (47 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (89 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (115 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (89 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (34 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (94 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (73 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (48 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (187 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (61 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (125 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (74 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dangling prepositions and phrasal verbs. (60 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>

30. Depressing vocabulary for mid-June
    • Depressing vocabulary for mid-June (51 lines)
      From: Elyse M. Grasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Depressing vocabulary for mid-June (79 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Depressing vocabulary for mid-June (93 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Depressing vocabulary for mid-June (203 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Depressing vocabulary for mid-June (66 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

31. Devanagari
    • Devanagari (44 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Devanagari (69 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

32. Devanagari (was Re: sorry Mark Lang...)
    • Devanagari (was Re: sorry Mark Lang...) (64 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Devanagari (was Re: sorry Mark Lang...) (76 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Devanagari (was Re: sorry Mark Lang...) (83 lines)
      From: Scott Heath <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Devanagari (was Re: sorry Mark Lang...) (63 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

33. DRAFT: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri
    • DRAFT: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri (33 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DRAFT: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri (52 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DRAFT: Numbers from 1 to 12 in Ayeri (51 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

34. English, Masculine, Feminine
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (85 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (51 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (60 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (167 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (51 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (60 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (50 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (80 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (40 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (65 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (50 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (60 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (33 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (67 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (59 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (64 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (76 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (64 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (66 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

35. Epphatha Qs
    • Re: Epphatha Qs (58 lines)
      From: Leo Caesius <[log in to unmask]>

36. Ergativity and verb forms
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (110 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (36 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (55 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (85 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (48 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (52 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (34 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verb forms (45 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

37. Ergativity and verbs forms
    • Ergativity and verbs forms (37 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and verbs forms (62 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

38. Excuse me: Carsten Becker
    • Excuse me: Carsten Becker (44 lines)
      From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Excuse me: Carsten Becker (54 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

39. For information only !
    • Re: For information only ! (73 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (117 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (84 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (74 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (92 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (57 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (45 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (113 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: For information only ! (124 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: For information only ! (57 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (57 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (49 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (93 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (49 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (79 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (58 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (107 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (121 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (168 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (72 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (67 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (91 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (100 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (90 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (61 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (50 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (75 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (83 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (62 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (120 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (71 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (50 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (31 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (56 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (55 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: For information only ! (60 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

40. future past
    • Re: future past (91 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: future past (106 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: future past (30 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: future past (35 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

41. Fw: Kassi Script
    • Re: Fw: Kassi Script (52 lines)
      From: Barbara Barrett <[log in to unmask]>

42. Half-Voiced Stops (was: Rotokas)
    • Half-Voiced Stops (was: Rotokas) (45 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Half-Voiced Stops (was: Rotokas) (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Half-Voiced Stops (was: Rotokas) (65 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Half-Voiced Stops (was: Rotokas) (42 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

43. Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel))
    • Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (36 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (43 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (60 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (41 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (59 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indication of non-syllabicity (WAS: Re: Celtica (WAS: Maggel)) (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

44. Infant Conphonology
    • Infant Conphonology (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (36 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (41 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (44 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (70 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (62 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (34 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Infant Conphonology (32 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

45. Lexicalising Ergativity
    • Lexicalising Ergativity (28 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lexicalising Ergativity (94 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Lexicalising Ergativity (47 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Lexicalising Ergativity (74 lines)
      From: Leo Caesius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lexicalising Ergativity (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lexicalising Ergativity (109 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>

46. Minority groups in Hungary (was: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger))
    • Minority groups in Hungary (was: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger)) (60 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Minority groups in Hungary (was: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger)) (60 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

47. NATLANG: Interdental /l/ - in ENGLISH
    • NATLANG: Interdental /l/ - in ENGLISH (109 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Interdental /l/ - in ENGLISH (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Interdental /l/ - in ENGLISH (38 lines)
      From: Barbara Barrett <[log in to unmask]>

48. NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules?
    • NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (36 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (50 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (106 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (157 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (159 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (73 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (107 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (128 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (130 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: Vowel harmony rules? (69 lines)
      From: Tamas Racsko <[log in to unmask]>

49. Newbie Question:Inerrancy
    • Re: Newbie Question:Inerrancy (61 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>

50. Nostratic (was Re: Etymology of English 'black'), Tech, and Albic
    • Re: Nostratic (was Re: Etymology of English 'black'), Tech, and Albic (86 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nostratic (was Re: Etymology of English 'black'), Tech, and Albic (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nostratic (was Re: Etymology of English 'black'), Tech, and Albic (123 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

51. OT Bloomsday
    • OT Bloomsday (38 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Bloomsday (50 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>

52. OT Re: California Cheeseburger
    • OT Re: California Cheeseburger (75 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Re: California Cheeseburger (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

53. OT: For information only !
    • Re: OT: For information only ! (72 lines)
      From: Aaron Grahn <[log in to unmask]>

54. Piktok Webpage
    • Piktok Webpage (20 lines)
      From: Nokta Kanto <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piktok Webpage (33 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piktok Webpage (49 lines)
      From: Steve Cooney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piktok Webpage (33 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piktok Webpage (71 lines)
      From: Steve Cooney <[log in to unmask]>

55. Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 4
    • Re: Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 4 (54 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 4 (51 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

56. Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 5 and 6
    • Re: Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 5 and 6 (76 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

57. Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 5A-6A
    • Re: Rihana: Hetiha: Sehahuzu 5A-6A (58 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

58. Rotokas
    • Re: Rotokas (168 lines)
      From: Aaron Grahn <[log in to unmask]>

59. Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger)
    • Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (65 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (61 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (57 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (93 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (59 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (84 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (97 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (56 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (82 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (54 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (91 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (71 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (252 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (40 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (51 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (41 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (97 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (42 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (104 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (119 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (71 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (46 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (100 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (47 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (101 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (113 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (66 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (55 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (35 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (52 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (83 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (66 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (62 lines)
      From: Tamás Racskó <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (47 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (44 lines)
      From: Racsko Tamas <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (120 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (63 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger) (70 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

60. rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia
    • rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (63 lines)
      From: Emily Zilch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (43 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (53 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (38 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (63 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (96 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (46 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (49 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (32 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: rotokas; practical syllabarology; et alia (52 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>

61. SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status ...
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status ... (75 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status ... (50 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

62. SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction...
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (60 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (152 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (133 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (80 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (88 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (54 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reaction... (50 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

63. SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reactions to conlanging from non-conlangers
    • SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reactions to conlanging from non-conlangers (59 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reactions to conlanging from non-conlangers (82 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status, personal experiences of reactions to conlanging from non-conlangers (85 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

64. sorry Mark Lang...
    • sorry Mark Lang... (62 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (81 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (60 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (78 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (79 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (128 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (113 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: sorry Mark Lang... (62 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

65. Subordinate Clauses
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (74 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (90 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (73 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (38 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (52 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (57 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (80 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (60 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (87 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (56 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (51 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (79 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (72 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (45 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (84 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (79 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (79 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (146 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (117 lines)
      From: Aaron Grahn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (231 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (455 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (51 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (200 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (79 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (302 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (64 lines)
      From: Aaron Grahn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (68 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (82 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (75 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (46 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (112 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (62 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (99 lines)
      From: Aaron Grahn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (84 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (43 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (48 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (57 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (47 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (57 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate Clauses (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

66. subphonemic orthographies [was: Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger)]
    • subphonemic orthographies [was: Re: Rotokas (was: California Cheeseburger)] (110 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

67. Summertime task
    • Summertime task (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Summertime task (44 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

68. The difficulties of being weirder than English
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (37 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English (52 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>

69. Translation theory; was: Subordinate Clauses
    • Translation theory; was: Subordinate Clauses (278 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translation theory; was: Subordinate Clauses (480 lines)
      From: David Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translation theory; was: Subordinate Clauses (70 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

70. USAGE: (YAEPT) Re: English, Masculine, Feminine
    • Re: USAGE: (YAEPT) Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: (YAEPT) Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (65 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: (YAEPT) Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: (YAEPT) Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (46 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>

71. USAGE: Re: English, Masculine, Feminine
    • USAGE: Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (75 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Re: English, Masculine, Feminine (40 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

72. Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status)
    • Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (92 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (224 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (127 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (185 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (134 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (220 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (47 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (117 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein & 'private language' (was: SemiOT: Revealing your conlanger status) (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

73. Wittgenstein and private language; was: revealing your status as a conlanger
    • Wittgenstein and private language; was: revealing your status as a conlanger (210 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Wittgenstein and private language; was: revealing your status as a conlanger (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

74. YAEPT/USAGE Re: NATLANG: Interdental /l/ - in ENGLISH
    • YAEPT/USAGE Re: NATLANG: Interdental /l/ - in ENGLISH (212 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>