Conlang Mailing List – July 2004, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (6 messages)
• ADMIN: The weird post that came through a while back
• Alveolar Trill Help (3 messages)
• An Introduction (8 messages)
• CHAT: So, do I really have to use subject codes like that? (3 messages)
• Consonant harmony dissertation (4 messages)
• Encourage new browser or use ASCII?
• Labialization
• LLL Weekly Update #04/2004
• Maerik Brainstorming
• Maerik Brainstorming correction
• NATLANG: phonotactics request (not YAPT!) (3 messages)
• New... ish.
• OT Re: Consonant harmony dissertation
• OT: "Unicode" keymap (3 messages)
• Palatalized uvular stop (2 messages)
• Questions Concerning Grammar (4 messages)
• Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
• Teaching children conlangs (3 messages)
• The country of Brasael, and language of Brasaelig (4 messages)
• Translating large works
• Ubykh (2 messages)
• Ubykh, Abkhaz
• USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article (5 messages)
• USAGE: minimum number of vowels? (3 messages)

1. A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario
   • Re: A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (37 lines)
     From: Ben <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (32 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (19 lines)
     From: Ben <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (43 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (26 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A hypothetical Sci-Fi conlang scenario (55 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>

2. ADMIN: The weird post that came through a while back
   • ADMIN: The weird post that came through a while back (54 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

3. Alveolar Trill Help
   • Alveolar Trill Help (21 lines)
     From: Jacob Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alveolar Trill Help (83 lines)
     From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alveolar Trill Help (108 lines)
     From: Jacob Weaver <[log in to unmask]>

4. An Introduction
   • An Introduction (32 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (62 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (60 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (47 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (45 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (53 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (41 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Introduction (24 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>

5. CHAT: So, do I really have to use subject codes like that?
   • CHAT: So, do I really have to use subject codes like that? (23 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: So, do I really have to use subject codes like that? (62 lines)
     From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: So, do I really have to use subject codes like that? (55 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

6. Consonant harmony dissertation
   • Consonant harmony dissertation (41 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonant harmony dissertation (50 lines)
     From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonant harmony dissertation (21 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonant harmony dissertation (51 lines)
     From: Jean-François COLSON <[log in to unmask]>

7. Encourage new browser or use ASCII?
   • Encourage new browser or use ASCII? (34 lines)
     From: Ben Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>

8. Labialization
   • Labialization (19 lines)
     From: David H <[log in to unmask]>

9. LLL Weekly Update #04/2004
   • LLL Weekly Update #04/2004 (40 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

10. Maerik Brainstorming
    • Maerik Brainstorming (178 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

11. Maerik Brainstorming correction
    • Maerik Brainstorming correction (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

12. NATLANG: phonotactics request (not YAPT!)
    • NATLANG: phonotactics request (not YAPT!) (42 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: phonotactics request (not YAPT!) (45 lines)
      From: Mark P. Line <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG: phonotactics request (not YAPT!) (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

13. New... ish.
    • New... ish. (48 lines)
      From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>

14. OT Re: Consonant harmony dissertation
    • OT Re: Consonant harmony dissertation (31 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>

15. OT: "Unicode" keymap
    • OT: "Unicode" keymap (34 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: "Unicode" keymap (108 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: "Unicode" keymap (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

16. Palatalized uvular stop
    • Re: Palatalized uvular stop (50 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palatalized uvular stop (46 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

17. Questions Concerning Grammar
    • Questions Concerning Grammar (33 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions Concerning Grammar (40 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions Concerning Grammar (64 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions Concerning Grammar (86 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

18. Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
    • Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (114 lines)
      From: L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <[log in to unmask]>

19. Teaching children conlangs
    • Re: Teaching children conlangs (68 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Teaching children conlangs (76 lines)
      From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Teaching children conlangs (38 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>

20. The country of Brasael, and language of Brasaelig
    • The country of Brasael, and language of Brasaelig (157 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The country of Brasael, and language of Brasaelig (47 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The country of Brasael, and language of Brasaelig (87 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The country of Brasael, and language of Brasaelig (91 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>

21. Translating large works
    • Re: Translating large works (52 lines)
      From: John Leland <[log in to unmask]>

22. Ubykh
    • Ubykh (19 lines)
      From: David H <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ubykh (36 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>

23. Ubykh, Abkhaz
    • Re: Ubykh, Abkhaz (76 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>

24. USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article
    • Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article (42 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article (48 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article (52 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article (42 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article (47 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

25. USAGE: minimum number of vowels?
    • Re: USAGE: minimum number of vowels? (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: minimum number of vowels? (50 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: minimum number of vowels? (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>