Conlang Mailing List – November 2004, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /k/ in i.t.a. (15 messages)
• /W/ without /w/? (4 messages)
• 900+ hits? (fy: Legratec)
• A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
• Advanced English + Babel text
• ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (8 messages)
• Anyone on MSN? (4 messages)
• Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?) (5 messages)
• Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (15 messages)
• Ayeri: Longer text & Sound example (2 messages)
• back to "rhotic miscellany" (3 messages)
• Bilabial Lateral Fricative (8 messages)
• Book Review & a comment on Kélen (3 messages)
• calendars (was: samhain?) (4 messages)
• Celtic word for "tree" (8 messages)
• CHAT of vests & tortoises (was: Spelling pronunciations) (3 messages)
• CHAT Re: Spelling pronunciations (multiple) (3 messages)
• CHAT Vests (was: Spelling pronunciations)
• Complex prepositions (was: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs?)
• CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
• CXS changes (19 messages)
• Disgusting thread... ;-) (6 messages)
• English l and Spanish ll (16 messages)
• Evolution of Applicatives (19 messages)
• Evolution of Applicatives (+ passive/antipassive question) (2 messages)
• First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system (2 messages)
• Fwd: Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs?
• Fwd: Re: back to "rhotic miscellany"
• Fwd: [rhetoric-list] CALLING ALL WORDOPHILES...
• I think I'm happy with my alphabet now!
• It's me again :)
• Legratec (21 messages)
• LLL Weekly Update #19/2004
• Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (12 messages)
• new conlang/script: Pinuyo (2 messages)
• Old Nindic to Classical Modern Nindic
• OT: Neographies Mail group
• Phaleran and C'ali updates: weak-crossover (2 messages)
• Putting the J in Sleep (6 messages)
• question
• Question about historical Japanese kana usage.
• question I can't parse into a Subject Line (2 messages)
• Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
• Rhean site is up! (11 messages)
• Rising/Falling diphthongs (10 messages)
• Small relay (13 messages)
• Spelling pronunciations (9 messages)
• Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (15 messages)
• spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)
• Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (13 messages)
• Tatari Faran webpage up!
• that particular creole Re: You might be a conlanger if... (2 messages)
• Two new things that might interrest you (4 messages)
• Types of possession
• USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (16 messages)
• What's this sound? (3 messages)
• YAEPT alert! [Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)]
• YAEPT Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)
• YAEPT: Pin/pen merger (Was: Re: You might be a conlanger if...) (2 messages)
• You might be a conlanger if... (38 messages)
• _the_ lateral fricative? (5 messages)

1. /k/ in i.t.a.
   • /k/ in i.t.a. (37 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (53 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (40 lines)
     From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (53 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (83 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (104 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (60 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (73 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (124 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (74 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (26 lines)
     From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (53 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (76 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /k/ in i.t.a. (61 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

2. /W/ without /w/?
   • /W/ without /w/? (52 lines)
     From: Dan Saunders <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /W/ without /w/? (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /W/ without /w/? (33 lines)
     From: Adam F. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /W/ without /w/? (54 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

3. 900+ hits? (fy: Legratec)
   • 900+ hits? (fy: Legratec) (51 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

4. A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
   • A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives (30 lines)
     From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>

5. Advanced English + Babel text
   • Re: Advanced English + Babel text (55 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

6. ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs?
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (99 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (16 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (79 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (72 lines)
     From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (70 lines)
     From: Kit La Touche <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (101 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (34 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (53 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

7. Anyone on MSN?
   • Anyone on MSN? (27 lines)
     From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone on MSN? (39 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone on MSN? (38 lines)
     From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone on MSN? (35 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

8. Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?)
   • Re: Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?) (38 lines)
     From: Simon Richard Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?) (64 lines)
     From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?) (57 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?) (43 lines)
     From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ashamed of [T]? (fy: /T/ -> /t_d/?) (69 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

9. Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs
   • Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (43 lines)
     From: scott <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (36 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (70 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (22 lines)
     From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (48 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (68 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (36 lines)
     From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (123 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (46 lines)
     From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (212 lines)
     From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (47 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (186 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (45 lines)
     From: scott <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (61 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect vs. case; stative and dynamic verbs (35 lines)
     From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

10. Ayeri: Longer text & Sound example
    • Ayeri: Longer text & Sound example (72 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ayeri: Longer text & Sound example (67 lines)
      From: Simon Richard Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>

11. back to "rhotic miscellany"
    • Re: back to "rhotic miscellany" (44 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: back to "rhotic miscellany" (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: back to "rhotic miscellany" (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

12. Bilabial Lateral Fricative
    • Bilabial Lateral Fricative (75 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (82 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (32 lines)
      From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (77 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (52 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (27 lines)
      From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (17 lines)
      From: Andrew Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bilabial Lateral Fricative (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

13. Book Review & a comment on Kélen
    • Book Review & a comment on Kélen (55 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Book Review & a comment on Kélen (88 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Book Review & a comment on Kélen (99 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

14. calendars (was: samhain?)
    • Re: calendars (was: samhain?) (108 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: calendars (was: samhain?) (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: calendars (was: samhain?) (48 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: calendars (was: samhain?) (56 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

15. Celtic word for "tree"
    • Celtic word for "tree" (39 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (68 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (48 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (52 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (124 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (60 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (46 lines)
      From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Celtic word for "tree" (73 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

16. CHAT of vests & tortoises (was: Spelling pronunciations)
    • CHAT of vests & tortoises (was: Spelling pronunciations) (149 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT of vests & tortoises (was: Spelling pronunciations) (63 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT of vests & tortoises (was: Spelling pronunciations) (40 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>

17. CHAT Re: Spelling pronunciations (multiple)
    • Re: CHAT Re: Spelling pronunciations (multiple) (97 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Re: Spelling pronunciations (multiple) (55 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Re: Spelling pronunciations (multiple) (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

18. CHAT Vests (was: Spelling pronunciations)
    • CHAT Vests (was: Spelling pronunciations) (136 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

19. Complex prepositions (was: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs?)
    • Complex prepositions (was: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs?) (84 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

20. CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
    • Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system (82 lines)
      From: Simon Richard Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>

21. CXS changes
    • Re: CXS changes (65 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (57 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (43 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (50 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (34 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (72 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (39 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CXS changes (52 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

22. Disgusting thread... ;-)
    • Re: Disgusting thread... ;-) (57 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Disgusting thread... ;-) (97 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Disgusting thread... ;-) (97 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Disgusting thread... ;-) (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Disgusting thread... ;-) (70 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Disgusting thread... ;-) (68 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>

23. English l and Spanish ll
    • English l and Spanish ll (41 lines)
      From: Adam Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (86 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (47 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (74 lines)
      From: Adam Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (17 lines)
      From: Adam Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (31 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (40 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (42 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (35 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (42 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English l and Spanish ll (40 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>

24. Evolution of Applicatives
    • Evolution of Applicatives (28 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (71 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (76 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (69 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (82 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (91 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (62 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (72 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (45 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (71 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (108 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (49 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (66 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (105 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (125 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (83 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (61 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (77 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>

25. Evolution of Applicatives (+ passive/antipassive question)
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (+ passive/antipassive question) (73 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of Applicatives (+ passive/antipassive question) (73 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

26. First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
    • Re: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system (16 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system (71 lines)
      From: Erich Kummerfeld <[log in to unmask]>

27. Fwd: Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs?
    • Fwd: Re: ANADEWISM: Natlangs that do comparison with true verbs? (37 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

28. Fwd: Re: back to "rhotic miscellany"
    • Fwd: Re: back to "rhotic miscellany" (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

29. Fwd: [rhetoric-list] CALLING ALL WORDOPHILES...
    • Fwd: [rhetoric-list] CALLING ALL WORDOPHILES... (126 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

30. I think I'm happy with my alphabet now!
    • I think I'm happy with my alphabet now! (46 lines)
      From: Glenn Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

31. It's me again :)
    • It's me again :) (62 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>

32. Legratec
    • Legratec (42 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (66 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (104 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (25 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (79 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (47 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (56 lines)
      From: Elyse M. Grasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (146 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (90 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (61 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (43 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (99 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (64 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (94 lines)
      From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (50 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (33 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (165 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (84 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Legratec (51 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>

33. LLL Weekly Update #19/2004
    • LLL Weekly Update #19/2004 (33 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

34. Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany"
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (94 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (39 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (86 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (252 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (133 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (69 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (143 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (63 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (59 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (163 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Need some help with terms: was "rhotic miscellany" (52 lines)
      From: Simon Richard Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>

35. new conlang/script: Pinuyo
    • new conlang/script: Pinuyo (35 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: new conlang/script: Pinuyo (58 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

36. Old Nindic to Classical Modern Nindic
    • Re: Old Nindic to Classical Modern Nindic (80 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>

37. OT: Neographies Mail group
    • OT: Neographies Mail group (40 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

38. Phaleran and C'ali updates: weak-crossover
    • Phaleran and C'ali updates: weak-crossover (143 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaleran and C'ali updates: weak-crossover (61 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

39. Putting the J in Sleep
    • Putting the J in Sleep (58 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Putting the J in Sleep (45 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Putting the J in Sleep (51 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Putting the J in Sleep (71 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Putting the J in Sleep (43 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Putting the J in Sleep (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

40. question
    • question (49 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>

41. Question about historical Japanese kana usage.
    • Re: Question about historical Japanese kana usage. (46 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

42. question I can't parse into a Subject Line
    • question I can't parse into a Subject Line (52 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: question I can't parse into a Subject Line (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

43. Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
    • Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (126 lines)
      From: L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <[log in to unmask]>

44. Rhean site is up!
    • Rhean site is up! (24 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (31 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (42 lines)
      From: scott <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (53 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (55 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (74 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (38 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rhean site is up! (34 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

45. Rising/Falling diphthongs
    • Rising/Falling diphthongs (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (56 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (46 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (59 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (44 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (52 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rising/Falling diphthongs (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

46. Small relay
    • Small relay (17 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (45 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (45 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (18 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (36 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (54 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (64 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (34 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (59 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (21 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (17 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (48 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small relay (23 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>

47. Spelling pronunciations
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (41 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (36 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (57 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (59 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (60 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (46 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (44 lines)
      From: Elyse M. Grasso <[log in to unmask]>

48. Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (100 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (44 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (54 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (76 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (45 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (56 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (43 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (47 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (55 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (50 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (131 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

49. spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)
    • Re: spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

50. Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (46 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (77 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (55 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (68 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (54 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (49 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (73 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (44 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

51. Tatari Faran webpage up!
    • Tatari Faran webpage up! (78 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

52. that particular creole Re: You might be a conlanger if...
    • Re: that particular creole Re: You might be a conlanger if... (47 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: that particular creole Re: You might be a conlanger if... (58 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

53. Two new things that might interrest you
    • Two new things that might interrest you (82 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two new things that might interrest you (50 lines)
      From: Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two new things that might interrest you (32 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two new things that might interrest you (15 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>

54. Types of possession
    • Types of possession (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

55. USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting
    • USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (43 lines)
      From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (76 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (42 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (56 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (60 lines)
      From: Alexander Savenkov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (56 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (49 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (51 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (40 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (53 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (45 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (51 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (51 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: 'like' as a referent to quoting (41 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>

56. What's this sound?
    • What's this sound? (47 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's this sound? (42 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's this sound? (57 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>

57. YAEPT alert! [Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)]
    • YAEPT alert! [Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)] (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

58. YAEPT Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany)
    • YAEPT Re: Spelling pronunciations (was: rhotic miscellany) (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

59. YAEPT: Pin/pen merger (Was: Re: You might be a conlanger if...)
    • YAEPT: Pin/pen merger (Was: Re: You might be a conlanger if...) (63 lines)
      From: Caleb Hines <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: Pin/pen merger (Was: Re: You might be a conlanger if...) (53 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

60. You might be a conlanger if...
    • You might be a conlanger if... (73 lines)
      From: Caleb Hines <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (39 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (36 lines)
      From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (59 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (145 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (36 lines)
      From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (55 lines)
      From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (72 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (37 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (41 lines)
      From: Glenn Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (189 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (83 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (85 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (51 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (104 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (41 lines)
      From: James W <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (234 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (43 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (133 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (33 lines)
      From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (55 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (65 lines)
      From: Caleb Hines <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (171 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (57 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (48 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (27 lines)
      From: Pablo Barenbaum <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (33 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (41 lines)
      From: Simon Richard Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (44 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (37 lines)
      From: Alexander Savenkov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (72 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (52 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (116 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (27 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: You might be a conlanger if... (56 lines)
      From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>

61. _the_ lateral fricative?
    • _the_ lateral fricative? (38 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: _the_ lateral fricative? (87 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: _the_ lateral fricative? (43 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: _the_ lateral fricative? (40 lines)
      From: Simon Richard Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: _the_ lateral fricative? (78 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>