Conlang
Mailing List November 2004, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(6 messages)
/k/ in i.t.a.
(2 messages)
2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(6 messages)
A Bit of a Flame
(20 messages)
A Bit of a Flame (commented on by Methos)
A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
(3 messages)
An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
(5 messages)
Another victory for the principle of ANADEWism
Anyone on MSN?
aspirated m?
(3 messages)
C-23...based on our discussions in-list...
CONCULTURE: dual planets
(15 messages)
CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(25 messages)
Conlang introduction
(6 messages)
Disambiguating polysemy (was: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them)
(4 messages)
Dormant conlangs (was Re: Tatari Faran and Flames)
Dyirbal?
(8 messages)
English l and Spanish ll
(6 messages)
ergative + another introduction
(9 messages)
Evolution of Applicatives
(8 messages)
Family business
(2 messages)
fonts
(4 messages)
Fwd: Re: New planet on the horizon
ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(6 messages)
I'm on ICQ now as well
idea - making a trigger lang from a NatLang?
Introduction
(35 messages)
kinship terms in Calénnawn
Klingon Xsampa
(5 messages)
Language in use
(15 messages)
Legratec
(4 messages)
Linguolabial (?) consonants
(2 messages)
LLL Weekly Update #20/2004
New conlang - Ichwara Prana
new conlang/script: Pinuyo
(2 messages)
New conlang: PátacasálahumÃnu
(2 messages)
New planet on the horizon
(2 messages)
Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(6 messages)
Numerical suffixes - How to use them
Old Chinese retroflexes--a few questions.
(4 messages)
Planets and Moons
(7 messages)
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
Rhean site is up!
Saarbrücken (was Re: [relay] A back-up account for the torch)
Sounds in Conlangs
(11 messages)
Sounds in Conlangs (and Qthen|gai in Chinese)
Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(36 messages)
Tatari Faran and Flames
(8 messages)
tatari faran and triggers
This is not a conlang (Potential Conlang Construction?).
This is not a conlang (Transcriptions).
(4 messages)
This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(7 messages)
This is not a conlang.
(17 messages)
Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(8 messages)
Unqualified Appology
(4 messages)
Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(6 messages)
What did Rodlox do? (was: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(2 messages)
Working on: Vijyareu
X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(6 messages)
X-SAMPA confusion (was: Introduction)
Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(8 messages)
Xinkutlan 2- Some Grammar
Your message to
[log in to unmask]
"triggers et al" as I presently understand them
"triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(72 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(127 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(110 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(50 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(88 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them
(52 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
/k/ in i.t.a.
Re: /k/ in i.t.a.
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /k/ in i.t.a.
(58 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
Re: 2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(42 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(65 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(57 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(63 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(64 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2 Re: A Bit of a Flame
(35 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Bit of a Flame
A Bit of a Flame
(85 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(31 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(17 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(148 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(82 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(133 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(55 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(67 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(25 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(81 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(221 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Bit of a Flame
(24 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Bit of a Flame (commented on by Methos)
Re: A Bit of a Flame (commented on by Methos)
(98 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
Re: A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question for the ejective gurus: strong~weak ejectives
(44 lines)
From:
rob_nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
(139 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
(27 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
(42 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
(160 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An incomplete, but interesting, Conlang sketch
(58 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another victory for the principle of ANADEWism
Another victory for the principle of ANADEWism
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anyone on MSN?
Re: Anyone on MSN?
(32 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
aspirated m?
aspirated m?
(44 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: aspirated m?
(53 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: aspirated m?
(89 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
C-23...based on our discussions in-list...
C-23...based on our discussions in-list...
(322 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONCULTURE: dual planets
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(118 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(169 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(75 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(123 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(132 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(60 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(68 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(40 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(113 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: dual planets
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(98 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(108 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(56 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(38 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(85 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(61 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(51 lines)
From:
Elyse M. Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(62 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(61 lines)
From:
Erich Kummerfeld <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(67 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan Mc Leay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(85 lines)
From:
Erich Kummerfeld <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(91 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(53 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(83 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(75 lines)
From:
Erich Kummerfeld <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system
(39 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang introduction
Conlang introduction
(32 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang introduction
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang introduction
(15 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang introduction
(76 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang introduction
(43 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang introduction
(83 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Disambiguating polysemy (was: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them)
Disambiguating polysemy (was: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them)
(63 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Disambiguating polysemy (was: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them)
(93 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Disambiguating polysemy (was: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them)
(102 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Disambiguating polysemy (was: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them)
(50 lines)
From:
Cowbert von Moo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dormant conlangs (was Re: Tatari Faran and Flames)
Dormant conlangs (was Re: Tatari Faran and Flames)
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dyirbal?
Dyirbal?
(51 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(33 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(52 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(48 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(75 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(61 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dyirbal?
(119 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
English l and Spanish ll
Re: English l and Spanish ll
(40 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English l and Spanish ll
(43 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English l and Spanish ll
(61 lines)
From:
Tristan Mc Leay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English l and Spanish ll
(41 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English l and Spanish ll
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan Mc Leay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English l and Spanish ll
(41 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
ergative + another introduction
ergative + another introduction
(70 lines)
From:
Erich Kummerfeld <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(151 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(59 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(109 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(62 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ergative + another introduction
(56 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evolution of Applicatives
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(43 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(52 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(65 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(46 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(85 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(128 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(86 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of Applicatives
(110 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Family business
Family business
(34 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Family business
(76 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
fonts
fonts
(49 lines)
From:
Lupin Wolfe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fonts
(28 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fonts
(47 lines)
From:
Jonathyn Bet'nct <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fonts
(44 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: New planet on the horizon
Fwd: Re: New planet on the horizon
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(73 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(54 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(86 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(52 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(112 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ghosts, flames, and fox fire; was: a bit of...
(87 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm on ICQ now as well
I'm on ICQ now as well
(29 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
idea - making a trigger lang from a NatLang?
idea - making a trigger lang from a NatLang?
(65 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction
Introduction
(45 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(74 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(107 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(54 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(40 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(89 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(82 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(86 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(54 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(48 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(30 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(65 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(54 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(35 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(37 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(67 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(26 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(75 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(58 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(58 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(76 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(77 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(36 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(60 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(48 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(46 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
kinship terms in Calénnawn
kinship terms in Calénnawn
(38 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon Xsampa
Klingon Xsampa
(38 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Xsampa
(55 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Xsampa
(34 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Xsampa
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Xsampa
(80 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language in use
Language in use
(17 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(67 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(70 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(19 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(44 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(40 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(69 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(63 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(96 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(71 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(88 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(15 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language in use
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Legratec
Re: Legratec
(57 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Legratec
(17 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Legratec
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Legratec
(43 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Linguolabial (?) consonants
Linguolabial (?) consonants
(35 lines)
From:
Pablo Barenbaum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguolabial (?) consonants
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
LLL Weekly Update #20/2004
LLL Weekly Update #20/2004
(34 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
New conlang - Ichwara Prana
New conlang - Ichwara Prana
(48 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
new conlang/script: Pinuyo
Re: new conlang/script: Pinuyo
(46 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlang/script: Pinuyo
(67 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
New conlang: PátacasálahumÃnu
New conlang: PátacasálahumÃnu
(92 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang: PátacasálahumÃnu
(26 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
New planet on the horizon
New planet on the horizon
(102 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New planet on the horizon
(49 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(70 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(38 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(52 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Chomskyan Syntax Page
(20 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numerical suffixes - How to use them
Numerical suffixes - How to use them
(56 lines)
From:
Andrew Patterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Old Chinese retroflexes--a few questions.
Old Chinese retroflexes--a few questions.
(73 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Chinese retroflexes--a few questions.
(65 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Chinese retroflexes--a few questions.
(60 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Chinese retroflexes--a few questions.
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Planets and Moons
Planets and Moons
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Planets and Moons
(55 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Planets and Moons
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Planets and Moons
(54 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Planets and Moons
(68 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Planets and Moons
(38 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Planets and Moons
(47 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
(97 lines)
From:
L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
Rejected posting to
[log in to unmask]
(97 lines)
From:
L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhean site is up!
Rhean site is up!
(28 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saarbrücken (was Re: [relay] A back-up account for the torch)
Saarbrücken (was Re: [relay] A back-up account for the torch)
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sounds in Conlangs
Sounds in Conlangs
(47 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(64 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan Mc Leay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(70 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(58 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(95 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(73 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(43 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(79 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sounds in Conlangs
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sounds in Conlangs (and Qthen|gai in Chinese)
Re: Sounds in Conlangs (and Qthen|gai in Chinese)
(67 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(48 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(65 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(79 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(93 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(157 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(161 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(165 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(100 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(100 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(135 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(112 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(355 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(49 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(304 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(123 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(442 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(177 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(100 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(86 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(231 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(152 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(140 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(431 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(117 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(114 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(376 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(59 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(220 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(170 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(447 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(193 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tatari Faran and Flames
Tatari Faran and Flames
(103 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(147 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(145 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(132 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(87 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(77 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tatari Faran and Flames
(40 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
tatari faran and triggers
tatari faran and triggers
(186 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
This is not a conlang (Potential Conlang Construction?).
Re: This is not a conlang (Potential Conlang Construction?).
(93 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
This is not a conlang (Transcriptions).
Re: This is not a conlang (Transcriptions).
(83 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang (Transcriptions).
(94 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang (Transcriptions).
(58 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang (Transcriptions).
(53 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(115 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(81 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(48 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
(60 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
This is not a conlang.
This is not a conlang.
(55 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(125 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(88 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(26 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(114 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(54 lines)
From:
Simon Richard Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(52 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(42 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(65 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(85 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(51 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(40 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(124 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(36 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: This is not a conlang.
(67 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(36 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(72 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(48 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(66 lines)
From:
Tristan Mc Leay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(37 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Umlaut, Vowel Harmony etc
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unqualified Appology
Unqualified Appology
(34 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unqualified Appology
(47 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unqualified Appology
(35 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unqualified Appology
(66 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(89 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(42 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(70 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal System: I'd like comments. :)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
What did Rodlox do? (was: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
What did Rodlox do? (was: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(78 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What did Rodlox do? (was: Tagalog & trigger idea: I'd like comments. :)
(56 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Working on: Vijyareu
Working on: Vijyareu
(87 lines)
From:
Samantha Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(47 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(53 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
(52 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
X-SAMPA confusion (was: Introduction)
X-SAMPA confusion (was: Introduction)
(123 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(19 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(52 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(40 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan Mc Leay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(25 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(19 lines)
From:
Adam F. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(40 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Xinkutlan 1- Phonology
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Xinkutlan 2- Some Grammar
Xinkutlan 2- Some Grammar
(101 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Your message to
[log in to unmask]
Your message to
[log in to unmask]
(78 lines)
From:
L-Soft list server at Brown University (1.8d) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU