Conlang
Mailing List – December 2004, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Free" word order (was Re: Greek definite article (was Re: Addendum: a holy spirit))
ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
(5 messages)
ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentalityof Conlang
(2 messages)
Aluric language site has moved...
An apology & bye till 2005 (was: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?)
ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(9 messages)
And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(6 messages)
Australish
can-may
(18 messages)
CHAT: Music
(2 messages)
CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(14 messages)
Chatiga - McGuffey's Reader Lessons 1-6 + Exercise
CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
(4 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 23 Dec 2004 to 24 Dec 2004 (#2004-358)
Creolization
DECAL - Scheduling, outline fleshing-out
dZs?
(6 messages)
Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(8 messages)
Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
(5 messages)
Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda
Grammars
(4 messages)
Lateral Trill
(2 messages)
Let me introduce myself
(5 messages)
Let the listener guess what happened
(5 messages)
LLL Weekly Update #25/2004
logic vocabulary
(20 messages)
man-
(8 messages)
man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(10 messages)
man- etc.
(2 messages)
McGuffey in Curnalis [Re: O tempora! Naming the case.]
(2 messages)
McGuffey Project Update: 172 Sentences
(3 messages)
McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(7 messages)
men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(13 messages)
nasal diphthongs
(2 messages)
nasal diphtongs
(2 messages)
New first reader
New source for McGuffey's Reader text online
(4 messages)
O tempora! Naming the case.
(5 messages)
Observations on Spoken Merkin
(4 messages)
On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(7 messages)
OT: Merry Christmas!
(30 messages)
phrase's order
(5 messages)
Reduction and Grammaticalization
(3 messages)
savoir-connaîtr e (was: Re: can-may)
savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
(2 messages)
savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(10 messages)
Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(2 messages)
Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(4 messages)
the conditional mood
(2 messages)
The McGuffey Project in Minza
(3 messages)
The transition from Ancient Tazhu to Old Early Tazhu.
THEORY: word-order
(2 messages)
Time
(4 messages)
two pronouns words
(6 messages)
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (in general)
(2 messages)
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 38 - 48)
(4 messages)
Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(27 messages)
[CONLANG] Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
"Free" word order (was Re: Greek definite article (was Re: Addendum: a holy spirit))
Re: "Free" word order (was Re: Greek definite article (was Re: Addendum: a holy spirit))
(51 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
(56 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
(29 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentality of Conlang
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentalityof Conlang
Re: ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentalityof Conlang
(40 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: John Cowan departing; turnover in the Instrumentalityof Conlang
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aluric language site has moved...
Aluric language site has moved...
(54 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
An apology & bye till 2005 (was: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?)
An apology & bye till 2005 (was: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?)
(53 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
ANADEWism? interrogative mood
ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(32 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(33 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(36 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(36 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(63 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANADEWism? interrogative mood
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
And now for something completely different - Chatiga
And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(81 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(61 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(56 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now for something completely different - Chatiga
(80 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Australish
Australish
(30 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
can-may
can-may
(49 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(84 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(100 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(73 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(43 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(124 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(66 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(67 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(105 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(140 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(71 lines)
From:
JC <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(53 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(73 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(58 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: can-may
(68 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Music
CHAT: Music
(36 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Music
(47 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(87 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(74 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(112 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(70 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(100 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(116 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(121 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(65 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(43 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Our opinions of what can be called 'winter' (was: OT: Merry Christmas!)
(40 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chatiga - McGuffey's Reader Lessons 1-6 + Exercise
Chatiga - McGuffey's Reader Lessons 1-6 + Exercise
(201 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
(157 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
(47 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
(30 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
(36 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 23 Dec 2004 to 24 Dec 2004 (#2004-358)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 23 Dec 2004 to 24 Dec 2004 (#2004-358)
(27 lines)
From:
phunki007 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Creolization
Creolization
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
DECAL - Scheduling, outline fleshing-out
DECAL - Scheduling, outline fleshing-out
(357 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
dZs?
dZs?
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dZs?
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dZs?
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dZs?
(72 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dZs?
(87 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: dZs?
(56 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(72 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(105 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(82 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eliding repeated morphemes: synthesis vs analysis
(91 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
(118 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
(74 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
(50 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
(54 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolving a Pidgin (was Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization)
(33 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda
Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda
(22 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Grammars
Grammars
(33 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammars
(36 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammars
(36 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammars
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lateral Trill
Lateral Trill
(39 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lateral Trill
(30 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Let me introduce myself
Let me introduce myself
(57 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let me introduce myself
(86 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let me introduce myself
(109 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let me introduce myself
(94 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let me introduce myself
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Let the listener guess what happened
Let the listener guess what happened
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let the listener guess what happened
(63 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let the listener guess what happened
(42 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let the listener guess what happened
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Let the listener guess what happened
(71 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
LLL Weekly Update #25/2004
LLL Weekly Update #25/2004
(34 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
logic vocabulary
Re: logic vocabulary
(149 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(222 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(30 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(128 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(82 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(42 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(58 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(290 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(88 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(86 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(66 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(86 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(77 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(43 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: logic vocabulary
(43 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
man-
Re: man-
(47 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(69 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(68 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(67 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(42 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man-
(54 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
man- (was: logic vocabulary)
man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(61 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(80 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(61 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(75 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(70 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
(60 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
man- etc.
Re: man- etc.
(190 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: man- etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
McGuffey in Curnalis [Re: O tempora! Naming the case.]
McGuffey in Curnalis [Re: O tempora! Naming the case.]
(145 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffey in Curnalis [Re: O tempora! Naming the case.]
(170 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
McGuffey Project Update: 172 Sentences
Re: McGuffey Project Update: 172 Sentences
(45 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffey Project Update: 172 Sentences
(30 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffey Project Update: 172 Sentences
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(35 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(60 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(60 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffy Readers: Image Copyright?
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(120 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(42 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(111 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(96 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(64 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(74 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: men, elves, wolves, and robots; was: man, etc.
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
nasal diphthongs
Re: nasal diphthongs
(43 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: nasal diphthongs
(41 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
nasal diphtongs
nasal diphtongs
(31 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: nasal diphtongs
(41 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
New first reader
New first reader
(32 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
New source for McGuffey's Reader text online
New source for McGuffey's Reader text online
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New source for McGuffey's Reader text online
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New source for McGuffey's Reader text online
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New source for McGuffey's Reader text online
(46 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
O tempora! Naming the case.
O tempora! Naming the case.
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O tempora! Naming the case.
(81 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O tempora! Naming the case.
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O tempora! Naming the case.
(62 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O tempora! Naming the case.
(18 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Observations on Spoken Merkin
Observations on Spoken Merkin
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Observations on Spoken Merkin
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Observations on Spoken Merkin
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Observations on Spoken Merkin
(53 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(240 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(74 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(61 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On prescriptions and misunderstanding: was can/may
(223 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Merry Christmas!
OT: Merry Christmas!
(50 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(59 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(39 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(54 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(60 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(90 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(90 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(79 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(56 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(67 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(54 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(36 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(59 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(42 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(56 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(67 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(55 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Merry Christmas!
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
phrase's order
phrase's order
(54 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrase's order
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrase's order
(81 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrase's order
(82 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrase's order
(71 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reduction and Grammaticalization
Reduction and Grammaticalization
(43 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization
(74 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reduction and Grammaticalization
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
savoir-connaîtr e (was: Re: can-may)
Re: savoir-connaîtr e (was: Re: can-may)
(101 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
(41 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(43 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
RE: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(72 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(89 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(145 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(87 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(132 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(49 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can-may)
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
Re: Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(86 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(83 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(50 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(90 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(57 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tense and aspect (was: savoir-connaître)
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
the conditional mood
the conditional mood
(47 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the conditional mood
(39 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
The McGuffey Project in Minza
The McGuffey Project in Minza
(88 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The McGuffey Project in Minza
(53 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The McGuffey Project in Minza
(55 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
The transition from Ancient Tazhu to Old Early Tazhu.
The transition from Ancient Tazhu to Old Early Tazhu.
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: word-order
THEORY: word-order
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: word-order
(79 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time
Time
(36 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time
(25 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time
(81 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time
(102 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
two pronouns words
two pronouns words
(48 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: two pronouns words
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: two pronouns words
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: two pronouns words
(69 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: two pronouns words
(89 lines)
From:
Rene Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: two pronouns words
(58 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (in general)
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (in general)
(40 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (in general)
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 38 - 48)
Re: VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 38 - 48)
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 38 - 48)
(62 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 38 - 48)
(68 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 38 - 48)
(55 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(33 lines)
From:
Adam F. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(46 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(67 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(58 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(72 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(37 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(15 lines)
From:
Adam F. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(48 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(62 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(32 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(74 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(119 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(53 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(67 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(32 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel Harmony Asthetically Pleasing?
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CONLANG] Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
Re: [CONLANG] Re: savoir-connaître (was: Re: can -may)
(62 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – December 2004, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – December 2004, week 4
