Conlang Mailing List – January 2005, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Anadewism? Reflexive case
• Animal/meat (was Re: Tricky translations)
• appositions in lists (was: Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (3 messages)
• Ayhan (The Language Formerly Known As: Saalangal)
• Consonants as source of vowels (13 messages)
• CXS to IPA-UTF8-converter? (3 messages)
• DECAL: Examples #1 and #2
• DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics (2 messages)
• DECAL: Examples #3: Phonological change rules
• DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences (5 messages)
• DECAL: Readings? (2 messages)
• DECAL: Research questions #1
• Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (17 messages)
• Dubious historical linguistics (was Re: Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics))
• English |a| (21 messages)
• European isolates (2 messages)
• Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (14 messages)
• Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (17 messages)
• Fwd: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (2 messages)
• grammar
• is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (7 messages)
• Jesse Bangs - hello? (3 messages)
• Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics) (3 messages)
• making/marking articles? Re Exit Methkaeki,
• More Kash stuff (was Re: Naming Mythical creatures) (2 messages)
• mu for [N]
• mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (13 messages)
• Naming Mythical creatures (13 messages)
• Not purely isolating (was: Dropping Q and C)
• Orthography of palatalized consonants (23 messages)
• OT: #conlang? (2 messages)
• OT: CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
• Palatal vs. Palatalized (was Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants) (4 messages)
• politeness and quizzical questions (2 messages)
• Senyecan Verb Idiom I
• Somali C (3 messages)
• Some isolating verb patterns (8 messages)
• Switch Systems and Relative Animacy (5 messages)
• TECH: Backups
• TECH: Backups (Was: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations)) (4 messages)
• TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations) (4 messages)
• THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (2 messages)
• THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (43 messages)
• THEORY: French and polypersonalism
• THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (6 messages)
• Theory: Hick (etc) accents - universals?
• THEORY: Is ASL a trigger language?
• THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (8 messages)
• THEORY: Polysynthetic languages - used in a sentence?
• Tricky translations (26 messages)
• USAGE double written consonants (was: Orthography of palatalized consonants)
• USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (7 messages)
• what is "vl-vd" ? (was Re Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (2 messages)
• Workshops Review #02, 2005

1. Anadewism? Reflexive case
   • Anadewism? Reflexive case (60 lines)
     From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>

2. Animal/meat (was Re: Tricky translations)
   • Re: Animal/meat (was Re: Tricky translations) (68 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

3. appositions in lists (was: Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
   • appositions in lists (was: Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (105 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: appositions in lists (was: Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (49 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: appositions in lists (was: Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (133 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

4. Ayhan (The Language Formerly Known As: Saalangal)
   • Ayhan (The Language Formerly Known As: Saalangal) (155 lines)
     From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

5. Consonants as source of vowels
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (47 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (68 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (41 lines)
     From: Pablo Flores <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (44 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (40 lines)
     From: Pablo Flores <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (48 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (47 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (62 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (52 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (37 lines)
     From: Pablo Flores <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (53 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (57 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Consonants as source of vowels (69 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

6. CXS to IPA-UTF8-converter?
   • CXS to IPA-UTF8-converter? (48 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS to IPA-UTF8-converter? (50 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS to IPA-UTF8-converter? (49 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

7. DECAL: Examples #1 and #2
   • Re: DECAL: Examples #1 and #2 (100 lines)
     From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>

8. DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics
   • Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics (104 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics (47 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

9. DECAL: Examples #3: Phonological change rules
   • Re: DECAL: Examples #3: Phonological change rules (137 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

10. DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences
    • Re: DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences (176 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences (338 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences (45 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences (64 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DECAL: Examples #4: Interesting Sentences (96 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

11. DECAL: Readings?
    • DECAL: Readings? (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: DECAL: Readings? (39 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

12. DECAL: Research questions #1
    • Re: DECAL: Research questions #1 (152 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

13. Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns)
    • Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (92 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (64 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (91 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (67 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (66 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (72 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (83 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (46 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (106 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (83 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (39 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (55 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (140 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (57 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dropping Q and C (was: Some isolating verb patterns) (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

14. Dubious historical linguistics (was Re: Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics))
    • Dubious historical linguistics (was Re: Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics)) (94 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

15. English |a|
    • English |a| (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (76 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (43 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (69 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (73 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (96 lines)
      From: Bryan Parry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (27 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (90 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (92 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (32 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (42 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (67 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (79 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (61 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (54 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (51 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (59 lines)
      From: Elyse M. Grasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English |a| (57 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

16. European isolates
    • European isolates (46 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: European isolates (74 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

17. Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
    • Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (102 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (92 lines)
      From: Cian Ross <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (63 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (63 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (88 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (100 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (79 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (142 lines)
      From: Trent Pehrson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (42 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (85 lines)
      From: JC <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

18. Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali
    • Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (39 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (37 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (48 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (90 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (46 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (48 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

19. Fwd: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
    • Fwd: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (49 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fwd: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem (57 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

20. grammar
    • Re: grammar (55 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

21. is there a Latin-Chinese conlang?
    • is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (31 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (32 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (40 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (53 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (68 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (97 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: is there a Latin-Chinese conlang? (46 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>

22. Jesse Bangs - hello?
    • Jesse Bangs - hello? (43 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Jesse Bangs - hello? (37 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Jesse Bangs - hello? (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

23. Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics)
    • Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics) (58 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics) (76 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Koryak Vowel harmony (was Re: DECAL: Examples #2: Phonotactics) (50 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

24. making/marking articles? Re Exit Methkaeki,
    • Re: making/marking articles? Re Exit Methkaeki, (41 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>

25. More Kash stuff (was Re: Naming Mythical creatures)
    • Re: More Kash stuff (was Re: Naming Mythical creatures) (35 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Kash stuff (was Re: Naming Mythical creatures) (53 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

26. mu for [N]
    • Re: mu for [N] (73 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

27. mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
    • mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (56 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (48 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (60 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (65 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (40 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (111 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (44 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony) (174 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

28. Naming Mythical creatures
    • Naming Mythical creatures (49 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (146 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (75 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (90 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (51 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (74 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (53 lines)
      From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (73 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (48 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (49 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (53 lines)
      From: kcasada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (66 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Naming Mythical creatures (82 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

29. Not purely isolating (was: Dropping Q and C)
    • Not purely isolating (was: Dropping Q and C) (97 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

30. Orthography of palatalized consonants
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (177 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (55 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (56 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (46 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (53 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (51 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (188 lines)
      From: kcasada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (33 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (41 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (49 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (37 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (62 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (41 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (49 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (61 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (63 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (49 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

31. OT: #conlang?
    • OT: #conlang? (21 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: #conlang? (28 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

32. OT: CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again
    • OT: CONCULTURE: Ayeri calendar again (245 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

33. Palatal vs. Palatalized (was Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants)
    • Re: Palatal vs. Palatalized (was Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants) (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palatal vs. Palatalized (was Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants) (68 lines)
      From: kcasada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palatal vs. Palatalized (was Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants) (53 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Palatal vs. Palatalized (was Re: Orthography of palatalized consonants) (47 lines)
      From: kcasada <[log in to unmask]>

34. politeness and quizzical questions
    • politeness and quizzical questions (71 lines)
      From: JC <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: politeness and quizzical questions (118 lines)
      From: JC <[log in to unmask]>

35. Senyecan Verb Idiom I
    • Re: Senyecan Verb Idiom I (56 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

36. Somali C
    • Re: Somali C (56 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Somali C (63 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Somali C (58 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

37. Some isolating verb patterns
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (113 lines)
      From: Pascal A. Kramm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (110 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (58 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (86 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some isolating verb patterns (54 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

38. Switch Systems and Relative Animacy
    • Switch Systems and Relative Animacy (51 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Switch Systems and Relative Animacy (78 lines)
      From: James W <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Switch Systems and Relative Animacy (77 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Switch Systems and Relative Animacy (106 lines)
      From: James W <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Switch Systems and Relative Animacy (78 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>

39. TECH: Backups
    • Re: TECH: Backups (29 lines)
      From: Estel Telcontar <[log in to unmask]>

40. TECH: Backups (Was: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations))
    • TECH: Backups (Was: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations)) (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Backups (Was: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations)) (48 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Backups (Was: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations)) (60 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Backups (Was: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations)) (72 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

41. TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations)
    • TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations) (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations) (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations) (61 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Reply-To headers (was: Tricky translations) (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

42. THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
    • THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (85 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (122 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

43. THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
    • THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (38 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (57 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (53 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (49 lines)
      From: damien perrotin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (43 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (54 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (103 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (57 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (69 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (53 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (52 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (103 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (52 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (228 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (96 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (151 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (139 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (54 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (41 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (53 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (79 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (44 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (46 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (48 lines)
      From: damien perrotin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (206 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (53 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (47 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (41 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (64 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (47 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (78 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (114 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (74 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (45 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (49 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (84 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism (101 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

44. THEORY: French and polypersonalism
    • Re: THEORY: French and polypersonalism (139 lines)
      From: damien perrotin <[log in to unmask]>

45. THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
    • THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (290 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (68 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (47 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (129 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (70 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: French and polypersonalism (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism) (120 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

46. Theory: Hick (etc) accents - universals?
    • Theory: Hick (etc) accents - universals? (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

47. THEORY: Is ASL a trigger language?
    • THEORY: Is ASL a trigger language? (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

48. THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival
    • THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (47 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (61 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (61 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (44 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival (73 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

49. THEORY: Polysynthetic languages - used in a sentence?
    • Re: THEORY: Polysynthetic languages - used in a sentence? (59 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

50. Tricky translations
    • Tricky translations (45 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (74 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (48 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (38 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (62 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (42 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (55 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (94 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (53 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (45 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (46 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (104 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (174 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (60 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (53 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (168 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (62 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (46 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (73 lines)
      From: Rene Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tricky translations (85 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

51. USAGE double written consonants (was: Orthography of palatalized consonants)
    • USAGE double written consonants (was: Orthography of palatalized consonants) (80 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

52. USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish)
    • USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (56 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (110 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (51 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (111 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: What happened to Anglo-Saxon letters? (was: Intro to Frankish) (71 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

53. what is "vl-vd" ? (was Re Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali
    • Re: what is "vl-vd" ? (was Re Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (42 lines)
      From: Rodlox <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: what is "vl-vd" ? (was Re Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

54. Workshops Review #02, 2005
    • Workshops Review #02, 2005 (107 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>