Conlang
Mailing List January 2005, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"To whom"
(35 messages)
' Khaerakh '
(2 messages)
(offlist) North Wind story Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
Alteutonik (was: Intergermansk)
(3 messages)
Ayhan (Saalangal) page up
Babel in Seduk
beggining in tones
Cases
(2 messages)
CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
(5 messages)
CHAT: Yitzik's name (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(2 messages)
CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(4 messages)
CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
conlang names and Mensa
Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
(2 messages)
Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
DECAL: One day left.
(4 messages)
DECAL: Small file host - reader, outline, etc
Distant linguistic relationships (was Re: Japanese from Tungus)
eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
(5 messages)
Elasin Babel Text Verse 1
(3 messages)
Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
(5 messages)
English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(12 messages)
Esthetics
(11 messages)
Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
(3 messages)
Fwd: Re: Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
GRAMMAR: Checklist hoi!
(3 messages)
Hacker Language (was Re: Language comparison)
Hardcore spellings (was Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(4 messages)
Idea for Roman orthography.
(6 messages)
infix
(4 messages)
Intergermansk
(28 messages)
Intergermansk + Babel text
Intergermansk - Dictionary
Intergermansk - McGuffey's Reader 1-6
Intergermansk - Three Rings
(15 messages)
Introduction and Þēwthà j Phonology
(3 messages)
Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
(5 messages)
Is this polysynthetic?
(2 messages)
Japanese from Tungus
(28 messages)
Javascript, target in sight
lacruma etc (was: Y not?)
(4 messages)
LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(6 messages)
mu for [N]
(3 messages)
mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(11 messages)
Musical conlang query
No reviews for this week et alia
Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(7 messages)
On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(11 messages)
On Relating Languages
(6 messages)
Origin of Russian Free Accent
(3 messages)
OT: Codetalkers
(4 messages)
OT: Conlangism: 'lect
(3 messages)
OT: Re:Conlangism: 'lect
Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
(3 messages)
Questions about ergativity
(3 messages)
Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(2 messages)
Slang, curses and vulgarities
(7 messages)
sounds
(2 messages)
Subordinate clauses in Xinkutlan
Supposed Celtic semiticisms
(5 messages)
Supposed Celtic semiticisms (was: Japanese from Tungus)
(2 messages)
TECH: Browser problems and solutions (was Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N]))
(4 messages)
TECH: Syllable generation
(18 messages)
The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(17 messages)
THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
THEORY: (HELP) Sound changes for dummies?
(3 messages)
THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(11 messages)
THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival
Tshena - my Turco-Latin-Chinese hybrid conlang
(2 messages)
uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(10 messages)
USAGE: (YAGPT?): Swiss German (was: Intergermansk)
USAGE: English [N] (was: mu for [N])
(2 messages)
USAGE: VOT and the status of /r/
(2 messages)
USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(22 messages)
USAGE: [YAEPT] non-rhotic r (was Re: "To whom")
(3 messages)
Verbs Outside of the Slavic
(2 messages)
Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(33 messages)
|ñ| for /N/ (was Re: mu for /N/ (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
|ñ| for /N/ (was Re: mu for /N/ (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
"To whom"
"To whom"
(55 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(33 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(110 lines)
From:
Bryan Parry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(40 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(56 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(75 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(130 lines)
From:
Bryan Parry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(51 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(55 lines)
From:
Bryan Parry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(60 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(57 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(54 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(62 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(41 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(62 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(49 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(52 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(41 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(59 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(96 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(80 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(76 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(58 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(53 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(48 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(31 lines)
From:
Joseph a.k.a Buck <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(45 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "To whom"
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
' Khaerakh '
' Khaerakh '
(71 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ' Khaerakh '
(100 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
(offlist) North Wind story Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
Re: (offlist) North Wind story Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alteutonik (was: Intergermansk)
Alteutonik (was: Intergermansk)
(83 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alteutonik (was: Intergermansk)
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alteutonik (was: Intergermansk)
(34 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ayhan (Saalangal) page up
Ayhan (Saalangal) page up
(45 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel in Seduk
Babel in Seduk
(31 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
beggining in tones
beggining in tones
(138 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cases
Cases
(96 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cases
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
(39 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
(26 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: friendster.com accounts?
(22 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Yitzik's name (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
CHAT: Yitzik's name (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Yitzik's name (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(69 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(132 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(33 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(100 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(50 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang names and Mensa
Re: conlang names and Mensa
(56 lines)
From:
Simon Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
Re: Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
(51 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
(84 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
Da Mätz se Basa: Syntax
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
DECAL: One day left.
DECAL: One day left.
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: One day left.
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: One day left.
(42 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: One day left.
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
DECAL: Small file host - reader, outline, etc
DECAL: Small file host - reader, outline, etc
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Distant linguistic relationships (was Re: Japanese from Tungus)
Distant linguistic relationships (was Re: Japanese from Tungus)
(133 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
(41 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: eggcorn (was Re: "To whom")
(63 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Elasin Babel Text Verse 1
Elasin Babel Text Verse 1
(63 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elasin Babel Text Verse 1
(61 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elasin Babel Text Verse 1
(43 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
(70 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
(71 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
(62 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elasin Babel Text verses 2 & 3
(49 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(50 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(114 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(80 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(38 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(90 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(36 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(63 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(54 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English Pronouns (was Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Esthetics
Esthetics
(52 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(74 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(36 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(48 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(44 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(68 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(46 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(64 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esthetics
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Examples #5: Translate the One Ring poem
(43 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
Fwd: Re: Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
(59 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
GRAMMAR: Checklist hoi!
GRAMMAR: Checklist hoi!
(45 lines)
From:
Edward Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GRAMMAR: Checklist hoi!
(54 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GRAMMAR: Checklist hoi!
(60 lines)
From:
Edward Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hacker Language (was Re: Language comparison)
Re: Hacker Language (was Re: Language comparison)
(72 lines)
From:
Simon Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hardcore spellings (was Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
Hardcore spellings (was Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(65 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hardcore spellings (was Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hardcore spellings (was Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(72 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hardcore spellings (was Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Idea for Roman orthography.
Idea for Roman orthography.
(78 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idea for Roman orthography.
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idea for Roman orthography.
(73 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idea for Roman orthography.
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idea for Roman orthography.
(48 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idea for Roman orthography.
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
infix
infix
(50 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: infix
(56 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: infix
(71 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: infix
(39 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Intergermansk
Re: Intergermansk
(86 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(95 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(154 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(96 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(114 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(93 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(195 lines)
From:
Bryan Parry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(72 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(83 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(68 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(49 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(58 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(174 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(56 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(94 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(42 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(38 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(106 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(80 lines)
From:
Shaul Vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(60 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk
(74 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Intergermansk + Babel text
Intergermansk + Babel text
(53 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Intergermansk - Dictionary
Intergermansk - Dictionary
(31 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Intergermansk - McGuffey's Reader 1-6
Intergermansk - McGuffey's Reader 1-6
(175 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Intergermansk - Three Rings
Intergermansk - Three Rings
(43 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(62 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(34 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(72 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(65 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(54 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(61 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(39 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(86 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(59 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
(41 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction and Þēwthà j Phonology
Re: Introduction and Þēwthà j Phonology
(89 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and Þēwthà j Phonology
(79 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and Þēwthà j Phonology
(52 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
(95 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
(54 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
(136 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
(57 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and Þēwthàj Phonology
(44 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is this polysynthetic?
Is this polysynthetic?
(34 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is this polysynthetic?
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Japanese from Tungus
Japanese from Tungus
(32 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(41 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(49 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(56 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(42 lines)
From:
Pipian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(49 lines)
From:
Pipian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(52 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(83 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(44 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(36 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(28 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(67 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(35 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(37 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(139 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(66 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(77 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(30 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(146 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(52 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(69 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(59 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(101 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese from Tungus
(33 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Javascript, target in sight
Re: Javascript, target in sight
(109 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
lacruma etc (was: Y not?)
lacruma etc (was: Y not?)
(110 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lacruma etc (was: Y not?)
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lacruma etc (was: Y not?)
(80 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lacruma etc (was: Y not?)
(39 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(68 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(96 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LaTeX (was Re: Intergermansk)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
mu for [N]
Re: mu for [N]
(51 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N]
(50 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N]
(73 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(38 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(51 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(64 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(66 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(61 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(50 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(120 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
(67 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Musical conlang query
Musical conlang query
(44 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
No reviews for this week et alia
No reviews for this week et alia
(34 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(100 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(43 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(91 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(44 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N])
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(38 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(89 lines)
From:
Bryan Parry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(83 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(151 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(107 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(38 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(103 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(57 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(46 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(67 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Phonological Constraints: The Long Vowel Rule
(75 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
On Relating Languages
On Relating Languages
(50 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Relating Languages
(64 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Relating Languages
(116 lines)
From:
damien perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Relating Languages
(89 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Relating Languages
(102 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On Relating Languages
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Origin of Russian Free Accent
Origin of Russian Free Accent
(24 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of Russian Free Accent
(39 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of Russian Free Accent
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Codetalkers
OT: Codetalkers
(40 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Codetalkers
(68 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Codetalkers
(66 lines)
From:
James W <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Codetalkers
(66 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Conlangism: 'lect
OT: Conlangism: 'lect
(25 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Conlangism: 'lect
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Conlangism: 'lect
(49 lines)
From:
Estel Telcontar <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re:Conlangism: 'lect
OT: Re:Conlangism: 'lect
(47 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
(74 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patronymics (was CHAT: Yitzik's name.)
(84 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Questions about ergativity
Questions about ergativity
(65 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about ergativity
(21 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about ergativity
(32 lines)
From:
Trebor Jung <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
Re: Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(47 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: CONCULTURE: Xinkùtlan souls and metaphysics
(89 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Slang, curses and vulgarities
Slang, curses and vulgarities
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang, curses and vulgarities
(73 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang, curses and vulgarities
(59 lines)
From:
James W <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang, curses and vulgarities
(78 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang, curses and vulgarities
(29 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang, curses and vulgarities
(39 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang, curses and vulgarities
(49 lines)
From:
scott <
[log in to unmask]
>
sounds
sounds
(42 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sounds
(58 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subordinate clauses in Xinkutlan
Subordinate clauses in Xinkutlan
(146 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Supposed Celtic semiticisms
Re: Supposed Celtic semiticisms
(90 lines)
From:
damien perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Supposed Celtic semiticisms
(54 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Supposed Celtic semiticisms
(103 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Supposed Celtic semiticisms
(40 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Supposed Celtic semiticisms
(52 lines)
From:
damien perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Supposed Celtic semiticisms (was: Japanese from Tungus)
Supposed Celtic semiticisms (was: Japanese from Tungus)
(84 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Supposed Celtic semiticisms (was: Japanese from Tungus)
(41 lines)
From:
B. Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Browser problems and solutions (was Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N]))
TECH: Browser problems and solutions (was Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N]))
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Browser problems and solutions (was Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N]))
(71 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Browser problems and solutions (was Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N]))
(84 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Browser problems and solutions (was Re: Of Haa/hhet & other matters (was: mu for [N]))
(87 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Syllable generation
TECH: Syllable generation
(34 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(71 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(29 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(55 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(42 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(60 lines)
From:
Edward Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(70 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(39 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(60 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(31 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(42 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(53 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(65 lines)
From:
Sam Drost <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(38 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Syllable generation
(41 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(32 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(73 lines)
From:
Shaul Vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(48 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(21 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(34 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(54 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(69 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(56 lines)
From:
Shaul Vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(65 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(43 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(47 lines)
From:
Nicolas Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(40 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Shift of Antecedent Prepositions to Suffixes ????
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
Re: THEORY isolating & other typologies (was: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism)
(109 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: (HELP) Sound changes for dummies?
THEORY: (HELP) Sound changes for dummies?
(49 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: (HELP) Sound changes for dummies?
(147 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: (HELP) Sound changes for dummies?
(61 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(43 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(77 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(42 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(45 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(58 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(59 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(39 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(72 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism
(108 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival
Re: THEORY: Language tech & conlang survival
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tshena - my Turco-Latin-Chinese hybrid conlang
Tshena - my Turco-Latin-Chinese hybrid conlang
(227 lines)
From:
Rodlox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tshena - my Turco-Latin-Chinese hybrid conlang
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(35 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(87 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(42 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(45 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(47 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(58 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(151 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(66 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: uppercase/lowercase (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(41 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: (YAGPT?): Swiss German (was: Intergermansk)
USAGE: (YAGPT?): Swiss German (was: Intergermansk)
(69 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: English [N] (was: mu for [N])
USAGE: English [N] (was: mu for [N])
(80 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: English [N] (was: mu for [N])
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: VOT and the status of /r/
USAGE: VOT and the status of /r/
(70 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: VOT and the status of /r/
(72 lines)
From:
Your Name <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(137 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(75 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(77 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(135 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(74 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(55 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(49 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(45 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(73 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(41 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(37 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(89 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(62 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(102 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(71 lines)
From:
Pascal A. Kramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] (was Re: "To whom")
(33 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: [YAEPT] non-rhotic r (was Re: "To whom")
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] non-rhotic r (was Re: "To whom")
(86 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] non-rhotic r (was Re: "To whom")
(62 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: [YAEPT] non-rhotic r (was Re: "To whom")
(39 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbs Outside of the Slavic
Verbs Outside of the Slavic
(35 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs Outside of the Slavic
(99 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(131 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(75 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(55 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(137 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(88 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(38 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(30 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(191 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(93 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(35 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(73 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(40 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(109 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(59 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(60 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(36 lines)
From:
kcasada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(35 lines)
From:
Matt Arriola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Y not? (was: Of Haa/hhet & other matters)
(45 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
|ñ| for /N/ (was Re: mu for /N/ (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
Re: |ñ| for /N/ (was Re: mu for /N/ (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
|ñ| for /N/ (was Re: mu for /N/ (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
|ñ| for /N/ (was Re: mu for /N/ (was: Koryak Vowel harmony))
(54 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU