Conlang
Mailing List February 2005, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Ê in Pinyin?
(2 messages)
Ê in Pinyin?
"if that makes any difference"
(18 messages)
"if that makes any difference" - female lurkers
"Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(7 messages)
"work detail; argot" (was: Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri)
'come' and 'go' with directional affixes
(3 messages)
a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words)
(3 messages)
Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(3 messages)
Another proofreading request
Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(9 messages)
Aorfoenni - New Language
(12 messages)
Asha'ille McGuffey Primer, lessons 11-20
CONCULTURE: Dr. Zahar's Questionnaire
(2 messages)
Constructive linguistics
(4 messages)
Constructive linguistics--literature, audiences, miniatures
(2 messages)
Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(6 messages)
Constructive linguistics--Sally's questions
Constructive linguistics--Sorry, Joerg
Constructive linguistics-Cinje pronouns
Constructive: Jim and David, and date of survey
(2 messages)
DECAL: Class videos - now in DivX!
DECAL: Class videos update
(6 messages)
Degaspregos (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Egramith - New Language
(5 messages)
Epicene words
(17 messages)
Example sentences (was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Fith Redux
Glitch? (Lunatic Survey)
(2 messages)
Go and come
(2 messages)
Hands and Eyes (was Re: "if that makes any difference")
Incubus = ... in English?
Introducing myself, and several questions
Irish Gaelic is evil!
(6 messages)
Kontaxta
(4 messages)
LLL Monthly Update #02/2005
lunatic survey
Lunatic Survey 2005
LUNATIC SURVEY 2005
Lunatic Survey about to go up
LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(50 messages)
Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
(5 messages)
McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(4 messages)
Mephali numbers
Minor adjustment in licensing terms (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Multiple wh-words
(7 messages)
Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(3 messages)
My first romlang sentence
(17 messages)
My Three Assertions
(13 messages)
Natlang feature question
(2 messages)
New member greets list :-)
(9 messages)
numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller
(4 messages)
One of Jim's Answers (Re: LUNATIC SURVEY 2005)
(2 messages)
OT: 4D
(12 messages)
OT: Allergic fruit (Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: ...))
OT: dadgum shire reaves
(3 messages)
OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(6 messages)
Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(9 messages)
Peculiar pecuniary fee (was: Epicene words)
Pejorative words (was: Introducing myself, and several questions)
Published paper on conlang (Lojban)
(2 messages)
Romaji as syllabary
(5 messages)
Sandhi phones
Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions)
(3 messages)
Stack-based syntax ()
Stack-based syntax (was affixes)
Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(11 messages)
TECH: email problem?
(3 messages)
testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
(5 messages)
The Wolf and The Crane
Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(17 messages)
TinkerFont - Caligraphic style
TinkerFont progress report
(6 messages)
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 49 - 53)
Vowel qualities and consonants
Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri
Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
(5 messages)
Workshops Review #05
Yahoo groups version of CONLANG
[OT] Psychological Reality of Linguistic Theories (was Re: stress)
(2 messages)
|c| in Volapük
(4 messages)
Ê in Pinyin?
Re: Ê in Pinyin?
(50 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ê in Pinyin?
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ê in Pinyin?
Re: Ê in Pinyin?
(61 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"if that makes any difference"
"if that makes any difference"
(79 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(58 lines)
From:
Cristina Escalante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(37 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(55 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(72 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(57 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(39 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(42 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(50 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(60 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(63 lines)
From:
Cristina Escalante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "if that makes any difference"
(48 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
"if that makes any difference" - female lurkers
Re: "if that makes any difference" - female lurkers
(91 lines)
From:
Martha C. Cardenas <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(82 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(44 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(61 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Neumann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
"work detail; argot" (was: Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri)
Re: "work detail; argot" (was: Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri)
(80 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
'come' and 'go' with directional affixes
'come' and 'go' with directional affixes
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'come' and 'go' with directional affixes
(58 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'come' and 'go' with directional affixes
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words)
a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words)
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words)
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words)
(86 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(120 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(76 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(146 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another proofreading request
Another proofreading request
(36 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(54 lines)
From:
Shaul Vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(35 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(38 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(54 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(62 lines)
From:
JC <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(40 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(53 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference")
(54 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aorfoenni - New Language
Aorfoenni - New Language
(19 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(33 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(40 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(29 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(32 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(28 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(17 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(40 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(38 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(38 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aorfoenni - New Language
(79 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language
(47 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Asha'ille McGuffey Primer, lessons 11-20
Asha'ille McGuffey Primer, lessons 11-20
(47 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONCULTURE: Dr. Zahar's Questionnaire
CONCULTURE: Dr. Zahar's Questionnaire
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONCULTURE: Dr. Zahar's Questionnaire
(43 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive linguistics
Re: Constructive linguistics
(245 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics
(53 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics
(66 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive linguistics--literature, audiences, miniatures
Constructive linguistics--literature, audiences, miniatures
(94 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics--literature, audiences, miniatures
(151 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(72 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(41 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(59 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey
(30 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive linguistics--Sally's questions
Constructive linguistics--Sally's questions
(84 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive linguistics--Sorry, Joerg
Constructive linguistics--Sorry, Joerg
(32 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive linguistics-Cinje pronouns
Constructive linguistics-Cinje pronouns
(91 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructive: Jim and David, and date of survey
Constructive: Jim and David, and date of survey
(284 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructive: Jim and David, and date of survey
(216 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
DECAL: Class videos - now in DivX!
DECAL: Class videos - now in DivX!
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
DECAL: Class videos update
DECAL: Class videos update
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update
(47 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update
(54 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update
(47 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Degaspregos (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Degaspregos (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Egramith - New Language
Egramith - New Language
(22 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Egramith - New Language
(22 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Egramith - New Language
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Egramith - New Language
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Egramith - New Language
(60 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Epicene words
Epicene words
(44 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(78 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(67 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(49 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(98 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(85 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(48 lines)
From:
Andy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(55 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(101 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(87 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(46 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(42 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(67 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene words
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Example sentences (was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Re: Example sentences (was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fith Redux
Fith Redux
(60 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Glitch? (Lunatic Survey)
Glitch? (Lunatic Survey)
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glitch? (Lunatic Survey)
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Go and come
Re: Go and come
(80 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Go and come
(53 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hands and Eyes (was Re: "if that makes any difference")
Hands and Eyes (was Re: "if that makes any difference")
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Incubus = ... in English?
Re: Incubus = ... in English?
(59 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introducing myself, and several questions
Re: Introducing myself, and several questions
(90 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irish Gaelic is evil!
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil!
(106 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil!
(49 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil!
(84 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil!
(70 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil!
(73 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil!
(62 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kontaxta
Kontaxta
(142 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kontaxta
(52 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kontaxta
(64 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kontaxta
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
LLL Monthly Update #02/2005
LLL Monthly Update #02/2005
(35 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
lunatic survey
Re: lunatic survey
(587 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lunatic Survey 2005
Lunatic Survey 2005
(607 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
LUNATIC SURVEY 2005
LUNATIC SURVEY 2005
(822 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lunatic Survey about to go up
Lunatic Survey about to go up
(47 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(804 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(447 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(740 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(620 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(668 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(611 lines)
From:
JC <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(457 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(308 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(693 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(620 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(1609 lines)
From:
Shaul Vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(653 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(746 lines)
From:
Peter Kolb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(1030 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(752 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(402 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(377 lines)
From:
James W <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(671 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(642 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(566 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(505 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(631 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(823 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(753 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(686 lines)
From:
Kevin Athey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(1307 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(514 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(157 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(512 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(689 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(537 lines)
From:
Andreas Neumann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(111 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(632 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(676 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(672 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(707 lines)
From:
Paul Sherrill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(475 lines)
From:
Sean <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(597 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(745 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(437 lines)
From:
Cristina Escalante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(791 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(610 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(68 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(463 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(335 lines)
From:
scott <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(595 lines)
From:
Matt Trinsic <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(568 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005
(688 lines)
From:
Phil Bordelon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
(42 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
(47 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
(65 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
(61 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mærik grammar outline added to wiki page
(105 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(40 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(53 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(25 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mephali numbers
Re: Mephali numbers
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Minor adjustment in licensing terms (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Minor adjustment in licensing terms (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Multiple wh-words
Re: Multiple wh-words
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words
(54 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words
(60 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words
(89 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words
(72 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(54 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(63 lines)
From:
Andy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005)
(77 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
My first romlang sentence
Re: My first romlang sentence
(65 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(38 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(94 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(53 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(51 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(35 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(60 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(37 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My first romlang sentence
(56 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
My Three Assertions
My Three Assertions
(56 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(87 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(47 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(110 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(43 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(78 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(51 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(27 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(81 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(109 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(73 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Three Assertions
(102 lines)
From:
Trent Pehrson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlang feature question
Natlang feature question
(71 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang feature question
(97 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
New member greets list :-)
New member greets list :-)
(57 lines)
From:
Kinetic <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(46 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(44 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(51 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(68 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(36 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New member greets list :-)
(50 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller
numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller
(49 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller
(49 lines)
From:
Jonathyn Bet'nct <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller
(221 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller
(33 lines)
From:
Sean <
[log in to unmask]
>
One of Jim's Answers (Re: LUNATIC SURVEY 2005)
One of Jim's Answers (Re: LUNATIC SURVEY 2005)
(56 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: One of Jim's Answers (Re: LUNATIC SURVEY 2005)
(89 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: 4D
OT: 4D
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(178 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(60 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(128 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(81 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(278 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(38 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(73 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(101 lines)
From:
Simon Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(45 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: 4D
(45 lines)
From:
Ivan Baines <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Allergic fruit (Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: ...))
OT: Allergic fruit (Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: ...))
(47 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: dadgum shire reaves
OT: dadgum shire reaves
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: dadgum shire reaves
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: dadgum shire reaves
(42 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Incubus = ... in English?
OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(21 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(42 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(50 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English?
(41 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(56 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(52 lines)
From:
JC <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(54 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(63 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(77 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence)
(74 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Peculiar pecuniary fee (was: Epicene words)
Peculiar pecuniary fee (was: Epicene words)
(76 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pejorative words (was: Introducing myself, and several questions)
Re: Pejorative words (was: Introducing myself, and several questions)
(59 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Published paper on conlang (Lojban)
Published paper on conlang (Lojban)
(41 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Published paper on conlang (Lojban)
(28 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romaji as syllabary
Re: Romaji as syllabary
(87 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romaji as syllabary
(78 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romaji as syllabary
(90 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romaji as syllabary
(109 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romaji as syllabary
(64 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sandhi phones
Sandhi phones
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions)
Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions)
(113 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions)
(125 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions)
(146 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stack-based syntax ()
Re: Stack-based syntax ()
(43 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stack-based syntax (was affixes)
Re: Stack-based syntax (was affixes)
(72 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(186 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(239 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(156 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(142 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(67 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(223 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(75 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(159 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes)
(134 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: email problem?
TECH: email problem?
(25 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: email problem?
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: email problem?
(64 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
(37 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
(49 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
(48 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list
(44 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Wolf and The Crane
The Wolf and The Crane
(49 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(72 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(64 lines)
From:
Jonathyn Bet'nct <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(101 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(38 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(73 lines)
From:
Martha C. Cardenas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(41 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(54 lines)
From:
Etak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(55 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(89 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(65 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
TinkerFont - Caligraphic style
TinkerFont - Caligraphic style
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
TinkerFont progress report
TinkerFont progress report
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TinkerFont progress report
(49 lines)
From:
Phil Bordelon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TinkerFont progress report
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TinkerFont progress report
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TinkerFont progress report
(56 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TinkerFont progress report
(49 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 49 - 53)
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 49 - 53)
(192 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel qualities and consonants
Vowel qualities and consonants
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri
Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri
(289 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
(130 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
(103 lines)
From:
Cristina Escalante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
(132 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
(100 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey
(208 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #05
Workshops Review #05
(106 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yahoo groups version of CONLANG
Yahoo groups version of CONLANG
(46 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Psychological Reality of Linguistic Theories (was Re: stress)
[OT] Psychological Reality of Linguistic Theories (was Re: stress)
(65 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Psychological Reality of Linguistic Theories (was Re: stress)
(186 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
|c| in Volapük
|c| in Volapük
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
|c| in Volapük
(339 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: |c| in Volapük
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: |c| in Volapük
(79 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU