Conlang Mailing List -- February 2005, week 4

Conlang Mailing List – February 2005, week 4

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey (38 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Constructive linguistics--literature, audiences, miniatures (94 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
[OT] Psychological Reality of Linguistic Theories (was Re: stress) (65 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Constructive linguistics--Sally's questions (84 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Constructive linguistics--Sorry, Joerg (32 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics (245 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey (72 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
CONCULTURE: Dr. Zahar's Questionnaire (37 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics (53 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ÃŠ in Pinyin? (50 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Go and come (80 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey (42 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey (41 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Aorfoenni - New Language (19 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: [OT] Psychological Reality of Linguistic Theories (was Re: stress) (186 lines)
From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Published paper on conlang (Lojban) (41 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Published paper on conlang (Lojban) (28 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (33 lines)
From: Cian Ross <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (40 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (29 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (32 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Ê in Pinyin? (61 lines)
From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (28 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (17 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ÃŠ in Pinyin? (54 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (40 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics--literature, audiences, miniatures (151 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey (59 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics (66 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (186 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (38 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (38 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (239 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Constructive linguistics-Cinje pronouns (91 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Aorfoenni - New Language (79 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (72 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (32 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics (45 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
|c| in VolapÃ¼k (35 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Constructive: Jim and David, and date of survey (284 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Go and come (53 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax () (43 lines)
From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil! (106 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (64 lines)
From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
New member greets list :-) (57 lines)
From: Kinetic <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive linguistics--Lunatic Survey (30 lines)
From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
|c| in VolapÃ¼k (339 lines)
From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (49 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Aorfoenni - New Language (47 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (70 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: |c| in VolapÃ¼k (35 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (46 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CONCULTURE: Dr. Zahar's Questionnaire (43 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (44 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
OT: 4D (57 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (51 lines)
From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Constructive: Jim and David, and date of survey (216 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil! (49 lines)
From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil! (84 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri (289 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (45 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (101 lines)
From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil! (70 lines)
From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "work detail; argot" (was: Weekly Vocab 3 and 4 in Ayeri) (80 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (178 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (38 lines)
From: Nokta Kanto <[log in to unmask]>
Re: |c| in VolapÃ¼k (79 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (156 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (58 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (142 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (67 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (68 lines)
From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (60 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (128 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil! (73 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (81 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (278 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Irish Gaelic is evil! (62 lines)
From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (37 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (73 lines)
From: Martha C. Cardenas <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (41 lines)
From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pejorative words (was: Introducing myself, and several questions) (59 lines)
From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (36 lines)
From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (65 lines)
From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Romaji as syllabary (87 lines)
From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
My Three Assertions (56 lines)
From: Trent Pehrson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (61 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
OT: Incubus = ... in English? (21 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English? (42 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English? (41 lines)
From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English? (50 lines)
From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English? (38 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Lunatic Survey about to go up (47 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (223 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (804 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Incubus = ... in English? (59 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (75 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (41 lines)
From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (58 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (87 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (38 lines)
From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (37 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (54 lines)
From: Etak <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (447 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: Incubus = ... in English? (41 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (58 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (50 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (740 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (620 lines)
From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (47 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Egramith - New Language (22 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (55 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (38 lines)
From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
Natlang feature question (71 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (668 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (611 lines)
From: JC <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (49 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (89 lines)
From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was affixes) (72 lines)
From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (110 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (43 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (457 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (308 lines)
From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (78 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (693 lines)
From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (620 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (1609 lines)
From: Shaul Vardi <[log in to unmask]>
The Wolf and The Crane (49 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (653 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Romaji as syllabary (78 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (746 lines)
From: Peter Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Natlang feature question (97 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (1030 lines)
From: Cian Ross <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (752 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (402 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (94 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (377 lines)
From: James W <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (51 lines)
From: Trent Pehrson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (27 lines)
From: Trent Pehrson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New member greets list :-) (50 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (53 lines)
From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (671 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (51 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (49 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (53 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Lunatic Survey 2005 (607 lines)
From: Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (642 lines)
From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Egramith - New Language (22 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Egramith - New Language (42 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (566 lines)
From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
OT: dadgum shire reaves (38 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (81 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
DECAL: Class videos update (34 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (159 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (505 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (631 lines)
From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (63 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update (47 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (109 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (823 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (753 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
TinkerFont - Caligraphic style (36 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Yahoo groups version of CONLANG (46 lines)
From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (686 lines)
From: Kevin Athey <[log in to unmask]>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update (54 lines)
From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update (36 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (1307 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Example sentences (was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (44 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (514 lines)
From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (120 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (35 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
OT: dadgum shire reaves (47 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (73 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (76 lines)
From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (157 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (512 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (73 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update (47 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
LUNATIC SURVEY 2005 (822 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (60 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (62 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (689 lines)
From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
One of Jim's Answers (Re: LUNATIC SURVEY 2005) (56 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (65 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Another proofreading request (36 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tinkerfont - Any con-alphabet you want it to be (45 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (537 lines)
From: Andreas Neumann <[log in to unmask]>
Epicene words (44 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: One of Jim's Answers (Re: LUNATIC SURVEY 2005) (89 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (37 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (45 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (111 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (52 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (78 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (82 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: dadgum shire reaves (42 lines)
From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (632 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based syntax (was: affixes) (134 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Vowel qualities and consonants (38 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (44 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Adjectiveless/verbless conlangs, etc. (Was: Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (146 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (44 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (676 lines)
From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (672 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (67 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
TinkerFont progress report (36 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (56 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (52 lines)
From: JC <[log in to unmask]>
Minor adjustment in licensing terms (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (43 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (49 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (707 lines)
From: Paul Sherrill <[log in to unmask]>
testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list (37 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list (49 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list (48 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (98 lines)
From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list (44 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (57 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: testing new email & re-intro'ing self to list (44 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (475 lines)
From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (597 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (745 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (85 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Egramith - New Language (41 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
VOCABULARY AID: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (topics 49 - 53) (192 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (61 lines)
From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions) (113 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (48 lines)
From: Andy <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (101 lines)
From: Simon Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
MÃ¦rik grammar outline added to wiki page (42 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (437 lines)
From: Cristina Escalante <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My first romlang sentence (56 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (44 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (40 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (45 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (53 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Egramith - New Language (60 lines)
From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (55 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Romaji as syllabary (90 lines)
From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (101 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (51 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
'come' and 'go' with directional affixes (59 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Sandhi phones (58 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Glitch? (Lunatic Survey) (38 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Glitch? (Lunatic Survey) (43 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (42 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: MÃ¦rik grammar outline added to wiki page (47 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (791 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TinkerFont progress report (49 lines)
From: Phil Bordelon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (87 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (41 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (53 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions) (125 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TinkerFont progress report (70 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Kontaxta (142 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Re: 'come' and 'go' with directional affixes (58 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (54 lines)
From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (610 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (68 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (48 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (60 lines)
From: Andreas Neumann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (53 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TinkerFont progress report (60 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Kontaxta (52 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: 'come' and 'go' with directional affixes (45 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (69 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Kontaxta (64 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Fith Redux (60 lines)
From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
Re: McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (25 lines)
From: Jeffrey Henning <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (54 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Kontaxta (36 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TinkerFont progress report (56 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (63 lines)
From: Andy <[log in to unmask]>
TECH: email problem? (25 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (463 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: DECAL: Class videos update (38 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (60 lines)
From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (46 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (42 lines)
From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
Degaspregos (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (51 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Romaji as syllabary (109 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (54 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (67 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "Kauderwelsch" (was: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (50 lines)
From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (was Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (77 lines)
From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
"if that makes any difference" (79 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
DECAL: Class videos - now in DivX! (45 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Re: MÃ¦rik grammar outline added to wiki page (65 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: MÃ¦rik grammar outline added to wiki page (61 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (54 lines)
From: Shaul Vardi <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (35 lines)
From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (42 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Introducing myself, and several questions (90 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (58 lines)
From: Cristina Escalante <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (89 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (46 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Epicene words (50 lines)
From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (335 lines)
From: scott <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (63 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (45 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (38 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Three Assertions (102 lines)
From: Trent Pehrson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (54 lines)
From: bob thornton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TinkerFont progress report (49 lines)
From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (595 lines)
From: Matt Trinsic <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (62 lines)
From: JC <[log in to unmask]>
numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller (49 lines)
From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" - female lurkers (91 lines)
From: Martha C. Cardenas <[log in to unmask]>
Re: numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller (49 lines)
From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
Re: McGuffey's readers (was LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005) (46 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (43 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (37 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Re: lunatic survey (587 lines)
From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: email problem? (57 lines)
From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: MÃ¦rik grammar outline added to wiki page (105 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (72 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Peculiar pecuniary fee (was: Epicene words) (76 lines)
From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (55 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words) (51 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Stack-based human languages? (was Re: My Three Assertions) (146 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
LLL Monthly Update #02/2005 (35 lines)
From: JÃ¶rg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (72 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey (130 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Workshops Review #05 (106 lines)
From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OT: 4D (45 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Multiple wh-words (48 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words) (55 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller (221 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Mephali numbers (53 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (61 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (52 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey (103 lines)
From: Cristina Escalante <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (50 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (58 lines)
From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Re: numbers from 1 to 10 by Sean P. Miller (33 lines)
From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Romaji as syllabary (64 lines)
From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (57 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (77 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: TECH: email problem? (64 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (39 lines)
From: Ivan Baines <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (568 lines)
From: Joe Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a-umlaut (was Re: Epicene words) (86 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Asha'ille McGuffey Primer, lessons 11-20 (47 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (53 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (42 lines)
From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (50 lines)
From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (40 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (65 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey (132 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
OT: Allergic fruit (Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: ...)) (47 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (60 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pangram (was Re: My first romlang sentence) (74 lines)
From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (53 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (63 lines)
From: Cristina Escalante <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey (100 lines)
From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
Hands and Eyes (was Re: "if that makes any difference") (46 lines)
From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LUNATIC SURVEY: 2005 (688 lines)
From: Phil Bordelon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "if that makes any difference" (48 lines)
From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Welcome Christine! And the "woman" issue. WAS: lunatic survey (208 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Anything else to declare? (Was: RE: "if that makes any difference") (54 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU