Conlang Mailing List – May 2005, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (8 messages)
• Conlang wikis (was Re: Delean Languages) (3 messages)
• Delean Languages (4 messages)
• FLAMEBAIT: Fireman at work
• FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (5 messages)
• forms of "them" or "it" ? (2 messages)
• Fwd: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space
• Hive English Orthography (3 messages)
• Interlinguistics and Spaka
• My conlang, take two
• Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (6 messages)
• NATLANG: [t_md] vs [t_ad]? (3 messages)
• Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (52 messages)
• OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (7 messages)
• OT: Computer broken & away next weekend (2 messages)
• Pretty little girls' school (was: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?)
• Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (5 messages)
• question - for organizing a long-delayed language (5 messages)
• question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (8 messages)
• Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (was Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?) (2 messages)
• Semi-OT: Linguist battles to save 'lost' Eritrean language (2 messages)
• Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (10 messages)
• Toki Pona
• Travellers Phrasebook Sections 1-6 in Franj
• Travellers' Phrasebook Sections 4-6
• Tree writing [Was: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?]
• Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (16 messages)
• USAGE: AAVE/Spanish pidgin? (2 messages)
• Vocab. development (8 messages)
• When is a verb not a verb? (was: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be") (3 messages)
• Which part of speech? (21 messages)

1. A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ?
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (38 lines)
     From: Nicolas Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:59:39 -0400
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (42 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 05:58:40 -0700
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (56 lines)
     From: Nicolas Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 06:11:34 -0400
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (75 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:04:51 -0400
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (60 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:54:47 -0700
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (55 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:19:00 -0700
   • Re: A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (48 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:12:18 +0300
   • A Conlang Journal For The List ? ? ? (23 lines)
     From: Nicolas Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 06:06:30 -0400

2. Conlang wikis (was Re: Delean Languages)
   • Re: Conlang wikis (was Re: Delean Languages) (41 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:12:12 +0200
   • Re: Conlang wikis (was Re: Delean Languages) (49 lines)
     From: Aaron Morse <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:03:17 -0400
   • Conlang wikis (was Re: Delean Languages) (40 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 22:00:24 +0200

3. Delean Languages
   • Re: Delean Languages (37 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:10:22 +0100
   • Re: Delean Languages (55 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:09:12 +0100
   • Re: Delean Languages (62 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:09:36 -0700
   • Delean Languages (38 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:18:35 -0700

4. FLAMEBAIT: Fireman at work
   • Re: FLAMEBAIT: Fireman at work (60 lines)
     From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:50:47 +0200

5. FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?
   • Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (44 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:23:56 +0100
   • Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (42 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:04:26 +0100
   • FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (35 lines)
     From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:22:40 -0000
   • Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (37 lines)
     From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 05:12:39 -0400
   • FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (39 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:22:41 -0400

6. forms of "them" or "it" ?
   • Re: forms of "them" or "it" ? (55 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:35:13 -0400
   • forms of "them" or "it" ? (45 lines)
     From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:00:48 +0000

7. Fwd: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space
   • Fwd: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (48 lines)
     From: Simon Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:45:51 +0100

8. Hive English Orthography
   • Re: Hive English Orthography (66 lines)
     From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:18:31 -0700
   • Re: Hive English Orthography (57 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:09:47 -0400
   • Re: Hive English Orthography (122 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:04:23 -0400

9. Interlinguistics and Spaka
   • Interlinguistics and Spaka (83 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:51:30 -0700

10. My conlang, take two
    • My conlang, take two (39 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:20:12 -0700

11. Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system
    • Re: Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (56 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:00:58 -0700
    • Re: Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (134 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:05:08 +0100
    • Re: Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (81 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 02:02:38 +0200
    • Re: Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:08:18 +0200
    • Re: Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (48 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:04:51 +0200
    • Names in a non-linear full-2d writing system (105 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:42:59 +0100

12. NATLANG: [t_md] vs [t_ad]?
    • Re: NATLANG: [t_md] vs [t_ad]? (47 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 21:26:10 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: [t_md] vs [t_ad]? (51 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:36:11 +0200
    • NATLANG: [t_md] vs [t_ad]? (38 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:10:31 -0700

13. Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (98 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 02:04:35 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (103 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:07:13 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (93 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 07:59:16 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (97 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 04:00:36 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (52 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:37:54 -0400
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:08:37 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (136 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:39:40 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (204 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:45:57 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (66 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:58:03 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (65 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 01:29:40 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (108 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 02:31:33 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (110 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:18:40 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (50 lines)
      From: Simon Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:54:56 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (138 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 13:22:53 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (55 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 13:08:11 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (163 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:01:03 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (176 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:33:29 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (134 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:33:47 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (33 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:08:57 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (34 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:51:57 -0000
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 05:17:56 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (94 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 06:50:54 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (43 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:40:16 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (81 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:00:12 -0400
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (95 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:11:43 -0400
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (38 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:04:57 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (140 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 00:48:09 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (111 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:22:50 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (39 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:23:08 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (147 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:14:52 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (58 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:04:32 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (49 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:34:25 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (60 lines)
      From: Trent Pehrson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:19:18 -0400
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (30 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:36:13 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (72 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 00:13:14 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (150 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 06:56:21 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 06:53:08 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (545 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 06:46:38 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (137 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 05:45:27 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (244 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 06:52:31 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (68 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 20:38:31 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (83 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 20:20:43 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (70 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 15:36:36 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (268 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:01:13 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (41 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:26:37 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (85 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 06:51:37 +0100
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (56 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 19:31:21 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (95 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 17:11:38 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (64 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 00:44:33 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (56 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 17:04:16 -0000
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (215 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 17:59:54 +0200
    • Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems? (80 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 06:10:35 +0100

14. OT: All'y'all's's's's'...
    • Re: OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (40 lines)
      From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:23:02 -0500
    • Re: OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (60 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:39:21 -0400
    • Re: OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (33 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 06:41:10 -0700
    • Re: OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:02:44 -0700
    • Re: OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (58 lines)
      From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:12:45 -0500
    • Re: OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (68 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:58:32 -0700
    • OT: All'y'all's's's's'... (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 07:20:32 -0700

15. OT: Computer broken & away next weekend
    • Re: OT: Computer broken & away next weekend (49 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:16:44 +0000
    • OT: Computer broken & away next weekend (39 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:13:15 -0400

16. Pretty little girls' school (was: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?)
    • Pretty little girls' school (was: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?) (69 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:05:33 +0100

17. Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space
    • Re: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (50 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 01:16:51 -0700
    • Re: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (62 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 06:44:08 +0100
    • Re: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (51 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 05:02:12 -0700
    • Re: Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (160 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:54:14 -0400
    • Quarterly Contest! Writing in Two Dimensional Space (253 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:13:16 -0400

18. question - for organizing a long-delayed language
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language (102 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 23:08:33 +0000
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language (80 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 01:30:14 -0400
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language (106 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:29:16 -0700
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language (143 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 14:12:16 +0000
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language (149 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 02:21:40 -0700

19. question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (38 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:49:13 +0000
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (34 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 01:53:03 +0100
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (34 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 00:28:06 -0000
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (36 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:45:59 -0700
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (48 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 23:03:24 +0000
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (33 lines)
      From: Joseph a.k.a Buck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:30:43 -0700
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (85 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:23:42 +0000
    • Re: question - for organizing a long-delayed language - my US$0.02 (74 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:40:36 -0000

20. Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (was Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?)
    • Re: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (was Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?) (69 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:47:21 +0100
    • Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (was Re: FLAMEBAIT: Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?) (61 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:24:14 +0200

21. Semi-OT: Linguist battles to save 'lost' Eritrean language
    • Re: Semi-OT: Linguist battles to save 'lost' Eritrean language (101 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:25:04 +1200
    • Semi-OT: Linguist battles to save 'lost' Eritrean language (70 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:46:53 -0700

22. Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles)
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (120 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:23:05 -0700
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (33 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:29:28 -0000
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (55 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:42:43 +0200
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (47 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:36:09 +0200
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:02:24 -0400
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (75 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:13:03 -0700
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (53 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 20:01:29 -0400
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (70 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:46:48 +0100
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (113 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 19:15:57 +0100
    • Re: Tagalog discussion (was: Anadewism questions 2: Linking particles) (19 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:18:30 -0400

23. Toki Pona
    • Toki Pona (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:31:20 -0400

24. Travellers Phrasebook Sections 1-6 in Franj
    • Travellers Phrasebook Sections 1-6 in Franj (277 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 03:52:19 -0400

25. Travellers' Phrasebook Sections 4-6
    • Travellers' Phrasebook Sections 4-6 (150 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 03:33:33 -0400

26. Tree writing [Was: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?]
    • Re: Tree writing [Was: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?] (92 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:10:16 -0700

27. Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be"
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (80 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 02:18:22 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (115 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:30:04 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (99 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 00:55:30 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (60 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 23:56:41 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (18 lines)
      From: Alex J. Man <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:50:18 -0400
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (150 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 18:43:58 +0100
    • Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (33 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:58:50 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (95 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:34:21 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (59 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 00:33:29 -0400
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (96 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:17:22 -0400
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (38 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 01:22:58 +0100
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (58 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:15:38 -0400
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (83 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 18:09:07 -0400
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (97 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:04:33 -0700
    • Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (48 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:24:44 +0100
    • Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be" (42 lines)
      From: Alex J. Man <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:57:30 -0400

28. USAGE: AAVE/Spanish pidgin?
    • Re: USAGE: AAVE/Spanish pidgin? (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 19:51:39 -0400
    • USAGE: AAVE/Spanish pidgin? (42 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 19:20:07 -0400

29. Vocab. development
    • Re: Vocab. development (49 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:05:50 +0200
    • Re: Vocab. development (132 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:03:29 -0700
    • Re: Vocab. development (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:50:38 -0400
    • Re: Vocab. development (75 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 18:45:52 +0200
    • Re: Vocab. development (95 lines)
      From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:47:35 -0700
    • Re: Vocab. development (42 lines)
      From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 17:29:24 -0500
    • Re: Vocab. development (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 00:10:44 +0200
    • Vocab. development (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 13:59:55 -0400

30. When is a verb not a verb? (was: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be")
    • Re: When is a verb not a verb? (was: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be") (130 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:29:46 +0100
    • Re: When is a verb not a verb? (was: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be") (67 lines)
      From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:51:15 -0500
    • When is a verb not a verb? (was: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be") (157 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:07:28 +0100

31. Which part of speech?
    • Re: Which part of speech? (69 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 06:41:14 +0100
    • Re: Which part of speech? (81 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:00:33 +0200
    • Re: Which part of speech? (101 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 06:59:04 +0100
    • Re: Which part of speech? (266 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:25:57 -0700
    • Re: Which part of speech? (168 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:33:34 +0100
    • Re: Which part of speech? (73 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:36:03 -0400
    • Re: Which part of speech? (64 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:24:41 +0200
    • Re: Which part of speech? (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:24:51 +0200
    • Re: Which part of speech? (45 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:33:04 -0600
    • Re: Which part of speech? (73 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:19:17 -0600
    • Re: Which part of speech? (47 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:51:43 +0200
    • Re: Which part of speech? (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:29:55 +0200
    • Re: Which part of speech? (160 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 06:18:58 -0400
    • Re: Which part of speech? (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:54:34 +0200
    • Re: Which part of speech? (130 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:20:25 -0700
    • Re: Which part of speech? (57 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:11:21 -0400
    • Re: Which part of speech? (52 lines)
      From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:35:18 -0500
    • Re: Which part of speech? (126 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:55:59 -0700
    • Re: Which part of speech? (115 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 18:41:11 +0100
    • Re: Which part of speech? (62 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:23:45 -0600
    • Re: Which part of speech? (54 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:47:18 -0400