Conlang
Mailing List – June 2005, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?
(2 messages)
American Cuisine (Was: Re: Homonymy -- Hot Stuff Dept.)
Ant: Palatovelars: RTR, ATR, Uvulurized, Pharyngealized
Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(11 messages)
CHAT mass-hallucination? (was: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(12 messages)
Delurking...
For those of you who use Windows 2000/XP
(3 messages)
Homonymy
(23 messages)
Homonymy (hot stuff dept.)
If I had...I would have... constructions
(20 messages)
Lateral/Central vs Apical/Laminal/Dorsal
(4 messages)
Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(5 messages)
measuring time
(17 messages)
Moghul conlang
Moghul conlang (Text-rich)
Most challenging features of languages?
(2 messages)
NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(7 messages)
negation
(2 messages)
negation (ne, en , nen)
OT: HTML assistance
OT: Inuktitut course?
(2 messages)
OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(7 messages)
Pater Noster in Da Mätz se Basa
Playing with my dictionary
(3 messages)
question about creaky voice
(12 messages)
Subclause marking
Tesäfcüm phonology sketch (formerly S11)
Tesäfcüm phonology sketch (formerly S11)
The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics)
the smallest dictionary
(4 messages)
THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?
(2 messages)
U Trau in Michigan
V2, not SVO
(2 messages)
V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!)
(2 messages)
[OT] Tewa (natlang) question
(3 messages)
[Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(7 messages)
"Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?
Re: "Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?
(49 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?
(41 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
American Cuisine (Was: Re: Homonymy -- Hot Stuff Dept.)
Re: American Cuisine (Was: Re: Homonymy -- Hot Stuff Dept.)
(80 lines)
From:
Tom Chappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ant: Palatovelars: RTR, ATR, Uvulurized, Pharyngealized
Re: Ant: Palatovelars: RTR, ATR, Uvulurized, Pharyngealized
(53 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(50 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(39 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(47 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ant: Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(162 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT mass-hallucination? (was: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?)
CHAT mass-hallucination? (was: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?)
(62 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT mass-hallucination? (was: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?)
(45 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(121 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(37 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(76 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(104 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(120 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(124 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(52 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(140 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: mass-hallucination?
(179 lines)
From:
william drewery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Delurking...
Re: Delurking...
(128 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
For those of you who use Windows 2000/XP
For those of you who use Windows 2000/XP
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For those of you who use Windows 2000/XP
(19 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For those of you who use Windows 2000/XP
(20 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Homonymy
Homonymy
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(66 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(104 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(41 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(43 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(35 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(34 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(77 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(161 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(52 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(50 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(136 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(45 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(72 lines)
From:
bob thornton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(72 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Homonymy
(66 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Homonymy (hot stuff dept.)
Re: Homonymy (hot stuff dept.)
(98 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
If I had...I would have... constructions
If I had...I would have... constructions
(27 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(98 lines)
From:
Edward Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(36 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(72 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(87 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(39 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(61 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(44 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(137 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(53 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(141 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(91 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(42 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(42 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If I had...I would have... constructions
(129 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lateral/Central vs Apical/Laminal/Dorsal
Lateral/Central vs Apical/Laminal/Dorsal
(34 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lateral/Central vs Apical/Laminal/Dorsal
(40 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lateral/Central vs Apical/Laminal/Dorsal
(49 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lateral/Central vs Apical/Laminal/Dorsal
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(23 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistics: Final /?/ and /h/
(93 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
measuring time
measuring time
(41 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(56 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(68 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(69 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(162 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(96 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(63 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(58 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(54 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(80 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(58 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(31 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(93 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: measuring time
(64 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Moghul conlang
Moghul conlang
(160 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Moghul conlang (Text-rich)
Moghul conlang (Text-rich)
(217 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Most challenging features of languages?
Most challenging features of languages?
(33 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most challenging features of languages?
(40 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(58 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(58 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(62 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(32 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
negation
Re: negation
(67 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: negation
(34 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
negation (ne, en , nen)
Re: negation (ne, en , nen)
(199 lines)
From:
David Fernandez-Nieto <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: HTML assistance
OT: HTML assistance
(40 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Inuktitut course?
OT: Inuktitut course?
(45 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Inuktitut course?
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(55 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(82 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(49 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(42 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(58 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators)
(22 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pater Noster in Da Mätz se Basa
Pater Noster in Da Mätz se Basa
(71 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Playing with my dictionary
Playing with my dictionary
(64 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Playing with my dictionary
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Playing with my dictionary
(44 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
question about creaky voice
question about creaky voice
(40 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(40 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(60 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(58 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(76 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(63 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(39 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(32 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about creaky voice
(44 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subclause marking
Subclause marking
(36 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tesäfcüm phonology sketch (formerly S11)
Re: Tesäfcüm phonology sketch (formerly S11)
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tesäfcüm phonology sketch (formerly S11)
Tesäfcüm phonology sketch (formerly S11)
(205 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics)
Re: The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics)
(300 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
the smallest dictionary
the smallest dictionary
(47 lines)
From:
David Fernandez-Nieto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the smallest dictionary
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the smallest dictionary
(66 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the smallest dictionary
(49 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?
Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?
(68 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
U Trau in Michigan
U Trau in Michigan
(141 lines)
From:
Christopher Marshall <
[log in to unmask]
>
V2, not SVO
Re: V2, not SVO
(81 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: V2, not SVO
(71 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!)
Re: V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!)
(28 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!)
(145 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Tewa (natlang) question
[OT] Tewa (natlang) question
(35 lines)
From:
Elyse M. Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Tewa (natlang) question
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Tewa (natlang) question
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
[Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(39 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(44 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(82 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Waaay OT] Re: V2, not SVO
(66 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – June 2005, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – June 2005, week 3
