Conlang Mailing List – June 2005, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?
• A C-a grammar question (8 messages)
• A Vocabulary or Phrasebook of the Mutsun Language, spoken at the Mission San Juan Bautista (3 messages)
• ANNOUNCE: Relay 11 (finally!)
• Auto-Segmenting Engelang (was REQUEST: Engelang?)
• Bablefish, no 2
• Bargoens (Was: Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (3 messages)
• Compound Verboids (2 messages)
• Interesting Babelfish translation (4 messages)
• Kelenala (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (3 messages)
• Labial flap (3 messages)
• NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide (5 messages)
• negation (5 messages)
• Norman French Question
• Noygwexaal Babel text
• OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (10 messages)
• OT: Re: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal) (2 messages)
• OT: relaxing music (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (...))
• Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal) (2 messages)
• Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (11 messages)
• sound changes (9 messages)
• The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics) (2 messages)
• THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (14 messages)
• Three Stop Series (3 messages)
• Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (10 messages)
• V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!)

1. "Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?
   • Re: "Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity? (69 lines)
     From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:11:29 -0700

2. A C-a grammar question
   • A C-a grammar question (87 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:47:01 -0700
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (39 lines)
     From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 04:10:03 -0000
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (85 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:14:03 -0400
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (82 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:40:43 +0100
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (132 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:46:27 -0700
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (154 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:05:13 -0700
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (72 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:18:29 -0400
   • Re: A C-a grammar question (114 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:29:47 +0100

3. A Vocabulary or Phrasebook of the Mutsun Language, spoken at the Mission San Juan Bautista
   • A Vocabulary or Phrasebook of the Mutsun Language, spoken at the Mission San Juan Bautista (58 lines)
     From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:14:18 -0700
   • Re: A Vocabulary or Phrasebook of the Mutsun Language, spoken at the Mission San Juan Bautista (59 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:30:27 -0400
   • Re: A Vocabulary or Phrasebook of the Mutsun Language, spoken at the Mission San Juan Bautista (93 lines)
     From: B. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:38:30 -0700

4. ANNOUNCE: Relay 11 (finally!)
   • ANNOUNCE: Relay 11 (finally!) (57 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:01:50 +0200

5. Auto-Segmenting Engelang (was REQUEST: Engelang?)
   • Re: Auto-Segmenting Engelang (was REQUEST: Engelang?) (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:01:56 -0400

6. Bablefish, no 2
   • Bablefish, no 2 (66 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:33:44 +0200

7. Bargoens (Was: Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)))
   • Bargoens (Was: Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (57 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:39:51 +0200
   • Re: Bargoens (Was: Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (90 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:33:00 +0200
   • Re: Bargoens (Was: Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (56 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:22:57 +0300

8. Compound Verboids
   • Compound Verboids (87 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:28:35 -0400
   • Re: Compound Verboids (117 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:06:06 +0200

9. Interesting Babelfish translation
   • Interesting Babelfish translation (47 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:42:28 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Babelfish translation (35 lines)
     From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:58:21 -0000
   • Re: Interesting Babelfish translation (27 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:16:16 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Babelfish translation (37 lines)
     From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:05:17 -0000

10. Kelenala (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)))
    • Kelenala (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (63 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:12:01 -0700
    • Re: Kelenala (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (72 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:40:08 +0200
    • Re: Kelenala (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))) (68 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:40:37 -0700

11. Labial flap
    • Labial flap (32 lines)
      From: Trebor Jung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:47:03 -0400
    • Re: Labial flap (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:27:56 GMT
    • Re: Labial flap (44 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:12:03 +0200

12. NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide
    • NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide (33 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:15:49 +0200
    • Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide (47 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:37:53 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:59:57 +0200
    • Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide (63 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:07:31 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: Maya pronunciation guide (305 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:16:23 -0400

13. negation
    • negation (63 lines)
      From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:47:24 -0700
    • Re: negation (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:33:51 GMT
    • Re: negation (102 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:07:29 -0700
    • Re: negation (34 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:30:33 -0400
    • Re: negation (84 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:06:34 +0200

14. Norman French Question
    • Norman French Question (42 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:51:58 -0700

15. Noygwexaal Babel text
    • Re: Noygwexaal Babel text (303 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:57:35 -0700

16. OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal))
    • OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (81 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:47:06 +0200
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (99 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:43:01 -0700
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (113 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:30:17 +0200
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (69 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:35:18 +0200
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (57 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:09:16 -0400
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:41:57 +0200
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (50 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:50:39 +0100
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (46 lines)
      From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:17:42 -0700
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:35:54 +0200
    • Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (was: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)) (37 lines)
      From: Matt Arriola <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:26:33 -0400

17. OT: Re: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)
    • OT: Re: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal) (58 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:44:09 -0400
    • Re: OT: Re: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal) (77 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:54:55 +0200

18. OT: relaxing music (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (...))
    • OT: relaxing music (was Re: OT: Programmed/Hand made music (...)) (64 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:03:11 +0200

19. Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal)
    • Re: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal) (67 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:49:04 +1200
    • Re: Random word generators (was Re: Worthwhile Engelang Goal) (53 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:16:02 +0200

20. Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!
    • Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (39 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:40:50 +0200
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (62 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:30:44 -0400
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (50 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:51:10 +0200
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (50 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:45:51 +0100
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (39 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:13:18 -0400
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (65 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:27:03 +0200
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (77 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:23:07 +0200
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (87 lines)
      From: Christian Köttl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:27:27 +0200
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (43 lines)
      From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:09:39 -0400
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (108 lines)
      From: Julia "Schnecki" Simon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:52:13 +0300
    • Re: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead! (94 lines)
      From: Julia "Schnecki" Simon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:10:27 +0300

21. sound changes
    • Re: sound changes (52 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:12:26 -0600
    • Re: sound changes (76 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:51:07 -0400
    • Re: sound changes (61 lines)
      From: Nicolas Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:55:06 -0400
    • Re: sound changes (42 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 23:12:36 -0400
    • Re: sound changes (51 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:28:06 -0400
    • Re: sound changes (56 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:41:01 +0200
    • Re: sound changes (41 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:04:25 +0100
    • Re: sound changes (32 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:01:39 -0400
    • Re: sound changes (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:48:06 +0200

22. The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics)
    • The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics) (272 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:35:26 -0400
    • Re: The languages of Aohutl, Parts I and II: Oa-Oa-Lahahan and Mwa (was: SF Xenolinguistics) (68 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:29:27 +0100

23. THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous?
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (101 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:32:25 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (144 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:38:35 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (139 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:50:53 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (49 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:00:35 -0000
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (132 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 07:08:44 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (70 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:42:22 -0000
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (101 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:55:58 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (314 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:42:39 -0000
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (399 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:56:50 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (82 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:01:25 +0200
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:28:13 +0200
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (36 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:28:31 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (55 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:52:40 +0200
    • Re: THEORY: Are commands to believe infelicitous? (64 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:55:44 -0000

24. Three Stop Series
    • Three Stop Series (52 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:25:34 +0100
    • Re: Three Stop Series (33 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:35:01 +0100
    • Re: Three Stop Series (53 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:25:29 +0200

25. Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)?
    • Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (41 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:19:02 +0200
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (43 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:21:29 +0100
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (142 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:26:15 -0400
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (58 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:13:19 +0200
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (53 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:54:54 -0400
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (53 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:53:12 -0000
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (144 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:17:14 +0100
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (61 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:38:32 +0100
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (243 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:02:52 -0400
    • Re: Throwing out the tree-structured grammar (SF Xenolinguistics FAQ)? (118 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:28:51 +0100

26. V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!)
    • V2, not SVO (Was: Save of the dative, the genitive's is already dead!) (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:46:39 +0200