Conlang Mailing List – July 2005, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A unified plan for Minza colors
• Ant: Re: USAGE: np (2 messages)
• Basic Conlang: Serasraes (not complex)
• Chinese dimensionality (was:Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians)
• ConScript Unicode Registry (7 messages)
• CXS suggestions (18 messages)
• Days (was: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...)) (2 messages)
• Different Syntax in Idioms (5 messages)
• Fwd: Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...)
• Fwd: USAGE: survey
• Gnomes (Was: what is an aorist?) (4 messages)
• Hi! Reintroducing myself, and introducing bryatesle (3 messages)
• Hikka (was Heinlein's speedtalk)
• Is there any derivatives of Heinlein's "gulf" language speedtalk? (2 messages)
• Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (6 messages)
• META five posts a day limit( was: introduction Middelsprake)
• Mixed person plurals (8 messages)
• Mixed Person Plurals
• OT: After-college plans: world travel (2 messages)
• phonemic silence?? (5 messages)
• Reintroducing myself and stuff (4 messages)
• Salamanders (Was: Gnomes)
• TECH: Caution: Login data in Listserv URLs!
• TECH: Posting using X=... and Y=... in URL
• TECH: Test
• Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (23 messages)
• the the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...)) (3 messages)
• THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders Among Neuter (2 messages)
• THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders...
• THEORY: Non-Content/Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries ...)
• THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxi...
• THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries (5 messages)
• This morning (5 messages)
• Two-dimensional frame-foregrounded writing: A preliminary sketch (2 messages)
• Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (6 messages)
• USAGE: np (4 messages)
• USAGE: Survey
• What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries) (5 messages)

1. A unified plan for Minza colors
   • Re: A unified plan for Minza colors (42 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

2. Ant: Re: USAGE: np
   • Ant: Re: USAGE: np (63 lines)
     From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ant: Re: USAGE: np (128 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

3. Basic Conlang: Serasraes (not complex)
   • Basic Conlang: Serasraes (not complex) (191 lines)
     From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>

4. Chinese dimensionality (was:Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians)
   • Chinese dimensionality (was:Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians) (105 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

5. ConScript Unicode Registry
   • ConScript Unicode Registry (42 lines)
     From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (51 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (43 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (55 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (62 lines)
     From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (50 lines)
     From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (52 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

6. CXS suggestions
   • CXS suggestions (53 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (38 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (44 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (38 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (79 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (42 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (73 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (65 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (54 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (39 lines)
     From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (148 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (48 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (47 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (56 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (52 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (52 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (54 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CXS suggestions (47 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

7. Days (was: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...))
   • Days (was: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...)) (93 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Days (was: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...)) (49 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

8. Different Syntax in Idioms
   • Different Syntax in Idioms (79 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Different Syntax in Idioms (42 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Different Syntax in Idioms (44 lines)
     From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Different Syntax in Idioms (59 lines)
     From: Kris Kowal <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Different Syntax in Idioms (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

9. Fwd: Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...)
   • Fwd: Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (38 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

10. Fwd: USAGE: survey
    • Re: Fwd: USAGE: survey (51 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

11. Gnomes (Was: what is an aorist?)
    • Gnomes (Was: what is an aorist?) (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gnomes (Was: what is an aorist?) (90 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gnomes (Was: what is an aorist?) (44 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gnomes (Was: what is an aorist?) (49 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

12. Hi! Reintroducing myself, and introducing bryatesle
    • Hi! Reintroducing myself, and introducing bryatesle (37 lines)
      From: Markus Miekko <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hi! Reintroducing myself, and introducing bryatesle (66 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hi! Reintroducing myself, and introducing bryatesle (79 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>

13. Hikka (was Heinlein's speedtalk)
    • Re: Hikka (was Heinlein's speedtalk) (49 lines)
      From: makeenan <[log in to unmask]>

14. Is there any derivatives of Heinlein's "gulf" language speedtalk?
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of Heinlein's "gulf" language speedtalk? (100 lines)
      From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of Heinlein's "gulf" language speedtalk? (42 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

15. Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk?
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (105 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (55 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (125 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (24 lines)
      From: Dav Newq <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (15 lines)
      From: Dav Newq <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is there any derivatives of heinleins "gulf" language speedtalk? (34 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>

16. META five posts a day limit( was: introduction Middelsprake)
    • Re: META five posts a day limit( was: introduction Middelsprake) (43 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

17. Mixed person plurals
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (89 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (120 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (114 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (64 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (60 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (244 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (106 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mixed person plurals (112 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>

18. Mixed Person Plurals
    • Re: Mixed Person Plurals (385 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>

19. OT: After-college plans: world travel
    • OT: After-college plans: world travel (88 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: After-college plans: world travel (68 lines)
      From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>

20. phonemic silence??
    • phonemic silence?? (37 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonemic silence?? (48 lines)
      From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonemic silence?? (50 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonemic silence?? (51 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonemic silence?? (45 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

21. Reintroducing myself and stuff
    • Reintroducing myself and stuff (41 lines)
      From: Markus Miekko <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reintroducing myself and stuff (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reintroducing myself and stuff (61 lines)
      From: Markus Miekko <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reintroducing myself and stuff (36 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

22. Salamanders (Was: Gnomes)
    • Re: Salamanders (Was: Gnomes) (56 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

23. TECH: Caution: Login data in Listserv URLs!
    • TECH: Caution: Login data in Listserv URLs! (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

24. TECH: Posting using X=... and Y=... in URL
    • TECH: Posting using X=... and Y=... in URL (21 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

25. TECH: Test
    • TECH: Test (34 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

26. Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...)
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (124 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (98 lines)
      From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (72 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (144 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (76 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (122 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (62 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (75 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (39 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (58 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (31 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (42 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (133 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (75 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (54 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (41 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (94 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (41 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tenses (was: Re: THEORY: ... Auxiliaries...) (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

27. the the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...))
    • the the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...)) (52 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...)) (47 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...)) (52 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>

28. THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders Among Neuter
    • Re: THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders Among Neuter (148 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders Among Neuter (453 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>

29. THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders...
    • Re: THEORY: Language for a Multi-Species Society: Sex-Based Genders... (61 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>

30. THEORY: Non-Content/Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries ...)
    • Re: THEORY: Non-Content/Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries ...) (110 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

31. THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxi...
    • Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxi... (43 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>

32. THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries
    • Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries (339 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries (56 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries (93 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries (87 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries (203 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

33. This morning
    • Re: This morning (92 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: This morning (74 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: This morning (41 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: This morning (79 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: This morning (63 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

34. Two-dimensional frame-foregrounded writing: A preliminary sketch
    • Two-dimensional frame-foregrounded writing: A preliminary sketch (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two-dimensional frame-foregrounded writing: A preliminary sketch (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

35. Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality
    • Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (87 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (46 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (54 lines)
      From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (79 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Two-dimensional time and the friends of Whorfians (was:Re:Chinese dimensionality (33 lines)
      From: Joseph Bridwell <[log in to unmask]>

36. USAGE: np
    • USAGE: np (43 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: np (43 lines)
      From: James W. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: np (102 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: np (45 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

37. USAGE: Survey
    • Re: USAGE: Survey (55 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

38. What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries)
    • What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries) (72 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries) (110 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries) (88 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries) (51 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What is an aorist? (was Re: THEORY: Temporal Auxiliaries, Aspectual Auxiliaries, Modal Auxiliaries) (61 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>