Conlang
Mailing List July 2005, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Active languages
(14 messages)
Active languages: --- and Middle "Voice"
Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
(2 messages)
Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(3 messages)
Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(10 messages)
cases depending of nouns
(3 messages)
Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(7 messages)
Fwd: Re: Non-humanoid langs
(2 messages)
Fwd: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
Going off-line
(3 messages)
Mixed person plurals
New conlang
(3 messages)
New Yasaro page on FrathWiki
Notification of Absence
(4 messages)
OT: Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
OT: Meta: Wikipedia
Parallel Languages
(7 messages)
THEORY: "Quirky" Case -- "Quirky" Subjects and "Quirky" Objects
THEORY: Four-valent Clauses
THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(20 messages)
USAGE: Mayan construct state?
(3 messages)
Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(7 messages)
Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
[relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(5 messages)
[TECH] IPA Keyboard Layout for Mac OS X
Active languages
Active languages
(40 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(33 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(55 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(97 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(55 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(137 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(101 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(49 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active languages
(103 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active languages: --- and Middle "Voice"
Re: Active languages: --- and Middle "Voice"
(229 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
(35 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
(35 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(32 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(61 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(88 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(78 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(69 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(51 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(144 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(286 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case stacking; was: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(78 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
cases depending of nouns
cases depending of nouns
(44 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: cases depending of nouns
(52 lines)
From:
Damian Yerrick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: cases depending of nouns
(67 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(227 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(62 lines)
From:
Ingmar Roerdinkholder <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(66 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(75 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(21 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian
(63 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: Non-humanoid langs
Fwd: Re: Non-humanoid langs
(174 lines)
From:
Tom Chappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fwd: Re: Non-humanoid langs
(28 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
Fwd: Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going off-line
Going off-line
(35 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going off-line
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going off-line
(44 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixed person plurals
Re: Mixed person plurals
(89 lines)
From:
Simon Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
New conlang
New conlang
(186 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang
(205 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New conlang
(249 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Yasaro page on FrathWiki
New Yasaro page on FrathWiki
(31 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Notification of Absence
Notification of Absence
(32 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notification of Absence
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notification of Absence
(29 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notification of Absence
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
Re: OT: Browser (Was Conlang in planning: Tarsyanian)
(25 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Meta: Wikipedia
OT: Meta: Wikipedia
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Parallel Languages
Parallel Languages
(58 lines)
From:
makeenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parallel Languages
(50 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Parallel Languages
(351 lines)
From:
Jim G <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parallel Languages
(64 lines)
From:
makeenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parallel Languages
(91 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parallel Languages
(118 lines)
From:
makeenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Parallel Languages
(128 lines)
From:
makeenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: "Quirky" Case -- "Quirky" Subjects and "Quirky" Objects
THEORY: "Quirky" Case -- "Quirky" Subjects and "Quirky" Objects
(93 lines)
From:
Tom Chappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Four-valent Clauses
THEORY: Four-valent Clauses
(49 lines)
From:
Tom Chappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(115 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(129 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(299 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(69 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(81 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(82 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(48 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(156 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(181 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(75 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(73 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(124 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(88 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(173 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: genitive vs. construct case/izafe
(40 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Mayan construct state?
USAGE: Mayan construct state?
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Mayan construct state?
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Mayan construct state?
(256 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(73 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(60 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(53 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(60 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(85 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(110 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger
(65 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(61 lines)
From:
Kate Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
[relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
Re: [relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(241 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [relay] Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger!
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[TECH] IPA Keyboard Layout for Mac OS X
[TECH] IPA Keyboard Layout for Mac OS X
(53 lines)
From:
Jonathyn Bet'nct <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU