Conlang
Mailing List – August 2005, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Active languages, part 2
Another update of gjâ-zym-byn
(3 messages)
Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(2 messages)
Case's Name
(2 messages)
Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state
(3 messages)
Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn
Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(15 messages)
FYI: Kalaallisut Internet Radio
Going away
Help unsubscribing
IPA block in Unicode
(20 messages)
Langmaker not up?
(2 messages)
Mandarin syllabic consonants (Was: IPA block in Unicode)
Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(10 messages)
Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
(5 messages)
MP3: Reading in Da Maetz se Basa
No more plural? No, more plural!
(7 messages)
Off for a week
Proposed peer-reviewed journal of conlangs
Real Life conlang classes
Relative Clauses
(4 messages)
Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(10 messages)
Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives: Old Albic Applicat
(2 messages)
Switch-Reference (was: Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic)
TECH: the *very* old archives
(2 messages)
the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...))
THEORY: Non-nom Subj & Nom Obj -- Quirky OVS Word Order Or Quirky Case?
(4 messages)
Vibrants (was: New conlang)
Active languages, part 2
Re: Active languages, part 2
(91 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another update of gjâ-zym-byn
Another update of gjâ-zym-byn
(68 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another update of gjâ-zym-byn
(27 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another update of gjâ-zym-byn
(49 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
Re: Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
(45 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Case's Name
Re: Case's Name
(38 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case's Name
(104 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state
Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state
(73 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state
(102 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state
(128 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn
Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn
(78 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(131 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(132 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(166 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(210 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(55 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(123 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(62 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(76 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(101 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(43 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(93 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(59 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(89 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic
(72 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
FYI: Kalaallisut Internet Radio
FYI: Kalaallisut Internet Radio
(44 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going away
Going away
(42 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help unsubscribing
Help unsubscribing
(34 lines)
From:
Lorien Patton <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA block in Unicode
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(122 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(52 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(49 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(86 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(44 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(58 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(76 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(61 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(33 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(54 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(55 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(56 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(67 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(72 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(31 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(33 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA block in Unicode
(58 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Langmaker not up?
Langmaker not up?
(14 lines)
From:
Yann Kiraly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker not up?
(36 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mandarin syllabic consonants (Was: IPA block in Unicode)
Mandarin syllabic consonants (Was: IPA block in Unicode)
(79 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(148 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(133 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(401 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(157 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(228 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(298 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(220 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(74 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(101 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; !Ora
(52 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
(43 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
(91 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
(36 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
(54 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed person plurals: gender & the (in/ex)clusive distinction; ...
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
MP3: Reading in Da Maetz se Basa
Re: MP3: Reading in Da Maetz se Basa
(44 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
No more plural? No, more plural!
No more plural? No, more plural!
(132 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No more plural? No, more plural!
(45 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No more plural? No, more plural!
(114 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No more plural? No, more plural!
(77 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No more plural? No, more plural!
(174 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No more plural? No, more plural!
(187 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No more plural? No, more plural!
(84 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Off for a week
Off for a week
(36 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proposed peer-reviewed journal of conlangs
Proposed peer-reviewed journal of conlangs
(53 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Real Life conlang classes
Real Life conlang classes
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relative Clauses
Re: Relative Clauses
(226 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative Clauses
(98 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative Clauses
(205 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative Clauses
(180 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(74 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(61 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(47 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(162 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(81 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(107 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives
(104 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives: Old Albic Applicat
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives: Old Albic Applicat
(102 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/weak verbs, expanded infinitives and applicatives: Old Albic Applicat
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Switch-Reference (was: Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic)
Switch-Reference (was: Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic)
(132 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: the *very* old archives
TECH: the *very* old archives
(123 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: the *very* old archives
(43 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...))
the day before yesterday etc. (was Re: Tenses (...))
(88 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Non-nom Subj & Nom Obj -- Quirky OVS Word Order Or Quirky Case?
Re: THEORY: Non-nom Subj & Nom Obj -- Quirky OVS Word Order Or Quirky Case?
(67 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Non-nom Subj & Nom Obj -- Quirky OVS Word Order Or Quirky Case?
(78 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Non-nom Subj & Nom Obj -- Quirky OVS Word Order Or Quirky Case?
(136 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Non-nom Subj & Nom Obj -- Quirky OVS Word Order Or Quirky Case?
(87 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vibrants (was: New conlang)
Re: Vibrants (was: New conlang)
(62 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – August 2005, week 2
Conlang Mailing List – August 2005, week 2
