Conlang Mailing List – August 2005, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A Case List (3 messages)
• A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (6 messages)
• Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together (2 messages)
• Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (21 messages)
• Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn (3 messages)
• Final (?) Senyecan Orthography (4 messages)
• I'm back! (10 messages)
• IPA block in Unicode (3 messages)
• Mandarin syllabic consonants (Was: IPA block in Unicode)
• Mi no parla italiano ! (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!)
• No more plural? No, more plural! (8 messages)
• No more plural? No,more plural!:-- Gramm. Numbr when Non-Integer Semantic # (2 messages)
• OFFLIST: Old archives
• Possessive Frenchies (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!) (2 messages)
• Pronoun systems, Texperanto, ANADEW (was:Re: Mixed person plurals) (4 messages)
• Relative Clauses (4 messages)
• Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (7 messages)
• Stacked sound change?
• THEORY: Phonology: Natlangs: Attested Minimal Pairs? (4 messages)
• THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers... (3 messages)
• THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities ...
• THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (11 messages)
• Timetravel tenses (was Re: No more plural? ..)

1. A Case List
   • A Case List (35 lines)
     From: Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Case List (53 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Case List (61 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

2. A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion
   • A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (35 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (46 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (39 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (48 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (52 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A mock-article about Klingon from the Onion (65 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

3. Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together
   • Re: Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together (53 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cambridge Mass. Conlang Get-together (39 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>

4. Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (52 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (219 lines)
     From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (109 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (52 lines)
     From: Kit La Touche <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (88 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (75 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (92 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (124 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (169 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (196 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (67 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (91 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (103 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (62 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (41 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (64 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (79 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (44 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (70 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (60 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Colloquial German, experiencers and the construct state (54 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>

5. Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn
   • Re: Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn (81 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn (145 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Evidentiality in gjâ-zym-byn (103 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

6. Final (?) Senyecan Orthography
   • Final (?) Senyecan Orthography (127 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Final (?) Senyecan Orthography (106 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Final (?) Senyecan Orthography (39 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Final (?) Senyecan Orthography (43 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

7. I'm back!
   • I'm back! (26 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (35 lines)
     From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (43 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (39 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (46 lines)
     From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (36 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (38 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (47 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (40 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (71 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

8. IPA block in Unicode
   • Re: IPA block in Unicode (51 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: IPA block in Unicode (70 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: IPA block in Unicode (53 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

9. Mandarin syllabic consonants (Was: IPA block in Unicode)
   • Re: Mandarin syllabic consonants (Was: IPA block in Unicode) (74 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>

10. Mi no parla italiano ! (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!)
    • Mi no parla italiano ! (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!) (99 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>

11. No more plural? No, more plural!
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (70 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (109 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (83 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (99 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (61 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (78 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No, more plural! (110 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>

12. No more plural? No,more plural!:-- Gramm. Numbr when Non-Integer Semantic #
    • Re: No more plural? No,more plural!:-- Gramm. Numbr when Non-Integer Semantic # (166 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No more plural? No,more plural!:-- Gramm. Numbr when Non-Integer Semantic # (144 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

13. OFFLIST: Old archives
    • Re: OFFLIST: Old archives (60 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>

14. Possessive Frenchies (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!)
    • Possessive Frenchies (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!) (106 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possessive Frenchies (was: Re: No more plural? No, more plural!) (52 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

15. Pronoun systems, Texperanto, ANADEW (was:Re: Mixed person plurals)
    • Re: Pronoun systems, Texperanto, ANADEW (was:Re: Mixed person plurals) (41 lines)
      From: Rex May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Pronoun systems, Texperanto, ANADEW (was:Re: Mixed person plurals) (173 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronoun systems, Texperanto, ANADEW (was:Re: Mixed person plurals) (18 lines)
      From: Rex May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronoun systems, Texperanto, ANADEW (was:Re: Mixed person plurals) (183 lines)
      From: Rex May <[log in to unmask]>

16. Relative Clauses
    • Re: Relative Clauses (93 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative Clauses (81 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative Clauses (281 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative Clauses (79 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

17. Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!)
    • Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (60 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (78 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semetic-style Syllabry (was Re: I'm back!) (56 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

18. Stacked sound change?
    • Stacked sound change? (57 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

19. THEORY: Phonology: Natlangs: Attested Minimal Pairs?
    • THEORY: Phonology: Natlangs: Attested Minimal Pairs? (94 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Phonology: Natlangs: Attested Minimal Pairs? (166 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Phonology: Natlangs: Attested Minimal Pairs? (47 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Phonology: Natlangs: Attested Minimal Pairs? (176 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>

20. THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers...
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers... (87 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers... (173 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers... (124 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>

21. THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities ...
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities ... (36 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>

22. THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities
    • THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (137 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (83 lines)
      From: # 1 <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (50 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (72 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (66 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (194 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (43 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (52 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (86 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (48 lines)
      From: Via_Acadon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Tenses for Time Travelers; Plus, Moods and Modalities for Alternate Realities (120 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>

23. Timetravel tenses (was Re: No more plural? ..)
    • Timetravel tenses (was Re: No more plural? ..) (75 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>