Conlang
Mailing List – September 2005, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
'Yemls Grammar
(3 messages)
A bunch of phonological questions
Adposition or Case for Ground of Motion
An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
brz reloaded!
(7 messages)
brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(13 messages)
Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(9 messages)
Difficult-to-translate word (was Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino)
(3 messages)
Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(6 messages)
Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(17 messages)
Etruscan and other fun?
(6 messages)
Etruscan numerals
(2 messages)
Etruscan numerals (was: Interesting pre-Greek article)
(2 messages)
Historical Linguistics Question
(2 messages)
How naturalistic is this? Colors & Composition in Sein'
How to evaluate a conlang
(8 messages)
Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(20 messages)
interesting english syntax
(8 messages)
Interesting pre-Greek article
(2 messages)
Introduction
(5 messages)
Kinds of knowledge
(2 messages)
Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
(5 messages)
loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(8 messages)
META: Virus Warning!?
(4 messages)
Minor milestone
Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?
Online Drill for Scripts (Hiragana, Katakana, Hangul, Bopomofo)
OT--Early American Migrations
OT: (was: Historical Linguistics Question)
(2 messages)
OT: Re: Historical Linguistics Question
Phonology Problem: Nasalization Spreading
(4 messages)
PIE and Nostratic
(5 messages)
PIE and Nostratic Re: PIE and Nostratic Re: PIE and Nostratic
Piraha Article
Properties of consonants
(2 messages)
Sapir-Whorf Comic!
Seezzitonian
THEORY: Incorporating Agents vs. Patients in Verbs (was: 'Yemls Grammar)
(4 messages)
Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
(5 messages)
To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(11 messages)
Ubykh suspicions (was brz reloaded!)
(3 messages)
Using 'to be' and cases
(8 messages)
What is this construction
Would this be too hard to work with?
(5 messages)
'Yemls Grammar
Re: 'Yemls Grammar
(76 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls Grammar
(88 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls Grammar
(106 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
A bunch of phonological questions
Re: A bunch of phonological questions
(78 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Adposition or Case for Ground of Motion
Re: Adposition or Case for Ground of Motion
(92 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(74 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
brz reloaded!
brz reloaded!
(152 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz reloaded!
(24 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz reloaded!
(206 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz reloaded!
(257 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz reloaded!
(293 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz reloaded!
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz reloaded!
(292 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(140 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(203 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(116 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(82 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(133 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(51 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(125 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(121 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(61 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(69 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(119 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(108 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)
(71 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(85 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(75 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(107 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(89 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(75 lines)
From:
Damien Perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(120 lines)
From:
Damien Perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dates of Human Diaspora WAS: Re: PIE and Nostratic
(85 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Difficult-to-translate word (was Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino)
Difficult-to-translate word (was Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino)
(138 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult-to-translate word (was Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino)
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult-to-translate word (was Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino)
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(91 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(140 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(122 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(178 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(66 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double-segmentation (Was: brz, or Plan B revisited)
(118 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(76 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(92 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(61 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(82 lines)
From:
# 1 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(77 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(78 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(120 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(39 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Error rate, Circumlocution, and Cappucino
(174 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etruscan and other fun?
Etruscan and other fun?
(57 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan and other fun?
(136 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan and other fun?
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan and other fun?
(87 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan and other fun?
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan and other fun?
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etruscan numerals
Re: Etruscan numerals
(140 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan numerals
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etruscan numerals (was: Interesting pre-Greek article)
Etruscan numerals (was: Interesting pre-Greek article)
(123 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etruscan numerals (was: Interesting pre-Greek article)
(142 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Historical Linguistics Question
Re: Historical Linguistics Question
(66 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Historical Linguistics Question
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
How naturalistic is this? Colors & Composition in Sein'
Re: How naturalistic is this? Colors & Composition in Sein'
(47 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
How to evaluate a conlang
How to evaluate a conlang
(35 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(74 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(67 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(20 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(82 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(71 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How to evaluate a conlang
(42 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(93 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(58 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(186 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(52 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(49 lines)
From:
Leo Caesius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(105 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(115 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(36 lines)
From:
Leo Caesius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(267 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(115 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(130 lines)
From:
Thomas Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(34 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(35 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(57 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(111 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(141 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Indo-European family tree (was Re: Celtic and Afro-Asiatic?)
(188 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
interesting english syntax
interesting english syntax
(55 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(86 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(66 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(100 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(64 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(56 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting english syntax
(70 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting pre-Greek article
Re: Interesting pre-Greek article
(111 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting pre-Greek article
(123 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction
Introduction
(39 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(69 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kinds of knowledge
Re: Kinds of knowledge
(105 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kinds of knowledge
(168 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
(166 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
(70 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
(82 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kinds of knowledge was (RE: An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)))
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(76 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(84 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(77 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(80 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(57 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(180 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(198 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))
(75 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Virus Warning!?
META: Virus Warning!?
(27 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Virus Warning!?
(84 lines)
From:
Aaron Grahn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Virus Warning!?
(69 lines)
From:
Aaron Grahn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Virus Warning!?
(29 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Minor milestone
Re: Minor milestone
(61 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?
Re: Non-linear / full-2d writing systems?
(124 lines)
From:
Schuyler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Online Drill for Scripts (Hiragana, Katakana, Hangul, Bopomofo)
Re: Online Drill for Scripts (Hiragana, Katakana, Hangul, Bopomofo)
(67 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT--Early American Migrations
OT--Early American Migrations
(41 lines)
From:
James Comer <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: (was: Historical Linguistics Question)
OT: (was: Historical Linguistics Question)
(52 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: (was: Historical Linguistics Question)
(58 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Historical Linguistics Question
OT: Re: Historical Linguistics Question
(37 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology Problem: Nasalization Spreading
Phonology Problem: Nasalization Spreading
(71 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Problem: Nasalization Spreading
(54 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Problem: Nasalization Spreading
(55 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Problem: Nasalization Spreading
(54 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIE and Nostratic
PIE and Nostratic
(50 lines)
From:
James Comer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE and Nostratic
(41 lines)
From:
Sanghyeon Seo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE and Nostratic
(75 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE and Nostratic
(63 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE and Nostratic
(48 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIE and Nostratic Re: PIE and Nostratic Re: PIE and Nostratic
PIE and Nostratic Re: PIE and Nostratic Re: PIE and Nostratic
(49 lines)
From:
James Comer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piraha Article
Re: Piraha Article
(47 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Properties of consonants
Properties of consonants
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Properties of consonants
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sapir-Whorf Comic!
Sapir-Whorf Comic!
(31 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Seezzitonian
Re: Seezzitonian
(94 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Incorporating Agents vs. Patients in Verbs (was: 'Yemls Grammar)
THEORY: Incorporating Agents vs. Patients in Verbs (was: 'Yemls Grammar)
(196 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Incorporating Agents vs. Patients in Verbs (was: 'Yemls Grammar)
(180 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Incorporating Agents vs. Patients in Verbs (was: 'Yemls Grammar)
(60 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Incorporating Agents vs. Patients in Verbs (was: 'Yemls Grammar)
(66 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
(190 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
(21 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
(257 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
(127 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thoughts on Tarsyanian verbs
(237 lines)
From:
tomhchappell <
[log in to unmask]
>
To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(55 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(23 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(44 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(105 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To go "teita" and "atta" instead of "spazieren"
(47 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ubykh suspicions (was brz reloaded!)
Re: Ubykh suspicions (was brz reloaded!)
(77 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ubykh suspicions (was brz reloaded!)
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ubykh suspicions (was brz reloaded!)
(72 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Using 'to be' and cases
Using 'to be' and cases
(39 lines)
From:
zzz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(96 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(52 lines)
From:
zzz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(93 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(31 lines)
From:
zzz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(63 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(60 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using 'to be' and cases
(123 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is this construction
Re: What is this construction
(101 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Would this be too hard to work with?
Re: Would this be too hard to work with?
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Would this be too hard to work with?
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Would this be too hard to work with?
(50 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Would this be too hard to work with?
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Would this be too hard to work with?
(71 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – September 2005, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – September 2005, week 4
