Conlang Mailing List – October 2005, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• a couple Inar texts (2 messages)
• A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (28 messages)
• Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (6 messages)
• Can someone ID this script?
• Constructing plausible language evolution (5 messages)
• Cross-Linguistic Definitions of: Definiteness, Familiarity, Identifiability, Referentiality, Specificity
• Featural Alphabets
• Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can (4 messages)
• Iconicity (2 messages)
• OT: Language learning software?
• OT: Re: Extensions of Script Teacher
• Phonological questions, bunch 2 (6 messages)
• TECH: Font Problem? (4 messages)
• Translation Challenge? (was Re: Iconicity)
• Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (6 messages)
• What is "validationality"?

1. a couple Inar texts
   • a couple Inar texts (150 lines)
     From: Matt Arriola <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a couple Inar texts (55 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

2. A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune
   • A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (60 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (94 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (79 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (78 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (91 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (41 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (66 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (57 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (40 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (272 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (63 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (51 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (69 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (136 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (62 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (92 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (80 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (46 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (37 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (55 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (91 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (103 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (71 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (69 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (128 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (48 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (52 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune (88 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

3. Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph
   • Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (100 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (101 lines)
     From: Kit La Touche <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (65 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (122 lines)
     From: Kit La Touche <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (45 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph (88 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

4. Can someone ID this script?
   • Can someone ID this script? (84 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>

5. Constructing plausible language evolution
   • Constructing plausible language evolution (43 lines)
     From: 轡虫 <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructing plausible language evolution (50 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructing plausible language evolution (54 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructing plausible language evolution (72 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructing plausible language evolution (62 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

6. Cross-Linguistic Definitions of: Definiteness, Familiarity, Identifiability, Referentiality, Specificity
   • Cross-Linguistic Definitions of: Definiteness, Familiarity, Identifiability, Referentiality, Specificity (105 lines)
     From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>

7. Featural Alphabets
   • Re: Featural Alphabets (73 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

8. Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can
   • Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can (55 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can (51 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can (70 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can (77 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

9. Iconicity
   • Iconicity (110 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Iconicity (71 lines)
     From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>

10. OT: Language learning software?
    • OT: Language learning software? (45 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

11. OT: Re: Extensions of Script Teacher
    • OT: Re: Extensions of Script Teacher (31 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

12. Phonological questions, bunch 2
    • Phonological questions, bunch 2 (43 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonological questions, bunch 2 (53 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonological questions, bunch 2 (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonological questions, bunch 2 (36 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonological questions, bunch 2 (51 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonological questions, bunch 2 (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

13. TECH: Font Problem?
    • TECH: Font Problem? (55 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Font Problem? (52 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Font Problem? (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Font Problem? (47 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

14. Translation Challenge? (was Re: Iconicity)
    • Translation Challenge? (was Re: Iconicity) (76 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

15. Vowelspace vs. Colorspace
    • Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (51 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (57 lines)
      From: Jonathyn Bet'nct <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (53 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (57 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowelspace vs. Colorspace (61 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

16. What is "validationality"?
    • Re: What is "validationality"? (97 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>