Conlang Mailing List – October 2005, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment (5 messages)
• Alternation of Airstream (2 messages)
• Anthroponymics (5 messages)
• Anthroponymics -- U.S.American laws about "first" and "last" names and name-changes
• Bye for now
• Can your conlang do this?
• CHAT Almost well-formed southern ape (wasRe: Teknonyms) (3 messages)
• CHAT sedecimal
• Codish
• English: 'Drop me a line'
• Fwd: Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms
• Graeco-Latin hybrids
• Idiolect Sound Change, or Broader Usage? n# > m#
• Latina Albana (2 messages)
• Library Program
• Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (8 messages)
• OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (6 messages)
• OT: Re: Anthroponymics (12 messages)
• Preview of a New Non-Linear, Morpho-Phonemic Writing System (4 messages)
• Quenya/Sindarin (2 messages)
• Requesting some challenging sentences (12 messages)
• Simple grammar, take two (3 messages)
• Solsbury Hill Etymology
• Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (5 messages)
• Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics)
• The Holy Grail: A double heresy and an object lesson in the dangers of specialisation
• THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (8 messages)

1. Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment
   • Re: Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment (79 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment (102 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment (118 lines)
     From: Kari Kraus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment (56 lines)
     From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Accelerated language evolution : a proposed experiment (52 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

2. Alternation of Airstream
   • Re: Alternation of Airstream (55 lines)
     From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alternation of Airstream (65 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

3. Anthroponymics
   • Re: Anthroponymics (83 lines)
     From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anthroponymics (90 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Anthroponymics (209 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anthroponymics (113 lines)
     From: Tristan Mc Leay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anthroponymics (85 lines)
     From: mike poxon <[log in to unmask]>

4. Anthroponymics -- U.S.American laws about "first" and "last" names and name-changes
   • Re: Anthroponymics -- U.S.American laws about "first" and "last" names and name-changes (285 lines)
     From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>

5. Bye for now
   • Bye for now (37 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

6. Can your conlang do this?
   • Can your conlang do this? (76 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

7. CHAT Almost well-formed southern ape (wasRe: Teknonyms)
   • CHAT Almost well-formed southern ape (wasRe: Teknonyms) (60 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT Almost well-formed southern ape (wasRe: Teknonyms) (79 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT Almost well-formed southern ape (wasRe: Teknonyms) (65 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

8. CHAT sedecimal
   • Re: CHAT sedecimal (110 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

9. Codish
   • Re: Codish (54 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

10. English: 'Drop me a line'
    • Re: English: 'Drop me a line' (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

11. Fwd: Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms
    • Fwd: Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

12. Graeco-Latin hybrids
    • Re: Graeco-Latin hybrids (80 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

13. Idiolect Sound Change, or Broader Usage? n# > m#
    • Re: Idiolect Sound Change, or Broader Usage? n# > m# (53 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>

14. Latina Albana
    • Latina Albana (58 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Latina Albana (57 lines)
      From: As Lak <[log in to unmask]>

15. Library Program
    • Re: Library Program (51 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

16. Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned?
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (132 lines)
      From: Tom Chappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (64 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (52 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (67 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (97 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (54 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians have more than one surname? How are they assigned? (78 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

17. OT: English: 'Drop me a line'
    • OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (48 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (58 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (60 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (44 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: English: 'Drop me a line' (81 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

18. OT: Re: Anthroponymics
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (70 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (54 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>
    • OT: Re: Anthroponymics (92 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (97 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (57 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (66 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (86 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (42 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (97 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (101 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (80 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics (46 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

19. Preview of a New Non-Linear, Morpho-Phonemic Writing System
    • Preview of a New Non-Linear, Morpho-Phonemic Writing System (76 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Preview of a New Non-Linear, Morpho-Phonemic Writing System (91 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Preview of a New Non-Linear, Morpho-Phonemic Writing System (80 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Preview of a New Non-Linear, Morpho-Phonemic Writing System (30 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

20. Quenya/Sindarin
    • Quenya/Sindarin (40 lines)
      From: Kris Kowal <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quenya/Sindarin (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

21. Requesting some challenging sentences
    • Requesting some challenging sentences (40 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (40 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (49 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (130 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (56 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (61 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (71 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (44 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (63 lines)
      From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (50 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Requesting some challenging sentences (31 lines)
      From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>

22. Simple grammar, take two
    • Simple grammar, take two (30 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Simple grammar, take two (189 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Simple grammar, take two (16 lines)
      From: Yann Kiraly <[log in to unmask]>

23. Solsbury Hill Etymology
    • Solsbury Hill Etymology (49 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

24. Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms
    • Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (84 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (102 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (97 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (44 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms (62 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

25. Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics)
    • Re: Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics) (61 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

26. The Holy Grail: A double heresy and an object lesson in the dangers of specialisation
    • The Holy Grail: A double heresy and an object lesson in the dangers of specialisation (111 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

27. THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions
    • THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (58 lines)
      From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (86 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (56 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (41 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (126 lines)
      From: tomhchappell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (64 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (65 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Expressing the outcome of "productive" actions (45 lines)
      From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>