Conlang
Mailing List – February 2006, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(6 messages)
Ease of pronunciation
(5 messages)
Essence of Elvishness
(5 messages)
Funky Mathlangs (Was: We Z'te)
(3 messages)
Fwd: Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(3 messages)
Hi, everybody!
(3 messages)
Languages with the essential parts removed (was: Greek plosives)
Latin Tutorial
META: brown.edu is frequently off ATM?
(2 messages)
monovalence
(9 messages)
My language
(12 messages)
NLF2DWS approach in archives (WAS: intuitive writing)
NLF2DWS Manifesto - draft location
Non-linear full-2d writing systems: request for summarized arguments / issues to address
Old Albic and the quest for the essence of Elvishness
(2 messages)
Other Vulgar Latins?
(11 messages)
Patient marking in active languages
(11 messages)
Problem (?) in Gwr sound changes
Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(7 messages)
Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
(5 messages)
Tam Lin translation exercise
(6 messages)
Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(6 messages)
Time words and that ZBB game (was Re: Reviving an old tradition)
To What Extent is Standard Finnish a Conlang?
(3 messages)
Upstart Conlang Community on IRC
(3 messages)
We Z'te
(8 messages)
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
(3 messages)
YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(4 messages)
A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(35 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(54 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(85 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(67 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(62 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ease of pronunciation
Ease of pronunciation
(36 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ease of pronunciation
(54 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ease of pronunciation
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ease of pronunciation
(71 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ease of pronunciation
(48 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essence of Elvishness
Re: Essence of Elvishness
(60 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essence of Elvishness
(39 lines)
From:
Kris Kowal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essence of Elvishness
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essence of Elvishness
(47 lines)
From:
Kris Kowal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essence of Elvishness
(40 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Funky Mathlangs (Was: We Z'te)
Funky Mathlangs (Was: We Z'te)
(58 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Funky Mathlangs (Was: We Z'te)
(35 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Funky Mathlangs (Was: We Z'te)
(61 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Fwd: Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
Fwd: Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(44 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fwd: Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(38 lines)
From:
Senno Niegendorff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fwd: Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hi, everybody!
Hi, everybody!
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, everybody!
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, everybody!
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Languages with the essential parts removed (was: Greek plosives)
Re: Languages with the essential parts removed (was: Greek plosives)
(42 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin Tutorial
Latin Tutorial
(55 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: brown.edu is frequently off ATM?
META: brown.edu is frequently off ATM?
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: brown.edu is frequently off ATM?
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
monovalence
monovalence
(32 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(72 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(64 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(40 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(86 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: monovalence
(51 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
My language
My language
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: My language
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(48 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: My language
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(48 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: My language
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(57 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(53 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(72 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My language
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
NLF2DWS approach in archives (WAS: intuitive writing)
NLF2DWS approach in archives (WAS: intuitive writing)
(376 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
NLF2DWS Manifesto - draft location
NLF2DWS Manifesto - draft location
(42 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-linear full-2d writing systems: request for summarized arguments / issues to address
Non-linear full-2d writing systems: request for summarized arguments / issues to address
(82 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Old Albic and the quest for the essence of Elvishness
Old Albic and the quest for the essence of Elvishness
(72 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Albic and the quest for the essence of Elvishness
(93 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Other Vulgar Latins?
Other Vulgar Latins?
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(92 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(51 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(67 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(94 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(77 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Other Vulgar Latins?
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Patient marking in active languages
Patient marking in active languages
(24 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(84 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(47 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(42 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(24 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(60 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(85 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(86 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Patient marking in active languages
(28 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Problem (?) in Gwr sound changes
Re: Problem (?) in Gwr sound changes
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(37 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(56 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(57 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised sketch of Old Albic now on FrathWiki
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
Re: Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
(93 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
(121 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silindion Dialects [was an axe to grind]
(39 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tam Lin translation exercise
Tam Lin translation exercise
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tam Lin translation exercise
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tam Lin translation exercise
(61 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tam Lin translation exercise
(51 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tam Lin translation exercise
(71 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tam Lin translation exercise
(45 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
Re: Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(114 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(53 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(26 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(73 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(67 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thalassan possessive and object suffixes
(52 lines)
From:
Christian Köttl <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time words and that ZBB game (was Re: Reviving an old tradition)
Re: Time words and that ZBB game (was Re: Reviving an old tradition)
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
To What Extent is Standard Finnish a Conlang?
Re: To What Extent is Standard Finnish a Conlang?
(35 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To What Extent is Standard Finnish a Conlang?
(106 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To What Extent is Standard Finnish a Conlang?
(71 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Upstart Conlang Community on IRC
Upstart Conlang Community on IRC
(25 lines)
From:
Chris Weimer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Upstart Conlang Community on IRC
(43 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Upstart Conlang Community on IRC
(55 lines)
From:
Chris Weimer <
[log in to unmask]
>
We Z'te
We Z'te
(43 lines)
From:
Mikul Tuba <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: We Z'te
(56 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: We Z'te
(24 lines)
From:
Mikul Tuba <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: We Z'te
(42 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: We Z'te
(92 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: We Z'te
(29 lines)
From:
Mikul Tuba <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: We Z'te
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: We Z'te
(24 lines)
From:
Mikul Tuba <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
(84 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
(52 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
(97 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(63 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(148 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2006, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – February 2006, week 3
