Conlang
Mailing List – February 2006, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(5 messages)
Alien psychology
(3 messages)
Alien Psychology
Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
Carraxan royal coat of arms
Conlang Flag
(6 messages)
First Language Creation Conference: Registration
(2 messages)
Fwd: Re: Carraxan royal coat of arms
Fwd: Re: Terminology query
Gascon
Gascon (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
Gmail: Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(2 messages)
IPA soundfiles (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
(2 messages)
META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
(5 messages)
Moscow State University
Name?
Norman French question
(5 messages)
Norman French Question
OT: Re: Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(12 messages)
Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(21 messages)
Seinundjei Script
(6 messages)
Tell your conlang story!
(27 messages)
Terminology query
(9 messages)
The language formerly known as brz...
(8 messages)
Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
(2 messages)
Tonica Vocabulary
(3 messages)
Tunica Vocabulary
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(17 messages)
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
YAEPT: apparently bizarre semivowels
YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(7 messages)
[Conlangs-Conf]
[Conlangs-Conf] Funding update, request for help
[Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(8 messages)
[Conlangs-Conf] Organizational structure
[Conlangs-Conf] Ticket prices
[Conlangs-DECal] Class #3 ujp - Finishing orthography, beginning Babel
[OT] Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
(3 messages)
A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(43 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(37 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(57 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A new funlang: Gobldi Guk
(64 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alien psychology
Alien psychology
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alien psychology
(80 lines)
From:
John Schlembach <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alien psychology
(20 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alien Psychology
Alien Psychology
(27 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
Re: Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
(81 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Carraxan royal coat of arms
Re: Carraxan royal coat of arms
(50 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Flag
Conlang Flag
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Flag
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Flag
(31 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Flag
(48 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Flag
(59 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Flag
(56 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Language Creation Conference: Registration
First Language Creation Conference: Registration
(113 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Language Creation Conference: Registration
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: Carraxan royal coat of arms
Fwd: Re: Carraxan royal coat of arms
(61 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: Terminology query
Fwd: Re: Terminology query
(62 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gascon
Re: Gascon
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gascon (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
Gascon (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
(62 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gmail: Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
Gmail: Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gmail: Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA soundfiles (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
Re: IPA soundfiles (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
(38 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA soundfiles (was: Phonetics vs. Phonemics)
(55 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
(54 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Weird increase of equality signs in emails
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Moscow State University
Re: Moscow State University
(39 lines)
From:
Vladimir Vysotsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Name?
Re: Name?
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Norman French question
Norman French question
(34 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French question
(53 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French question
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French question
(55 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French question
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Norman French Question
Re: Norman French Question
(135 lines)
From:
Daniel Hicken <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
OT: Re: Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonetics vs. Phonemics
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(65 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(68 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics
(69 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(46 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(44 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(77 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(67 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(75 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(64 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(86 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(61 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(98 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(60 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Seinundjei Script
Seinundjei Script
(59 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Seinundjei Script
(68 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Seinundjei Script
(84 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Seinundjei Script
(24 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Seinundjei Script
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Seinundjei Script
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tell your conlang story!
Tell your conlang story!
(100 lines)
From:
Monica Byrne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(84 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(70 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(121 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(46 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(70 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(132 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(133 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(144 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(34 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(99 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(74 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(79 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(63 lines)
From:
Monica Byrne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(175 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(56 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(53 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(60 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(52 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(100 lines)
From:
John Schlembach <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(46 lines)
From:
John Schlembach <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(71 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(67 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tell your conlang story!
(92 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terminology query
Terminology query
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(38 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(49 lines)
From:
Christian Köttl <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(40 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(68 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(43 lines)
From:
Christian Köttl <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(61 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology query
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
The language formerly known as brz...
The language formerly known as brz...
(34 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(56 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(60 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(72 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(73 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The language formerly known as brz...
(78 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
(67 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to cut loose? Mli Vjacgu nee Vjatjackwa
(81 lines)
From:
Christian Köttl <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tonica Vocabulary
Tonica Vocabulary
(142 lines)
From:
Daniel Hicken <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonica Vocabulary
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonica Vocabulary
(180 lines)
From:
Daniel Hicken <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tunica Vocabulary
Re: Tunica Vocabulary
(57 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(41 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(44 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(66 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(52 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(75 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(77 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(80 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(63 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(81 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(96 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(67 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Lat
(78 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre 'A's (was Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?))
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: apparently bizarre semivowels
Re: YAEPT: apparently bizarre semivowels
(62 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(89 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(91 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(91 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(40 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YEAPT: f/T (was Re: Other Vulgar Latins?)
(20 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf]
[Conlangs-Conf]
(99 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf] Funding update, request for help
[Conlangs-Conf] Funding update, request for help
(162 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf] Name?
[Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(41 lines)
From:
John Schlembach <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(80 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(47 lines)
From:
John Schlembach <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(80 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(43 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(89 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Name?
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf] Organizational structure
[Conlangs-Conf] Organizational structure
(97 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf] Ticket prices
[Conlangs-Conf] Ticket prices
(52 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-DECal] Class #3 ujp - Finishing orthography, beginning Babel
[Conlangs-DECal] Class #3 ujp - Finishing orthography, beginning Babel
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
Re: [OT] Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
(46 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
(41 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Call Signs (was: Tell your conlang story!)
(60 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2006, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – February 2006, week 4
