Conlang Mailing List – May 2006, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A sample of Tiki vocabulary (2 messages)
• Auxiliary verbs (6 messages)
• Back to the List with More Chomsky (2 messages)
• Bronze age British languages (2 messages)
• Brothers in law (6 messages)
• Brothers-in-law (17 messages)
• Bye, for a little while
• Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (6 messages)
• Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (6 messages)
• Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (5 messages)
• Dutch questions (9 messages)
• Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
• Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
• Fwd: Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration!
• iljena verse form
• Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (11 messages)
• Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
• Lexical Relatedness Morphology (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
• Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (6 messages)
• McGuffey Reader Primer in Kamakawi
• Mythical Mutations (8 messages)
• Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (3 messages)
• On the design of an ideal language (21 messages)
• OT: Re: [CONLANG] Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
• Penpal? Imäeladi? (3 messages)
• PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae
• RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (2 messages)
• Russian 'zhe' (the word) (6 messages)
• Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
• TECH: Word Processors (2 messages)
• The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (3 messages)
• Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought (2 messages)
• Verb Structure
• Word Processors (4 messages)
• Word used more than once (12 messages)
• Words of derogetory nature.
• [Conlangs-Conf] A couple personal requests
• [Conlangs-Conf] Audio interviews are up.
• [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (7 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Feedback about the conference (for public release)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (4 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (3 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (16 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete (2 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Videos are live!
• [OT] Speech synthesis

1. A sample of Tiki vocabulary
   • Re: A sample of Tiki vocabulary (33 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A sample of Tiki vocabulary (62 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

2. Auxiliary verbs
   • Auxiliary verbs (59 lines)
     From: Alain Lemaire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (52 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (49 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (36 lines)
     From: Alain Lemaire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (52 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (78 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

3. Back to the List with More Chomsky
   • Back to the List with More Chomsky (54 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to the List with More Chomsky (43 lines)
     From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>

4. Bronze age British languages
   • Re: Bronze age British languages (70 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bronze age British languages (71 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

5. Brothers in law
   • Re: Brothers in law (83 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers in law (51 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers in law (73 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers in law (43 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers in law (42 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers in law (63 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Brothers-in-law
   • Brothers-in-law (64 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (55 lines)
     From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (73 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (46 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (52 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (44 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (43 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (35 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (50 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (94 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (44 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (47 lines)
     From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (95 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (41 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (53 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (39 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

7. Bye, for a little while
   • Bye, for a little while (34 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

8. Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (36 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (98 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (60 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (55 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (79 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (51 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

9. Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
   • Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (148 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (97 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (77 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (317 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (74 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

10. Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition)
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (63 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (57 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (82 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (43 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

11. Dutch questions
    • Dutch questions (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (88 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (60 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (37 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (41 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (85 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (77 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

12. Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
    • Re: Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (79 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>

13. Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
    • Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (69 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

14. Fwd: Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration!
    • Fwd: Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (78 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

15. iljena verse form
    • iljena verse form (62 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

16. Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language)
    • Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (39 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (76 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (58 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (136 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (31 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (91 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (44 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (129 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (50 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (51 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

17. Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
    • Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (274 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

18. Lexical Relatedness Morphology (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
    • Lexical Relatedness Morphology (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (376 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

19. Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood.
    • Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (86 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (78 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (142 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (121 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (115 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

20. McGuffey Reader Primer in Kamakawi
    • McGuffey Reader Primer in Kamakawi (42 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

21. Mythical Mutations
    • Mythical Mutations (30 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (35 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (54 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (62 lines)
      From: James W. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (46 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (67 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (67 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

22. Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea
    • Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (58 lines)
      From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (68 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

23. On the design of an ideal language
    • On the design of an ideal language (84 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (184 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (123 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (104 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (141 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (63 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (144 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (67 lines)
      From: Jackson Moore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (47 lines)
      From: Jackson Moore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (193 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (84 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (75 lines)
      From: Jackson Moore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (110 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (61 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (66 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (118 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (71 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (58 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

24. OT: Re: [CONLANG] Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
    • OT: Re: [CONLANG] Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology) (69 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

25. Penpal? Imäeladi?
    • Penpal? Imäeladi? (44 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Penpal? Imäeladi? (40 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Penpal? Imäeladi? (38 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

26. PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae
    • PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

27. RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary
    • RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (45 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

28. Russian 'zhe' (the word)
    • Russian 'zhe' (the word) (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (73 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

29. Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
    • Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology) (64 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

30. TECH: Word Processors
    • TECH: Word Processors (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Word Processors (53 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

31. The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release)
    • The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (61 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (40 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

32. Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought
    • Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought (31 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought (87 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>

33. Verb Structure
    • Verb Structure (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

34. Word Processors
    • Re: Word Processors (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word Processors (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Word Processors (103 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word Processors (61 lines)
      From: robert wilson <[log in to unmask]>

35. Word used more than once
    • Word used more than once (51 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (59 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (51 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (104 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (42 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (41 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (56 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

36. Words of derogetory nature.
    • Words of derogetory nature. (113 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

37. [Conlangs-Conf] A couple personal requests
    • [Conlangs-Conf] A couple personal requests (107 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

38. [Conlangs-Conf] Audio interviews are up.
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Audio interviews are up. (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

39. [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (54 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (113 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (45 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (49 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (251 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (60 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

40. [Conlangs-Conf] Feedback about the conference (for public release)
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Feedback about the conference (for public release) (442 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

41. [Conlangs-Conf] Press release
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (81 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (49 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

42. [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (173 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (37 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

43. [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration!
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (69 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (85 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (124 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (36 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (145 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (53 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (48 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (121 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (184 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (36 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (124 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (72 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (54 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (45 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

44. [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete (52 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

45. [Conlangs-Conf] Videos are live!
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Videos are live! (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

46. [OT] Speech synthesis
    • [OT] Speech synthesis (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>