Conlang Mailing List – May 2006, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• -s plurals, was [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (4 messages)
• <No subject> (2 messages)
• Anyone good at font-making? (12 messages)
• Auxiliary verbs (12 messages)
• Baby Terms (2 messages)
• Can you crack this? It cracked me up!
• CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (6 messages)
• Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (6 messages)
• Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (8 messages)
• Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (2 messages)
• Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (15 messages)
• Dutch questions (8 messages)
• Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
• Fwd: Book on conlangs - published (3 messages)
• Fwd: Verb Structure (2 messages)
• IPAZounds (was: Reversible sound change applier) (2 messages)
• Just an idea (10 messages)
• LCC Handouts, etc. (3 messages)
• Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (4 messages)
• More LRM
• Mothers' Day; "Teen" (3 messages)
• Nominative for recipient (2 messages)
• OT: Roman Jakobson (was: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents?
• PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (6 messages)
• RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (6 messages)
• Reversible sound change applier (21 messages)
• Sino-Tibetan resource (2 messages)
• The Starling's Song 2: The Revenge (was Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics) (2 messages)
• THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
• varjag, hanseatic league and Variags of Khand....
• Verb Structure (11 messages)
• What is a cordwangle? (2 messages)
• Word used more than once
• Wright's OHG
• [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (3 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Updated website - media, links, supplements, reviews, detailed behind-the-scenes, etc (2 messages)

1. -s plurals, was [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview
   • Re: -s plurals, was [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (56 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -s plurals, was [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (55 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -s plurals, was [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (67 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -s plurals, was [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (76 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

2. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (46 lines)
     From: Caleb Hines <[log in to unmask]>
   • <No subject> (57 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

3. Anyone good at font-making?
   • Anyone good at font-making? (34 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (51 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (56 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (51 lines)
     From: Dustin Metzger <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (38 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (69 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (55 lines)
     From: Dustin Metzger <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (21 lines)
     From: Alain Lemaire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (61 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (60 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (56 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone good at font-making? (81 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

4. Auxiliary verbs
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (40 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (125 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (55 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (69 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (93 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (137 lines)
     From: Sapthan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (68 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (268 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (123 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (63 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (70 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (110 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

5. Baby Terms
   • Baby Terms (70 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Baby Terms (44 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

6. Can you crack this? It cracked me up!
   • Can you crack this? It cracked me up! (82 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

7. CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview))
   • CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (54 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (54 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (51 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (42 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (59 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Strawberry (was Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)) (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

8. Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
   • Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (110 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (191 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (64 lines)
     From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
   • Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (55 lines)
     From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (68 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics (44 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

9. Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (55 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (39 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (83 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (66 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (70 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (53 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (83 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (43 lines)
     From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>

10. Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
    • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (55 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (40 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

11. Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents?
    • Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (350 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (37 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (57 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (51 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (58 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (119 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (44 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (81 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (39 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (143 lines)
      From: Daniel Hicken <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (78 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (41 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (83 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (113 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (41 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

12. Dutch questions
    • Re: Dutch questions (99 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (40 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (83 lines)
      From: Pieterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (118 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (47 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (33 lines)
      From: Hemmo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (56 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dutch questions (43 lines)
      From: Pieterson <[log in to unmask]>

13. Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
    • Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang) (133 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>

14. Fwd: Book on conlangs - published
    • Fwd: Book on conlangs - published (39 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fwd: Book on conlangs - published (43 lines)
      From: Vladimir Vysotsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fwd: Book on conlangs - published (53 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

15. Fwd: Verb Structure
    • Fwd: Verb Structure (56 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fwd: Verb Structure (52 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>

16. IPAZounds (was: Reversible sound change applier)
    • Re: IPAZounds (was: Reversible sound change applier) (54 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPAZounds (was: Reversible sound change applier) (59 lines)
      From: Jamie Norrish <[log in to unmask]>

17. Just an idea
    • Just an idea (32 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (37 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (51 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (52 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Just an idea (46 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (60 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (51 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just an idea (61 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

18. LCC Handouts, etc.
    • Re: LCC Handouts, etc. (63 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC Handouts, etc. (46 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC Handouts, etc. (59 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

19. Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
    • Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (75 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (97 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (129 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (72 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

20. More LRM
    • More LRM (196 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

21. Mothers' Day; "Teen"
    • Mothers' Day; "Teen" (45 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen" (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen" (34 lines)
      From: Declan O'Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>

22. Nominative for recipient
    • Nominative for recipient (57 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nominative for recipient (68 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

23. OT: Roman Jakobson (was: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents?
    • OT: Roman Jakobson (was: Does every language family contain one with "ma-" "da-" "ta-" words for parents? (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

24. PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae
    • Re: PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (92 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (74 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (73 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (110 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (70 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (111 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

25. RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (66 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (70 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (77 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (46 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (71 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

26. Reversible sound change applier
    • Reversible sound change applier (35 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (49 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (58 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (69 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (83 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (44 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (75 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (40 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (37 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (58 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (65 lines)
      From: Jamie Norrish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (60 lines)
      From: Jamie Norrish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (91 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (73 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (61 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (72 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (111 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (60 lines)
      From: Jamie Norrish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (63 lines)
      From: Jamie Norrish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reversible sound change applier (47 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

27. Sino-Tibetan resource
    • Sino-Tibetan resource (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sino-Tibetan resource (43 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

28. The Starling's Song 2: The Revenge (was Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics)
    • The Starling's Song 2: The Revenge (was Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics) (49 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Starling's Song 2: The Revenge (was Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics) (49 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

29. THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
    • THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski (139 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

30. varjag, hanseatic league and Variags of Khand....
    • varjag, hanseatic league and Variags of Khand.... (39 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

31. Verb Structure
    • Re: Verb Structure (65 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (87 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (49 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (40 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (64 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (61 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (36 lines)
      From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (54 lines)
      From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb Structure (66 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

32. What is a cordwangle?
    • What is a cordwangle? (100 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What is a cordwangle? (86 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

33. Word used more than once
    • Re: Word used more than once (40 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

34. Wright's OHG
    • Re: Wright's OHG (35 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

35. [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (54 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (49 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (62 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

36. [Conlangs-Conf] Updated website - media, links, supplements, reviews, detailed behind-the-scenes, etc
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Updated website - media, links, supplements, reviews, detailed behind-the-scenes, etc (54 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Updated website - media, links, supplements, reviews, detailed behind-the-scenes, etc (33 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>