Conlang
Mailing List May 2006, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(8 messages)
ADMIN: Topic markers
(8 messages)
Aroha from Honoruru....
Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(8 messages)
Bala-i-balan (wasRe: new to the list)
(2 messages)
BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
(5 messages)
Celtic/Germnanic
ceremonial conlangs (was: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an)
CHAT: Place name constituents
(9 messages)
Chicken and egg; sound and form
Chomsky (was:Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(5 messages)
coincidence
(12 messages)
Conlang Software Ideas and Survey
Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs
(4 messages)
Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs -- was: Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
Divine conlang usage (Was: Word used more than once)
(2 messages)
Frath wiki editing help
(3 messages)
Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(11 messages)
Hel Vôcre (or, sunblock in summer and woad in winter)
Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(6 messages)
Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(11 messages)
Negative gone Positive
new to the list
(45 messages)
Non-Human Phonology
(20 messages)
Olá amigos conlangers!
(8 messages)
OT Re: Tritones (was Non-Human Phonology)
OT: IE relations & non-relations (was: Celtic/Germnanic)
OT: Place Names
(3 messages)
OT: Place Names Re: Place name constituents
OT: Re: Place name constituents
(4 messages)
OT: Re: [CONLANG] Place name constituents
OT: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(2 messages)
OT: TECH: Is it Gmail or Outlook Express?
OT: Tritones (was Non-Human Phonology)
OT: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(3 messages)
OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost)
OVS langs (was: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
Passive voice
(12 messages)
Pet names
(3 messages)
Place name constituents
(21 messages)
Spreading the Conlang Gospel
(2 messages)
Star Trek
(21 messages)
Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(6 messages)
Thagojian 2.0 first text
(8 messages)
THEORY: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(5 messages)
THEORY: Valency-Reducing Operations on High-Valency Predicates
THEORY: What's a "word"? What's "Polysynthetic? Self-Segrating Morphology, and Milewski
(2 messages)
USAGE: English word order
Utterly shameless self-promotion
(5 messages)
Various weirdnesses in natlangs, plus obconlang questions following them
(3 messages)
Word Order of Hixkaryana
Word used more than once
(9 messages)
Zireen and Sangari (was Re: Star Trek)
(4 messages)
[OT] Place name constituents
[OT] Star Trek
Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(64 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(110 lines)
From:
Kit La Touche <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(55 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
(178 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
ADMIN: Topic markers
ADMIN: Topic markers
(68 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(42 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(61 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(46 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ADMIN: Topic markers
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aroha from Honoruru....
Re: Aroha from Honoruru....
(507 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(89 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(58 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(81 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(54 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an
(96 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bala-i-balan (wasRe: new to the list)
Bala-i-balan (wasRe: new to the list)
(48 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bala-i-balan (wasRe: new to the list)
(100 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
(42 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
(47 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
(55 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BLhGLs on the list (Was: new to the list)
(65 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Celtic/Germnanic
Celtic/Germnanic
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
ceremonial conlangs (was: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an)
ceremonial conlangs (was: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an)
(66 lines)
From:
Falcata <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Place name constituents
CHAT: Place name constituents
(47 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Place name constituents
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Place name constituents
(39 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Place name constituents
(38 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Place name constituents
(38 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Place name constituents
(45 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Place name constituents
(72 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Place name constituents
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Place name constituents
(62 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chicken and egg; sound and form
Chicken and egg; sound and form
(111 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chomsky (was:Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
Re: Chomsky (was:Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(79 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(72 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(78 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(122 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cognitive Linguistics, "The Language Instinct", and High-Functioning Autistics
(48 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
coincidence
coincidence
(40 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(40 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(113 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(90 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(79 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(38 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(48 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(35 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: coincidence
(42 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Software Ideas and Survey
Conlang Software Ideas and Survey
(166 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs
Re: Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs
(84 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs
(60 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs -- was: Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
Construct state and/or genitive case in Semitic langs -- was: Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(106 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Divine conlang usage (Was: Word used more than once)
Divine conlang usage (Was: Word used more than once)
(89 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Divine conlang usage (Was: Word used more than once)
(55 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Frath wiki editing help
Frath wiki editing help
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Frath wiki editing help
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Frath wiki editing help
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(71 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(225 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(185 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(95 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(74 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(172 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(55 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Functions of Classifiers (in a conlang)
(98 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hel Vôcre (or, sunblock in summer and woad in winter)
Hel Vôcre (or, sunblock in summer and woad in winter)
(121 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(192 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(146 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(86 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(56 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(38 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(100 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mothers' Day; "Teen"
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(60 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(64 lines)
From:
Sapthan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(37 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(107 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(127 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mothers' Day; "Teen"
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negative gone Positive
Negative gone Positive
(110 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
new to the list
new to the list
(61 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(53 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: new to the list
(40 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: new to the list
(46 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(32 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(59 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(53 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(35 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(64 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(76 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(74 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: new to the list
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(52 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(37 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(80 lines)
From:
Sapthan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(66 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(46 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(71 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(38 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(65 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(39 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(52 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(46 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(81 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(84 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(85 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(48 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: new to the list
(216 lines)
From:
eldin_raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(49 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(34 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(47 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: new to the list
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(41 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(45 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(56 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-Human Phonology
Non-Human Phonology
(55 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(56 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(44 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(130 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(103 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(64 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(56 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(42 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(77 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(32 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(31 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(51 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(49 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(64 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(48 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(64 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Olá amigos conlangers!
Olá amigos conlangers!
(262 lines)
From:
Falcata <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(79 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(44 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(41 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(54 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(54 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(41 lines)
From:
Falcata <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Olá amigos conlangers!
(47 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Re: Tritones (was Non-Human Phonology)
OT Re: Tritones (was Non-Human Phonology)
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: IE relations & non-relations (was: Celtic/Germnanic)
OT: IE relations & non-relations (was: Celtic/Germnanic)
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Place Names
Re: OT: Place Names
(35 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Place Names
(115 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Place Names
(46 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Place Names Re: Place name constituents
OT: Place Names Re: Place name constituents
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Place name constituents
OT: Re: Place name constituents
(59 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Place name constituents
(91 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Place name constituents
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Place name constituents
(78 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: [CONLANG] Place name constituents
OT: Re: [CONLANG] Place name constituents
(55 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
OT: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(31 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(40 lines)
From:
Joseph Bridwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: TECH: Is it Gmail or Outlook Express?
OT: TECH: Is it Gmail or Outlook Express?
(49 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Tritones (was Non-Human Phonology)
OT: Tritones (was Non-Human Phonology)
(70 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Utterly shameless self-promotion
OT: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(57 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(53 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost)
Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost)
(98 lines)
From:
Raik Lorenz <
[log in to unmask]
>
OVS langs (was: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
OVS langs (was: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(61 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Passive voice
Passive voice
(34 lines)
From:
Alain Lemaire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(79 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(74 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(42 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(35 lines)
From:
Alain Lemaire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(67 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(54 lines)
From:
Alain Lemaire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(88 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(76 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(80 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive voice
(156 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pet names
Pet names
(37 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pet names
(84 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pet names
(52 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Place name constituents
Place name constituents
(46 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(60 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(59 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(51 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(36 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(43 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(37 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(25 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(41 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(57 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(94 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(61 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(88 lines)
From:
Falcata <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(87 lines)
From:
Falcata <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(51 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Place name constituents
(54 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spreading the Conlang Gospel
Spreading the Conlang Gospel
(53 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spreading the Conlang Gospel
(31 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Star Trek
Star Trek
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(46 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(76 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(41 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(114 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(66 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(33 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(44 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(115 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(55 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(73 lines)
From:
Taka Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(54 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(52 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(33 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(69 lines)
From:
Caleb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek
(60 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
Re: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(50 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(34 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(35 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(59 lines)
From:
Sam Drost <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
(57 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thagojian 2.0 first text
Thagojian 2.0 first text
(82 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(84 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(68 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(89 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
THEORY: Morphomes (was Re: Chicken and egg; sound and form)
(92 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(135 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(584 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(136 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(155 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Morphosyntactic Alignment (again?), and Milewski
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Valency-Reducing Operations on High-Valency Predicates
THEORY: Valency-Reducing Operations on High-Valency Predicates
(495 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: What's a "word"? What's "Polysynthetic? Self-Segrating Morphology, and Milewski
THEORY: What's a "word"? What's "Polysynthetic? Self-Segrating Morphology, and Milewski
(192 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What's a "word"? What's "Polysynthetic? Self-Segrating Morphology, and Milewski
(222 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: English word order
USAGE: English word order
(56 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Utterly shameless self-promotion
Re: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(76 lines)
From:
hchester <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(74 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(46 lines)
From:
hchester <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Utterly shameless self-promotion
(53 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Various weirdnesses in natlangs, plus obconlang questions following them
Various weirdnesses in natlangs, plus obconlang questions following them
(268 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Various weirdnesses in natlangs, plus obconlang questions following them
(136 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Various weirdnesses in natlangs, plus obconlang questions following them
(120 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word Order of Hixkaryana
Word Order of Hixkaryana
(69 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word used more than once
Re: Word used more than once
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(38 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(38 lines)
From:
João Ricardo de Mendonça <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word used more than once
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zireen and Sangari (was Re: Star Trek)
Zireen and Sangari (was Re: Star Trek)
(50 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Zireen and Sangari (was Re: Star Trek)
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Zireen and Sangari (was Re: Star Trek)
(79 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Zireen and Sangari (was Re: Star Trek)
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Place name constituents
Re: [OT] Place name constituents
(35 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Star Trek
Re: [OT] Star Trek
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU