Conlang Mailing List – May 2006, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 110 new words per day.
• A conlang free-for-all (19 messages)
• A resource for conlangers? If only I could find a copy.
• Abdul Alhazred again (5 messages)
• Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab! (3 messages)
• Adapting non-Latin scripts (18 messages)
• Adding New Words (3 messages)
• CHAT: Place name constituents (2 messages)
• CHAT: Re: coincidence (2 messages)
• CHAT: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts)
• coincidence (10 messages)
• Conlang Software Ideas and Survey (4 messages)
• Conlanging with Excel? (3 messages)
• Critique needed for lessons (12 messages)
• Date and time on Cindu (10 messages)
• Double construct state? (2 messages)
• Forts and other fun (2 messages)
• Implosives (was Re: Relative frequency of ejectives) (2 messages)
• Implosives (Was: Relative frequency of ejectives)
• Kalusa feature requests (4 messages)
• Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised (3 messages)
• Kalusa: War of the Words (9 messages)
• Latin x in 're:x' (4 messages)
• new to the list
• Olá amigos conlangers!
• OT: Family roots? (3 messages)
• OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons) (5 messages)
• OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (8 messages)
• Passive voice (2 messages)
• Pet names
• Pharyngeal glides (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht...) (2 messages)
• Place name constituents (5 messages)
• Place name constituents - Summary (3 messages)
• Pronunciation Question (17 messages)
• Recipes (was: Date and time on Cindu) (4 messages)
• Relative frequency of ejectives (7 messages)
• Semantic field for local cases (4 messages)
• Star Trek (2 messages)
• Thagojian 2.0 first text (3 messages)
• THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (6 messages)
• THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (14 messages)
• THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (15 messages)
• THEORY: Valency-Reducing Operations on High-Valency Predicates
• Treatise on consonant clusters (4 messages)
• USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (7 messages)
• USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..) (5 messages)
• USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (5 messages)
• USAGE: YAEPT (was Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an) (2 messages)
• VSO language evolving from Nom/Acc to Erg/Abs (3 messages)
• Word used more than once (3 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Story of Burke's disappearance (2 messages)
• [OT]Re: Spreading the Conlang Gospel

1. 110 new words per day.
   • 110 new words per day. (39 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

2. A conlang free-for-all
   • A conlang free-for-all (102 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (80 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (32 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (41 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (39 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (42 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (37 lines)
     From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (38 lines)
     From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (49 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (42 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (55 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (79 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (76 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (52 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (27 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (31 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (79 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (37 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A conlang free-for-all (45 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

3. A resource for conlangers? If only I could find a copy.
   • A resource for conlangers? If only I could find a copy. (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

4. Abdul Alhazred again
   • Abdul Alhazred again (37 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred again (47 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred again (53 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred again (43 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred again (54 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

5. Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab!
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab! (62 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab! (48 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abdul Alhazred: Let's retroconlang the Mad Arab! (80 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Adapting non-Latin scripts
   • Adapting non-Latin scripts (68 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (45 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (57 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (94 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (41 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (64 lines)
     From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (49 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (66 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (57 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (77 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (54 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (68 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (97 lines)
     From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (38 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (45 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (42 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (132 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts (42 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

7. Adding New Words
   • Adding New Words (58 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adding New Words (56 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Adding New Words (68 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

8. CHAT: Place name constituents
   • Re: CHAT: Place name constituents (67 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Place name constituents (102 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

9. CHAT: Re: coincidence
   • CHAT: Re: coincidence (42 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: coincidence (40 lines)
     From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>

10. CHAT: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts)
    • Re: CHAT: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (71 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

11. coincidence
    • Re: coincidence (42 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (34 lines)
      From: Sraelisk.org <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (41 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (47 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (46 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (31 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (41 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: coincidence (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

12. Conlang Software Ideas and Survey
    • Re: Conlang Software Ideas and Survey (266 lines)
      From: Caleb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang Software Ideas and Survey (46 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang Software Ideas and Survey (287 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang Software Ideas and Survey (176 lines)
      From: kaleissin <[log in to unmask]>

13. Conlanging with Excel?
    • Conlanging with Excel? (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlanging with Excel? (38 lines)
      From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlanging with Excel? (49 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>

14. Critique needed for lessons
    • Critique needed for lessons (45 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (34 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (44 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (70 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (61 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (69 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (56 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (139 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (55 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Critique needed for lessons (56 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

15. Date and time on Cindu
    • Date and time on Cindu (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (41 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (32 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (37 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (54 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (46 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Date and time on Cindu (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

16. Double construct state?
    • Double construct state? (30 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Double construct state? (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

17. Forts and other fun
    • Forts and other fun (53 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Forts and other fun (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

18. Implosives (was Re: Relative frequency of ejectives)
    • Implosives (was Re: Relative frequency of ejectives) (54 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implosives (was Re: Relative frequency of ejectives) (46 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

19. Implosives (Was: Relative frequency of ejectives)
    • Re: Implosives (Was: Relative frequency of ejectives) (56 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

20. Kalusa feature requests
    • Kalusa feature requests (90 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa feature requests (46 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa feature requests (69 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa feature requests (102 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

21. Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised
    • Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised (135 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised (53 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised (59 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

22. Kalusa: War of the Words
    • Kalusa: War of the Words (72 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (103 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (54 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (109 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (78 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (50 lines)
      From: Sanghyeon Seo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (61 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalusa: War of the Words (45 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

23. Latin x in 're:x'
    • Latin x in 're:x' (38 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin x in 're:x' (23 lines)
      From: Alain Lemaire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin x in 're:x' (69 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin x in 're:x' (52 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

24. new to the list
    • Re: new to the list (54 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

25. Olá amigos conlangers!
    • Re: Olá amigos conlangers! (434 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>

26. OT: Family roots?
    • OT: Family roots? (84 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Family roots? (68 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Family roots? (109 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

27. OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons)
    • OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons) (93 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons) (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons) (49 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons) (57 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: TECH: css (fuit: Re: Critique needed for lessons) (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

28. OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost)
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (46 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (77 lines)
      From: eldin_raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (58 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (60 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (109 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (82 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OVS / StarTrek thread (original header lost) (103 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

29. Passive voice
    • Re: Passive voice (94 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive voice (61 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

30. Pet names
    • Re: Pet names (56 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

31. Pharyngeal glides (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht...)
    • Re: Pharyngeal glides (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht...) (46 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pharyngeal glides (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht...) (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

32. Place name constituents
    • Re: Place name constituents (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Place name constituents (83 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Place name constituents (101 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Place name constituents (35 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Place name constituents (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

33. Place name constituents - Summary
    • Place name constituents - Summary (126 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Place name constituents - Summary (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Place name constituents - Summary (68 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

34. Pronunciation Question
    • Pronunciation Question (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (38 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (52 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (27 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (40 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (42 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (30 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (38 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (36 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (38 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pronunciation Question (60 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

35. Recipes (was: Date and time on Cindu)
    • Recipes (was: Date and time on Cindu) (47 lines)
      From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recipes (was: Date and time on Cindu) (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recipes (was: Date and time on Cindu) (55 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recipes (was: Date and time on Cindu) (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

36. Relative frequency of ejectives
    • Relative frequency of ejectives (31 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative frequency of ejectives (47 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative frequency of ejectives (46 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative frequency of ejectives (95 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative frequency of ejectives (40 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative frequency of ejectives (57 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative frequency of ejectives (72 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

37. Semantic field for local cases
    • Semantic field for local cases (90 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic field for local cases (81 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic field for local cases (63 lines)
      From: kaleissin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic field for local cases (85 lines)
      From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>

38. Star Trek
    • Re: Star Trek (362 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Star Trek (41 lines)
      From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>

39. Thagojian 2.0 first text
    • Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text (58 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Thagojian 2.0 first text (56 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

40. THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (131 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (60 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

41. THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs
    • THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (116 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (48 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (71 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (149 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (67 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (71 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (101 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (64 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (55 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (42 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

42. THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms
    • THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (101 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (86 lines)
      From: Kit La Touche <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (45 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (105 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (58 lines)
      From: Kit La Touche <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (48 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (40 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (99 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (110 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (91 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (100 lines)
      From: eldin_raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: NATLANGS: Pro-Forms (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

43. THEORY: Valency-Reducing Operations on High-Valency Predicates
    • Re: THEORY: Valency-Reducing Operations on High-Valency Predicates (55 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

44. Treatise on consonant clusters
    • Treatise on consonant clusters (136 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Treatise on consonant clusters (71 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Treatise on consonant clusters (43 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Treatise on consonant clusters (59 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

45. USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (48 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (94 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (61 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Adapting non-Latin scripts (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

46. USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..)
    • Re: USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..) (47 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..) (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..) (36 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..) (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: di"f"thong (was: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Dipht..) (45 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

47. USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts)
    • Re: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (125 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (151 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (160 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (107 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Finnish and English vowels (was: Adapting non-Latin scripts) (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

48. USAGE: YAEPT (was Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an)
    • USAGE: YAEPT (was Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an) (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: YAEPT (was Re: Ba'l-a-i-bal-an) (64 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

49. VSO language evolving from Nom/Acc to Erg/Abs
    • VSO language evolving from Nom/Acc to Erg/Abs (42 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: VSO language evolving from Nom/Acc to Erg/Abs (73 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: VSO language evolving from Nom/Acc to Erg/Abs (39 lines)
      From: Sam Drost <[log in to unmask]>

50. Word used more than once
    • Re: Word used more than once (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (50 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Word used more than once (70 lines)
      From: João Ricardo de Mendonça <[log in to unmask]>

51. [Conlangs-Conf] Story of Burke's disappearance
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Story of Burke's disappearance (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Story of Burke's disappearance (49 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

52. [OT]Re: Spreading the Conlang Gospel
    • [OT]Re: Spreading the Conlang Gospel (49 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>